-
Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2023To determine the pooled incidence and prevalence rate of medical device-related pressure injuries(MDRPIs) using the Braden QD scale, medical devices that frequently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PROBLEM
To determine the pooled incidence and prevalence rate of medical device-related pressure injuries(MDRPIs) using the Braden QD scale, medical devices that frequently cause MDRPIs, and anatomical locations that are vulnerable to them.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Using the Braden QD scale, being published in English between 01/01/2018-and 01/03/2023.
METHODS
This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (No: CRD42021276501).
SAMPLE
A total of 7 studies with 25,742 pediatric patients were included.
RESULTS
The pooled prevalence and cumulative incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries(HAPIs) were 7.8% (95% CI: 5.2-11.4%) and 3.9% (95% CI: 0.5-24.6%) respectively, and the incidence rate was 8.2/1000 person-days (95% CI: 2.4-14.2/1000 person-days). The pooled prevalence and cumulative incidence of MDRPIs were 7% (95% CI: 5.5-8.8%) and 5% (95% CI: 3.2-7.8%) respectively, and the incidence rate was 6.7/1000 person-days (95% CI, 0.11-13.4/1000 person-days). The most affected anatomical locations were the face (29.1%), ankle/foot (20.1%), and head (15.7%). Medical devices that frequently caused MDRPIs were external monitoring devices (24.5%), respiratory devices (22.8%), and supportive/securing devices (14.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
According to the current systematic review and meta-analyses, the incidence and prevalence of HAPIs and MDRPIs are moderate to high.
IMPLICATIONS
The findings suggested that healthcare providers should pay more attention to reducing HAPIs and MDRPIs and future studies should be conducted to understand their characteristics and risk factors.
Topics: Child; Humans; Pressure Ulcer; Incidence; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37344345
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.06.019 -
International Wound Journal Aug 2023Pressure injuries (PIs) are one of the major and costliest medical problems with severe implications for patients. Cardiovascular surgery patients are at the higher risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pressure injuries (PIs) are one of the major and costliest medical problems with severe implications for patients. Cardiovascular surgery patients are at the higher risk of developing surgery-related PIs. So this study was conducted with the aim of investigating the prevalence and factors associated with PIs in patients undergoing open heart surgery. We identified articles through electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest; and Persian Databases: SID, Magiran and Irandoc without restriction on language or publication period (from inception through June 2022). Finally, 17 studies that fulfilled eligibility criteria were included in final systematic review and meta-analysis. Data analyses were conducted using STATA version 14. The pooled prevalence of PI in patients undergoing open heart surgery was 24.06% (95% CI: 17.85-30.27). High heterogeneity was observed across the included studies (I = 96.0, P < 0.000). The prevalence by gender was reported as 25.19% (95% CI: 13.45-36.93) in men and 33.36% (95 CI%: 19.99-46.74) in women. The result showed there was statistically significant association between PI and Female sex (Pooled Est: 1.551, 95% CI: 1.199-2.006, z = 3.345, P = 0.001), diabetes (Pooled Est: 1.985, 95% CI: 1.383-2.849, z = 3.719, P = 0.000), advanced age (SMD: 0.33 years; 95% CI: 0.09-0.57), Duration of surgery (SMD: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.19-0.75) and preoperative serum albumin level (SMD: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.14-0.98). The relatively high PIs incidence among patients undergoing open heart surgery suggests that typical PI prevention methods are insufficient for this population. Targeted prevention measures must be developed and implemented.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Infant; Pressure Ulcer; Prevalence; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Incidence
PubMed: 36447333
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14040 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Dec 2023Wounds are a significant health issue, and reliable and safe strategies to promote repair are needed. Clinical trials have demonstrated that local insulin promotes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Wounds are a significant health issue, and reliable and safe strategies to promote repair are needed. Clinical trials have demonstrated that local insulin promotes healing in acute and chronic wounds (ie, reductions of 7% to 40% versus placebo). However, the trials' sample sizes have prevented drawing solid conclusions. Furthermore, no analysis has focused on safety concerns (ie, hypoglycemia). Under the hypothesis that local insulin promotes healing through proangiogenic effects and cellular recruitment, the aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to assess its safety and relative effectiveness using a Bayesian approach.
