Did you mean: 'metronomic chemotherapy'
-
JAMA Oncology Sep 2023In spite of the effectiveness of endocrine therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine, Cyclophosphamide, and Capecitabine vs Weekly Intravenous Paclitaxel in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results From the Phase 2 METEORA-II Randomized Clinical Trial.
IMPORTANCE
In spite of the effectiveness of endocrine therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2/neu])-negative (ER+/ERBB2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients eventually develop resistance, and eventually most will receive chemotherapy. The METEORA-II trial compared a metronomic all-oral treatment with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of the oral vinorelbine plus cyclophosphamide plus capecitabine (VEX) regimen vs weekly IV paclitaxel among patients with ER+/ERBB2- MBC who are candidates for chemotherapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This phase 2 randomized clinical trial including 140 women 18 years and older (randomized 1:1) with ER+/ERBB2- MBC was carried out from September 13, 2017, to January 14, 2021 at 15 centers in Italy. Eligible patients could have received 1 prior line of chemotherapy for MBC and/or 2 lines of endocrine therapy (including CDK4/6 inhibitors).
INTERVENTIONS
In 4-week cycles, patients received either metronomic oral VEX or weekly IV paclitaxel.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary end point was investigator-assessed time to treatment failure (TTF) defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the end of treatment (because of disease progression or lack of tolerability or because further trial treatment was declined). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (complete or partial response or stable disease lasting for at least 24 weeks).
RESULTS
In total, 133 patients received either VEX (n = 70) or paclitaxel (n = 63) in 4-weekly cycles. The median age was 61 (range, 30-80) years. The VEX treatment significantly prolonged TTF vs paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P = .008), median TTF was 8.3 (95% CI, 5.6-11.1) months for VEX vs 5.7 (95% CI, 4.1-6.1) months for paclitaxel, and the 12-month TTF was 34.3% for VEX vs 8.6% for paclitaxel. The median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI, 8.3-13.8) months vs 6.9 (95% CI, 5.4-10.1) months favoring VEX (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96, P = .03). The 12-month PFS was 43.5% for VEX vs 21.9% for paclitaxel. No difference in OS was found. The TF event for 55.6% of patients was progression of disease; for 23% it was AEs. More patients assigned to VEX had at least 1 grade 3 or 4 targeted adverse event (VEX, 42.9%; 95% CI, 31.1%-55.3% vs paclitaxel, 28.6%; 95% CI, 17.9%-41.3%), but essentially no alopecia.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
This randomized clinical trial found significantly prolonged TTF and PFS for oral VEX but no improvement in OS compared with intravenous paclitaxel, despite increased but still manageable toxic effects. The VEX regimen may provide more prolonged disease control than weekly paclitaxel for ER+/ERBB2- MBC.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954055.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Cyclophosphamide; Paclitaxel; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptors, Estrogen; Vinorelbine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37440239
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2150 -
Cancers Aug 2023Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of "maintaining" tumor complete remission. This... (Review)
Review
Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of "maintaining" tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% ( = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% ( = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions.
PubMed: 37568826
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15154012 -
JAMA Oncology Dec 2023Medulloblastoma recurrence in patients who have previously received irradiation has a dismal prognosis and lacks a standard salvage regimen.
IMPORTANCE
Medulloblastoma recurrence in patients who have previously received irradiation has a dismal prognosis and lacks a standard salvage regimen.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the response rate of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma recurrence using an antiangiogenic metronomic combinatorial approach (Medulloblastoma European Multitarget Metronomic Anti-Angiogenic Trial [MEMMAT]).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This phase 2, investigator-initiated, multicenter nonrandomized controlled trial assessed 40 patients with relapsed or refractory medulloblastoma without a ventriculoperitoneal shunt who were younger than 20 years at original diagnosis. Patients were enrolled between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2021.
INTERVENTIONS
Treatment consisted of daily oral thalidomide, fenofibrate, celecoxib, and alternating 21-day cycles of low-dose (metronomic) oral etoposide and cyclophosphamide, supplemented by intravenous bevacizumab and intraventricular therapy consisting of alternating etoposide and cytarabine.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary end point was response after 6 months of antiangiogenic metronomic therapy. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life. Adverse events were monitored to assess safety.
