-
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and... Aug 2023To compare the difference in outcomes in laparoscopic large hiatus hernia (LHH) repair using suture-based and mesh-based repair techniques. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To compare the difference in outcomes in laparoscopic large hiatus hernia (LHH) repair using suture-based and mesh-based repair techniques.
METHODS
A systematic search of articles was conducted in PubMed, Medline and Embase using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing recurrences and reoperations in those patients with large hiatal hernia repair (> 30% stomach in the chest, > 5 cm hiatal defect, hiatal surface area > 10 cm) who had mesh vs no mesh were assessed quantitatively. The impact of mesh on significant intraoperative/postoperative surgical complications was qualitatively assessed.
RESULTS
Pooled data included six randomized controlled trials and thirteen observational studies with 1670 patients (824 with no mesh, 846 with mesh). There was a significant reduction in the total recurrence rate with mesh (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.80, p = 0.007). Mesh use did not cause significant reduction in recurrences > 2 cm (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52-1.67, p = 0.83) or in reoperation rates (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09). None of the specific meshes assessed were found to be superior in the reduction of recurrence or reoperation rates. Cases of mesh erosion with eventual foregut resection were noted and were associated with synthetic meshes only.
CONCLUSION
Mesh reinforcement seemed protective against total recurrence in LHH although this has to be interpreted with caution given the level of heterogeneity introduced by the inclusion of observational studies in the analysis. There was no significant reduction in large recurrences (> 2 cm) or reoperation rate. If the synthetic mesh is to be used patients need to be informed of the risk of mesh erosion.
Topics: Humans; Hernia, Hiatal; Herniorrhaphy; Laparoscopy; Surgical Mesh; Suture Techniques; Recurrence; Postoperative Complications; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37010656
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2 -
Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica... Sep 2023Although conservative treatment of calcific tendinopathy has a high success rate, arthroscopic excision of the calcific deposit is occasionally necessary. Controversy... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Although conservative treatment of calcific tendinopathy has a high success rate, arthroscopic excision of the calcific deposit is occasionally necessary. Controversy exists as to whether the remaining rotator cuff defect can be left in situ or should be repaired to achieve better functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare the results of debridement versus debridement combined with suturing in arthroscopic surgery for calcific tendinopathy.
METHODOLOGY
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2023 for articles on arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinopathy. Functional outcomes (VAS, ASES, UCLA, and Constant) and the number of complications were analyzed. The effect size was calculated using Cohen's d-index.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included, including a total of 1172 patients aged between 44.7 and 55 years. The mean follow-up time was 24.7 months. The combined ES estimates for the total score of the VAS, ASES, UCLA, and Constant scales were very strong (>1.0) for both debridement and combined debridement with suture. The ES estimates for the number of total complications were 1.75 (95% CI: 0.08-3.43, I = 0%) for debridement and 9.07 (95% CI: -0.03-18.17, I = 50.4%) for combined debridement with suture.
CONCLUSIONS
Both arthroscopic procedures improve the total score significantly on the EVA, ASES, UCLA, and Constant scales. However, a higher proportion of complications was observed in the group that performed suturing. In this regard, we must consider whether it is really necessary to repair all partial tears after the calcified deposits removal.
PubMed: 37573942
DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.08.015 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2024Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a respiratory illness that is associated with recurrent episodes of either partial or full obstruction of the upper airways,... (Review)
Review
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a respiratory illness that is associated with recurrent episodes of either partial or full obstruction of the upper airways, or apnea, among other sleep disorders. This study aims to analyze, through a literature review, whether orthodontic treatment can be a good treatment strategy for this type of disorder. We performed a database search on Scopus, Web of Science, and Pubmed with the keywords OSA(S) and orthodontics to select the papers under evaluation. The criteria for inclusion were articles related to OSA(S) children undergoing an orthodontic treatment and clinical studies or case series, excluding systematic reviews, narrative reviews, meta-analyses, adult studies, animal models, and in vitro studies. The screening phase ended with the selection of 16 publications for this work. RME, or rapid maxillary expansion, turned out to be the preferred orthodontic treatment in cases of pediatric OSAS. The goal of this orthodontic procedure is to increase the hard palate's transverse diameter by reopening the mid-palatal suture. Children with maxillary contraction and dental malocclusion typically undergo such a procedure and have excellent results. However, OSAS is a multifactorial disorder; it does not seem related to the morphology of the oral cavity, and therefore, it is not always possible to cope with this problem exclusively through orthodontic treatment.
