-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023The Neonatal Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) makes practice recommendations for the care of newborn infants in the delivery... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Neonatal Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) makes practice recommendations for the care of newborn infants in the delivery room (DR). ILCOR recommends that all infants who are gasping, apnoeic, or bradycardic (heart rate < 100 per minute) should be given positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with a manual ventilation device (T-piece, self-inflating bag, or flow-inflating bag) via an interface. The most commonly used interface is a face mask that encircles the infant's nose and mouth. However, gas leak and airway obstruction are common during face mask PPV. Nasal interfaces (single and binasal prongs (long or short), or nasal masks) and laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) may also be used to deliver PPV to newborns in the DR, and may be more effective than face masks.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether newborn infants receiving PPV in the delivery room with a nasal interface compared to a face mask, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), or another type of nasal interface have reduced mortality and morbidity. To assess whether safety and efficacy of the nasal interface differs according to gestational age or ventilation device.
SEARCH METHODS
Searches were conducted in September 2022 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, and two trial registries. We searched conference abstracts and checked the reference lists of included trials and related systematic reviews identified through the search.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCT's that compared the use of nasal interfaces to other interfaces (face masks, LMAs, or one nasal interface to another) to deliver PPV to newborn infants in the DR.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Each review author independently evaluated the search results against the selection criteria, screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. If they were study authors, they did not participate in the selection, risk of bias assessment, or data extraction related to the study. In such instances, the study was independently assessed by other review authors. We contacted trial investigators to obtain additional information. We completed data analysis according to the standards of Cochrane Neonatal, using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence Intervals (CI) to measure the effect of the different interfaces. We used fixed-effect models and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five trials, in which 1406 infants participated. They were conducted in 13 neonatal centres across Europe and Australia. Each of these trials compared a nasal interface to a face mask for the delivery of respiratory support to newborn infants in the DR. Potential sources of bias were a lack of blinding to treatment allocation of the caregivers and investigators in all trials. The evidence suggests that resuscitation with a nasal interface in the DR, compared with a face mask, may have little to no effect on reducing death before discharge (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.13; 3 studies, 1124 infants; low-certainty evidence). Resuscitation with a nasal interface may reduce the rate of intubation in the DR, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85; 5 studies, 1406 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for the rate of intubation within 24 hours of birth (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09; 3 studies, 749 infants; very low-certainty evidence), endotracheal intubation outside the DR during hospitalisation (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.42; 1 study, 144 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and cranial ultrasound abnormalities (intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade ≥ 3, or periventricular leukomalacia; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.61; 3 studies, 749 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Resuscitation with a nasal interface in the DR, compared with a face mask, may have little to no effect on the incidence of air leaks (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09; 2 studies, 507 infants; low-certainty evidence), or the need for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' corrected gestational age (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.40; 2 studies, 507 infants; low-certainty evidence). We identified one ongoing study, which compares a nasal mask to a face mask to deliver PPV to infants in the DR. We did not identify any completed trials that compared nasal interfaces to LMAs or one nasal interface to another.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Nasal interfaces were found to offer comparable efficacy to face masks (low- to very low-certainty evidence), supporting resuscitation guidelines that state that nasal interfaces are a comparable alternative to face masks for providing respiratory support in the DR. Resuscitation with a nasal interface may reduce the rate of intubation in the DR when compared with a face mask. However, the evidence is very uncertain. This uncertainty is attributed to the use of a new ventilation system in the nasal interface group in two of the five trials. As such, it is not possible to differentiate separate, specific effects related to the ventilation device or to the interface in these studies.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Resuscitation; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Respiration, Artificial; Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; Intubation, Intratracheal
PubMed: 37787113
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009102.pub2 -
Emerging Microbes & Infections Dec 2023Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) bacteremia can have poor clinical outcomes. Thus, determining the predictors of mortality from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) bacteremia can have poor clinical outcomes. Thus, determining the predictors of mortality from ESBL-PE bacteremia is very important. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate studies to determine predictors associated with ESBL-PE bacteremia mortality. We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant publications from January 2000 to August 2022. The outcome measure was mortality rate. In this systematic review of 22 observational studies, 4607 patients with ESBL-PE bacteremia were evaluated, of whom 976 (21.2%) died. The meta-analysis showed that prior antimicrobial therapy (RR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.22-6.85), neutropenia (RR, 5.58; 95% CI, 2.03-15.35), nosocomial infection (RR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.22-4.95), rapidly fatal underlying disease (RR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.19-8.08), respiratory tract infection (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.33-3.36), Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) (per1) (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.53), PBS ≥ 4 (RR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.77-5.85), severe sepsis (RR, 11.74; 95% CI, 4.68-29.43), and severe sepsis or septic shock (RR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.83-6.18) were found to be mortality predictors. Moreover, urinary tract infection (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.57) and appropriate empirical therapy (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.82) were found to be a protective factor against mortality. Patients with ESBL-PE bacteremia who have the aforementioned require prudent management for improved outcomes. This research will lead to better management and improvement of clinical outcomes of patients with bacteremia caused by ESBL-PE.
