-
Clinical Child and Family Psychology... Apr 2024Physiological synchrony is the phenomenon of linked physiological processes among two or more individuals. Evidence of linkage between dyads has been found among a broad... (Review)
Review
Physiological synchrony is the phenomenon of linked physiological processes among two or more individuals. Evidence of linkage between dyads has been found among a broad range of physiological indices, including the endocrine systems. During the transition to parenthood, both men and women undergo hormonal changes that facilitate parenting behavior. The present review sought to address the question as to whether hormonal synchronization occurs among expecting or new parents. A systematic literature search yielded 13 eligible records. The evidence of cortisol synchrony during the prenatal period, with additional testosterone, prolactin, and progesterone covariations in the time leading up to childbirth, was found to be most significant. During the postpartum period, parental synchrony was reported for oxytocin, testosterone, and cortisol levels. The implications of these covariations were found to translate into adaptive parenting behaviors and the facilitation of romantic bond. Associations with infant development were also reported, suggesting far-reaching effects of hormonal synchrony outside the parental dyad. The results highlight the importance of physiological interrelatedness during this sensitive period, underscoring the need for further research in this field. In view of the limited data available in this research domain, we have put forward a framework for future studies, recommending the adoption of standardized research protocols and repeated collections of specimens.
PubMed: 38615295
DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00474-7 -
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) Dec 2023How common is bleeding in early pregnancy after Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) and does bleeding affect the reproductive outcome? (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Early pregnancy bleeding after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and secondary data analysis from 320 patients undergoing hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer.
STUDY QUESTION
How common is bleeding in early pregnancy after Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) and does bleeding affect the reproductive outcome?
SUMMARY ANSWER
A total of 47% of HRT-FET patients experience bleeding before the eighth week of gestation, however, bleeding does not affect the reproductive outcome.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Bleeding occurs in 20% of spontaneously conceived pregnancies, although most will proceed to term. However, our knowledge regarding bleeding in early pregnancy after HRT-FET and the reproductive outcome is sparse.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
We performed a systematic review of the existing literature on early pregnancy bleeding after assisted reproductive technology (ART) to evaluate the bleeding prevalence and resulting reproductive outcome in this population. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis was conducted. Subsequently, we performed a prospective cohort study including 320 pregnant patients undergoing HRT-FET and a secondary analysis of the cohort study was performed to evaluate bleeding prevalence and reproductive outcome. The trial was conducted from January 2020 to November 2022 in a public fertility clinic.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed, using MESH terms and included studies with data from ART patients and with early pregnancy bleeding as a separate outcome. The cohort study included patients with autologous vitrified blastocyst transfer treated in an HRT-FET protocol. In the event of a positive HCG-test, an early pregnancy scan was performed around 8 weeks of gestation. During this visit, patients answered a questionnaire regarding bleeding or spotting and its duration after the positive pregnancy test. The information was verified through medical files, and these were used to obtain information on reproductive outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
The review revealed a total of 12 studies of interest. The studies reported a prevalence of early pregnancy bleeding ranging from 2.1% to 36.2%. The random effects proportional meta-analysis resulted in a pooled effect estimate of the prevalence of early pregnancy bleeding in the ART population of 18.1% (95% CI (10.5; 27.1)). Four of the included studies included data on miscarriage rate following an episode of bleeding. All four studies showed a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in patients with early pregnancy bleeding as compared to patients with no history of bleeding. No studies investigated bleeding after HRT-FET specifically. In our HRT-FET cohort study, we found that a total of 47% (149/320) of patients with a positive pregnancy test experienced bleeding before 8 weeks of gestation. Generally, the bleeding was described as spotting with a median of 2 days (range 0.5-16 days). Out of 149 patients with one or several bleeding episodes, a total of 106 patients (71%) had an ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. In comparison, 171 patients reported no bleeding episodes and a total of 115 (67%) of these patients had an ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. This difference was not significant (P = 0.45). Furthermore there was no difference in the live birth rate between the two groups (P = 0.29).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
