-
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and... Oct 2023To establish if preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) at the blastocyst stage improves the composite outcome of live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To establish if preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) at the blastocyst stage improves the composite outcome of live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer compared to conventional morphological assessment.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane database from 1st March 2000 until 1st March 2022. Studies comparing reproductive outcomes following in vitro fertilisation using comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) at the blastocyst stage with traditional morphological methods were evaluated.
RESULTS
Of the 1307 citations identified, six randomised control trials (RCTs) and ten cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled data identified a benefit between PGT-A and control groups in the composite outcome of live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy per embryo transfer in both the RCT (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and cohort studies (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.28-1.76). Euploid embryos identified by CCS were more likely to be successfully implanted amongst the RCT (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31) and cohort (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.29-2.21) studies. The rate of miscarriage per clinical pregnancy is also significantly lower when CCS is implemented (RCT: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96 and cohort: RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.72).
CONCLUSIONS
CCS-based PGT-A at the blastocyst biopsy stage increases the composite outcome of live births and ongoing pregnancies per embryo transfer and reduces the rate of miscarriage compared to morphological assessment alone. In view of the limited number of studies included and the variation in methodology between studies, future reviews and analyses are required to confirm these findings.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Aneuploidy; Birth Rate; Blastocyst; Genetic Testing
PubMed: 37479946
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02866-0 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Nov 2023The utility of procalcitonin to identify obstetric sepsis is unknown. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The utility of procalcitonin to identify obstetric sepsis is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To calculate the mean (range) procalcitonin in pregnancy among healthy women not in labor (group 1), healthy women in labor (group 2), and women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) without clinical chorioamnionitis (group 3).
SEARCH STRATEGY
NLM PubMed, Elsevier Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 21, 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Ten or more pregnant women with procalcitonin reported at more than 20 weeks of pregnancy, with information on labor, PPROM, and infection. Exclusions were major medical comorbidities.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Each abstract and full-text review was independently reviewed by the same two authors. Quality was reviewed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
The systematic review included 25 studies: 10 (40%) of good quality and 15 (60%) of poor quality. The meta-analysis included 21 studies. Mean procalcitonin in group 1 was 0.092 ng/mL (range 0.036-0.049 ng/mL), in group 2 it was 0.130 ng/mL (range 0.049-0.259 ng/mL), and in group 3 it was 0.345 ng/mL (range 0.005-1.292 ng/mL).
CONCLUSIONS
Among healthy pregnant women not in labor, procalcitonin levels are comparable to those in non-pregnant adults and may be useful in identifying infection. Procalcitonin levels in other groups overlap abnormal values of procalcitonin in non-pregnant adults, and may not discriminate infection among women in labor or with obstetric comorbidities.
PROSPERO
CRD42020157376, registered 4/28/2020.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Chorioamnionitis; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Labor, Obstetric; Procalcitonin; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37118923
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14813 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Jan 2024Tularemia is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Francisella tularensis. Although rare, tularemia during pregnancy has been associated with pregnancy complications;...
BACKGROUND
Tularemia is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Francisella tularensis. Although rare, tularemia during pregnancy has been associated with pregnancy complications; data on efficacy of recommended antimicrobials for treatment are limited. We performed a systematic literature review to characterize clinical manifestations of tularemia during pregnancy and examine maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes with and without antimicrobial treatment.
METHODS
We searched 9 databases, including Medline, Embase, Global Health, and PubMed Central, using terms related to tularemia and pregnancy. Articles reporting cases of tularemia with ≥1 maternal or fetal outcome were included.
RESULTS
Of 5891 articles identified, 30 articles describing 52 cases of tularemia in pregnant patients met inclusion criteria. Cases were reported from 9 countries, and oropharyngeal and ulceroglandular tularemia were the most common presenting forms. A plurality (46%) of infections occurred in the second trimester. Six complications were observed: lymph node aspiration, lymph node excision, maternal bleeding, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, and preterm birth. No deaths among mothers were reported. Of 28 patients who received antimicrobial treatment, 1 pregnancy loss and 1 fetal death were reported. Among 24 untreated patients, 1 pregnancy loss and 3 fetal deaths were reported, including one where F. tularensis was detected in placental and fetal tissues.
