-
Cureus Aug 2023Osteoporosis affects a significant number of postmenopausal women in the United States. Screening is performed using clinical assessments and bone mineral density scans... (Review)
Review
Osteoporosis affects a significant number of postmenopausal women in the United States. Screening is performed using clinical assessments and bone mineral density scans via dual x-ray absorptiometry. Oral therapy is indicated to prevent pathologic fractures in those deemed at increased risk following screening. Bisphosphonates including alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate are currently first-line oral therapeutics in fracture prevention following the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Hormonal therapies include estrogen-containing therapies, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and other compounds that mimic the effects of estrogen such as tibolone. Lifestyle modifications such as supplementation and physical activity may also contribute to the prevention of osteoporosis and are used as adjuncts to therapy following diagnosis. These therapeutics are limited primarily by their adverse effects. Treatment regimens should be tailored based on significant risk factors demonstrated by patients, adverse effects, and clinical response to treatment. The most severe risk factors relevant to pharmacological selection involve hormone replacement therapies, where concern for venous thrombosis, coronary artery disease, breast, and uterine cancer exist. Bisphosphonates are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal discomfort which may be mitigated with proper administration. Although adverse effects exist, these medications have proven to be efficacious in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women. Fracture risk should be weighed against the risk of adverse events associated with each of the regimens, with clinical judgment dictating the treatment approach centered around patient goals and experiences.
PubMed: 37664395
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42870 -
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism Nov 2023Bisphosphonates (BPs) are medications widely used in clinical practice to treat osteoporosis and reduce fragility fractures. Its beneficial effects on bone tissue have... (Review)
Review
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are medications widely used in clinical practice to treat osteoporosis and reduce fragility fractures. Its beneficial effects on bone tissue have been consolidated in the literature for the last decades. They have a high affinity for bone hydroxyapatite crystals, and most bisphosphonates remain on the bone surface for a long period of time. Benefits of long-term use of BPs: Large and important trials (Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension and Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial) with extended use of alendronate (up to 10 years) and zoledronate (up to 6 years) evidenced significant gain of bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fracture risk reduction. Risks of long-term use of BPs: The extended use of antiresorptive therapy has drawn attention to two extremely rare, although severe, adverse events. That is, atypical femoral fracture and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw are more common in patients with high cumulative doses and longer duration of therapy. BPs have demonstrated safety and effectiveness throughout the years and evidenced increased BMD and reduced fracture risks, resulting in reduced morbimortality, and improved quality of life. These benefits overweight the risks of rare adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Female; Diphosphonates; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Quality of Life; Osteoporosis; Alendronate; Zoledronic Acid; Fractures, Bone; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
PubMed: 37948565
DOI: 10.20945/2359-4292-2022-0334 -
Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach,... Jan 2024Elimination of bacterial infections and simultaneously promoting osteogenic differentiation are highly required for infectious bone diseases. Massive reactive oxygen...
Elimination of bacterial infections and simultaneously promoting osteogenic differentiation are highly required for infectious bone diseases. Massive reactive oxygen species (ROS) can damage cells, while low ROS concentrations as a molecular signal can regulate cellular fate. In this study, a Janus-ROS healing system is developed for infectious bone regeneration. An alendronate (ALN)-mediated defective metal-organic framework (MOF) sonosensitizer is prepared, which can effectively clear Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and promote osteogenic differentiation under differential ultrasonic irradiation. In the presence of zirconium-phosphate coordination, the ALN-mediated porphyrin-based MOF (HN25) with a proper defect has great sonodynamic antibacterial efficiency (98.97%, 15 min) and bone-targeting ability. Notably, under low-power ultrasound irradiation, HN25 can increase the chromatin accessibility of ossification-related genes and FOXO1 to promote bone repair through low ROS concentrations. Animal models of paravertebral infection, fracture with infection, and osteomyelitis demonstrate that HN25 successfully realizes the targeted and potent repair of various infectious bone tissues through rapid MRSA elimination, inhibiting osteoclast activity and promoting bone regeneration. The results show that high catalytic efficiency and bioactive MOF can be constructed using pharmaceutical-mediated defect engineering. The Janus-ROS treatment is also a promising therapeutic mode for infectious tissue regeneration.