Most studies included in the review were older and not all studies specified the type of ART. Moreover, the studies were of moderate methodological quality. The patients in the cohort study were treated in a personalized HRT-FET protocol using a rectal supplementary rescue regimen if serum progesterone levels were <35 nmol/l at embryo transfer. The results may not be applicable to other FET protocols, and the present data were based on self-reported symptoms. The systematic review revealed an increased risk of miscarriage following an episode of early pregnancy bleeding. However our cohort study found no such association. This discrepancy can partly be due to the fact, that the four studies in the review only included episodes of heavy bleeding. Also, none of the four studies included data on HRT-FET cycles making them unfit for direct comparison.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Episodes of early bleeding during pregnancy are associated with distress for the pregnant woman, especially in a cohort of infertile patients. Our cohort study showed that at least minor bleeding seems to be a common adverse event of early pregnancy after HRT-FET. From the systematic review, it seems that this prevalence is higher than what has previously been described in relation to other types of ART. However, minor bleeding during early pregnancy after HRT-FET does not seem to affect the reproductive outcome. Knowledge regarding the frequent occurrence of bleeding during early pregnancy after HRT-FET and the fact that this should not be used as a prognostic parameter will help the clinician in counselling patients.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
Gedeon Richter Nordic supported this investigator-initiated study with an unrestricted grant as well as study medication (Cyclogest). B.A. has received an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic and Merck and honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA, and Marckyrl Pharma. P.H. received honoraria for lectures from Merck, Gedeon Richter, Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA), and Besins as well as unrestricted research grants from Merck, Gedeon Richter, and Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA). The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
EudraCT no.: 2019-001539-29.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Pregnancy Rate; Cohort Studies; Abortion, Spontaneous; Prospective Studies; Secondary Data Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Embryo Transfer; Hormone Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 37897214
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead218 -
Human Reproduction Open 2024Is exposure to dydrogesterone a risk factor for congenital anomalies when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in... (Review)
Review
STUDY QUESTION
Is exposure to dydrogesterone a risk factor for congenital anomalies when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in assisted reproductive technology (ART)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Dydrogesterone, when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in ART, is not a relevant additional risk factor for congenital anomalies.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Despite large clinical trials and meta-analyses that show no association between dydrogesterone and congenital anomalies, some recently retracted publications have postulated an association with teratogenicity. Dydrogesterone is also often rated as less safe than bioidentical progestins.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION
A systematic review was conducted according to a pre-specified protocol with searches on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was limited to human studies, with no restrictions on language, geographical region, or date. The search algorithm used a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome)-style approach combining both simple search terms and medical subject heading terms. As congenital anomalies are mostly reported as secondary outcomes, the search term 'safety' was added.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS
Interventional study and observational study (OS) designs were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were: women >17 years old treated for threatened miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, and/or ART; the use of dydrogesterone in the first trimester compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions; and reporting of congenital anomalies in newborns or infants ≤12 months old (primary outcome). Two authors (A.K., M.R.N.) independently extracted the following data: general study information, study population details, intervention and comparator(s), and frequencies of congenital anomalies (classification, time of determination, and type). Risk of bias focused on the reporting of congenital malformations and was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Version 2 or the ROBINS-I tool. The GRADEproGDT platform was used to generate the GRADE summary of findings table.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Of the 897 records retrieved during the literature search, 47 were assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the final analysis: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three OSs. Among the RCTs, three had a low risk and three a high risk of bias. Two of the OSs were considered to have a serious risk of bias and one with critical risk of bias and was excluded for the evidence syntheses. The eight remaining studies included a total of 5070 participants and 2680 live births from 16 countries. In the meta-analysis of RCTs only, the overall risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 [95% CI 0.55; 1.55] with low certainty. When the two OSs were included, the overall RR was 1.11 [95% CI 0.73; 1.68] with low certainty.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION
The studies included in the analysis do not report congenital anomalies as the primary outcome; reporting of congenital anomalies was often not standardized.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
