-
The British Journal of Nutrition Aug 2023Selenium (Se) is essential for selenoprotein synthesis, being thus important for immune and thyroid function, and for antioxidant defence. Some studies have shown that... (Review)
Review
Selenium (Se) is essential for selenoprotein synthesis, being thus important for immune and thyroid function, and for antioxidant defence. Some studies have shown that low levels of Se may associate with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Nevertheless, evidence supporting Se supplementation in pregnant or childbearing-age women is still lacking. In this context, this work aimed to systematically review the most recent scientific evidence to understand the relationship between Se levels and HDP. We performed a systematic review (protocol number: CRD42022310424) with literature of the last decade. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, registers and grey literature were searched to identify studies reporting measurement of Se levels in normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women (supplemented or not with Se). Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools. Among the thirty included studies, a majority, 61 % ( 19) of the 'good' or 'fair' studies, reported a negative association between Se and HDP, and some studies, 39 % ( 11) of the 'good' or 'fair' studies, reported a lack of association. This review provides an important amount of quality evidence suggesting that low Se levels associate with the occurrence of HDP. Nevertheless, the gathered information is not enough to underlie a recommendation for Se supplementation in pregnancy to protect against HDP. Thus, this review emphasises the need for further well-designed randomised controlled trials that may provide blunt evidence regarding the benefits of Se supplementation during pregnancy.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Selenium; Pre-Eclampsia; Dietary Supplements; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 36408672
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114522003671 -
Epigenetics Dec 2023Most pregnancy complications originate with early placentation. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) may play an important role in placentation and function as biomarkers of future...
Most pregnancy complications originate with early placentation. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) may play an important role in placentation and function as biomarkers of future pregnancy complications. We summarized from the literature all first trimester circulating miRNAs associated with pregnancy complications of placental origin and further identified the miRNAs which have the most evidence as potential early biomarkers for pregnancy complications. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA reporting guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42020183421). We identified all first trimester serum or plasma miRNAs associated with a pregnancy complication of placental origin (preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), gestational hypertension, preterm delivery) and the number of times those miRNAs were identified, as a measure of replication. Twenty-one studies examined 118 unique miRNAs, and 87 were associated with at least one pregnancy complication; preeclampsia was the most common. Seven miRNAs were significantly associated with a pregnancy complication in at least two studies: miR-125b, miR-518b, miR-628-3p, miR-365a-3p, miR-520h, miR-374a-5p, miR-191-5p. Few miRNAs were associated with more than one pregnancy complication: miR-518b and miR-520h with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, miR-374a-5p and miR-191-5p with preterm birth and preeclampsia. Our systematic review suggests seven miRNAs as potential biomarkers of pregnancy complications. These complications are thought to originate with early placental defects and these miRNAs may also be biomarkers of placental pathology. First-trimester biomarkers of pregnancy complications can facilitate early detection and interventions.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Female; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pre-Eclampsia; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Circulating MicroRNA; Placenta; Premature Birth; DNA Methylation; MicroRNAs; Pregnancy Complications; Placentation; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36503407
DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2152615 -
Health Science Reports Oct 2023The aim of this meta-analysis was to find the association between periodontal disease (PD) and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including Pre-eclampsia (PE),...
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The aim of this meta-analysis was to find the association between periodontal disease (PD) and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including Pre-eclampsia (PE), premature rupture of the amniotic sac, gestational diabetes (GDM), or low birth weight (LBW) in pregnant women, which should be investigated in a systematic meta-analysis.
METHODS
Studies that reported the association between PD and pregnancy or neonatal outcomes and were published from January 1990 to December 2022, were identified by an extensive search in PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Medline (Elsevier). After retrieving the studies, the screening stage was performed based on their titles, abstracts, and full texts, and after selecting the final articles, their information was extracted and their quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale checklist.
RESULTS
Pregnant women with PD had a 1.39 higher chance of developing GDM than those who did not have the infection (risk ratio [RR]: 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.61; I square: 49.67%; : 0.03). Additionally, the pooled RR of LBW was 2.19, which indicates that pregnant women with PD had a 2.19-fold higher risk of LBW than pregnant women who do not have the infection (RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.82-2.64; I square: 0.00%; : 0.65). The relationship between the risk of PE and the existence of PD was examined in 33 cohort and case-control studies for this meta-analysis. These results were combined, and the pooled RR was 1.43. This indicates that pregnant women with PD are 1.43 times more likely to experience PE than pregnant women without PD (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.32-1.54; I square: 82.64%; : 0.00).