CONCLUSIONS
Pregnancy loss and other complications have been reported among cases of tularemia during pregnancy. However, risk of adverse outcomes may be lower when antimicrobials known to be effective are used. Without treatment, transplacental transmission appears possible. These data underscore the importance of prompt recognition and treatment of tularemia during pregnancy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Tularemia; Premature Birth; Placenta; Francisella tularensis; Abortion, Spontaneous; Anti-Infective Agents
PubMed: 38294114
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad686 -
Journal of Vascular and Interventional... Jul 2023To systematically review published studies on the pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for uterine arteriovenous malformations (UAVMs). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To systematically review published studies on the pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for uterine arteriovenous malformations (UAVMs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
International medical databases were searched for all English-language studies published between 2000 and 2022 on patients with UAVMs who had undergone embolization and had a subsequent pregnancy. Data on the pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, and physiologic status of newborns were extracted from the articles. Ten case series were included in the meta-analysis, and 18 case reports on pregnancy following UAE were reviewed.
RESULTS
In the case series, 44 pregnancies were reported in 189 patients. The pooled estimate of pregnancy rate was 23.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3%-29.3%). The pregnancy rate was higher in studies of women with a mean age of ≤30 years (50.6% vs 22.2%; P < .05). The pooled estimate of live birth rate was 88.6% (95% CI, 78.6%-98.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
All published series report preservation of fertility and successful pregnancies after embolization of UAVMs. The live birth rate in these series does not differ substantially from that of the general population.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Female; Adult; Uterine Artery Embolization; Pregnancy Rate; Fertility; Arteriovenous Malformations
PubMed: 36972845
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.03.015 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in comparison with land-based birth.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and gray literature sources, from inception to February 28, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients who delivered either conventionally or while submerged in water.
METHODS
Pooled unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model (restricted maximum likelihood method). We assessed the 95% prediction intervals to estimate the likely range of future study results. To evaluate the robustness of the results, we calculated fragility indices. Maternal infection was designated as the primary outcome, whereas postpartum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, umbilical cord avulsion, low Apgar scores, neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation, neonatal infection, neonatal mortality within 30 days of birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were considered secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Of the 20,642 articles identified, 52 were included in the meta-analyses. Based on data from observational studies, water birth was not associated with increased probability of maternal infection compared with land birth (10 articles, 113,395 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.14). Patients undergoing water birth had decreased odds of postpartum hemorrhage (21 articles, 149,732 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.94). Neonates delivered while submerged in water had increased odds of cord avulsion (10 articles, 91,504 pregnancies; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.24) and decreased odds of low Apgar scores (21 articles, 165,917 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.82), neonatal infection (15 articles, 53,635 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.97), neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation (19 articles, 181,001 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.84), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (30 articles, 287,698 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.70).
CONCLUSION
When compared with land birth, water birth does not appear to increase the risk of most maternal and neonatal complications. Like any other delivery method, water birth has its unique considerations and potential risks, which health care providers and expectant parents should evaluate thoroughly. However, with proper precautions in place, water birth can be a reasonable choice for mothers and newborns, in facilities equipped to conduct water births safely.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Delivery, Obstetric; Infant Mortality; Natural Childbirth; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Water
PubMed: 38462266
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.034 -
Thyroid : Official Journal of the... Nov 2023Thyroid autoimmunity is the most prevalent autoimmune disorder among women of reproductive age and has been suggested as a risk factor in recurrent pregnancy loss... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Thyroid autoimmunity is the most prevalent autoimmune disorder among women of reproductive age and has been suggested as a risk factor in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)-a condition in which couples suffer several consecutive pregnancy losses, but where a cause can be identified in less than half of the cases. Most studies have focused on thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs), not considering the presence of thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs). The aim of this study was to systematically assess the prevalence of TgAb positivity in women with RPL, and whether TgAb positivity was associated with the outcome of the next pregnancy. A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase (from inception to April 29, 2023) was performed for studies reporting on TgAbs in women with RPL. The primary outcome was TgAb positivity in women with RPL compared with women without RPL, with a secondary outcome of association between TgAb positivity and the outcome of the next pregnancy. Pooled effect estimates were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with confidence intervals [CI] using a random-effects model. The study was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42022310232) and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 770 studies were screened, 28 of which could be included reporting data from a total of 6868 women. The prevalence of TgAb positivity in women with RPL ranged from 3.6% to 28% compared with 2.4% to 29% in women without RPL. The OR for TgAb positivity was 1.93 ([CI 1.27-2.92]; = 63%) compared with women without RPL, and for TgAbs and/or TPOAbs 2.66 ([CI 1.75-4.05]; = 69%). Four studies reported on the outcome of the next pregnancy after antibody measurement with highly heterogeneous results (OR for pregnancy loss ranging from 0.99 in one study to 10.0 in the other study, and two studies reported no data eligible for meta-analysis). Consequently, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Women with RPL were significantly more often TgAb-positive than women without RPL. Although there was a lack of studies reporting prospective outcomes, the findings of this study support the significance of awareness about the strong association between RPL and thyroid autoimmunity.