Topics: Humans; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Enterobacteriaceae; Bacteremia; Sepsis; beta-Lactamases; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37219067
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2023.2217951 -
Italian Journal of Pediatrics Oct 2023Extubation failure (EF) is a significant concern in mechanically ventilated newborns, and predicting its occurrence is an ongoing area of research. To investigate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Extubation failure (EF) is a significant concern in mechanically ventilated newborns, and predicting its occurrence is an ongoing area of research. To investigate the predictors of EF in newborns undergoing planned extubation, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published in English from the inception of each database to March 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in all phases of this systematic review. The Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies tool was used to assess methodological quality. Thirty-four studies were included, 10 of which were overall low risk of bias, 15 of moderate risk of bias, and 9 of high risk of bias. The studies reported 43 possible predictors in six broad categories (intrinsic factors; maternal factors; diseases and adverse conditions of the newborn; treatment of the newborn; characteristics before and after extubation; and clinical scores and composite indicators). Through a qualitative synthesis of 43 predictors and a quantitative meta-analysis of 19 factors, we identified five definite factors, eight possible factors, and 22 unclear factors related to EF. Definite factors included gestational age, sepsis, pre-extubation pH, pre-extubation FiO, and respiratory severity score. Possible factors included age at extubation, anemia, inotropic use, mean airway pressure, pre-extubation PCO, mechanical ventilation duration, Apgar score, and spontaneous breathing trial. With only a few high-quality studies currently available, well-designed and more extensive prospective studies investigating the predictors affecting EF are still needed. In the future, it will be important to explore the possibility of combining multiple predictors or assessment tools to enhance the accuracy of predicting extubation outcomes in clinical practice.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Prospective Studies; Airway Extubation; Respiration, Artificial; Ventilator Weaning; Family
PubMed: 37784184
DOI: 10.1186/s13052-023-01538-0 -
Biomedicines Nov 2023Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often a consequence of a dysregulated immune response; therefore, immunomodulation by extracorporeal cytokine removal has... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often a consequence of a dysregulated immune response; therefore, immunomodulation by extracorporeal cytokine removal has been increasingly used as an adjuvant therapy, but convincing data are still missing. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adjunctive hemoadsorption (HA) on clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with ARDS.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science (PROSPERO: CRD42022292176). The population was patients receiving HA therapy for ARDS. The primary outcome was the change in PaO2/FiO2 before and after HA therapy. Secondary outcomes included the before and after values for C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and norepinephrine (NE) doses.
RESULTS
We included 26 publications, with 243 patients (198 undergoing HA therapy and 45 controls). There was a significant improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio following HA therapy (MD = 68.93 [95%-CI: 28.79 to 109.06] mmHg, = 0.005) and a reduction in CRP levels (MD = -45.02 [95%-CI: -82.64; -7.39] mg/dL, = 0.026) and NE dose (MD = -0.24 [95%-CI: -0.44 to -0.04] μg/kg/min, = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our findings, HA resulted in a significant improvement in oxygenation and a reduction in NE dose and CRP levels in patients treated with ARDS. Properly designed RCTs are still needed.
