-
Human Reproduction Update Sep 2023The number of frozen embryo transfers (FET) has increased dramatically over the past decade. Based on current evidence, there is no difference in pregnancy rates when... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The number of frozen embryo transfers (FET) has increased dramatically over the past decade. Based on current evidence, there is no difference in pregnancy rates when natural cycle FET (NC-FET) is compared to artificial cycle FET (AC-FET) in subfertile women. However, NC-FET seems to be associated with lower risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET cycles. Currently, there is no consensus about whether NC-FET needs to be combined with luteal phase support (LPS) or not. The question of how to prepare the endometrium for FET has now gained even more importance and taken the dimension of safety into account as it should not simply be reduced to the basic question of effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
The objective of this project was to determine whether NC-FET, with or without LPS, decreases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET.
SEARCH METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. A literature search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from inception to 10 October 2022. Observational studies, including cohort studies, and registries comparing obstetric and neonatal outcomes between singleton pregnancies after NC-FET and those after AC-FET were sought. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs), pooled risk differences (RDs), pooled adjusted ORs, and prevalence estimates with 95% CI using a random effect model, while heterogeneity was assessed by the I2.
OUTCOMES
The conducted search identified 2436 studies, 890 duplicates were removed and 1546 studies were screened. Thirty studies (NC-FET n = 56 445; AC-FET n = 57 231) were included, 19 of which used LPS in NC-FET. Birthweight was lower following NC-FET versus AC-FET (mean difference 26.35 g; 95% CI 11.61-41.08, I2 = 63%). Furthermore NC-FET compared to AC-FET resulted in a lower risk of large for gestational age (OR 0.88, 95% 0.83-0.94, I2 = 54%), macrosomia (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93, I2 = 68%), low birthweight (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.85, I2 = 41%), early pregnancy loss (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.86, I2 = 70%), preterm birth (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.75-0.85, I2 = 20%), very preterm birth (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.84, I2 = 0%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.65, I2 = 61%), pre-eclampsia (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.42-0.60, I2 = 44%), placenta previa (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, I2 = 0%), and postpartum hemorrhage (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.38-0.48, I2 = 53%). Stratified analyses on LPS use in NC-FET suggested that, compared to AC-FET, NC-FET with LPS decreased preterm birth risk, while NC-FET without LPS did not (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.81). LPS use did not modify the other outcomes. Heterogeneity varied from low to high, while quality of the evidence was very low to moderate.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
This study confirms that NC-FET decreases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with AC-FET. We estimate that for each adverse outcome, use of NC-FET may prevent 4 to 22 cases per 1000 women. Consequently, NC-FET should be the preferred treatment in women with ovulatory cycles undergoing FET. Based on very low quality of evidence, the risk of preterm birth be decreased when LPS is used in NC-FET compared to AC-FET. However, because of many uncertainties-the major being the debate about efficacy of the use of LPS-future research is needed on efficacy and safety of LPS and no recommendation can be made about the use of LPS.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Birth Weight; Premature Birth; Luteal Phase; Lipopolysaccharides; Cryopreservation; Embryo Transfer; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37172270
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad011 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics May 2024Preeclampsia is a major cause of health problems for both pregnant women and unborn babies worldwide. However, the underlying causes of preeclampsia are not fully... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Preeclampsia is a major cause of health problems for both pregnant women and unborn babies worldwide. However, the underlying causes of preeclampsia are not fully understood, leading to limited effective treatments. The goal of this study is to enhance our knowledge of its causes, devise prevention strategies, and develop treatments.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search. Six models regarding the pathogenesis of preeclampsia are discussed in this review.
RESULTS
This review focuses on the latest advancements in understanding preeclampsia's origins. Preeclampsia is a complex condition caused by various factors, processes, and pathways. Reduced blood flow and oxygen to the uterus and placenta, heightened inflammatory reactions, immune imbalances, altered genetic changes, imbalanced blood vessel growth factors, and disrupted gut bacteria may contribute to its development.
CONCLUSION
Preeclampsia is thought to result from the interplay of these factors.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pre-Eclampsia; Placenta; Uterus
PubMed: 38421424
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07393-6 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Sep 2023This study aimed to review the diagnostic criteria for mirror syndrome and describe its clinical presentation. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to review the diagnostic criteria for mirror syndrome and describe its clinical presentation.