METHODS
Medline, CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, and gray literature sources were searched for human studies assessing the local use of insulin versus any comparator since inception to October of 2020. Data on glucose changes and adverse events, wound and treatment characteristics, and healing outcomes were extracted, and an NMA was conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 949 reports were found, of which 23 ( n = 1240 patients) were included in the NMA. The studies evaluated six different therapies, and most comparisons were against placebo. NMA showed -1.8 mg/dL blood glucose level change with insulin and a lack of reported adverse events. Statistically significant clinical outcomes identified include reduction in wound size (-27%), increased healing rate (23 mm/day), reduction in Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing scores (-2.7), -10 days to attain complete closure, and an odds ratio of 20 for complete wound closure with insulin use. Likewise, significantly increased neoangiogenesis (+30 vessels/mm 2 ) and granulation tissue (+25%) were also found.
CONCLUSION
Local insulin promotes wound healing without significant adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Bayes Theorem; Insulin; Network Meta-Analysis; Wound Healing
PubMed: 36940147
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010432 -
British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen... Nov 2023Although preventable, pressure injuries are commonly observed in the hospital setting and are estimated to be the third most costly condition, after cancer and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although preventable, pressure injuries are commonly observed in the hospital setting and are estimated to be the third most costly condition, after cancer and cardiovascular disease.
AIM
Nurses play a crucial role in the prevention and management of pressure injuries, however, published evidence on the effectiveness of educational interventions, directed specifically at nurses in the hospital environment, is scarce.
METHOD
The authors retrieved published studies on the subject from selected databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) in a number of languages (Portuguese, English, French and Spanish). The search yielded randomised controlled trials, as well as quasi-experimental and comparative studies.
FINDINGS
In total, 11 studies were selected. The outcomes analysed, following some type of educational intervention, included the attitudes and knowledge of the nursing professionals, as well as the incidence of pressure injuries.
CONCLUSION
The present study demonstrated that different educational strategies can help prevent pressure injuries in the hospital environment.
Topics: Humans; Pressure Ulcer; Hospitals
PubMed: 37949494
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.Sup20.S40 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Jul 2024Numerous interventions for pressure injury prevention have been developed, including care bundles. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Numerous interventions for pressure injury prevention have been developed, including care bundles.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention care bundles on pressure injury prevalence, incidence, and hospital-acquired pressure injury rate in hospitalised patients.
DATA SOURCES
The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (via PubMed), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and two registries were searched (from 2009 to September 2023).
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies with a comparison group published in English after 2008 were included. Studies reporting on the frequency of pressure injuries where the number of patients was not the numerator or denominator, or where the denominator was not reported, and single subgroups of hospitalised patients were excluded. Educational programmes targeting healthcare professionals and bundles targeting specific types of pressure injuries were excluded.
PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS
Bundles with ≥3 components directed towards patients and implemented in ≥2 hospital services were included.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were undertaken independently by two researchers. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of the body of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
RESULTS
Nine studies (seven non-randomised with historical controls; two randomised) conducted in eight countries were included. There were four to eight bundle components; most were core, and only a few were discretionary. Various strategies were used prior to (six studies), during (five studies) and after (two studies) implementation to embed the bundles. The pooled risk ratio for pressure injury prevalence (five non-randomised studies) was 0.55 (95 % confidence intervals 0.29-1.03), and for hospital-acquired pressure injury rate (five non-randomised studies) it was 0.31 (95 % confidence intervals 0.12-0.83). All non-randomised studies were at high risk of bias, with very low certainty of evidence. In the two randomised studies, the care bundles had non-significant effects on hospital-acquired pressure injury incidence density, but data could not be pooled.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS
Whilst some studies showed decreases in pressure injuries, this evidence was very low certainty. The potential benefits of adding emerging evidence-based components to bundles should be considered. Future effectiveness studies should include contemporaneous controls and the development of a comprehensive, theory and evidence-informed implementation plan.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42023423058.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Pressure injury prevention care bundles decrease hospital-acquired pressure injuries, but the certainty of this evidence is very low.
Topics: Pressure Ulcer; Humans; Patient Care Bundles; Hospitalization
PubMed: 38642429
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104768 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2023Despite numerous measures used to prevent pressure ulcers, their growing prevalence in recent years is expected to continue as the population ages. This review aims to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite numerous measures used to prevent pressure ulcers, their growing prevalence in recent years is expected to continue as the population ages. This review aims to report the outcomes of the regenerative potential of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers, assessing the effectiveness of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers.
METHODS
A computerized search for articles on animal models that use MSCs as primary therapy to treat pressure ulcers, published from conception to present, was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Our search yielded 52 articles, narrowed to 44 after excluding duplicates.