CONCLUSION
According to the findings of the current meta-analysis, PD may contribute to a higher risk of poor maternal and newborn outcomes in pregnant women.
PubMed: 37867783
DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1630 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... May 2024Treatment with vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of miscarriage and preterm birth in selected high-risk women. The hypothesis that vaginal progesterone can reduce... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Treatment with vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of miscarriage and preterm birth in selected high-risk women. The hypothesis that vaginal progesterone can reduce the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is unexplored.
OBJECTIVES
To summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone to reduce the risk of HDP.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov from inception until 20 June 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included placebo-controlled randomised trials (RCTs) of vaginal progesterone for the prevention or treatment of any pregnancy complications.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted absolute event numbers for HDP and pre-eclampsia in women receiving vaginal progesterone or placebo, and meta-analysed the data with a random effects model. We appraised the certainty of the evidence using GRADE methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
The quantitative synthesis included 11 RCTs, of which three initiated vaginal progesterone in the first trimester, and eight in the second or third trimesters. Vaginal progesterone started in the first trimester of pregnancy lowered the risk of any HDP (risk ratio [RR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.93, 2 RCTs, n = 4431 women, I = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) and pre-eclampsia (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92, 3 RCTs, n = 5267 women, I = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) when compared with placebo. Vaginal progesterone started in the second or third trimesters was not associated with a reduction in HDP (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.67-2.12, 3 RCTs, n = 1602 women, I = 9%; low-certainty evidence) or pre-eclampsia (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31, 5 RCTs, n = 4274 women, I = 0%; low-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review found first-trimester initiated vaginal micronised progesterone may reduce the risk of HDP and pre-eclampsia.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Progesterone; Pre-Eclampsia; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Premature Birth; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 37941309
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17705 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2024Maternal high blood pressure (BP) was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the association between high BP prior to or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Maternal high blood pressure (BP) was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the association between high BP prior to or in early pregnancy with maternal and fetal complications.
METHODS
We searched the cohort studies assessing the effect of high BP in the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Internet databases. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol was registered in PROSPERRO (CRD 42023414945).
RESULTS
23 eligible studies were identified. High BP prior to or in early pregnancy was associated with higher odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.91-3.89), gestational hypertension (2.56, 2.01-3.12), preeclampsia (3.20, 2.66-3.74), gestational diabetes mellitus (1.71, 1.36-2.06), preterm birth (1.66, 1.39-1.93), stillbirth (2.01, 1.45-2.58) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (1.22, 1.08-1.37). Subgroup analyses indicated that pre-hypertension could significantly increase the odds of these outcomes except for stillbirth, though the odds were lower than hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS
High BP prior to or in early pregnancy was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and this association increased with hypertension severity. The findings emphasized an urgent need for heightened surveillance for maternal BP, especially pre-hypertensive status.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Stillbirth; Premature Birth; Pregnancy Outcome; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Pre-Eclampsia
PubMed: 38151254
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2296366 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Apr 2024To show the impact of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To show the impact of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy.
METHODS
We performed a literature search based on PubMed, Web of science, Wan fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and ProQuest databases from 1 January 2007 to 6 November 2022. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Trial sequential analyses were performed by TSA 0.9.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 2341 patients and 2472 pregnancies with SS were included in our analysis. This current analysis showed pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia/eclampsia to be significantly higher in pregnant women with SS compared to pregnant women without SS (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.04-2.63; P = 0.03), (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.16-3.65; P = 0.01) respectively. Cesarean section, thromboembolic disease, premature rupture of membranes, and spontaneous abortion were also significantly higher in the SS women with OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.48-2.88; P < 0.0001, OR: 9.45, 95% CI: 1.99-44.87; P = 0.005, OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.64; P = 0.001, OR: 9.30, 95% CI: 4.13-20.93; P < 0.00001, respectively. Significantly higher premature births were observed with infants who were born from SS mothers (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.54-3.12; P < 0.0001). Infants defined as 'small for gestational age/intrauterine growth restriction' and 'weighing < 2500 g' were also significantly higher in patients suffering from SS (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.38-3.70; P = 0.001), (OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.39-10.61; P = 0.009) respectively. In addition, live birth significantly favored infants who were born from mothers without SS (OR: 21.53, 95% CI: 8.36-55.44; P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis by sample size revealed that pregnancy hypertension risk has significantly increased in small cohort (OR: 2.74, 95%CI: 1.45-5.18), and a slight increase was found in population-based studies (OR: 1.14, 95%CI: 0.91-1.43). In both small cohorts and population-based researches, cesarean section was significantly higher in SS (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.52; OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.29-2.64, respectively). The number of infants with intrauterine growth restriction did not grow in the population-based researches (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 0.92-4.66) although there has been an increase in small reports (OR: 2.53, 95%CI: 1.16-5.51). Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of study location (not Asian vs. Asian countries) indicated that cesarean section was significantly higher in SS in both countries (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.31-2.18; OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 2.39-4.77, respectively).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis has shown SS to have a high impact on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy.
