-
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2023Acute exacerbation (AE) is a devastating complication of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and leads to high mortality. This study aimed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Acute exacerbation (AE) is a devastating complication of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and leads to high mortality. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (AE-RA-ILD).
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline were searched through 8 February 2023. Two independent researchers selected eligible articles and extracted available data. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of studies used for meta-analysis. The incidence and prognosis of AE-RA-ILD were investigated. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated to explore the risk factors of AE in RA-ILD.
RESULTS
Twenty-one of 1,589 articles were eligible. A total of 385 patients with AE-RA-ILD, of whom 53.5% were male, were included. The frequency of AE in patients with RA-ILD ranged from 6.3 to 55.6%. The 1-year and 5-year AE incidences were 2.6-11.1% and 11-29.4%, respectively. The all-cause mortality rate of AE-RA-ILD was 12.6-27.9% at 30 days and 16.7-48.3% at 90 days. Age at RA diagnosis (WMD: 3.61, 95% CI: 0.22-7.01), male sex (OR: 1.60, 95% CI:1.16-2.21), smoking (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.08-2.08), lower forced vital capacity predicted (FVC%; WMD: -8.63, 95% CI: -14.68 to - 2.58), and definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.22) were the risk factors of AE-RA-ILD. Moreover, the use of corticosteroids, methotrexate, and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, was not associated with AE-RA-ILD.
CONCLUSION
AE-RA-ILD was not rare and had a poor prognosis. Age at RA diagnosis, male sex, smoking, lower FVC%, and definite UIP pattern increased the risk of AE-RA-ILD. The use of medications, especially methotrexate and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, may not be related to AE-RA-ILD.
REGISTRATION
CRD42023396772.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Incidence; Methotrexate; Risk Factors; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Prognosis; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; Antirheumatic Agents
PubMed: 37434169
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02532-2 -
Addiction (Abingdon, England) Nov 2023To determine effects of concurrent smoking and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use on reported heaviness of smoking, nicotine (cotinine) body fluid and exhaled air... (Review)
Review
AIMS
To determine effects of concurrent smoking and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use on reported heaviness of smoking, nicotine (cotinine) body fluid and exhaled air carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, which test interventions permitting concurrent NRT use and smoking and comparing, within participants, outcomes when smoking with those when smoking and using NRT concurrently. Measurements included reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD), body fluid cotinine and expired air CO concentrations.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis of nine showed that, compared with when solely smoking, fewer cigarettes were smoked daily when NRT was used (mean difference during concurrent smoking and NRT use, -2.06 CPD [95% CI = -3.06 to -1.07, P < 0.0001]). Meta-analysis of seven studies revealed a non-significant reduction in exhaled CO during concurrent smoking and NRT use (mean difference, -0.58 ppm [95% CI = -2.18 to 1.03, P = 0.48]), but in the three studies that tested NRT used in the lead-up to quitting (i.e. as preloading), a similar reduction in exhaled CO was statistically significant (mean difference, -2.54 ppm CO [95% CI = -4.14 to -0.95, P = 0.002]). Eleven studies reported cotinine concentrations, but meta-analysis was not possible because of data reporting heterogeneity; of these, seven reported lower cotinine concentrations with concurrent NRT use and smoking, four reported no differences, and none reported higher concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS
People who smoke and also use nicotine replacement therapy report smoking less heavily than people who solely smoke. When nicotine replacement therapy is used in the lead-up to quitting (preloading), this reported smoking reduction has been biochemically confirmed. There is no evidence that concurrent smoking and nicotine replacement therapy use result in greater nicotine exposure than solely smoking.
PubMed: 37394704
DOI: 10.1111/add.16279 -
JCO Precision Oncology Jan 2024Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Modifiable risk factors, including obesity, physical activity, alcohol intake,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Modifiable risk factors, including obesity, physical activity, alcohol intake, and smoking, are well-established in sporadic cancers but are less studied in Lynch syndrome.
