-
Annals of Plastic Surgery Oct 2023Although craniosynostoses involving the major sutures have been well described, the frequency of isolated minor suture craniosynostoses is much lower. Squamosal...
BACKGROUND
Although craniosynostoses involving the major sutures have been well described, the frequency of isolated minor suture craniosynostoses is much lower. Squamosal craniosynostosis (SQS) is a rare form of cranial synostosis, and the paucity of literature has made the creation of a standardized treatment plan difficult. We present a systematic review of the literature on isolated SQS to identify disease characteristics that lead to a need for operative intervention and to delineate patterns in surgical management.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE and the key words "squamosal AND craniosynostosis," "squamous AND craniosynostosis," "squamosal craniosynostosis, "squamosal suture craniosynostosis," and "isolated squamosal craniosynostosis." Only human studies that described presentation and management of SQS were included. A blinded, 2-reviewer analysis of the articles was performed. Data collected included patient and disease characteristics, imaging workup, and treatment specifics, which were analyzed by descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 19 studies examining 119 patients with SQS were reviewed, with 97 (82%) multisutural cases and 22 isolated cases (18%). Of the isolated cases, 6 (27%) required surgical craniosynostosis repair, of which 1 (17%) had unilateral sutural involvement and 5 (83%) had bilateral involvement. Of the patients with isolated SQS, 7 (32%) had a congenital syndrome and comprised 33% of patients who required surgical intervention. The nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who required surgery presented with a wide array of phenotypic findings; 3 patients underwent some form of cranial vault remodeling, whereas 1 patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt only. Of the 4 nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who underwent surgical repair, half required operative intervention because of elevated intracranial pressure and the other half because of dysmorphic head shape.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this updated systematic review suggest a trend toward surgical management in bilateral SQS versus unilateral SQS, and that patients with isolated SQS, previously considered to be a nonsurgical finding, should be carefully monitored, as there remains risk of increased intracranial pressure. Pooled systematic review data suggest isolated SQS has a 27% operative intervention rate, with the presence of coexisting syndromic diagnoses increasing that risk.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Craniosynostoses; Skull; Cranial Sutures; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37553899
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003642 -
BioMed Research International 2023Pancreatic trauma is an uncommon injury that occurs usually in a young population and is frequently overlooked and not readily appreciated on initial examination.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic trauma is an uncommon injury that occurs usually in a young population and is frequently overlooked and not readily appreciated on initial examination. Nowadays, the diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma are still controversial, and there is no gold standard for the treatment. The aim of this study is to describe our experience in the management of blunt pancreatic trauma with a laparoscopic approach and review the literature on laparoscopic management of pancreatic trauma.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed, and 40 cases were reported and analysed; 10 cases were excluded because the complete data were not retrievable. We also reported our experience with the case of an 18-year-old male diagnosed with a deep laceration of the pancreas between body and tail, involving the main pancreatic duct, and with a concomitant hematoma. The patient underwent exploratory laparoscopy with abdominal toilet, necrosectomy, and suture of main pancreatic duct; the total blood loss was less than 200 ml, and the total operative time was 180 minutes. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 6th postoperative day.
RESULTS
30 patients with pancreatic trauma, 10 adults and 20 pediatrics (mean age 28.2 years and 10.5 years), underwent a total laparoscopic approach: 2 distal pancreatic-splenectomy, 22 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, and 6 laparoscopic drainage. The mean operative time for the adult and pediatric populations was 160.6 and 214.5 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 400 ml and 75 ml, and the mean hospital stay was 14.9 and 9 days, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic management for pancreatic trauma can be considered feasible and safe when performed by an experienced laparoscopic pancreatic team, and in such a setting, it can be considered a viable alternative to open surgery, offering the well-known benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Child; Adolescent; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Diseases; Spleen; Laparoscopy; Abdominal Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37810623
DOI: 10.1155/2023/9296570 -
Journal of Orthopaedics Sep 2024The All-Inside PCL Reconstruction is a surgical technique which overcomes some of the key challenges faced with traditional PCL Reconstruction, and is becoming more... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The All-Inside PCL Reconstruction is a surgical technique which overcomes some of the key challenges faced with traditional PCL Reconstruction, and is becoming more relevant as the rate of PCL reconstruction increases.The purpose of this study is to review the technical practices of the all-inside PCL reconstruction since it was first introduced, with respect to the various key components involved in the surgical technique, to provide more information to the surgeon of the various surgical options available in practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed by the authors in January 2023 as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify all studies outlining the all-inside surgical technique in the past decade. The predetermined eligibility criteria were applied in the screening of the literature in Pubmed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included in the final review, 9 technical studies, 2 case series, 2 book chapters and 1 review. An allograft was the preferred choice in 9 of the 14 studies. The semitendinosus was preferred when an autograft was chosen. Quadruple folding of the graft was the preferred configuration in 11 studies with the graft diameters from 8 to 12 mm and length ranging from 60 to 150 mm. The femur socket length ranged from 15 to 35 mm and the tibia socket length ranged from 20 to 70 mm. All the studies reported the use of at least 3 portals and up to 6 portals was also reported. 13 studies reported the graft docking first into tibia socket followed by the femoral socket. 7 studies reported the graft entry via the AM portal and 6 studies used a lateral portal. 9 studies used augmentation such as suture anchors (6 studies) and suture tape (3 studies). The 30° and 70° arthroscopic lenses were used alternatingly in 8 studies and fluoroscopy was utilized in 10 studies.