RESULTS
Out of 52 articles collected from four databases, 11 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 11 articles published between 2008 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were observational descriptive papers in animal models, and three were prospective. Six studies used autologous MSCs, while five used allogenic MSCs. Three studies were conducted in humans, and the remaining eight were conducted in animals. The most common method of cell delivery was an intradermal injection in the margins of the ulcer. All studies reported positive results, including improved wound healing, reduced inflammation, and improved tissue regeneration.
CONCLUSIONS
MSCs have shown promising results in treating pressure ulcers in animal and clinical trials. The combination of MSCs and scaffold materials has also been studied and found to be effective in wound healing. A standardized human wound model has been proposed further to investigate the efficacy of cell-based therapies for chronic wounds. However, more research is needed to determine the best quantity of cells to apply for pressure ulcers and to ensure the safety and efficacy of these treatments in clinical settings.
PubMed: 38137625
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247545 -
The International Journal of Lower... Jan 2024Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich... (Review)
Review
Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been explored for its potential in treating pressure ulcers. Herein, a study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in comparison to conventional treatments for pressure ulcers. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from the inception to May 20, 2023, with only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on the healing of pressure ulcers included. The outcomes of interest included healing rates, ulcer area, ulcer volume, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score, healing time, and complications. Finally, 9 RCTs, involving 511 patients with 523 pressure ulcers, met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in the healing rate, as evidenced by a weighted odds ratio (OR) of 3.40 (95% CI = 1.87 to 6.21, = 32%, < 0.0001). Additionally, the standard mean difference (SMD) for healed ulcer area favored the PRP group, reflecting an improvement of 1.38 cm ( = 0.02). Furthermore, the reduction in PUSH scores within the PRP group outperformed that observed in the control group, demonstrating a SMD of 1.69 ( = 0.01). Nevertheless, complications and the SMD for ulcer volume reduction revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups. From these findings, PRP stands out as a promising and safe therapeutic approach for pressure ulcers. For a deeper understanding of PRP's role in pressure ulcer healing, it is crucial to conduct more well-structured, high-quality RCTs in upcoming studies.
PubMed: 38239009
DOI: 10.1177/15347346241227001 -
Cureus Apr 2024Venous ulcers are open wounds commonly associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Each patient's healing process is unique, and factors like nutrition and compression... (Review)
Review
Venous ulcers are open wounds commonly associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Each patient's healing process is unique, and factors like nutrition and compression therapy can affect it. Compression therapy and optimal nutritional status can assist in improving venous blood circulation, decreasing swelling, and promoting wound healing. This in-depth review looks at all the recent research on how nutrition and compression therapy can help heal venous ulcers, aiming to develop evidence-based guidelines for improving treatment outcomes. The systematic review, registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles, conducted an extensive electronic search in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and different types of studies, the search method focused on studies that directly looked at how nutrition and compression therapy affected the healing of venous ulcers. After deduplicating and screening publications, a collaborative full-text review was conducted to determine their inclusion. As a result, several research studies were chosen for the qualitative synthesis. The authors created a data extraction form to document important variables such as demographics, therapy specifics, and wound features. Several studies on patients with venous ulcers have shown that consuming basic nutrients can improve wound healing. Treatment results differed depending on the types of compression and pressure intensity. Although minimal data indicates the possible benefits of two-layer therapy, a definitive comparison is still uncertain. Further clinical studies are necessary to investigate a wider range of dietary factors and to evaluate different treatments in similar situations.
PubMed: 38694674
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57407 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2024Up to 1% of adults will have a leg ulcer at some time. Most leg ulcers are venous in origin and are caused by high pressure in the veins due to blockage or damaged...
BACKGROUND
Up to 1% of adults will have a leg ulcer at some time. Most leg ulcers are venous in origin and are caused by high pressure in the veins due to blockage or damaged valves. Venous ulcer prevention and treatment typically involves the application of compression bandages/stockings to improve venous return and thus reduce pressure in the legs. Other treatment options involve removing or repairing veins. Most venous ulcers heal with compression therapy, but ulcer recurrence is common. For this reason, clinical guidelines recommend that people continue with compression treatment after their ulcer has healed. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and last updated in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of compression (socks, stockings, tights, bandages) for preventing recurrence of venous leg ulcers.