DATA SOURCES
Databases from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL were inquired for case series containing ≥2 cases of mirror syndrome from inception to February 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies were included if they reported ≥2 cases of mirror syndrome and included case reports, case series, cohort studies, and case-control studies.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
The studies' quality and risk of bias were independently assessed. Data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel and summarized using narrative review and descriptive statistics. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All eligible references were assessed. Screening of records and data extraction were independently performed, and a third author resolved disagreements.
RESULTS
Of 13 citations, 12 studies (n=82) reported diagnostic criteria for mirror syndrome: maternal edema (11/12), fetal hydrops (9/12), placental edema (6/12), placentomegaly (5/12), and preeclampsia (2/12); 12 studies (n=82) described the clinical presentation of mirror syndrome as maternal edema (62.2%), hypoalbuminemia (54.9%), anemia (39.0%), and new-onset hypertension (39.0%); 4 studies (n=36) reported that hemodilution was present in all patients; 8 studies (n=36) reported the etiology of fetal hydrops, with the most common being structural cardiac malformations (19.4%), alpha thalassemia (19.4%), Rh isoimmunization (13.9%), and nonimmune hydrops fetalis (13.9%); and 6 studies (n=47) reported maternal complications, 89.4% of which were major: postpartum hemorrhage (44.7%), hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (19.1%), intensive care unit admission (12.8%), heart failure (10.6%), pulmonary edema (8.5%), and renal dysfunction (8.5%). In 39 cases, the reported fetal outcomes were stillbirth (66.6%) and neonatal or infant death (25.6%). The overall survival rate among continued pregnancies was 7.7%.
CONCLUSION
The diagnostic criteria of mirror syndrome differed considerably among studies. Mirror syndrome clinical presentation overlapped with preeclampsia. Only 4 studies discussed hemodilution. Significant maternal morbidity and fetal mortality were associated with mirror syndrome. Further research is warranted to elucidate the pathogenesis of mirror syndrome to better guide clinicians in identifying and managing the condition.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Edema; Hydrops Fetalis; Placenta; Pre-Eclampsia; Syndrome; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 37385374
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101067 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.
OBJECTIVES
To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Pre-Eclampsia; Magnesium Sulfate; Eclampsia; Perinatal Death; Stillbirth; Maternal Death; Seizures
PubMed: 37815037
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007388.pub3 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Dec 2023To investigate differences between gut microbiota diversity and composition of healthy pregnant women and women with pre-eclampsia (PE). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To investigate differences between gut microbiota diversity and composition of healthy pregnant women and women with pre-eclampsia (PE).
METHODS AND RESULTS
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, in which the terms "pre-eclampsia", "gastrointestinal microbiome" and "pregnant women" were used to search MEDLINE (PubMed), BVS (LILACS and others), Embase (Elsevier) and Cochrane Library, including observational studies and case-control that investigated changes in the gut microbiota during pregnancy. Six studies were included, with 479 pregnant women. A significantly lower gut microbiota alpha diversity measured as the Shannon index was found in pregnant women with PE in comparison with healthy controls (SMD: -0.47; 95 %IC: -0.77 to -0.18; P = 0.02; I = 0 %; three studies, 179 participants), while no significant differences were found in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, despite significant differences reported in the individual studies.
CONCLUSION
Pregnant women with PE have lower gut microbiome diversity, however, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether there are changes in gut microbiota composition.
SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY
The gut microbiota can be a new treatment target to try to prevent changes in maternal bacterial proportions, aiming to reduce complications during pregnancy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Pre-Eclampsia; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37826991
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.003 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... May 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of existing externally validated prediction models for pre-eclampsia (PE) (specifically,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of existing externally validated prediction models for pre-eclampsia (PE) (specifically, any-onset, early-onset, late-onset and preterm PE).
