-
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jul 2024We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the performance of ML in detecting genetic mutation status in NSCLC patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the performance of ML in detecting genetic mutation status in NSCLC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science up until July 2023. We discussed the genetic mutation status of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, and BRAF, as well as the mutation status at different sites of EGFR.
RESULTS
We included a total of 128 original studies, of which 114 constructed ML models based on radiomic features mainly extracted from CT, MRI, and PET-CT data. From a genetic mutation perspective, 121 studies focused on EGFR mutation status analysis. In the validation set, for the detection of EGFR mutation status, the aggregated c-index was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.706-0.814) for clinical feature-based models, 0.772 (95%CI: 0.753-0.791) for CT-based radiomics models, 0.816 (95%CI: 0.776-0.856) for MRI-based radiomics models, and 0.750 (95%CI: 0.712-0.789) for PET-CT-based radiomics models. When combined with clinical features, the aggregated c-index was 0.807 (95%CI: 0.781-0.832) for CT-based radiomics models, 0.806 (95%CI: 0.773-0.839) for MRI-based radiomics models, and 0.822 (95%CI: 0.789-0.854) for PET-CT-based radiomics models. In the validation set, the aggregated c-indexes for radiomics-based models to detect mutation status of ALK and KRAS, as well as the mutation status at different sites of EGFR were all greater than 0.7.
CONCLUSION
The use of radiomics-based methods for early discrimination of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC demonstrates relatively high accuracy. However, the influence of clinical variables cannot be overlooked in this process. In addition, future studies should also pay attention to the accuracy of radiomics in identifying mutation status of other genes in EGFR.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Machine Learning; Mutation; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; ErbB Receptors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
PubMed: 38734145
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110325 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... May 2024The optimal strategy for second-line (IIL) treatment in KRAS wt metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not determined yet. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal strategy for second-line (IIL) treatment in KRAS wt metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not determined yet.
METHODS
A random-effect NMA of phase II/III RCTs was conducted to evaluate IIL treatment for all-RAS wt mCRC, comparing anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF, and chemotherapy (CT).
RESULTS
Overall, 11 RCTs (3613 patients) were included. In KRAS wt patients, PFS was improved with anti-VEGF (HR 0.43) and anti-EGFR (HR 0.63) vs CT. However, anti-VEGF based therapy had the highest likelihood of being ranked as the best treatment in terms of PFS (SUCRA 99.3%) and OS (SUCRA 99.4%). Bevacizumab-based treatment is most likely to be the best treatment in terms of PFS (SUCRA 89.1%) and OS (SUCRA 86.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
Second line treatment with anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR improved PFS in mCRC patients, however, anti-VEGF based therapy, particularly CT plus bevacizumab, is the best treatment according to SUCRA in terms of PFS and OS.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; ErbB Receptors; Bevacizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
PubMed: 37586908
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.013 -
Head and Neck Pathology Dec 2023The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E in benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal and malignant odontogenic tumors. In addition, we discussed the different detection methods used to assess for aberrant BRAF.
METHODS
This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in Prospero (CRD42023445689). A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to answer the question "What is the prevalence of the BRAF p.V600E mutation in benign mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors?" The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool.
RESULTS
Initially, 387 records were identified, but only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 70 patients with benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumors and 63 with malignant odontogenic tumors were included in the analysis. We found that the BRAF p.V600E mutation had a prevalence of 31.42% in mixed tumors and 26.98% in malignant odontogenic tumors. Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed high concordance with DNA-based molecular methods.
CONCLUSION
In general, the BRAF p.V600E variant exhibited a prominent prevalence in mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors. However, most of the findings are based on small cohorts of patients and further studies with larger cohorts are needed.
Topics: Humans; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Prevalence; Odontogenic Tumors; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 38057461
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-023-01601-6 -
Pharmacological Research Feb 2024To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRAS inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRAS inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRAS inhibitor treatment.
Topics: Humans; Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Mutation; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38185210
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107060 -
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Oct 2023Adverse reactions to traditional Chinese medicine have hindered the healthy development and internationalization process of the traditional Chinese medicine industry....
