-
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Sep 2023Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009....
INTRODUCTION
Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.
METHODS
The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.
RESULTS
Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICm or IAm).
SUMMARY
The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Topics: Female; Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Endometrial Neoplasms; Endometrium; Uterus; Carcinoma, Endometrioid
PubMed: 37593813
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e85 -
Advances in Anatomic Pathology Jul 2023A remarkable amount of new information has been generated on peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM), ranging from nomenclature changes, including the removal of "malignant" when...
A remarkable amount of new information has been generated on peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM), ranging from nomenclature changes, including the removal of "malignant" when referring to this neoplasm and the use of the term "tumor" rather than "mesothelioma" to designate the neoplasm formerly known as "well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma", to the acknowledgment that PeMs can be associated with tumor predisposition syndromes or germline mutations. Although the disease is still more frequently seen in caucasian males, PeM is not uncommon in women. In addition, it can represent a diagnostic challenge when it has an uncommon presentation (ie, paraneoplastic syndrome or incidental finding) or when it has confounding histologic features. Ancillary testing, including immunohistochemical stains, in situ hybridization for CDKN2A or NF2 , and molecular studies, in selected cases, allows its correct diagnosis. The molecular landscape of PeM is still a work in progress; however, some findings, such as ALK gene rearrangements and EWSR1/FUS-ATF1 fusions, are specifically seen in PeM of young patients. The biological behavior of PeM is variable; however, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have markedly improved the survival of patients affected by this disease.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Mesothelioma; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Germ-Line Mutation
PubMed: 36729766
DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000387 -
Annals of Surgery Jul 2023The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma treated in the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) phase 3 randomized controlled trial (STRASS cohort) and off-trial (STREXIT cohort) and to pool STRASS and STREXIT data to test the hypothesis that RT improves ARFS in patients with liposarcoma.
BACKGROUND
The STRASS trial did not show any difference in ARFS between patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy+surgery (RT+S) versus surgery alone (S).
METHODS
All consecutive adult patients not enrolled in STRASS and underwent curative-intent surgery for a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma with or without preoperative RT between 2012 and 2017 (STRASS recruiting period) among ten STRASS-recruiting centres formed the STREXIT cohort. The effect of RT in STREXIT was explored with a propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. Primary endpoint was ARFS defined as macroscopically incomplete resection or abdominal recurrence or death of any cause, whichever occurred first.
RESULTS
STRASS included 266 patients, STREXIT included 831 patients (727 after excluding patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, 202 after 1:1 PS-matching). The effect of RT on ARFS in STRASS and 1:1 PS-matched STREXIT cohorts, overall and in patients with liposarcoma, was similar. In the pooled cohort analysis, RT administration was associated with better ARFS in patients with liposarcoma [N=321, hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.89]. In particular, patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (G1-2 DDLPS, n=266) treated with RT+S had better ARFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) while patients with G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma had not. At the current follow-up, there was no association between RT and overall survival or distant metastases-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, preoperative RT was associated with better ARFS in patients with primary well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 DDLPS.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Sarcoma; Liposarcoma; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Retroperitoneal Space; Proportional Hazards Models; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 35833413
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005492 -
Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Oct 2023
Topics: Humans; Abdomen; Abdominal Muscles; Abdominal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37752356
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01947-1 -
Medicina Clinica Dec 2023
Topics: Humans; Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous
PubMed: 37423876
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.05.015 -
The Journal of the Royal College of... Sep 2023
Topics: Humans; Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; Peritoneal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37329264
DOI: 10.1177/14782715231179254 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology... Nov 2023
Topics: Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Leiomyoma; Diagnosis, Differential
PubMed: 37977722
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.12.002 -
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics 2023Mesotheliomas are tumors similar to, and probably derived from, mesothelial cells. They carry acquired chromosomal rearrangements, deletions affecting CDKN2A,...
BACKGROUND/AIM
Mesotheliomas are tumors similar to, and probably derived from, mesothelial cells. They carry acquired chromosomal rearrangements, deletions affecting CDKN2A, pathogenetic polymorphisms in NF2, and fusion genes which often contain the promiscuous EWSR1, FUS, and ALK as partner genes. Here, we report the cytogenomic results on two peritoneal mesotheliomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Both tumors were examined using G-banding with karyotyping and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). One of them was further investigated with RNA sequencing, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Sanger sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
RESULTS
In the first mesothelioma, the karyotype was 25∼26,X,+5,+7,+20[cp4]/50∼52,idemx2[cp7]/46,XX[2]. aCGH detected gains of chromosomes 5, 7, and 20 with retained heterozygosity on these chromosomes. In the second tumor, the karyotype was 46,XX,inv(10)(p11q25)[7]/46,XX[3]. aCGH did not detect any gains or losses and showed heterozygosity for all chromosomes. RNA sequencing, RT-PCR/Sanger sequencing, and FISH showed that the inv(10) fused MAP3K8 from 10p11 with ABLIM1 from 10q25. The MAP3K8::ABLIM1 chimera lacked exon 9 of MAP3K8.
CONCLUSION
Our data, together with information on previously described mesotheliomas, illustrate two pathogenetic mechanisms in peritoneal mesothelioma: One pathway is characterized by hyperhaploidy, but with retained disomies for chromosomes 5, 7, and 20; this may be particularly prevalent in biphasic mesotheliomas. The second pathway is characterized by rearrangements of MAP3K8 from which exon 9 of MAP3K8 is lost. The absence of exon 9 from oncogenetically rearranged MAP3K8 is a common theme in thyroid carcinoma, lung cancer, and spitzoid as well as other melanoma subtypes.
Topics: Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Comparative Genomic Hybridization; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Mesothelioma; Carcinogenesis; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Microfilament Proteins; LIM Domain Proteins
PubMed: 37400148
DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20388 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Apr 2024
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy; Peritoneal Neoplasms
PubMed: 38261129
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14858-6 -
Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Oct 2023Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are rare and are diagnosed in at least 0.13% of appendectomies in Germany, although significant underreporting is likely.... (Review)
Review
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are rare and are diagnosed in at least 0.13% of appendectomies in Germany, although significant underreporting is likely. Perforation of the tumors can result in abdominal mucinous collections, so-called pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). The challenge in the treatment of LAMN is the adequate approach to the incidental finding of these tumors. If a mucinous neoplasm is preoperatively suspected in cases of an acute condition, usually appendicitis, it must be weighed up whether a conservative approach is justifiable or whether immediate appendectomy is necessary. If this is the case, an intraoperative perforation of the appendix must be avoided and the complete abdominal cavity must be inspected for mucin deposits. If conservative treatment is possible, further treatment should take place at a specialized center. If the neoplasm is first found incidentally during surgery, perforation of the appendix should also be avoided and the entire abdominal cavity should be inspected for a PMP. If a PMP is present cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) should be performed in a specialized center. If LAMN are found during the postoperative histological work-up, it should be evaluated whether a perforation was present and mucin collections are noted in the surgical report. In the case of LAMN without evidence of a PMP, appendectomy is the adequate treatment. In cases of intra-abdominal mucinous collections, samples should be taken and further treatment should be performed at a center with sufficient expertise. An ileocecal resection or oncological hemicolectomy is not indicated. After adequate treatment, all patients should receive a follow-up using cross-sectional imaging (preferably magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) and determination of the tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125.
Topics: Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Incidental Findings; Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous
PubMed: 37378666
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01910-0