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL and Maternity & Infant Care Database) and using Google Scholar/reference search to identify studies based on the Population, Index prediction model, Comparator, Outcome, Timing and Setting (PICOTS) approach until 20 May 2023. We extracted data using the CHARMS checklist and appraised the risk of bias using the PROBAST tool. A meta-analysis of discrimination and calibration performance was conducted when appropriate.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies reported 52 externally validated prediction models for PE (one preterm, 20 any-onset, 17 early-onset and 14 late-onset PE models). No model had the same set of predictors. Fifteen any-onset PE models were validated externally once, two were validated twice and three were validated three times, while the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model for preterm PE prediction was validated widely in 16 different settings. The most common predictors were maternal characteristics (prepregnancy body mass index, prior PE, family history of PE, chronic medical conditions and ethnicity) and biomarkers (uterine artery pulsatility index and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A). The FMF model for preterm PE (triple test plus maternal factors) had the best performance, with a pooled area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% prediction interval (PI), 0.76-0.96), and was well calibrated. The other models generally had poor-to-good discrimination performance (median AUC, 0.66 (range, 0.53-0.77)) and were overfitted on external validation. Apart from the FMF model, only two models that were validated multiple times for any-onset PE prediction, which were based on maternal characteristics only, produced reasonable pooled AUCs of 0.71 (95% PI, 0.66-0.76) and 0.73 (95% PI, 0.55-0.86).
CONCLUSIONS
Existing externally validated prediction models for any-, early- and late-onset PE have limited discrimination and calibration performance, and include inconsistent input variables. The triple-test FMF model had outstanding discrimination performance in predicting preterm PE in numerous settings, but the inclusion of specialized biomarkers may limit feasibility and implementation outside of high-resource settings. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pre-Eclampsia; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulsatile Flow; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 37724649
DOI: 10.1002/uog.27490 -
European Heart Journal. Quality of Care... Jan 2024There is a need for further studies on the cardiovascular risk of women experiencing pre-eclampsia (PE). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION
There is a need for further studies on the cardiovascular risk of women experiencing pre-eclampsia (PE).
PURPOSE
To update the literature regarding the association between a history of PE and subsequent cardiovascular diseases, including cardiovascular death, coronary heart diseases, heart failure, and stroke, focusing on the trend in the effect size (ES) estimates over time.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Following PRISMA guidelines, from inception to May 2023, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE. Randomized, cohort, or case-control studies in English were included if fulfiling the following criteria:(i) The association between PE and subsequent cardiovascular disease was adjusted for clinically relevant variables, (ii) the presence of a control group, and (iii) at least 1 year of follow-up. Pooled adjusted ESs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect estimates and calculated with a random-effect model. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. PE was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death (ES 2.08, 95% CI 1.70-2.54, I2 56%, P < 0.00001), coronary artery diseases (ES 2.04, 95% CI 1.76-2.38, I2 87%, P < 0.00001), heart failure (ES 2.47, 95% CI 1.89-3.22, I2 83%, P < 0.00001), and stroke (ES 1.75, 95% CI 1.52-2.02, I2 72%, P < 0.00001) after adjusting for potential confounders. This risk is evident in the first 1-to-3 years of follow-up and remains significant until 39 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to women who experienced a normal pregnancy, those suffering from PE have about double the risk of lifetime cardiovascular disease.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Pre-Eclampsia; Risk Factors; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Stroke
PubMed: 37974053
DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad065 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023L-Arginine (L-Arg)/Nitric Oxide (NO) system is involved in the pathophysiology of relevant Obstetric conditions. This review aims at summarizing the effects of L-Arg... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIM OF THE STUDY
L-Arginine (L-Arg)/Nitric Oxide (NO) system is involved in the pathophysiology of relevant Obstetric conditions. This review aims at summarizing the effects of L-Arg supplementation in pregnancy looking at safety and efficacy.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature utilizing PubMed for studies published from inception to September 2022. The search included human and animal studies where L-Arg was supplemented pre-conceptionally or during pregnancy, by either oral or intravenous route. The main perinatal outcomes were focused.
RESULTS
Among 1028 publications, 51 studies were eligible for inclusion, 25 were performed in women, and the remnant in animals. Compared to controls/placebo, the supplementation with L-Arg reduced the development of pre-eclampsia (four studies), decreased blood pressure, and reduced the need for antihypertensive drugs in women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP, eight studies). In women carrying growth retarded fetuses, L-Arg improved fetoplacental circulation, birth weight and neonatal outcomes (five studies), while in the case of threatened preterm birth, L-Arg reduced uterine contractions (two studies). In several animal species, L-Arg supplementation in pregnancy improved reproductive performance by increasing the litter number and size. Moreover, in pre-eclamptic and metabolic syndrome experimental models, maternal hypertension and fetal growth were improved.