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Thyroglobulin; Prospective Studies; Thyroid Gland; Autoantibodies; Autoimmunity; Abortion, Habitual
PubMed: 37725583
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2023.0292 -
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Apr 2024To determine whether prenatal cannabis use alone increases the likelihood of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We searched bibliographic databases, such as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To determine whether prenatal cannabis use alone increases the likelihood of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We searched bibliographic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar from inception through February 14, 2022. Cohort or case-control studies with prespecified fetal or neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with prenatal cannabis use. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks of gestation), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), birthweight (grams), and perinatal mortality. Two independent reviewers screened studies. Studies were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second using a predefined template. Risk of bias assessment of studies, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation for evaluating the certainty of evidence for select outcomes were performed by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, using adjusted and unadjusted effect estimates, to compare groups according to prenatal exposure to cannabis use status. Fifty-three studies were included. Except for birthweight, unadjusted and adjusted meta-analyses had similar results. We found very-low- to low-certainty evidence that cannabis use during pregnancy was significantly associated with greater odds of PTB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.69; , 93%; =0.0001), SGA (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.05; , 86%; <0.0001), and perinatal mortality (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.62; , 0%; <0.0001), but not significantly different for birthweight (mean difference, -40.69 g; 95% CI, -124.22 to 42.83; , 85%; =0.29). Because of substantial heterogeneity, we also conducted a narrative synthesis and found comparable results to meta-analyses. Prenatal cannabis use was associated with greater odds of PTB, SGA, and perinatal mortality even after accounting for prenatal tobacco use. However, our confidence in these findings is limited. Limitations of most existing studies was the failure to not include timing or quantity of cannabis use. This review can help guide health care providers with counseling, management, and addressing the limited existing safety data. PROSPERO CRD42020172343.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Cannabis; Birth Weight; Perinatal Mortality; Fetal Growth Retardation; Perinatal Death
PubMed: 36730710
DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0262 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aug 2023Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Throughout the pandemic, evidence on the effects... (Review)
Review
Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Throughout the pandemic, evidence on the effects of COVID-19 during pregnancy has been inadequate due to the limited number of studies published. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to evaluate current literature regarding the effects of COVID-19 during pregnancy and establish pregnancy outcomes and vertical and perinatal transmission during pregnancy. Multiple databases were searched, including Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Clinical Trials, using the following keywords: [Pregnancy] AND [COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR nCoV-19] OR [Perinatal transmission, Vertical transmission (VT), Pregnancy complications], [Pregnancy] AND [Hyperinflammation OR Cytokine storm]. We excluded in vitro and experimental studies, but also ex-vivo and animal study methods. To exclude the risk of bias during data collection and interpretation, all included studies were peer-reviewed publications. This review is estimated to tabulate the study intervention characteristics and compare them against the planned groups for each synthesis. Our findings showed that pregnant women are commonly susceptible to respiratory viral infections and severe pneumonia due to physiological immune suppression and pregnancy-induced changes. VT of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with a great deal of controversy and conflict. However, there is still no robust clinical evidence of VT. Furthermore, the clinical presentation and management of COVID-19 during pregnancy are nearly identical to those of non-pregnant women. Finally, chloroquine and remdesivir are the only two drugs evaluated as adequate for the management of COVID-19 during pregnancy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 36251144
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-022-00907-z -
Environment International Aug 2023Maternal pesticide exposure might be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes through triggering inflammation and oxidative stress and disrupting endocrine functions.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Maternal pesticide exposure might be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes through triggering inflammation and oxidative stress and disrupting endocrine functions. Yet the association between prenatal pesticide exposure and risk of preterm birth remains inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of human observational studies using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) framework to explore the association of per ten-fold increase of pesticide concentrations in maternal biological samples during pregnancy with risk of preterm birth and length of gestational age at birth.