This systematic literature review and meta-analysis provide clear reassurance to both clinicians and patients that dydrogesterone is not associated with congenital anomalies above the rate that might be expected due to environmental and genetic factors. The results of this work represent the highest current level of evidence for the question of congenital anomalies, which removes the existing uncertainty caused by poor quality and retracted studies.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS
Editorial support was provided by Highfield Communication Consultancy, Oxford, UK, sponsored by Abbott Products Operations AG, Allschwil, Switzerland. A.K., J.A.G.-V., L.P.S., J.N.v.d.A., and J.F.S. received honoraria from Abbott for preparation and participation in an advisory board. J.A.G.-V. received grants and lecture fees from Merck, Organon, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. M.R.N. has no conflicts of interest. J.N.v.d.A. and J.A.G.-V. have no other conflicts of interest. A.K. received payment from Abbott for a talk at the IVF Worldwide congress on 22 September 2023. J.F.S. has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, royalties/licences from Elsevier and Prescient Medicine (SOLVD Health), consulting fees from Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) and Bayer, honoraria from Magee Women's Research Institute, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, University of Kansas and Oakridge National Research Laboratory, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support to attend meetings for the International Academy of Human Reproduction (IAHR). J.F.S. has patents related to diagnosis and treatment of PCOS and prediction of preterm birth. J.F.S. participates on advisory boards for SOLVD Health, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, and FHI360, was the past President board member of the Society for Reproductive Investigation, has a leadership role for the following organizations: Scientific Advisory Board, SOLVD Health, EAB Chair for contraceptive technology initiative, FHI360, EAB member, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, Advisory Board for MWRI Summit, Chair of BWF NextGen Pregnancy Research Panel, Medical Executive Committee at the Howard, and Georgeanna Jones Foundation, and is Vice President, IAHR. L.P.S. has received consulting fees from Shield Pharmaceuticals, Scynexis, Organon, Natera, Celula China, AiVF, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo, American Regent, and Medicem, honoraria from Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support from BD Diagnostics. L.P.S. participates on the data safety monitoring board for Astellas and is a Chair of DSMB for fezolinetant. Abbott played no role in the funding of the study or in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022356977.
PubMed: 38344249
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae004 -
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Jun 2024We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.
RESULTS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
PubMed: 38905455
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0119 -
BMC Women's Health May 2024Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine gynecological disease affecting many women of reproductive age. Clomiphene is the first-line treatment for PCOS... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine gynecological disease affecting many women of reproductive age. Clomiphene is the first-line treatment for PCOS patients, but most individuals may be resistant to it. This study aims to assess the efficacy of dexamethasone and clomiphene in the treatment of PCOS patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to study and treat PCOS.
METHODS
Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Medical Network, and VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform (VIP) were searched from the inception to January 2023. Review Manager and Stata software were used for meta- analysis. The risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots, Begg's and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 12 literatures were finally included, with a total of 1270 PCOS patients. Compared with the control group, dexamethasone combined with clomiphene could significantly improve pregnancy (RR = 1.71, P < 0.00001), ovulation (RR = 1.30, P < 0.00001), luteinizing hormone level (SMD = -0.94, P < 0.00001), estradiol level (SMD = 0.99, P = 0.05), progesterone level (SMD = 5.08, P = 0.002) and testosterone level (SMD = -1.59, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant effects on ovulation-stimulating hormone level (SMD = 0.15, P = 0.37), adverse reactions (RR = 1.30, P = 0.30), dizziness (RR = 1.50, P = 0.45), and vomiting (RR = 1.67, P = 0.48).
CONCLUSION
The treatment of dexamethasone combined with clomiphene is helpful to improve the ovulation and pregnancy rate in patients with PCOS, and improve the hormone levels of patients.
Topics: Humans; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Clomiphene; Female; Dexamethasone; Fertility Agents, Female; Pregnancy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome; Pregnancy Rate
PubMed: 38769509
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03141-9 -
Medicine Jul 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture for the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility (ODI). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture in the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture for the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility (ODI).
METHODS
From January 1, 2018 to March 12, 2023, 7 electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and CBM, were systematically searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trial studies.