Topics: Infant; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Fetal Growth Retardation; Cesarean Section; Sjogren's Syndrome; Premature Birth; Pre-Eclampsia; Hypertension
PubMed: 37921880
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07259-3 -
The British Journal of Nutrition Jan 2024Findings from observational studies have suggested a possible association between dietary inflammatory index (DII) and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Findings from observational studies have suggested a possible association between dietary inflammatory index (DII) and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE). However, the results of these studies were inconclusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to illuminate this association. Systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus and other databases from inception until January 2023. The qualities of included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Nine studies (seven cohort, two case-control) were included in the meta-analysis, including 11 423 participants from five different countries. The meta-analysis indicated that a 1-unit increase in the DII score, representing pro-inflammatory diet, was associated with 13 % higher risk of GDM (OR = 1·13; 95 % CI 1·02, 1·25, I = 68·4 %, = 0·004) and 24 % higher risk of PE (OR = 1·24; 95 % CI 1·14, 1·35, I = 52·0 %, = 0·125). Subgroup analysis found that this association was evident among studies with Chinese populations (OR = 1·16; 95 % CI 1·06, 1·28) and studies with mid pregnancy (OR = 1·20; 95 % CI 1·07, 1·34). The findings indicate that pro-inflammatory diet can increase the risk of GDM and PE. Considering some limitations in this study, more studies are needed to verify this association.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Diabetes, Gestational; Pre-Eclampsia; Diet
PubMed: 37519248
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114523001678 -
Nutrition & Diabetes May 2024Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
BACKGROUND
Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effects of vitamin D deficiency and of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on maternal and offspring health-related outcomes.
METHODS
Prior to conducting this umbrella review, we registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022368003). We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on vitamin D in pregnancy, from database inception to October 2, 2023. All outcomes related to vitamin D in pregnancy obtained from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses were extracted.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently chose studies and collected information on health outcomes. The quality of the included articles' methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2).
RESULTS
We identified 16 eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which included 250,569 women. Our results demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of preterm birth, small-for gestational age/low birth weight infants, recurrent miscarriage, bacterial vaginosis and gestational diabetes mellitus. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy increases birth weight, and reduces the risk of maternal pre-eclampsia, miscarriage, and vitamin D deficiency, fetal or neonatal mortality, as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder in childhood. In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy can reduce the risk of maternal hyperbilirubinemia, polyhydramnios, macrosomia, fetal distress, and neonatal hospitalization.
CONCLUSION
Due to the association with adverse maternal and offspring health outcomes, we recommend the vitamin D status in pregnancy should be monitored, particularly in women at high risk of vitamin D deficiency. It is suggested that pregnant women take a dose of >400 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to prevent certain adverse outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin D; Pregnancy Complications; Dietary Supplements; Pregnancy Outcome; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Infant, Newborn; Premature Birth
PubMed: 38816412
DOI: 10.1038/s41387-024-00296-0 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Feb 2024This study aimed to evaluate the association between human chorionic gonadotropin and adverse pregnancy outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the association between human chorionic gonadotropin and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane were searched in November 2021 using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and relevant key words.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
This analysis included published full-text studies of pregnant women with serum human chorionic gonadotropin testing between 8 and 28 weeks of gestation, investigating fetal outcomes (fetal death in utero, small for gestational age, preterm birth) or maternal factors (hypertension in pregnancy: preeclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, placental abruption, HELLP syndrome, gestational diabetes mellitus).
METHODS
Studies were extracted using REDCap software. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess for risk of bias. Final meta-analyses underwent further quality assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) method.