CONCLUSION
The current literature review of all-inside PCL reconstruction consisted mainly technical studies and more clinical outcomes studies are needed to determine its efficacy. It observed a trend to use an allograft, at least 3 portals and docking the graft in the tibia socket first. There is no obvious preference of portal for graft entry.
PubMed: 38646465
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.041 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Jan 2024To evaluate the literature on suture anchor (SA) usage for patellar tendon repair, summarize the overall biomechanical and clinical outcomes, and assess whether the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the literature on suture anchor (SA) usage for patellar tendon repair, summarize the overall biomechanical and clinical outcomes, and assess whether the cumulative research supports the adoption of this technique compared with transosseous (TO) repair.
METHODS
A systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. Multiple electronic databases were searched to identify studies focusing on surgical outcomes of patellar tendon repair with suture anchor usage. Cadaver and animal biomechanical studies, technical studies, and clinical studies were included.
RESULTS
A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria: 6 cadaver, 3 animal, 9 technical, and 11 clinical reports. Four of the 6 cadaver studies and 1 of the 2 animal studies found significantly less gap formation from SA than from TO repair. Average gap formation in human studies ranged from 0.9 to 4.1 mm in the SA group compared with 2.9 to 10.3 mm in TO groups. Load to failure was significantly stronger in 1 of 5 cadaver studies and 2 of 3 animal studies, with human studies SA load to failure ranging from 258 to 868 N and TO load to failure ranging from 287 to 763 N. There were 11 clinical studies that included 133 knees repaired using SA. Nine studies showed no difference between complication rate or risk for reoperation, where one study reported a significantly lower re-rupture rate after SA repair compared with TO repair.
CONCLUSIONS
SA repair is a viable option for patellar tendon repair and could have several advantages over TO repair. Multiple studies indicate that SA repair has less gap formation during biomechanical testing compared with TO repair in human cadaver and animal models. No differences in complications or revisions were found in the majority of clinical studies.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Both animal and human models suggest SA fixation has potential biomechanical benefits when compared with TO tunnels for patellar tendon repair, whereas clinical studies show no difference in complications and revisions postoperatively.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Patellar Ligament; Suture Anchors; Suture Techniques; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cadaver
PubMed: 37230184
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.016 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023Surgical knots are sequences of half-knots (H) or half-hitches (S), defined by their number of throws, by an opposite or similar rotation compared with the previous one,... (Review)
Review
Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Loop and Knot Security, Varying with the Suture and Sequences, Throws, Rotation and Destabilization of Half-Knots or Half-Hitches.
Surgical knots are sequences of half-knots (H) or half-hitches (S), defined by their number of throws, by an opposite or similar rotation compared with the previous one, and for half-hitches whether they are sliding (s) or blocking (b). Opposite rotation results in (more secure) symmetric (s) knots, similar rotation in asymmetric (a) knots, and changing the active and passive ends has the same effect as changing the rotation. Loop security is the force to keep tissue together after a first half-knot or sliding half-hitches. With polyfilament sutures, H2, H3, SSs, and SSsSsSs have a loop security of 10, 18, 28, and 48 Newton (N), respectively. With monofilament sutures, they are only 7, 16, 18, and 25 N. Since many knots can reorganize, the definition of knot security as the force at which the knot opens or the suture breaks should be replaced by the clinically more relevant percentage of clinically dangerous and insecure knots. Secure knots with polyfilament sutures require a minimum of four or five throws, but the risk of destabilization is high. With monofilament sutures, only two symmetric+4 asymmetric blocking half-hitches are secure. In conclusion, in gynecology and in open and laparoscopic surgery, half-hitch sequences are recommended because they are mandatory for monofilament sutures, adding flexibility for loop security with less risk of destabilization.