PubMed: 38002070
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113068 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Jan 2024Obstructive sleep apnoea is characterised by recurrent reduction of airflow during sleep leading to intermittent hypoxia. Continuous positive airway pressure is the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Obstructive sleep apnoea is characterised by recurrent reduction of airflow during sleep leading to intermittent hypoxia. Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line treatment but is limited by poor adherence. Nocturnal oxygen therapy may be an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea but its effects remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the effects of nocturnal oxygen therapy on both obstructive sleep apnoea severity and blood pressure.A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. Peer-reviewed, randomised studies that compared the effect of nocturnal oxygen therapy to sham in obstructive sleep apnoea patients were included. The main outcomes were the apnoea-hypopnoea index and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.The search strategy yielded 1295 citations. Nine studies with 502 participants were included. When nocturnal oxygen therapy was compared to sham/air, it significantly reduced the apnoea-hypopnoea index (mean difference (MD) -15.17 events·h, 95% CI -19.95- -10.38 events·h, p<0.00001). Nocturnal oxygen therapy had no significant effect on blood pressure at follow-up without adjustment for baseline values, but did, where available, significantly attenuate the change in blood pressure from baseline to follow-up for both systolic blood pressure (MD -2.79 mmHg, 95% CI -5.45- -0.14 mmHg, p=0.040) and diastolic blood pressure (MD -2.20 mmHg, 95% CI -3.83- -0.57 mmHg, p=0.008).Nocturnal oxygen therapy reduced the apnoea-hypopnoea index severity and the change in (but not absolute) systolic and diastolic blood pressure, compared to sham. This suggests that nocturnal oxygen therapy may be a treatment option for obstructive sleep apnoea. Further studies with longer-term follow-up and standardised measurements are needed.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Hypoxia; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Oxygen; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38508665
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0173-2023 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Sep 2023To evaluate the effectiveness of supplemental oxygen therapy and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effectiveness of supplemental oxygen and high-flow nasal cannula therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea in different clinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of supplemental oxygen therapy and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in different clinical settings to assess its application to surgical patients in the postoperative setting.
DESIGN
A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and other databases from 1946 to December 16th, 2021. Title and abstract screening were conducted independently, and the lead investigators resolved conflicts. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model and are presented as mean difference and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. These were calculated using RevMan 5.4.
PATIENTS
1395 and 228 OSA patients underwent oxygen therapy and HFNC therapy respectively.
INTERVENTIONS
Oxygen therapy and HFNC therapy.
MEASUREMENTS
Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO), cumulative time with SPO < 90% (CT90).
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-seven oxygen therapy studies were included in the review, with ten randomized controlled trials (RCT), seven randomized crossovers, seven non-randomized crossovers, and three prospective cohorts. Pooled analyses showed that oxygen therapy significantly reduced AHI by 31% and increased SpO by 5% versus baseline, and CPAP significantly reduced AHI by 84%, and increased SpO by 3% versus baseline. CPAP was 53% more effective in reducing AHI than oxygen therapy, but both treatments had similar effectiveness in increasing SpO. Nine HFNC studies were included in the review, with five prospective cohorts, three randomized crossovers, and one RCT. Pooled analyses showed that HFNC therapy significantly reduced AHI by 36% but did not substantially increase SpO.
CONCLUSIONS
Oxygen therapy effectively reduces AHI and increases SpO in patients with OSA. CPAP is more effective in reducing AHI than oxygen therapy. HFNC therapy is effective in reducing AHI. Although both oxygen therapy and HFNC therapy effectively reduce AHI, more research is needed to draw conclusions on clinical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Cannula; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Oxygen
PubMed: 37172556
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111144 -
Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2023Changes in the ventilation demand nursing interventions duly adapted to the management of said impairment and to the adaptability of the child/parents. This revision... (Review)
Review
PROBLEM
Changes in the ventilation demand nursing interventions duly adapted to the management of said impairment and to the adaptability of the child/parents. This revision aimed to investigate the evidence behind the interventions performed on children with impaired ventilation.'