CONCLUSION
L-Arg displays biological activities in pregnancies complicated by HDP and growth restriction, both in women and animal models. L-Arg administration is safe and could be a candidate as an intervention beneficial to maternal and fetal outcomes, at least in moderate clinical disorders.
Topics: Pregnancy; Animals; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Premature Birth; Dietary Supplements; Pre-Eclampsia; Fetus; Arginine
PubMed: 37258415
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2217465 -
PloS One 2023Preeclampsia is a serious condition that is linked to poor perinatal outcomes. In Ethiopia, the overall prevalence of preeclampsia and its associated factors is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Preeclampsia is a serious condition that is linked to poor perinatal outcomes. In Ethiopia, the overall prevalence of preeclampsia and its associated factors is uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to find the prevalence of pre-eclampsia and its determinants in Ethiopia.
METHODS
To find primary studies, PubMed, Google Scholar, HINAR, Scopus, the Web of Sciences, and grey literature searches were used between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2023, in Ethiopia. A Microsoft Excel sheet was used to extract data. The pooled prevalence of pre-eclampsia was predicted using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine studies were included. The pooled prevalence of pre-eclampsia was 11.51% (95% CI: 8.41, 14.61). Age > 35 years old (AOR = 2.34, 95%CI, 1.74-2.94; p-value = 0.64), housewife (AOR = 2.76, 95%CI, 1.2-4.32; p-value = 0.37), previous history of pre-eclampsia (AOR = 4.02, 95%CI, 2.91-5.55; p-value = 0.09), family history of hypertension (OR = 1.84, 95%CI, 1.39-2.3; p-value = 0.4), history of chronic hypertension (AOR = 2.44, 95%CI, 1.8-3.08; p-value = 0.67), history of multiple pregnancies (AOR = 1.45, 95%CI, 1.09-1.8; p-value = 0.38), and alcohol intake during pregnancy (AOR = 1.53, 95%CI, 1.03-2.04; p-value = 0.03) were the determinants of pre-eclampsia.
CONCLUSIONS
When compared to previous studies, the overall pooled prevalence of pre-eclampsia was high. Pre-eclampsia is associated with maternal age >35 years, being a housewife, having a history of preeclampsia, having a history of chronic hypertension, having a family history of hypertension, having diabetes mellitus, drinking alcohol during pregnancy, and having multiple pregnancies.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Adult; Pre-Eclampsia; Ethiopia; Risk Factors; Maternal Age; Hypertension; Prevalence
PubMed: 37963147
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287038 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Oct 2023Protein neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been associated with kidney injury and inflammatory conditions. In particular, several studies have found... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Protein neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been associated with kidney injury and inflammatory conditions. In particular, several studies have found an association between maternal blood and urine levels and the development of pre-eclampsia.
OBJECTIVES
To examine whether maternal blood and urine levels of NGAL are good predictors of pre-eclampsia.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The authors searched MEDLINE databases via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Google Scholar, PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
The authors included case-control observational clinical studies comparing protein levels of NGAL in serum and urine in women with pre-eclampsia with uncomplicated pregnancies. Only studies where the collection of blood or urine was peformed before the occurrence of pre-eclampsia were selected.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The primary outcome was the difference in NGAL levels in blood or urine between women with and without pre-eclampsia.
RESULTS
Seven studies in total were included: five studies measuring NGAL in blood and two in urine. Regarding the serum studies, 315 patients were included as cases and 540 as controls. Higher NGAL in maternal blood during all three trimesters together was associated with pre-eclampsia; the standardized mean difference was 1.15 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.39; P < 0.01). Regarding the urine studies, 39 patients were included as cases and 220 as controls. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with pre-eclampsia and controls regarding urine NGAL.
CONCLUSIONS
NGAL in maternal blood is higher in patients who later develop pre-eclampsia compared with controls and could be used as a potential predicting test in the routine clinical setting.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Lipocalin-2; Pre-Eclampsia; Biomarkers; Acute Kidney Injury; Kidney
PubMed: 37040030
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14777