SEARCH METHODS
In August 2023, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two ongoing trials registries. We also scanned the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews and health technology reports. There were no restrictions on language, date of publication, or study setting.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated compression bandages or hosiery for preventing the recurrence of venous ulcers.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
At least two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Our primary outcome was reulceration (ulcer recurrence anywhere on the treated leg). Our secondary outcomes included duration of reulceration episodes, proportion of follow-up without ulcers, ulceration on the contralateral leg, noncompliance with compression therapy, comfort, and adverse effects. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
We included eight studies (1995 participants), which were published between 1995 and 2019. The median study sample size was 249 participants. The studies evaluated different classes of compression (UK class 2 or 3 and European (EU) class 1, 2, or 3). Duration of follow-up ranged from six months to 10 years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for risk of bias (lack of blinding), imprecision, and indirectness. EU class 3 compression stockings may reduce reulceration compared with no compression over six months (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.76; 1 study, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). EU class 1 compression stockings compared with EU class 2 compression stockings may have little or no effect on reulceration over 12 months (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.32; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in rates of noncompliance over 12 months between people using EU class 1 stockings and people using EU class 2 stockings (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.75; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). UK class 2 hosiery compared with UK class 3 hosiery may be associated with a higher risk of reulceration over 18 months to 10 years (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.91; 5 studies, 1314 participants; low-certainty evidence). People who use UK class 2 hosiery may be more compliant with compression treatment than people who use UK class 3 hosiery over 18 months to 10 years (RR for noncompliance 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99; 5 studies, 1372 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference between Scholl UK class 2 compression stockings and Medi UK class 2 compression stockings in terms of reulceration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.28; 1 study, 166 participants; low-certainty evidence) and noncompliance (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84.1 to 12; 1 study, 166 participants; low-certainty evidence) over 18 months. No studies compared different lengths of compression (e.g. below-knee versus above-knee), and no studies measured duration of reulceration episodes, ulceration on the contralateral leg, proportion of follow-up without ulcers, comfort, or adverse effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Compression with EU class 3 compression stockings may reduce reulceration compared with no compression over six months. Use of EU class 1 compression stockings compared with EU class 2 compression stockings may result in little or no difference in reulceration and noncompliance over 12 months. UK class 3 compression hosiery may reduce reulceration compared with UK class 2 compression hosiery; however, higher compression may lead to lower compliance. There may be little to no difference between Scholl and Medi UK class 2 compression stockings in terms of reulceration and noncompliance. There was no information on duration of reulceration episodes, ulceration on the contralateral leg, proportion of follow-up without ulcers, comfort, or adverse effects. More research is needed to investigate acceptable modes of long-term compression therapy for people at risk of recurrent venous ulceration. Future trials should consider interventions to improve compliance with compression treatment, as higher compression may result in lower rates of reulceration.
Topics: Humans; Compression Bandages; Stockings, Compression; Ulcer; Varicose Ulcer; Wound Healing
PubMed: 38451842
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002303.pub4 -
International Wound Journal Jun 2024Noninvasive ventilation interfaces are one of the main factors contributing to pressure injuries caused by medical devices. Prevention is still the best course of action... (Review)
Review
Noninvasive ventilation interfaces are one of the main factors contributing to pressure injuries caused by medical devices. Prevention is still the best course of action when discussing noninvasive ventilation-induced pressure injuries. A systematic review was designed to summarize and analyse all published literature on strategies to prevent pressure injuries caused by masks in patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation. The protocol of the systematic review followed the PRISMA guideline. An extensive search from the beginning to May 16, 2023, using current articles in databases such as Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Medical Subject Headings (MESH) were used as follows: "Pressure Injury," "Noninvasive Ventilation," "Prevention," and "Pressure Sore." Any language-published studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, including evaluation methodologies for all studies. Database searches yielded 2546 articles, which were reduced to 23 that met our criteria after reviewing full texts. A narrative synthesis was conducted. As a result, type of interface (14 studies), dressings (4 studies), adjustment of mask leakage (1 study), humidity (1 study), positioning (1 study), and design of personalized masks (2 studies) seem to be a practical approach to prevent pressure injuries caused by masks in patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation. The results of our study show the effectiveness of preventive methods in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries caused by masks. Given the significant occurrence of pressure injury related to noninvasive ventilation and the crucial role of prevention and treatment, it is imperative to conduct more rigorous studies to ascertain the efficacy of each strategy.
Topics: Humans; Pressure Ulcer; Masks; Noninvasive Ventilation; Female; Male; Aged; Middle Aged; Adult; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 38826030
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14909