DATA SOURCE
Five English (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus) and 3 Chinese databases (China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM)) were searched till Jan 18th, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS
To be included, pesticide exposure should be measured in maternal biological samples during pregnancy and in log-transformed forms. The primary outcome was preterm birth and the secondary outcome was gestational age at birth.
STUDY APPRAISAL, SYNTHESIS METHODS AND CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT
Quality of studies was evaluated using OHAT Risk of Bias Tool. Evidence was quantitatively synthesized with Correlated and Hierarchical Effects (CHE) model. The confidence rating in the body of evidence was done using OHAT.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies reported by 18 papers were included, with 7 studies for preterm birth and 19 for gestational age at birth. The meta-analysis found a ten-fold increase of pesticide concentrations was potentially associated with risk of preterm birth (pooled OR = 1.28; 95%CI: 0.93, 1.78) and shortened gestational age at birth (β = -0.10; 95%CI: -0.21, 0.01). Sampling biospecimens in different trimesters was identified as a potential modifier in the association between pesticide exposure and length of gestational age (F = 2.77, P < 0.05). For studies that collected samples at any time during pregnancy, pesticide exposure was found to be associated with shortened length of gestational age (β = -0.43; 95%CI: -0.81, -0.06). The confidence rating in the body of evidence was "moderate" and "very low" for preterm birth and gestational age at birth, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our result suggested moderate evidence of an association between pesticide exposure and higher risk of preterm birth. Yet more studies are still needed with larger sample size and careful considerations of confounders and accuracy of outcome measurements. Attention is also required on other pesticide compounds in addition to organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides, and on windows of susceptibility.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Premature Birth; Pesticides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Pregnancy Outcome; Gestational Age
PubMed: 37364307
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108043 -
Neurourology and Urodynamics Aug 2023We systematically assessed all available evidence on the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in pregnancy. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
We systematically assessed all available evidence on the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in pregnancy.
METHODS
On September 2022, a thorough search was done on Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. We chose studies that included pregnant women who had SNM previously. Two authors independently evaluated the quality of the study using a standardized tool of JBI. Studies were given a risk of bias rating of low, moderate, or high. Given the descriptive nature of this study, we utilized descriptive statistics to report demographic and clinical features. For continuous variables, we used mean and standard deviation, and for dichotomous data, we used frequencies and percentages.
RESULTS
Out of 991 abstracts screened, only 14 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Overall, the quality of the evidence available from the literature is low based on the design of the included studies. Fifty-eight women, including 72 pregnancies, had SNM. The indication of SNM implantation was filling phase disorders in 18 cases (30.5%), voiding dysfunction in 35 women (59.3%), IC/BPS in two cases (3.5%), and fecal incontinence. In 38 pregnancies (58.5%), the SNM status was ON during pregnancy. Forty-nine cases delivered a full-term baby (75.4%), 12 cases had pre-term labor (18.5%), two miscarriages, and two postterm pregnancies happened. The most complications in patients with devices were urinary tract infection in 15 women (23.8%), urinary retention in six patients (9.5%), and pyelonephritis in two cases (3.2%). The findings revealed that when the device was deactivated, 11 cases out of the 23 patients (47.8%) had full-term pregnancies, while in ON status, 35 out of the 38 pregnant women (92.1%) had full-term pregnancies. Nine preterm labors in OFF (39.1%), and two in ON status (5.3%) were recorded. The results revealed that this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002), and those who turned SNM of them off had more preterm labor. Although the studies reported all neonates had a healthy status, two children had chronic motor tic problems and a pilonidal sinus in a case with an active SNM in pregnancy. However, there was no association between the SNM status and pregnancy or neonatal complications (p = 0.057).
CONCLUSION
SNM activation in pregnancy seems safe and effective. The choice of whether to activate or deactivate SNM should be made on an individual basis given the current SNM evidence.
Topics: Child; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Urinary Retention; Urinary Tract Infections; Sacrum; Labor, Obstetric; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37288591
DOI: 10.1002/nau.25224