PubMed: 38337805
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030289 -
General Dentistry 2023The use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for surgical wound closure has become increasingly popular in recent years and has shown efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this...
The use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for surgical wound closure has become increasingly popular in recent years and has shown efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of cyanoacrylate adhesive as a substitute for conventional suture placement after extraction of impacted third molars. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and gray literature databases were searched for randomized or controlled prospective clinical trials published up to October 2022 that compared the use of cyanoacrylate adhesive and conventional silk suture in third molar surgeries. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using the RoB 2 tool (revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials). Five randomized clinical trials with a total of 236 patients were included. The most commonly evaluated outcomes were pain and bleeding. The type of adhesive used varied and included ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate, isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate, and a mixture of n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. Compared with 3-0 silk suture, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive resulted in lower levels of postoperative pain in 3 studies and lower rates of bleeding in all 5 studies. Thus, cyanoacrylate can be a good substitute for silk sutures for wound closure in intraoral surgeries.
Topics: Humans; Tissue Adhesives; Molar, Third; Prospective Studies; Cyanoacrylates; Sutures; Silk; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37595079
DOI: No ID Found -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2024While the biomechanical properties of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) have been well studied, there is no comprehensive summary of the biomechanics of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
While the biomechanical properties of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) have been well studied, there is no comprehensive summary of the biomechanics of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR). An accurate understanding of the kinematic properties and functional behavior of current techniques used in MPFLR is imperative to restoring native biomechanics and improving outcomes.
PURPOSE
To provide a comprehensive review of the biomechanical effects of variations in MPFLR, specifically to determine the effect of graft choice and reconstruction technique.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria: (1) using ≥8 human cadaveric specimens, (2) reporting on a component of MPFLR, and (3) having multiple comparison groups.
RESULTS
Gracilis, semitendinosus, and quadriceps grafts demonstrated an ultimate load to failure (N) of 206.2, 102.8, and 190.0 to 205.0 and stiffness (N/mm) of 20.4, 8.5, and 21.4 to 33.6, respectively. Single-bundle and double-bundle techniques produced an ultimate load to failure (N) of 171 and 213 and stiffness (N/mm) of 13.9 and 17.1, respectively. Anchors placed centrally and superomedially in the patella produced the smallest degree of length changes throughout range of motion in contrast to anchors placed more proximally. Sutures, suture anchors, and transosseous tunnels all produced similar ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and elongation data. Femoral tunnel malpositioning resulted in significant increases in contact pressures, patellar translation, tilt, and graft tightening or loosening. Low tension grafts (2 N) most closely restored the patellofemoral contact pressures, translation, and tilt. Graft fixation angles variably and inconsistently altered contact pressures, and patellar translation and tilt.
CONCLUSION
Data demonstrated that placement of the MPFLR femoral tunnel at the Schöttle point is critical to success. Femoral tunnel diameter should be ≥2 mm greater than graft diameter to limit graft advancement and overtensioning. Graft fixation, regardless of graft choice or fixation angle, is optimally performed under minimal tension with patellar fixation at the medial and superomedial patella. However, lower fixation angles may reduce graft strain, and higher fixation angles may exacerbate anisometry and length changes if femoral tunnel placement is nonanatomic.