PubMed: 37834810
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196166 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Jan 2024This study aims to compare single-row suture-anchors (SA) versus transosseous arthroscopic (TO) technique in the treatment of patients with rotator cuff tears in terms... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This study aims to compare single-row suture-anchors (SA) versus transosseous arthroscopic (TO) technique in the treatment of patients with rotator cuff tears in terms of clinical structural outcomes at atleast 24 months of follow-up.
METHODS
The systematic review was performed according to "PRISMA guidelines" (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses), in order to identify all the studies comparing clinical, both subjective and objective, outcomes with 24 months follow-up minimum in patients undergoing arthroscopic RC repair with the SR and TO technique. OVID-MEDLINE®, Cochrane, SCOPUS and PubMed were searched from January 2010 to October 2022 to identify relevant studies, using the following key words, that were combined together to achieve maximum search strategy sensitivity: "Rotator cuff tear" OR "repair" OR "shoulder" OR "reconstruction" OR "suture" OR "arthroscopic" OR "single-row" OR "transosseous".
RESULTS
Six papers were finally analyzed in this meta-analysis. The weighted mean difference on Constant scores and for ASES for studies considering suture-anchors (SA) group showed good outcomes. The weighted mean difference of Constant scores and of ASES for TO (transosseous) group showed good outcomes. The weighted mean difference of CONSTANT for TO versus SA groups showed no differences in the outcomes of SA and TO techniques for the repair of Rotator Cuff Tears at minimum 24 months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
The Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair technique and SA (suture-anchor) technique both lead to significant short-term improvement and satisfactory subjective outcome scores with low complication/failure rates. No differences were found in the final outcome between the two techniques.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Rotator Cuff; Treatment Outcome; Suture Techniques; Shoulder; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 37561195
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03657-0 -
European Archives of... Sep 2023This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of multilevel and single level surgery, including barbed pharyngoplasties, in the treatment of obstructive... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of multilevel and single level surgery, including barbed pharyngoplasties, in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
METHODS
The study followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Ovid databases for studies evaluating the effect of barbed pharyngoplasties on adults with OSA. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included with pre- and post-treatment comparisons of sleep tests and self-reported clinical outcomes. Exclusion criteria were non-English studies, case reports, reviews, conference abstracts, letters, and pediatric studies. Successful surgery was classified using Sher's criteria.
RESULTS
The study selected a total of 1014 patients from 26 studies, 24 of which were longitudinal studies with 10 retrospective trials and 14 prospective studies. The average age of the patients was 46.9 years, with an average Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25.6 kg/m. Most of the patients were male (84.6%). The study included only palatal surgical techniques with barbed sutures, and patients who underwent cardio-respiratory monitoring and Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) before surgery. Mean Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) preoperative was 32.9/h, AHI postoperative was 11.9/h, and mean reduction of AHI was 62.3%. The most commonly adopted palatoplasty was Barbed Repositioning Pharyngoplasty (BRP) in 16 out of 26 studies, followed by its subsequent modifications in 3 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Barbed pharyngoplasties appear to be effective both on objective measurement and subjective scores. DISE represents a fundamental tool to assess uni-level or multilevel obstruction. When retro-palatal collapse is present, barbed pharyngoplasty appears to be effective. Barbed pharyngoplasties maintain their good results both in single level or multilevel surgery. Randomized clinical controlled trials with multi-center cooperation and long-term study are necessary.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Child; Middle Aged; Female; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Otolaryngologists; Pharynx; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Otolaryngology; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37227471
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08018-5 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Sep 2023Arthroscopic Bankart repair is the most common procedure in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Various repair techniques using suture anchors have been used to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
No difference in biomechanical properties of simple, horizontal mattress, and double row repair in Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.
BACKGROUND
Arthroscopic Bankart repair is the most common procedure in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Various repair techniques using suture anchors have been used to improve the strength of fixation and surgical outcomes in arthroscopic Bankart surgery. However, evidence regarding which method is superior is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis study was designed to compare the biomechanical results of simple versus horizontal mattress versus double-row mattress for Bankart repair.
METHODS
A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify comparative biomechanical studies comparing the simple, horizontal mattress, and double-row techniques commonly used in Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included the ultimate load to failure, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and mode of failure after the ultimate load. The methodological quality was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale for biomechanical studies.