RESULTS
Of the 40 patients (median [range] age at treatment start, 10 [4-17] years; 25 [62.5%] male) prospectively enrolled, 23 (57.5%) achieved disease control after 6 months of treatment, with a response detected in 18 patients (45.0%). Median OS was 25.5 months (range, 10.9-40.0 months), and median PFS was 8.5 months (range, 1.7-15.4 months). Mean (SD) PFS at both 3 and 5 years was 24.6% (7.9%), while mean (SD) OS at 3 and 5 years was 43.6% (8.5%) and 22.6% (8.8%), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were evident based on molecular subgroup analysis or the number of prior recurrences. In patients demonstrating a response, mean (SD) overall 5-year PFS was 49.7% (14.3%), and for patients who remained progression free for the first 12 months of treatment, mean (SD) 5-year PFS was 66.7% (16.1%). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events included myelosuppression, infections, seizures, and headaches. One heavily pretreated patient with a third recurrence died of secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This feasible and well-tolerated MEMMAT combination regimen demonstrated promising activity in patients with previously irradiated recurrent medulloblastoma. Given these results, this predominantly oral, well-tolerated, and outpatient treatment warrants further evaluation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01356290.
Topics: Humans; Male; Child; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Female; Medulloblastoma; Etoposide; Quality of Life; Administration, Metronomic; Brain Neoplasms; Cerebellar Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37883081
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4437 -
Current Oncology Reports Apr 2024This review describes the most relevant studies found in the scientific literature regarding metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) in the geriatric oncology population to... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review describes the most relevant studies found in the scientific literature regarding metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) in the geriatric oncology population to support its use as a feasible treatment of care in the frail elderly patients.
RECENT FINDINGS
Recent years have seen a reevaluation of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs and MCT is an emerging schedule in phase II and III clinical trials. Ageing is one of the risk factors for the development of cancer, the incidence of whom increases dramatically in people who live longer. To date, standard oncological protocols involve chemotherapeutic drugs in short cycles of therapy at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Although these therapeutic regimens may be successful, they can cause important adverse drug reactions, especially in elderly or frail patients. MCT is a different modality of delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs (frequent low dose for prolonged time) and it looks at the overcoming of the limitations and disadvantages of MTD, in particular the toxicity aspect. We reviewed the experience of clinicians who have used MCT in clinical trials enrolling elderly patients with different cancer types.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 38448722
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01505-w -
Cancer Letters Nov 2023Translational research and the development of targeted therapies have transformed the therapeutic landscape in epithelial ovarian cancer over the last decade. However,...
Translational research and the development of targeted therapies have transformed the therapeutic landscape in epithelial ovarian cancer over the last decade. However, recurrent ovarian cancer continues to pose formidable challenges to therapeutic interventions, necessitating innovative strategies to optimize treatment outcomes. Current research focuses on the development of pharmaceuticals that target potential resistance pathways to DNA repair pathways. However, the cost and toxicity of some of these therapies are prohibitive and majority of patients lack access to clinical trials. Metronomic chemotherapy, characterized by the continuous administration of low doses of chemotherapeutic agents without long treatment breaks, has emerged as a promising approach with potential implications beyond recurrent setting. It acts primarily by inhibition of angiogenesis and activation of host immune system. We here review the mechanism of action of metronomic chemotherapy, as well as its current role, limitations, and avenues for further research in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Administration, Metronomic; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37923056
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216469 -
Cureus Dec 2023Treatment of locally advanced oral cancer requires multidisciplinary care, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which varies based on the stage of the... (Review)
Review
Treatment of locally advanced oral cancer requires multidisciplinary care, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which varies based on the stage of the disease, site of involvement, and surgical access. Oral cancer usually presents with an increased recurrence rate and potential for distant metastatic spread. It confers a poor prognosis with a 50% mortality rate after five years. Oral metronomic chemotherapy aims to achieve higher patient compliance due to its ease of administration, lower dosage, and lesser side effects than conventional IV regimens of platinum-based drugs. In this review, we have summarized the relevant literature to benefit the readers regarding the potential application of metronomic therapy in the management of oral cancer.