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Systematic reviews of literature in English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese from studies on nursing interventions related to children with impaired ventilation in all contexts of the clinical practice. The Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations were followed.
SAMPLE
We conducted a comprehensive search as of January 2022 and updated as of June 2023. The following electronic databases were searched: SCOPUS, Web of Science, Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO), MedicLatina (via EBSCO), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (via EBSCO), and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Nineteen articles published between 2012 and 2022 were included in this review.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies investigated the efficacy of respiratory exercises (Breathing Control - relaxed breathing, pursed lip breathing, Diaphragmatic breathing exercises, respiratory expansion exercise - deep breathing exercise, thoracic expansion exercises (with device), exercises for respiratory muscle strengthening and position to optimize ventilation. In the majority of the studies, it was not possible to evaluate the interventions separately. Thirteen studies evidenced the efficacy of respiratory exercises, BIPAP, and oxygen therapy. Seven articles demonstrated the effectiveness of respiratory muscle-strengthening exercises, and only three mentioned the efficacy of positioning regarding impaired ventilation. Interventions based on respiratory exercises and respiratory muscle training were the most common ones.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that nursing interventions to optimize ventilation are efficient. Nevertheless, the same present a low to moderate evidence degree, justified by the population characteristics (small and heterogeneous).
IMPLICATIONS
There is proof of evidence for the studied interventions. However, the lack of methodological robustness points to future research to duly describe interventions, data, and comparable results, using reliable samples in which the focus of the study is clear.
Topics: Child; Humans; Breathing Exercises; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 37690429
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.08.027 -
Journal of Sleep Research May 2024Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The study protocol was registered in Prospero Platform (CRD42018096980). We performed searches in the main databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via Pubmed; Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase) via Elsevier; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Cochrane Library; Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) through the Portal of the Virtual Health Library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) for all randomised-controlled trials published before July 2022. The randomised-controlled trials were assessed for risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Thirteen randomised-controlled trials were included. All studies had an overall high risk of bias. Inspiratory muscle training probably improves systolic blood pressure and sleepiness when compared with sham. However, inspiratory muscle training probably does not improve diastolic blood pressure and maximum expiratory pressure, and may not be superior to sham for apnea-hypopnea index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, sleep quality and quality of life. In addition, it is uncertain whether there is any effect of inspiratory muscle training on maximum inspiratory pressure and physical capacity. Inspiratory muscle training may also improve maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure compared with oropharyngeal exercises. However, it may not be superior for apnea-hypopnea index, sleep quality, sleepiness, quality of life and functional capacity. When associated with physical exercise, inspiratory muscle training may not be superior to physical exercise alone for maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and functional capacity. At the same time, when associated with cardiac rehabilitation exercises, inspiratory muscle training may reduce apnea-hypopnea index, improve inspiratory muscle strength, sleepiness and sleep quality compared with cardiac rehabilitation alone. However, it may not be superior for improving quality of life. Regarding expiratory muscle training, it may improve expiratory muscle strength and sleep quality, but not sleepiness when compared with sham. The evidence on the effects of expiratory muscle training in apnea-hypopnea index is very uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Breathing Exercises; Respiratory Muscles; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37258418
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13941 -
Evidence-based Dentistry Sep 2023PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published up to October 2021.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published up to October 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Two separate search strategies were employed: (1) In adults with periodontitis, what is the prevalence or incidence of respiratory diseases compared to healthy or gingivitis adults in cross-sectional, cohort or case -control studies. (2) In adults with periodontitis and respiratory disease, what are the effects of periodontal therapy compared to no or minimal therapy in clinical trials (randomised and non-randomised)? Respiratory diseases were defined as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), asthma, COVID-19, and community acquire pneumonia (CAP). Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, individuals with severe systemic comorbidities, less than 12 months follow up, and a sample size less than 10 individuals.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and selected manuscripts against the inclusion criteria. Disagreement was solved by consulting a third reviewer. Studies were classified according to the respiratory diseases investigated. Quality assessment was performed using various tools. Qualitative assessment was performed. Studies with sufficient data were included in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q test and I index. Fixed and random effects models were used. Effect sizes were presented as odds-ratios, relative risks, and hazard ratios.