METHODS
Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for cohort studies that investigated the association between modifiable risk factors and the risk of colorectal or endometrial cancer in people with Lynch syndrome. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for colorectal and endometrial cancers were pooled using a random effects model. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42022378462), and the meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 770 citations were reviewed. Eighteen studies were identified for qualitative synthesis, with seven colorectal cancer (CRC) studies eligible for meta-analysis. Obesity (HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.52 to 3.73]) was associated with increased CRC risk. There was no increased CRC risk associated with smoking (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.32]) or alcohol intake (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.81]). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and some dietary factors might increase risk of CRC although more studies are needed. In a qualitative synthesis of three endometrial cancer cohort studies, female hormonal risk factors and T2DM may affect the risk of endometrial cancer, but obesity was not associated with an increased risk.
CONCLUSION
Lifestyle recommendations related to weight and physical activity may also be relevant to cancer prevention for individuals with Lynch syndrome. Further high-quality prospective cohort studies, in particular, including endometrial cancer as an end point, are needed to inform evidence-based cancer prevention strategies in this high-risk population.
Topics: Female; Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endometrial Neoplasms; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38207227
DOI: 10.1200/PO.23.00196 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2024Smoking history is a heterogeneous situation for different populations, and numerous studies suggest that smoking cessation is conducive to reduce the mortality of lung... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Smoking history is a heterogeneous situation for different populations, and numerous studies suggest that smoking cessation is conducive to reduce the mortality of lung cancer. However, no quantitative meta-analysis regarding smoking cessation duration based on different populations has demonstrated it clearly.
METHODS
We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scoups) till February 2023. Eligible studies reported the association between lung cancer survival and duration of smoking cessation. Additionally, we stratified the study population according to whether they had lung cancer at the time they quit smoking. Studies were pooled with the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Out of the 11,361 potential studies initially identified, we included 24 studies involving 969,560 individuals in our analysis. Lung cancer mortality varied across two groups: general quitters and peri-diagnosis quitters. For general quitters, those who had quit smoking for less than 10 years exhibited an RR of 0.64 (95% CI [0.55-0.76]), while those who quit for 10-20 years had an RR of 0.33 (0.25-0.43), over 20 years had an RR of 0.16 (0.11-0.24), and never-smokers had an RR at 0.11 (0.07-0.15). Among peri-diagnosis quitters, the 1-year Overall Survival (OS) showed an RR of 0.80 (0.67-0.96), the 2-year OS had an RR of 0.89 (0.80-0.98), the 3-year OS had an RR of 0.93 (0.84-1.03), and the 5-year OS had an RR of 0.85 (0.76-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS
Earlier and longer smoking cessation is associated with reduced lung cancer mortality, no matter in which cessation stage for two different populations.
Topics: Humans; Smoking Cessation; Lung Neoplasms; Smoking; Tobacco Smoking
PubMed: 38462148
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104323 -
Journal of Evidence-based Medicine Dec 2023To investigate the most effective and best-tolerated drugs for treating diseased smokers. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the most effective and best-tolerated drugs for treating diseased smokers.
METHODS
Eight databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving different pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in disease patients (January 2023). Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.1 software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool assessed the risk of bias, and confidence in evidence was assessed using CINeMA.
RESULTS
A total of 60 RCTs involving 13,009 patients of 12 disease categories were included. All trials reported 13 interventions, resulting in 78 comparisons. Network meta-analysis showed that varenicline (OR = 2.30, 95% CI (1.77, 3.00)) and bupropion (OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.29, 2.11)) showed favorable abstinence effects compared to placebo in the cardiovascular disease population. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) had better withdrawal advantages than placebo (OR = 11.18, 95% CI (2.25, 55.54)) in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) population. Some combination treatments showed better results than monotherapy, such as bupropion + NRT was superior to bupropion (OR = 8.45, 95% CI (1.84, 38.89)) and NRT (OR = 4.98, 95% CI (1.25, 19.78)) in mental illness population. The final surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that bupropion + NRT achieved the best smoking cessation effect. Overall confidence in the evidence was low. In a comparison of drugs, the results showed that bupropion + NRT had the best safety.
CONCLUSIONS
Most interventions show the benefit of quitting smoking compared with placebo, including monotherapy and combination therapy. Moreover, varenicline or bupropion combined with NRT is superior to some monotherapies.