PubMed: 38855071
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241241537 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Aug 2023The optimal immobilization position of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair is controversial. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal immobilization position of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair is controversial.
PURPOSE
To compare the clinical outcomes and incidence of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between patients who used an abduction brace versus a sling for postoperative shoulder immobilization.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared abduction brace and sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using single-row, double-row, or suture-bridge fixation. Clinical scores, pain severity, and retear rates were compared between patients with abduction brace versus sling immobilization.
RESULTS
Of 1572 retrieved studies, 4 RCTs with a total of 224 patients (112 patients with abduction brace and 112 patients with sling) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 3 of the RCTs were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). There were no significant differences between the abduction brace and sling immobilization groups in the Constant-Murley score at 3 months (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.26 [95% CI, -1.30 to 1.83]; = .74; = 84%), 6 months (WMD, 1.91 [95% CI, -0.17 to 4.00]; = .07; = 85%), and 12 months (WMD, 0.55 [95% CI, -1.37 to 2.47]; = .57; = 0%); the visual analog scale score for pain at 1 week (WMD, 0.10 [95% CI, -0.20 to 0.41]; = .51; = 0%), 3 weeks (WMD, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.00]; = .29; = 0%), 6 weeks (WMD, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.30 to 0.06]; = .20; = 0%), and 12 weeks (WMD, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.27 to 0.02]; = .09; = 18%); or the retear rate at 3 months (risk ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.09 to 4.23]; = .64; = 0.47%) postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review demonstrated a lack of significant differences between the abduction brace and sling immobilization groups regarding postoperative clinical scores, pain severity, and tendon healing.
PubMed: 37538535
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231185368 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the best treatment option. The aims of the present systematic review were (1) to analyze the current literature and describe the outcomes of surgical treatment for TEF; and (2) to compare the outcomes of different surgical options using arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) with sutures or screws and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
METHODS
A search was carried out with Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane. Key terms were used "tibial" AND "eminence" or "spine" or "intercondylar" AND "paediatric" or "children" AND "fracture" or "avulsion" AND "treatment". Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates were evaluated for each study. Means/standard deviation and sum/percentage were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square or t-student tests were applied. A -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
ORIF showed superior clinical outcomes (Tegner ( < 0.05) and Lysholm ( < 0.001) scores) relative to ARIF and a lower incidence of arthrofibrosis ( < 0.05) and implant removal ( < 0.01). The Tegner, IKDC, and Lysholm scores showed statistically significant superior results following arthroscopic sutures compared to arthroscopic screws ( < 0.001). The incidence of arthrofibrosis was higher after arthroscopic sutures ( < 0.05), the implant removal was higher after screw fixation ( < 0.001) Conclusions: Better clinical results with low complication rates were achieved with ORIF surgery rather than ARIF; arthroscopic suture fixation resulted in higher clinical results compared to arthroscopic screw fixation and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications.
PubMed: 37628378
DOI: 10.3390/children10081379 -
Cureus Jul 2023Triceps tendon avulsion is a rare but debilitating condition and the least frequent of all tendon injuries, but it is receiving increasing attention in the literature.... (Review)
Review
Triceps tendon avulsion is a rare but debilitating condition and the least frequent of all tendon injuries, but it is receiving increasing attention in the literature. The most common mechanism of injury is resisted extension, which is typically seen in a fall onto an extended hand. Such injuries are easily overlooked and should be considered a differential diagnosis in all patients who describe pain and swelling at the posterior aspect of the elbow following a traumatic event. Non-operative management is the general principle for partial rupture as opposed to a variety of surgical treatments for a complete avulsion. The goal of this meta-analysis is to analyse the current literature on triceps avulsion and provide a detailed overview of the occurrence, diagnosis, treatment options and outcomes, comparison of various repair techniques, and consequences of this injury.