RESULTS
A total of 185 studies were included in the final review, including the outcomes of fetal death in utero (45), small for gestational age (79), preterm delivery (62), hypertension in pregnancy (107), gestational diabetes mellitus (29), placental abruption (17), and HELLP syndrome (2). Data were analyzed separately on the basis of categorical measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin measured on a continuous scale. Eligible studies underwent meta-analysis to generate a pooled odds ratio (categorical human chorionic gonadotropin level) or difference in medians (human chorionic gonadotropin continuous scale) between outcome groups. First-trimester low human chorionic gonadotropin levels were associated with preeclampsia and fetal death in utero, whereas high human chorionic gonadotropin levels were associated with preeclampsia. Second-trimester high human chorionic gonadotropin levels were associated with fetal death in utero and preeclampsia.
CONCLUSION
Human chorionic gonadotropin levels are associated with placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Both high and low human chorionic gonadotropin levels in the first trimester of pregnancy can be early warning signs of adverse outcomes. Further analysis of human chorionic gonadotropin subtypes and pregnancy outcomes is required to determine the diagnostic utility of these findings in reference to specific cutoff values.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Infant, Newborn; Pre-Eclampsia; Abruptio Placentae; Diabetes, Gestational; HELLP Syndrome; Placenta; Premature Birth; Biomarkers; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Pregnancy Outcome; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Fetal Death
PubMed: 37572838
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.007 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023To investigate the effect of embryo stage at the time of transfer on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) versus natural... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The influence of embryo stage on obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of embryo stage at the time of transfer on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) versus natural FET cycles.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Women with programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) and natural FET.
INTERVENTIONS
The PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRT) were searched from 1983 to October 2022. Twenty-three observational studies were included.
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE
The primary outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (PE). The secondary outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), placenta previa, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), placental abruption, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), macrosomia, and preterm delivery (PTD).
RESULTS
The risk of HDP (14 studies, odds ratio (OR) 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-2.41; P<0.00001; I = 43%), gestational hypertension (11 studies, OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.15-1.66; P=0.0006; I = 19%), PE (12 studies, OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.88-2.32; P<0.00001; I = 0%), GDM (20 studies, OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17; P=0.02; I = 8%), LGA (18 studies, OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.15; P<0.00001; I = 46%), macrosomia (12 studies, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24; P=0.0002; I = 31%), PTD (22 studies, OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.15-1.27; P<0.00001; I = 49%), placenta previa (17 studies, OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.02-1.41; P=0.03; I = 11%), PPROM (9 studies, OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.39; P=0.02; I = 40%), and PPH (12 studies, OR 2.27; 95% CI 2.02-2.55; P <0.00001; I = 55%) were increased in programmed FET cycles versus natural FET cycles with overall embryo transfer. Blastocyst transfer had a higher risk of HDP (6 studies, OR 2.48; 95% CI 2.12-2.91; P<0.00001; I = 39%), gestational hypertension (5 studies, OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.27-2.75; P=0.002; I = 25%), PE (6 studies, OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.93-2.56; P<0.00001; I = 0%), GDM (10 studies, OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.23; P=0.005; I = 39%), LGA (6 studies, OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21; P<0.0001; I = 9%), macrosomia (4 studies, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05-1.26; P<0.002; I = 68%), PTD (9 studies, OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.31-1.57; P<0.00001; I = 22%), PPH (6 studies, OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.46-2.51; P<0.00001; I = 55%), and PPROM (4 studies, OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.14-1.83; P=0.002; I = 46%) in programmed FET cycles than in natural FET cycles. Cleavage-stage embryo transfers revealed no difference in HDPs (1 study, OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.32-2.02; P=0.65; I not applicable), gestational hypertension (2 studies, OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.48-1.51; P=0.59; I = 0%), PE (1 study, OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.58-2.42; P=0.64; Inot applicable), GDM (3 study, OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.52-1.20; P=0.27; I = 21%), LGA (1 study, OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.62-2.11; P=0.66; Inot applicable), macrosomia (1 study, OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.54-2.77; P=0.64; I not applicable), PTD (2 studies, OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.49; P=0.79; I = 0%), PPH (1 study, OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.85-2.62; P=0.17; Inot applicable), or PPROM (2 studies, OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.46-1.21; P=0.23; I = 0%) between programmed FET cycles and natural FET cycles.
CONCLUSIONS
The risks of HDPs, gestational hypertension, PE, GDM, LGA, macrosomia, SGA, PTD, placenta previa, PPROM, and PPH were increased in programmed FET cycles versus natural FET cycles with overall embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer, but the risks were not clear for cleavage-stage embryo transfer.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Fetal Macrosomia; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Pre-Eclampsia; Diabetes, Gestational; Embryo Transfer
PubMed: 37664838
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1186068