RESULTS
Meta analysis showed that traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture can more effectively improve sex hormone levels compared to Western medicine alone, including follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in older patients (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.66; P = .024, I 2 = 28%), FSH in younger patients (SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: -0.15, 1.05; P = .03, I 2 = 71%), estradiol (E2) (SMD: 7.50; 95% CI: v0.47, 15.48; P < .00001, I 2 = 99%), and progesterone (P) (SMD: 2.20; 95% CI: 2.07-2.33; P < .00001, I 2 = 29%). Compared to Western medicine alone, traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture also had a better effect to increase ovulation rate (risk ratio [RR]: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.72-3.52; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%), pregnancy rate (RR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.96-3.18; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%), maximum follicle diameter (MFD) (SMD: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.37-3.16; P < .00001, I 2 = 91%), and endometrial thickness (SMD: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.31-2.11; P < .00001, I 2 = 87%). The combination of traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture also had better effects on quality of life (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.15-0.23; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%) and reduced adverse reactions (RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.48; P = .001, I 2 = 0%), compared to Western medicine alone.
CONCLUSION
This study shows evidence that traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture are an effective and safe treatment approach. However, this conclusion requires further confirmation due to the insufficient quality of the included trials.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Aged; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Quality of Life; Acupuncture Therapy; Infertility; Ovulation; Follicle Stimulating Hormone
PubMed: 37417606
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034310 -
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Sep 2023The value of human leukocyte antigen (HLA; also known as major histocompatibility complex) class I expression for the prediction of breast cancer survival outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The value of human leukocyte antigen (HLA; also known as major histocompatibility complex) class I expression for the prediction of breast cancer survival outcomes remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of this expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched electronic databases to identify reports on associations of HLA class I protein or mRNA expression with survival outcomes and clinicopathological factors in the breast cancer context. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to conduct a quantitative meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The sample comprised eight studies involving 3590 patients. Only the classical HLA class Ia (HLA-ABC) molecules studies were included in this meta-analysis. Elevated HLA class I protein expression was found to be significantly related to better disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.95, P = 0.03), particularly among patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, P < 0.001), but not to overall survival. It was also associated with estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24-2.35, P = 0.001), progesterone receptor (PR) negativity (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.22-1.81, P < 0.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.94, P = 0.001), TNBC (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.15-2.45, P < 0.01), high Ki-67 indices (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.62-2.61, P < 0.001), and high nuclear grades (OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.17-3.29, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis demonstrated that enhanced HLA class I protein expression is significantly associated with the better DFS of patients with breast cancer, especially TNBC, as well as with ER and PR negativity, HER2 positivity, TNBC, and high Ki-67 indices and nuclear grades. The immune target HLA class I may serve as a prognostic indicator for breast cancer.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Prognosis; Ki-67 Antigen; Clinical Relevance; Receptor, ErbB-2; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 37464212
DOI: 10.1007/s40291-023-00664-z -
BMC Cancer May 2024Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)...
BACKGROUND
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines as the first-line (1 L) treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- LABC/mBC). Although there are many treatment options, there is no clear standard of care for patients following 1 L CDK4/6i. Understanding the real-world effectiveness of subsequent therapies may help to identify an unmet need in this patient population. This systematic literature review qualitatively synthesized effectiveness and safety outcomes for treatments received in the real-world setting after 1 L CDK4/6i therapy in patients with HR+/ HER2- LABC/mBC.
METHODS
MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the Ovid® platform for real-world evidence studies published between 2015 and 2022. Grey literature was searched to identify relevant conference abstracts published from 2019 to 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023383914). Data were qualitatively synthesized and weighted average median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was calculated for NCCN/ESMO-recommended post-1 L CDK4/6i treatment regimens.