RESULTS
75 studies were included. Meta-analyses revealed statistically significant positive associations of periodontitis with COPD and OSA (p < 0.001) however no association for asthma. Four studies showed positive effects of periodontal treatment on COPD, asthma, and CAP.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; COVID-19; Periodontitis; Asthma; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 37188924
DOI: 10.1038/s41432-023-00899-z -
International Journal of Surgery... Aug 2023The incidence of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is nearly 1/5000 and patients with HSCR are usually treated through surgical intervention. Hirschsprung disease-associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The incidence of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is nearly 1/5000 and patients with HSCR are usually treated through surgical intervention. Hirschsprung disease-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) is a complication of HSCR with the highest morbidity and mortality in patients. The evidence on the risk factors for HAEC remains inconclusive to date.
METHODS
Four English databases and four Chinese databases were searched for relevant studies published until May 2022. The search retrieved 53 relevant studies. The retrieved studies were scored on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale by three researchers. Revman 5.4 software was employed for data synthesis and analysis. Stata 16 software was employed for sensitivity analysis and bias analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 53 articles were retrieved from the database search, which included 10 012 cases of HSCR and 2310 cases of HAEC. The systematic analysis revealed anastomotic stenosis or fistula [ I2 =66%, risk ratio (RR)=1.90, 95% CI 1.34-2.68, P <0.001], preoperative enterocolitis ( I2 =55%, RR=2.07, 95% CI 1.71-2.51, P <0.001), preoperative malnutrition ( I2 =0%, RR=1.96, 95% CI 1.52-2.53, P <0.001), preoperative respiratory infection or pneumonia ( I2 =0%, RR=2.37, 95% CI 1.91-2.93, P <0.001), postoperative ileus ( I2 =17%, RR=2.41, 95% CI 2.02-2.87, P <0.001), length of ganglionless segment greater than 30 cm ( I2 =0%, RR=3.64, 95% CI 2.43-5.48, P <0.001), preoperative hypoproteinemia ( I2 =0%, RR=1.91, 95% CI 1.44-2.54, P <0.001), and Down syndrome ( I2 =29%, RR=1.65, 95% CI 1.32-2.07, P <0.001) as the risk factors for postoperative HAEC. Short-segment HSCR ( I2 =46%, RR=0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.71, P <0.001) and transanal operation ( I2 =78%, RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96, P =0.03) were revealed as the protective factors against postoperative HAEC. Preoperative malnutrition ( I2 =35 % , RR=5.33, 95% CI 2.68-10.60, P <0.001), preoperative hypoproteinemia ( I2 =20%, RR=4.17, 95% CI 1.91-9.12, P <0.001), preoperative enterocolitis ( I2 =45%, RR=3.51, 95% CI 2.54-4.84, P <0.001), and preoperative respiratory infection or pneumonia ( I2 =0%, RR=7.20, 95% CI 4.00-12.94, P <0.001) were revealed as the risk factors for recurrent HAEC, while short-segment HSCR ( I2 =0%, RR=0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.76, P =0.005) was revealed as a protective factor against recurrent HAEC.
CONCLUSION
The present review delineated the multiple risk factors for HAEC, which could assist in preventing the development of HAEC.
Topics: Humans; Hirschsprung Disease; Enterocolitis; Risk Factors; Incidence; Morbidity
PubMed: 37288551
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000473