PubMed: 38169679
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49825 -
Cancer Letters Apr 2024Metronomic chemotherapy refers to the consistent and regular administration of low-dose chemotherapeutic agents over an extended period, with minimal or no extended... (Review)
Review
Metronomic chemotherapy refers to the consistent and regular administration of low-dose chemotherapeutic agents over an extended period, with minimal or no extended drug-free intervals. The effectiveness of metronomic chemotherapy is derived from its capacity to impede tumor angiogenesis and foster antitumor immune responses, rather than merely interrupting tumor cell mitosis. Metronomic chemotherapy has been applied in the treatment of neuroblastoma for decades, including patients with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma and relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. In the modern era of neuroblastoma treatment, metronomic chemotherapy remains a viable option for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed neuroblastoma patients without access to autologous stem cell transplantation or immunotherapy, especially in resource-limited regions. For relapsed or refractory patients, metronomic chemotherapy is a suitable alternative for individuals intolerant to intensified treatments or receiving palliative care. Cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vinca alkaloids, and celecoxib constitute the primary components of current metronomic chemotherapy. Given the need for additional research to determine the optimal regimen, comprehensive studies must be conducted to explore and establish standardized metronomic chemotherapy protocols. Additionally, investigating potential biomarkers and clinical prognostic factors is imperative for future advancements in this field.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Transplantation, Autologous; Neuroblastoma; Cyclophosphamide; Administration, Metronomic
PubMed: 38311055
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216617 -
Heliyon Feb 2024Cancer represents a significant global health and economic burden due to its high mortality rates. While effective in some instances, traditional chemotherapy often... (Review)
Review
Cancer represents a significant global health and economic burden due to its high mortality rates. While effective in some instances, traditional chemotherapy often falls short of entirely eradicating various types of cancer. It can cause severe side effects due to harm to healthy cells. Two therapeutic approaches have risen to the forefront to address these limitations: metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) and drug repurposing. Metronomic chemotherapy is an innovative approach that breaks from traditional models. It involves the administration of chemotherapeutic regimens at lower doses, without long drug-free intervals that have previously been a hallmark of such treatments. This method offers a significant reduction in side effects and improved disease management. Simultaneously, drug repurposing has gained considerable attraction in cancer treatment. This approach involves utilizing existing drugs, initially developed for other therapeutic purposes, as potential cancer treatments. The application of known drugs in a new context accelerates the timeline from laboratory to patient due to pre-existing safety and dosage data. The intersection of these two strategies gives rise to a novel therapeutic approach named 'Metronomics.' This approach encapsulates the benefits of both MCT and drug repurposing, leading to reduced toxicity, potential for oral administration, improved patient quality of life, accelerated clinical implementation, and enhanced affordability. Numerous clinical studies have endorsed the efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy with tolerable side effects, underlining the potential of Metronomics in better cancer management, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This review underscores the benefits and applications of metronomic chemotherapy and drug repurposing, specifically in the context of breast cancer, showcasing the promising results of pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, we acknowledge the necessity of additional clinical investigations to definitively establish the role of metronomic chemotherapy in conjunction with other treatments in comprehensive cancer management.
PubMed: 38314272
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24670 -
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology Mar 2024Thrombospondins (TSPs) have numerous different roles in cancer, regulating the behavior of cancer cells and non-neoplastic cells, and defining the responses of tumor... (Review)
Review
Thrombospondins (TSPs) have numerous different roles in cancer, regulating the behavior of cancer cells and non-neoplastic cells, and defining the responses of tumor cells to environmental changes, thorough their ability to orchestrate cellular and molecular interactions in the tumor microenvironment (TME). As a result of these activities, TSPs can also control drug delivery and activity, tumor response and resistance to therapies, with different outcomes depending on the nature of TSP-interacting cell types, receptors, and ligands, in a highly context-dependent manner. This review, focusing primarily on TSP-1, discusses the effects of TSPs on tumor response to chemotherapy, antiangiogenic, low-dose metronomic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, by analyzing TSP activity on different cell compartments - tumor cells, vascular endothelial cells and immune cells. We review evidence of the value of TSPs, specifically TSP-1 and TSP-2, as biomarkers of prognosis and tumor response to therapy. Finally, we examine possible approaches to develop TSP-based compounds as therapeutic tools to potentiate the efficacy of anticancer therapy.
Topics: Humans; Thrombospondin 1; Endothelial Cells; Thrombospondins; Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37414720
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.06.009 -
Cancer Letters Jul 2024Current methods of cancer therapy have demonstrated enormous potential in tumor inhibition. However, a high dosage regimen of chemotherapy results in various... (Review)
Review
Current methods of cancer therapy have demonstrated enormous potential in tumor inhibition. However, a high dosage regimen of chemotherapy results in various complications which affect the normal body cells. Tumor cells also develop resistance against the prescribed drugs in the whole treatment regimen increasing the risk of cancer relapse. Metronomic chemotherapy is a modern treatment method that involves administering drugs at low doses continuously, allowing the drug sufficient time to take its effect. This method ensures that the toxicity of the drugs is to a minimum in comparison to conventional chemotherapy. Nanoparticles have shown efficacy in delivering drugs to the tumor cells in various cancer therapies. Combining nanoparticles with metronomic chemotherapy can yield better treatment results. This combination stimulates the immune system, improving cancer cells recognition by immune cells. Evidence from clinical and pre-clinical trials supports the use of metronomic delivery for drug-loaded nanoparticles. This review focuses on the functionalization of nanoparticles for improved drug delivery and inhibition of tumor growth. It emphasizes the mechanisms of metronomic chemotherapy and its conjunction with nanotechnology. Additionally, it explores tumor progression and the current methods of chemotherapy. The challenges associated with nano-based metronomic chemotherapy are outlined, paving the way for prospects in this dynamic field.
Topics: Humans; Administration, Metronomic; Neoplasms; Nanoparticles; Antineoplastic Agents; Animals; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Carriers
PubMed: 38801886
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216990