RESULTS
Twenty records (9 full-text articles and 11 conference abstracts) encompassing 18 unique studies met the eligibility criteria and reported outcomes for second-line (2 L) treatments after 1 L CDK4/6i; no studies reported disaggregated outcomes in the third-line setting or beyond. Sixteen studies included NCCN/ESMO guideline-recommended treatments with the majority evaluating endocrine-based therapy; five studies on single-agent ET, six studies on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) ± ET, and three studies with a mix of ET and/or mTORi. Chemotherapy outcomes were reported in 11 studies. The most assessed outcome was median rwPFS; the weighted average median rwPFS was calculated as 3.9 months (3.3-6.0 months) for single-agent ET, 3.6 months (2.5-4.9 months) for mTORi ± ET, 3.7 months for a mix of ET and/or mTORi (3.0-4.0 months), and 6.1 months (3.7-9.7 months) for chemotherapy. Very few studies reported other effectiveness outcomes and only two studies reported safety outcomes. Most studies had heterogeneity in patient- and disease-related characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS
The real-world effectiveness of current 2 L treatments post-1 L CDK4/6i are suboptimal, highlighting an unmet need for this patient population.
Topics: Humans; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Breast Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; Female; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 38783218
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12269-8 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Mar 2024The association of FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism with breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in women remains inconclusive due to varying reports. In this study, we conducted...
OBJECTIVE
The association of FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism with breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in women remains inconclusive due to varying reports. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism and susceptibility to BC.
METHODS
Relevant literature were acquired through searches across multiple databases. Odds ratio (OR) values were pooled to assess the risk of BC for different alleles and genotypes. The heterogeneity among the included literature was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was used to verify the stability of the results. Egger's linear regression test was used to assess the significance of publication bias of the included literature.
RESULTS
A total of 17 publications were included, encompassing 122,607 cases and 175,966 controls. There was significantly increased risk of BC for allele A compared with G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.14-1.67, P < .001), genotype AA compared with GG (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.38, P < .001), and genotype GA compared with GG (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.12-1.26, P < .001). Both Egger's test and funnel plot indicated the presence of publication bias. After adjusting potential publication bias by the trim-and-fill method, the comparison of allele A versus G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.13-1.17, P < .001), genotype AA versus GG (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.28-1.37, P < .001), and genotype GA versus GG (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-1.22, P < .001) remained statistically significant. In various subgroups, the allele A showed significantly higher risk of BC upon allele G in estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, ER negative BC, progesterone receptor (PR) positive BC, PR negative BC, triple-negative BC, pathological grade I BC, grade II BC, and grade III breast cancer. The subsequent sensitivity analysis suggested the above findings stable and reliable.
CONCLUSION
In this study, we found that the allele A of the FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. This study underscores its potential as a genetic marker for personalized risk assessment and targeted interventions.
PubMed: 38641470
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.009 -
PloS One 2024Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment rely heavily on molecular markers such as HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER. Currently, these markers are identified by invasive methods. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment rely heavily on molecular markers such as HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER. Currently, these markers are identified by invasive methods.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics as a novel approach to predicting these markers.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies evaluating ultrasound-based radiomics in BC. Inclusion criteria encompassed research on HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER as key molecular markers. Quality assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was performed. The data extraction step was performed systematically.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis quantifies the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.78 for predicting HER2, 0.80, and 0.76 for Ki67 biomarkers. Studies did not provide sufficient data for quantitative PR and ER prediction analysis. The overall quality of studies based on the RQS tool was moderate. The QUADAS-2 evaluation showed that the studies had an unclear risk of bias regarding the flow and timing domain.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis indicated that AI models have a promising accuracy for predicting key molecular biomarkers' status in BC patients. We performed the quantitative analysis for HER2 and Ki67 biomarkers which yielded a moderate to high accuracy. However, studies did not provide adequate data for meta-analysis of ER and PR prediction accuracy of developed models. The overall quality of the studies was acceptable. In future research, studies need to report the results thoroughly. Also, we suggest more prospective studies from different centers.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Biomarkers, Tumor; Artificial Intelligence; Receptor, ErbB-2; Ki-67 Antigen; Ultrasonography; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone
PubMed: 38820391
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303669