Adverse reactions to traditional Chinese medicine have hindered the healthy development and internationalization process of the traditional Chinese medicine industry. The critical issue that needs to be solved urgently is to evaluate the safety of traditional Chinese medicine systematically and effectively. Podophyllotoxin (PPT) is a highly active compound extracted from plants of the genus Podophyllum such as Dysosma versipellis (DV). However, its high toxicity and toxicity to multiple target organs affect the clinical application, such as the liver and kidney. Based on the concurrent effects of PPT's medicinal activity and toxicity, it would be a good example to conduct a systematic review of its safety. Therefore, this study revolves around the Toxicological Evidence Chain (TEC) concept. Based on PPT as the main toxic constituent in DV, observe the objective toxicity impairment phenotype of animals. Evaluate the serum biochemical indicators and pathological tissue sections for substantial toxic damage results. Using metabolomics, lipidomics, and network toxicology to evaluate the nephrotoxicity of PPT from multiple perspectives systematically. The results showed that PPT-induced nephrotoxicity manifested as renal tubular damage, mainly affecting metabolic pathways such as glycerophospholipid metabolism and sphingolipid metabolism. PPT inhibits the autophagy process of kidney cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Nrf2/HO1 pathways and induces the activation of oxidative stress in the body, thereby causing nephrotoxic injury. This study fully verified the feasibility of the TEC concept for the safety and toxicity evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine. Provide a research template for systematically evaluating the safety of traditional Chinese medicine.
Topics: Animals; Rats; Kidney; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Podophyllotoxin; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Podophyllum; Drugs, Chinese Herbal
PubMed: 37651795
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115392 -
Cancer Causes & Control : CCC Feb 2024African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality of all racial groups in the USA, which may relate to differences in healthcare access or advanced...
PURPOSE
African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality of all racial groups in the USA, which may relate to differences in healthcare access or advanced stage at diagnosis. Recent evidence indicates that differences in tumor characteristics may also underlie disparities in mortality. To highlight recent findings and areas for investigation, we completed the first systematic review of racial disparities in CRC tumor prognostic markers, including clinicopathological markers, microsatellite instability (MSI), oncogene mutations, and novel markers, including cancer stem cells and immune markers.
METHODS
Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, limited to original research published within the last 10 years. Ninety-six articles were identified that compared the prevalence of mortality-related CRC tumor characteristics in African Americans (or other African ancestry populations) to White cases.
RESULTS
Tumors from African ancestry cases are approximately 10% more likely to contain mutations in KRAS, which confer elevated mortality and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Conversely, African Americans have approximately 50% lower odds for BRAF-mutant tumors, which occur less frequently but have similar effects on mortality and therapeutic resistance. There is less consistent evidence supporting disparities in mutations for other oncogenes, including PIK3CA, TP53, APC, NRAS, HER2, and PTEN, although higher rates of PIK3CA mutations and lower prevalence of MSI status for African ancestry cases are supported by recent evidence. Although emerging evidence suggests that immune markers reflecting anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment may be lower for African American cases, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate disparities in other novel markers, cancer stem cells, microRNAs, and the consensus molecular subtypes.
CONCLUSION
Higher rates of KRAS-mutant tumors in in African Americans may contribute to disparities in CRC mortality. Additional work is required to understand whether emerging markers, including immune cells, underlie the elevated CRC mortality observed for African Americans.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Racial Groups; Colorectal Neoplasms; Mutation; Microsatellite Instability; Biomarkers; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37688643
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01783-y -
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine :... Nov 2023This review aims to analyse the recurrence rate in BRAFv600e+ and BRAFv600e- ameloblastomas and explore its association with clinicopathological variables. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This review aims to analyse the recurrence rate in BRAFv600e+ and BRAFv600e- ameloblastomas and explore its association with clinicopathological variables.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and grey literature, without any limitation on start date or language up to 20 June 2023. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted and Metaregression analyses were performed based on available clinicopathological factors.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies met the criteria for meta-analysis of outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall recurrence rates between the two groups (risk difference = 0.001, p-value = 0.987). Increasing male:female ratio in the BRAFv600e+ group was associated with a lower reported recurrence, suggesting a higher recurrence rate in females. The odds of having mandibular lesion were four times higher in BRAFv600e+ cases compared to BRAFv600e- cases (confidence interval: 2.121-7.870, p < 0.001, I = 28.37%).