PubMed: 37559858
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41584 -
Diseases of the Esophagus : Official... Jul 2023Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (HHR) and fundoplication is a common low risk procedure providing excellent control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and restoring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
What works best in hiatus hernia repair, sutures alone, absorbable mesh or non-absorbable mesh? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (HHR) and fundoplication is a common low risk procedure providing excellent control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and restoring of normal anatomy at the hiatus. HHR may fail, however, resulting in hiatus hernia (HH) recurrence, and the use of tension-free mesh-augmented hernioplasty has been proposed to reduce recurrence. Previous research on this topic has been heterogeneous, including study methods, mesh type used and technique performed. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were carried out. An electronic systematic research was carried out using 'PUBMED', 'EMBASE', 'Medline (OVID)' and 'Web of Science', of articles identifying HHR with suture cruroplasty, non-absorbable mesh (NAM) and absorbable mesh (AM) reinforcement. Eight RCTs with 766 patients were evaluated. NAM had significantly (P < 0.05) lower early recurrence rates (OR: 0.225, 95% CI 0.0342, 0.871) compared with suture repair alone; however, no differences in late recurrences were evident. For AM, no difference in early (0.508, 95% CI 0.0605, 4.81) or late (1.07. 95% CI 0.116, 11.4) recurrence rates were evident compared with the suture only group. Major complication rates were similar in all groups. NAM reinforcement significantly reduced early HH recurrence when compared with sutured cruroplasty alone; however, late recurrence rates were similar with all techniques. Given the limited data in comparing AM with NAM, this study was unable to conclude which composition was significant. We emphasize caution when interpreting small sample size RCTs, and recommend more research with larger randomized studies.
Topics: Humans; Herniorrhaphy; Treatment Outcome; Surgical Mesh; Network Meta-Analysis; Laparoscopy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Hernia, Hiatal; Sutures; Recurrence
PubMed: 36563005
DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac101 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Oct 2023Although craniosynostoses involving the major sutures have been well described, the frequency of isolated minor suture craniosynostoses is much lower. Squamosal...
BACKGROUND
Although craniosynostoses involving the major sutures have been well described, the frequency of isolated minor suture craniosynostoses is much lower. Squamosal craniosynostosis (SQS) is a rare form of cranial synostosis, and the paucity of literature has made the creation of a standardized treatment plan difficult. We present a systematic review of the literature on isolated SQS to identify disease characteristics that lead to a need for operative intervention and to delineate patterns in surgical management.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE and the key words "squamosal AND craniosynostosis," "squamous AND craniosynostosis," "squamosal craniosynostosis, "squamosal suture craniosynostosis," and "isolated squamosal craniosynostosis." Only human studies that described presentation and management of SQS were included. A blinded, 2-reviewer analysis of the articles was performed. Data collected included patient and disease characteristics, imaging workup, and treatment specifics, which were analyzed by descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 19 studies examining 119 patients with SQS were reviewed, with 97 (82%) multisutural cases and 22 isolated cases (18%). Of the isolated cases, 6 (27%) required surgical craniosynostosis repair, of which 1 (17%) had unilateral sutural involvement and 5 (83%) had bilateral involvement. Of the patients with isolated SQS, 7 (32%) had a congenital syndrome and comprised 33% of patients who required surgical intervention. The nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who required surgery presented with a wide array of phenotypic findings; 3 patients underwent some form of cranial vault remodeling, whereas 1 patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt only. Of the 4 nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who underwent surgical repair, half required operative intervention because of elevated intracranial pressure and the other half because of dysmorphic head shape.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this updated systematic review suggest a trend toward surgical management in bilateral SQS versus unilateral SQS, and that patients with isolated SQS, previously considered to be a nonsurgical finding, should be carefully monitored, as there remains risk of increased intracranial pressure. Pooled systematic review data suggest isolated SQS has a 27% operative intervention rate, with the presence of coexisting syndromic diagnoses increasing that risk.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Craniosynostoses; Skull; Cranial Sutures; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37553899
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003642