Topics: Animals; Osteogenesis; Reactive Oxygen Species; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Bone Regeneration; Bone and Bones; Metal-Organic Frameworks
PubMed: 37855420
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202307846 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Jan 2024Bone turnover markers (BTM) are highly responsive to initiation and changes in anti-osteoporotic therapy. In contrast to the slow treatment-induced changes in bone... (Review)
Review
Bone turnover markers (BTM) are highly responsive to initiation and changes in anti-osteoporotic therapy. In contrast to the slow treatment-induced changes in bone mineral density, the fast changes in BTM enable the clinician to adjust treatment management within a short timeframe. This review describes how BTM can be used for treatment monitoring, including monitoring during discontinuation of alendronate and denosumab therapy. In addition, sources of errors and pitfalls when using BTM monitoring will be described.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Biomarkers; Osteoporosis; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Denosumab
PubMed: 38327195
DOI: 10.61409/V07230432 -
Small (Weinheim An Der Bergstrasse,... Nov 2023The pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is mainly determined by the adhesion of osteoclasts to the bone matrix and the involvement of various molecules in...
The pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is mainly determined by the adhesion of osteoclasts to the bone matrix and the involvement of various molecules in bone resorption. The dual regulation strategy of the physical barriers of bone matrix and intracellular gene regulation generated by advanced biomaterials is a decent alternative for the treatment of PMOP. Herein, for the first time, it is identified that hsa-miR-378i/mmu-miR-378a-3p are closely associated with PMOP. Then, an osteophilic and dual-regulated alendronate-gene lipoplex (antagomir@Aln-Lipo), composed of medicative alendronate-functionalized liposomal vehicle and encapsulated specific microRNAs is engineered, for bone-targeting delivery of genes to achieve combined mitigation of bone loss. Alendronate targets hydroxyapatite in the bone matrix and occupies the adhesion site of osteoclasts, thus providing the "physical barriers". Antagomir is coupled precisely to specific endogenous microRNAs, thus providing the "genetic signals". These functionalized lipoplexes exhibited long-term stability and good transfection efficiency. It is proven that antagomir@Aln-Lipo could synergistically regulate osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, intravenous injection of antagomir@Aln-Lipo efficiently reverses bone loss through a dual mechanism driven by alendronate and antagomir-378a-3p. In conclusion, the osteophilic and dual-regulated antagomir@Aln-Lipo offers a brand-new bifunctional strategy for the precise treatment of PMOP.
Topics: Humans; Alendronate; Antagomirs; Bone and Bones; Bone Resorption; MicroRNAs
PubMed: 37438648
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202303456 -
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research :... May 2024Although clinical trials have shown that denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density at key skeletal sites more than oral bisphosphonates, evidence is lacking...
Although clinical trials have shown that denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density at key skeletal sites more than oral bisphosphonates, evidence is lacking from head-to-head randomized trials evaluating fracture outcomes. This retrospective cohort study uses administrative claims data from Medicare fee-for service beneficiaries to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of denosumab versus alendronate in reducing fracture risk among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) in the US. Women with PMO ≥ 66 years of age with no prior history of osteoporosis treatment, who initiated denosumab (n = 89 115) or alendronate (n = 389 536) from 2012 to 2018, were followed from treatment initiation until the first of a specific fracture outcome, treatment discontinuation or switch, end of study (December 31, 2019), or other censoring criteria. A doubly robust inverse-probability of treatment and censoring weighted function was used to estimate the risk ratio associated with the use of denosumab compared with alendronate for hip, nonvertebral (NV; includes hip, humerus, pelvis, radius/ulna, other femur), non-hip nonvertebral (NHNV), hospitalized vertebral (HV), and major osteoporotic (MOP; consisting of NV and HV) fractures. Overall, denosumab reduced the risk of MOP by 39%, hip by 36%, NV by 43%, NHNV by 50%, and HV fractures by 30% compared with alendronate. Denosumab reduced the risk of MOP fractures by 9% at year 1, 12% at year 2, 18% at year 3, and 31% at year 5. An increase in the magnitude of fracture risk reduction with increasing duration of exposure was also observed for other NV fracture outcomes. In this cohort of almost half-a-million treatment-naive women with PMO, we observed clinically significant reductions in the risk of MOP, hip, NV, NHNV, and HV fractures for patients on denosumab compared with alendronate. Patients who remained on denosumab for longer periods of time experienced greater reductions in fracture risk.
PubMed: 38753892
DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae079 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2023Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a rare but catastrophic adverse event first reported in the long-term use of alendronate, one of the most commonly used drugs for...
Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a rare but catastrophic adverse event first reported in the long-term use of alendronate, one of the most commonly used drugs for osteoporosis currently. However, further evidence is needed to learn more regarding other common anti-osteoporosis drugs and the risk for AFF. In this study, reports of AFF were identified from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analyses were performed to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR), information component (IC) and adjusted ROR (adj. ROR) signals for AFF for common anti-osteoporosis drugs. A total of 1692 unique AFF reports were identified. The disproportionality signals (the lower bound of 95% confidence interval > 1 for ROR and adjusted ROR, and > 0 for IC) were detected for alendronate, denosumab, pamidronate, risedronate, zoledronate, ibandronate, and teriparatide while no signal was detected for raloxifene, abaloparatide, and romosozumab. When restricted in patients with osteoporosis, the disproportionality signals were still detected for alendronate, pamidronate, risedronate, denosumab, and ibandronate. Our results suggest that alendronate has the largest risk signal, while the risks varied among different bisphosphonates. In addition, denosumab was found statistically associated with AFF in both the entire database and patients with osteoporosis.
Topics: Humans; Alendronate; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Risedronic Acid; Denosumab; Ibandronic Acid; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pamidronate; Osteoporosis; Diphosphonates; Femur
PubMed: 37407650
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37944-x -
Therapie 2024Drug-induced hyperglycemia and diabetes have negative and potentially serious health consequences but can often be unnoticed. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Drug-induced hyperglycemia and diabetes have negative and potentially serious health consequences but can often be unnoticed.
METHODS
We reviewed the literature searching Medline database for articles addressing drug-induced hyperglycemia and diabetes up to January 31, 2023. We also selected drugs that could induce hyperglycemia or diabetes according official data from drug information databases Thériaque and Micromedex. For each selected drug or pharmacotherapeutic class, the mechanisms of action potentially involved were investigated. For drugs considered to be at risk of hyperglycemia or diabetes, disproportionality analyses were performed using data from the international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase. In order to detect new pharmacovigilance signals, additional disproportionality analyses were carried out for drug classes with more than 100 cases reported in VigiBase, but not found in the literature or official documents.
RESULTS
The main drug classes found to cause hyperglycemia are glucocorticoids, HMG-coA reductase inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, antipsychotics, fluoroquinolones, antiretrovirals, antineoplastic agents and immunosuppressants. The main mechanisms involved are alterations in insulin secretion and sensitivity, direct cytotoxic effects on pancreatic cells and increases in glucose production. Pharmacovigilance signal were found for a majority of drugs or pharmacological classes identified as being at risk of diabetes or hyperglycemia. We identified new pharmacovigilance signals with drugs not known to be at risk according to the literature or official data: phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, sodium oxybate, biphosphonates including alendronic acid, digoxin, sartans, linosipril, diltiazem, verapamil, and darbepoetin alpha. Further studies will be needed to confirm these signals.
CONCLUSIONS
The risks of induced hyperglycemia vary from one drug to another, and the underlying mechanisms are multiple and potentially complex. Clinicians need to be vigilant when using at-risk drugs in order to detect and manage these adverse drug reactions. However, it is to emphasize that the benefits of appropriately prescribed treatments most often outweigh their metabolic risks.
Topics: Humans; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Diabetes Mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Pharmacovigilance; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37985310
DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.09.010 -
Journal of Investigative Medicine : the... Oct 2023This study conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis medications in kidney transplant recipients and patients with chronic kidney... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis medications in kidney transplant recipients and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from the date of their inception through October 21, 2022. We performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis medications in adult patients with stage 3-5 CKD or kidney transplant recipients enrolled in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We calculated the standard mean deviations with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for bone mineral density (BMD) and T scores after 6 and 12 months treatment, pooled odds ratio and 95% CI for fracture risk, and summarized adverse events. The inclusion criteria were met by 27 studies. Out of this, 19 studies were included for the meta-analysis. In stage 3-4 CKD patients, alendronate increased lumbar spine BMD. In patients at stage 5 CKD and undergoing hemodialysis, alendronate and raloxifene increased lumbar spine BMD. After 6 months, the BMD of kidney transplant recipients was seen to be significantly increased; however, there was no difference after 12 months, and the risk of fracture did not reduce. Thus, there is no evidence that these medications reduce the risk of fracture, and their effect on BMD and fracture remains unproven. These medications may increase the incidence of adverse events and their safety needs to be further evaluated. Therefore, we cannot draw a definitive conclusion about the efficacy and safety of osteoporosis medications in the above group of patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Alendronate; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Kidney Transplantation; Osteoporosis; Bone Density; Fractures, Bone; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Kidney Failure, Chronic
PubMed: 37387531
DOI: 10.1177/10815589231184215