Topics: Humans; Smoking Cessation; Bupropion; Varenicline; Nicotinic Agonists; Smokers; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 38102895
DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12570 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Aug 2023A comprehensive appraisal of published meta-analyses incorporating Mendelian randomization studies was performed to map the different risk factors and assess the...
INTRODUCTION
A comprehensive appraisal of published meta-analyses incorporating Mendelian randomization studies was performed to map the different risk factors and assess the causality for lung cancer.
METHODS
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and interventional studies were reviewed based on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Mendelian randomization analyses were conducted to validate the causal associations of those various exposures with lung cancer using summary statistics from 10 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) consortia and other GWAS databases in MR-Base platform.
RESULTS
In the review of meta-analyses, 105 risk factors associated with lung cancer were identified from 93 articles. It was found that 72 risk factors were nominally significant (P < 0.05) associated with lung cancer. Mendelian randomization analyses were performed to analyze 36 exposures based on 551 SNPs and 4,944,052 individuals, finding that 3 exposures had a consistent risk/protective effect on lung cancer with the results of the meta-analysis. In Mendelian randomization anaylses, smoking (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.75; P = 0.001) and blood copper (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29; P = 0.039) significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer, whereas aspirin use (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89; P = 0.006) showed protective effects.
CONCLUSION
This study mapped putative associations of risk factors for lung cancer, revealing the causal hazard effect of smoking, blood copper, and the protective effect of aspirin use in the development of lung cancer.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY
This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020159082).
Topics: Humans; Copper; Genome-Wide Association Study; Lung Neoplasms; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Risk Factors; Smoking; Meta-Analysis as Topic
PubMed: 36809502
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04606-4 -
European Journal of Preventive... Jun 2024The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively summarize the evidence on the association between Life Simple's 7 (LS7) and multiple cardiovascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively summarize the evidence on the association between Life Simple's 7 (LS7) and multiple cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs).
METHODS AND RESULTS
EMBASE and PubMed were searched from January 2010 to March 2022 for observational studies that investigated the association between ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) with CVD or CMD outcomes in an adult population. Two reviewers independently selected studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Data were analysed with a random-effects meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included 59 studies (1 881 382 participants). Participants with ideal CVH had a considerably lower risk of a variety of CVDs and CMDs as compared with those with poor CVH, varying from 40% lower risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) {hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.83]} to 82% lower risk for myocardial infarction [HR = 0.18 (95% CI 0.12-0.28)]. Intermediate CVH was associated with 27-57% lower risk in CVDs and CMDs compared with poor CVH, with the highest hazard for AF [HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.59-0.91)] and the lowest hazard for peripheral arterial disease [HR = 0.43 (95% CI 0.30-0.60)].
CONCLUSION
Ideal and moderate CVH were associated with a lower incidence of CVDs and CMDs than poor CVH. Life Simple's 7 holds significant potential for promoting overall CVH and thereby contributing to the prevention of CVDs.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Risk Assessment; Health Status; Risk Reduction Behavior; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Healthy Lifestyle; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Aged; Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
PubMed: 38149986
DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad405 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Dec 2023The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are controversial. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the causality among gallstones, cholecystectomy and pancreatic cancer. Cohort studies published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2023 were retrieved. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using a random-effects model. We screened 1391 articles and included 16 studies. Gallstones were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer ( P = 0.082), with only the Asian population ( P = 0.011) showing an increased risk in the subgroup analysis. A markedly higher risk of pancreatic cancer was observed among patients with cholecystectomy (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41; P = 0.004; I 2 = 74.4%). The association remained significant in the Asian population ( P = 0.004), in the subgroup analyses stratified by sex, lag period, and time interval since cholecystectomy, and when the models were adjusted for diabetes, smoking, and BMI. Interestingly, cholecystectomy due to gallstones (RR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48; P < 0.001; I 2 = 30.8%), rather than for unspecified reasons ( P = 0.116), markedly increased the risk of pancreatic cancer. In conclusion, cholecystectomy due to gallstones, rather than gallstone formation, conferred an increased risk for pancreatic cancer. There was a higher risk for the Asian population for both gallstones and cholecystectomy.
Topics: Humans; Gallstones; Cholecystectomy; Cohort Studies; Risk; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37823406
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002652 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and is associated with a poor prognosis.