CONCLUSION
Within the BRAFv600e+ group, females showed a higher reported recurrence rate. This specific clinical group may benefit from BRAFv600e mutation investigation and potential upscaled surgical treatment and additional BRAF inhibitor therapy, which needs validation in future studies.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Ameloblastoma; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Mutation; Molecular Targeted Therapy
PubMed: 37872712
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13494 -
Head and Neck Pathology Mar 2024Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a commonly occurring malignancy with complex genetic alterations contributing to its development. The H-Ras, a proto-oncogene,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a commonly occurring malignancy with complex genetic alterations contributing to its development. The H-Ras, a proto-oncogene, becomes an oncogene when mutated and has been implicated in various cancers. This systematic review aims to research to what extent H-Ras expression and mutation contribute to the development and progression of OSCC, and how does this molecular alteration impacts the clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with OSCC.
METHODS
A thorough electronic scientific literature search was carried out in PUBMED, SCOPUS, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR databases from 2007 to 2021. The search strategy yielded 120 articles. Following aggregation and filtering all results through our inclusion and exclusion criteria total 9 articles were included in our literature review. It has also been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485202).
RESULTS
It was found that mutations in the Ras gene commonly reported in hotspots at codons 12, 13, and 61 resulting in the activation of downstream signaling pathways causing abnormal and uncontrolled cell growth. This systematic review has shown an increased prevalence of H-Ras mutation in well-differentiated OSCC and also the prevalence of H-Ras mutation in individuals engaging in multiple risk behaviors, particularly chewing tobacco, demonstrated a significant association with a higher prevalence of H-Ras positivity.
CONCLUSION
This review sheds light on the prevalence of H-Ras mutations, their association with clinical characteristics, and their potential implications for OSCC prognosis. It also enhances our comprehension of the molecular mechanisms that underlie OSCC and paves the way for further research into targeted treatments based on H-Ras alterations.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Mouth Neoplasms; Mutation; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 38502412
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-024-01623-8 -
Journal of Immunotherapy (Hagerstown,... May 2024The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving due to advances in molecular testing and the...
Clinical Outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With BRAF, ERBB2/HER2, MET , or RET Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review.
The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving due to advances in molecular testing and the development of new targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced or metastatic patients with NSCLC whose tumors harbor BRAF V600E mutation, HER2/ERBB2 alteration, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or RET rearrangement is not completely understood. A systematic literature review was performed to summarize evidence from clinical trials and observational studies on objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients whose tumors express these biomarkers and who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE, conference abstracts, and a clinical trial registry identified a total of 12 unique studies: 4 studies included patients with BRAF V600E mutation, 6 studies included patients with HER2/ERBB2 alteration, 7 studies included patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation, and 5 studies included patients with RET rearrangement. Across studies, there was heterogeneity in treatment and patient characteristics and a lack of reporting on many important predictive and prognostic factors, including treatment regimens, patients' line of therapy, and tumor PD-L1 expression, which may explain the wide variation in objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across studies. Therefore, additional studies prospectively evaluating clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors among patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumors harbor emerging predictive or prognostic biomarkers are needed to determine whether this class of immunotherapy can provide additional survival benefits for these patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; B7-H1 Antigen; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Receptor, ErbB-2
PubMed: 38112201
DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000500 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jun 2024Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.
BACKGROUND
Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid® for published single-arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N ≥ 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real-world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first-line crizotinib.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate).
CONCLUSION
The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real-world setting.
Topics: Crizotinib; Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Agents; Gene Fusion
PubMed: 38749072
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107816