RESULTS
Six biomechanical studies comprising 125 human cadavers were included in this systematic review. In biomechanical studies comparing simple and horizontal mattress repair and biomechanical studies comparing simple and double-row repair, there were no significant differences in the ultimate load to failure, stiffness, or cyclic displacement between the repair methods. The median QUACS scale was 11.5 with a range from 10 to 12, indicating a low risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
There was no biomechanically significant difference between the simple, horizontal mattress, and double-row methods in Bankart repair. Clinical evidence such as prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes according to the various repair methods.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review, Therapeutic level IV.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Prospective Studies; Shoulder Joint; Amputation, Surgical; Arthroplasty
PubMed: 37759194
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06864-2 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Apr 2024One of the most challenging tasks in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries is suturing. Knotless barbed sutures are intended to enable faster suturing and hemostasis. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
One of the most challenging tasks in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries is suturing. Knotless barbed sutures are intended to enable faster suturing and hemostasis. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of V-Loc barbed sutures (VBS) with conventional sutures (CS) in gynecological surgeries.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies published between 2010 and September 2021 comparing VBS to CS for OB/GYN procedures. All comparative studies were included. Primary analysis and subgroup analyses for the different surgery and suturing types were performed. Primary outcomes were operation time and suture time; secondary outcomes included post-operative complications, surgical site infections, estimated blood loss, length of stay, granulation tissue formation, and surgical difficulty. Results were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with a random effects model, and a sensitivity analysis for study quality, study size, and outlier results was performed. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022363187.
RESULTS
In total, 25 studies involving 4452 women undergoing hysterectomy, myomectomy, or excision of endometrioma. VBS were associated with a reduction in operation time (WMD - 17.08 min; 95% CI - 21.57, - 12.59), suture time (WMD - 5.39 min; 95% CI - 7.06, - 3.71), surgical site infection (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.09, 0.78), estimated blood loss (WMD - 44.91 ml; 95% CI - 66.01, - 23.81), granulation tissue formation (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.25, 0.89), and surgical difficulty (WMD - 1.98 VAS score; 95% CI - 2.83, - 1.13). No difference between VBS and CS was found regarding total postoperative complications or length of stay. Many of the outcomes showed high heterogeneity, likely due to the inclusion of different surgery types and comparators. Most results were shown to be robust in the sensitivity analysis except for the reduction in granulation tissue formation.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis indicates that V-Loc barbed sutures are safe and effective in gynecological surgeries as they reduce operation time, suture time, blood loss, infections, and surgical difficulty without increasing post-operative complications or length of stay compared to conventional sutures.
Topics: Humans; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Suture Techniques; Hysterectomy; Uterine Myomectomy; Sutures; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 38127141
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... May 2024To compare the 2 Latarjet fixation techniques-screw fixation (SF) versus suture button (SB) -for clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic outcomes. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
PURPOSE
To compare the 2 Latarjet fixation techniques-screw fixation (SF) versus suture button (SB) -for clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses guidelines using MEDLINE and Embase databases and was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Only comparative clinical and biomechanical studies of Latarjet with SF and SB were included. Studies were appraised using the Methodical Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool.
RESULTS
Eleven studies met eligible criteria: 7 clinical studies (SB, n = 279; SF, n = 845) and 4 biomechanical. In total, 80.9% (SB) and 84.2% (SF) of patients were male. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 63.6 months. The overall recurrent instability rate for SB ranged from 0 to 8.3% and for SF ranged from 0 to 2.75%. Only one study demonstrated a greater recurrent instability rate with SB (P = .02). Overall SB complication rates ranged from 0 to 12.5% and SF ranged from 0 to 27%. Two studies reported greater complications and reoperations with SF related to hardware. Summary forest plots from 4 studies showed no significant difference in Walch Duplay score (mean difference, range -5.00 to 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI} -12.13 to 8.56], I inconsistency = 0%), Rowe score (mean difference, range -2.00 to 4.00 [95% CI -7.37 to 7.66], I inconsistency = 45%), and VAS for pain (mean difference, range -0.10 to 0.60 [95% CI -0.72 to 1.33], I inconsistency = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference between SB and SF in the postoperative range of motion. Radiologically, there was no significant difference in graft positioning and union at final follow-up, but graft resorption was greater in SF (range 25.2%-47.6%) compared with SB (range 10.1%-18.5%). Biomechanical studies showed no significant difference in maximum load to failure (SB, range 184-266 N vs SF, range 148-288 N).
CONCLUSIONS
Clinically, SB fixation demonstrated similar functional outcome and range of motion when compared with SF, with the potential benefit of lower rates of graft resorption and hardware-related complications. Biomechanically there was no difference in maximum load to failure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, systematic review of Level III and biomechanical studies.
Topics: Humans; Bone Screws; Suture Techniques; Bone Resorption; Treatment Outcome; Biomechanical Phenomena; Suture Anchors; Sutures; Male
PubMed: 37890545
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.021