BACKGROUND
Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and is associated with a poor prognosis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the prevalence and risk factors of malnutrition in patients with PTB.
METHODS
Studies related to the prevalence and risk factors of malnutrition in patients with PTB were searched through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1990 to August 2022, and two researchers screened the literature, evaluated the quality, and extracted data independently. A random-effects model was used to pool the effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression analysis, and sensitivity analysis were further performed to identify sources of heterogeneity and evaluate the stability of the results. Publication bias was assessed by Doi plot, Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) asymmetry index, funnel plot, and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 53 studies involving 48, 598 participants were identified in this study. The prevalence of malnutrition was 48.0% (95% CI, 40.9-55.2%). Subgroup analysis revealed that malnutrition was more common among male gender (52.3%), bacterial positivity (55.9%), family size over 4 (54.5%), drug resistance (44.1%), residing in rural areas (51.2%), HIV infection (51.5%), Asian (51.5%), and African (54.5%) background. The prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition was 21.4%, 14.0%, and 29.4%, respectively. Bacterial positivity (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.26-3.41), low income (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.11-1.86), and residing in rural areas (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.20-1.89) were risk factors of malnutrition in patients with PTB. However, male (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.85-1.26) and drinking (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.69) were not risk factors for malnutrition in patients with PTB. Due to the instability of sensitivity analysis, HIV infection, age, family size, smoking, and pulmonary cavity need to be reevaluated. Meta-regression suggested that sample size was a source of heterogeneity of prevalence. The Doi plot and LFK asymmetry index (LFK = 3.87) indicated the presence of publication bias for prevalence, and the funnel plot and Egger's test showed no publication bias for risk factors.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis indicated that malnutrition was prevalent in patients with PTB, and bacterial positivity, low income, and those residing in rural areas were risk factors for malnutrition. Therefore, clinical workers should pay attention to screening the nutritional status of patients with PTB and identifying the risk factors to reduce the incidence of malnutrition and provide nutritional interventions early to improve the prognosis in patients with PTB.
PubMed: 37636566
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1173619 -
Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official... Aug 2023Peer support has been recommended to promote smoking cessation, but results from prior meta-analyses have not established its efficacy. We conducted a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Peer support has been recommended to promote smoking cessation, but results from prior meta-analyses have not established its efficacy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess current evidence and identify potential modifiers of efficacy.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of peer-support interventions with a smoking cessation outcome were identified in January 2022 from PubMed and references listed in identified studies. The meta-analysis outcome measure was mean risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for abstinence at the longest follow-up timepoint between 3 and 9 months from baseline. Potential modifiers tested were peer smoking status (former, current, or unknown), follow-up timepoint, abstinence measure, and cumulative engagement time between peers and smokers ("dose"). Studies were assessed for risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
RESULTS
We identified 16 trials, which varied in abstinence effect size (RR 0.61-3.07), sample size (23-2121), dose (41-207 minutes), and follow-up timepoint (<1-15 months). Across 15 trials with follow-up between 3 and 9 months (N = 8573 participants; 4565 intervention, 4008 control), the pooled Mantel-Haenszel RR was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.11-1.62). Effect sizes were greatest among interventions with formerly smoking peers (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.74; five trials). We found positive effects for follow-up timepoints ≥3 months but no effect of intervention dose. The overall quality of evidence was deemed "very low."
CONCLUSIONS
Peer-support interventions increased smoking abstinence. There remains a lack of consensus about how to define a peer. Intervention features such as peer smoking status appear to have explanatory power. Additional high-quality and more comparable trials are needed.
IMPLICATIONS
This study reviewed the latest evidence from randomized controlled trials and found that peer-support interventions enhance smoking cessation. Efficacy varies with key intervention features such as peer smoking status and follow-up timepoint, which may be used to facilitate development of more effective peer-support interventions. Future trials and reviews would benefit from careful consideration and clear reporting of peer smoking status, length of follow-up, abstinence measures, and intervention dose.
Topics: Humans; Smoking Cessation; Smoking; Counseling; Smoking Prevention; Tobacco Use Cessation Devices; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37042206
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad059