-
Psychopharmacology Bulletin Jul 2023Introduction The purpose of this guide is to provide convenient and useful information on about Alzheimer's disease and dementias of late life. The information includes...
Introduction The purpose of this guide is to provide convenient and useful information on about Alzheimer's disease and dementias of late life. The information includes selected facts, diagnostic criteria tables, descriptions of selected tests and screens, guidelines, clinical pharmacological data and references. This guide is divided into several sections: Background factsDiagnostic aids and criteria for dementia diagnosesMedications used for Alzheimer's disease and dementia Basic information on marketed treatments is provided although the treatment may not be FDA approved for this use. Approved cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and monoclonal antibodies are listed. No treatment is recommended or endorsed, however. This guide does not address the evidence base for the efficacy of the treatments listed. : Except for treatments above, discussions of medications for people with dementia nearly always involve off label use. For example, antidepressants and antipsychotics are indicated in the FDA-approved prescribing information for major depression and schizophrenia, and not for depressive symptoms or the delusions or hallucinations occurring within the context of dementia with two exceptions. In these instances, the doses listed are for reference only and should not be considered as recommendations or appropriate use. Physicians should consult the product package labeling for any drug mentioned.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Hallucinations; Memantine
PubMed: 37489152
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna,... Jul 2024To assess amantadine use and associated factors in the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
OBJECTIVE
To assess amantadine use and associated factors in the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
BACKGROUND
Immediate-release amantadine is approved for the treatment of PD and is largely used in clinical practice to treat "levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LIDs). Its use varies according to countries and PD stages. The prospective NS-Park cohort collects features of PD patients followed by 26 French PD Expert Centres.
METHODS
Variables used for the analyses included demographics, motor and non-motor PD symptoms and motor complications [motor fluctuations (MFs), LIDs)], antiparkinsonian pharmacological classes and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We evaluated: (i) prevalence of amantadine use and compared clinical features of amantadine users vs. non-users (cross-sectional analysis); (ii) factors associated with amantadine initiation (longitudinal analysis); (iii) amantadine effect on LIDs, MFs, apathy, impulse control disorders and freezing of gait (Fog) (longitudinal analysis).
RESULTS
Amantadine use prevalence was 12.6% (1,585/12,542, median dose = 200 mg). Amantadine users were significantly younger, with longer and more severe PD symptoms, greater LEDD and more frequent use of device-aided/surgical treatment. Factors independently associated with amantadine initiation were younger age, longer PD duration, more frequent LIDs, MFs and FoG, higher LEDD and better cognitive function. 9 of the 658 patients on amantadine had stopped it at the following visit, after 12-18 months (1.3%). New users of amantadine presented a higher improvement in LIDs and MF compared to amantadine never users.
CONCLUSIONS
About 12% of PD patients within the French NS-Park cohort used amantadine, mostly those with younger age and more severe PD. Amantadine initiation was associated with a subsequent reduction in LIDs and MFs.
Topics: Amantadine; Humans; Male; Female; France; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Parkinson Disease; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Cross-Sectional Studies; Levodopa; Longitudinal Studies; Cohort Studies
PubMed: 38578434
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02772-4 -
Viruses Apr 2024This review article describes the current knowledge about the use of antiviral chemotherapeutics in avian species, such as farm poultry and companion birds. Specific... (Review)
Review
This review article describes the current knowledge about the use of antiviral chemotherapeutics in avian species, such as farm poultry and companion birds. Specific therapeutics are described in alphabetical order including classic antiviral drugs, such as acyclovir, abacavir, adefovir, amantadine, didanosine, entecavir, ganciclovir, interferon, lamivudine, penciclovir, famciclovir, oseltamivir, ribavirin, and zidovudine, repurposed drugs, such as ivermectin and nitazoxanide, which were originally used as antiparasitic drugs, and some others substances showing antiviral activity, such as ampligen, azo derivates, docosanol, fluoroarabinosylpyrimidine nucleosides, and novel peptides. Most of them have only been used for research purposes and are not widely used in clinical practice because of a lack of essential pharmacokinetic and safety data. Suggested future research directions are also highlighted.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Animals; Birds; Virus Diseases; Bird Diseases; Poultry
PubMed: 38675934
DOI: 10.3390/v16040593 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 2023Levodopa remains the gold standard for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients develop complications with disease progression, necessitating adjunctive therapy... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Levodopa remains the gold standard for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients develop complications with disease progression, necessitating adjunctive therapy to control fluctuations in motor and non-motor symptoms and dyskinesia. Knowledge of medication safety and tolerability is critical to ascertain the benefit-risk ratio and select an adjunctive therapy that provides the highest chance for medication adherence. Posing a challenge are the sheer abundance of options, stemming from the development of several new drugs in recent years, as well as differences in commercial drug availability worldwide.
AREAS COVERED
This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current US FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated PD patients, including dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist amantadine, and the adenosine receptor antagonist istradefylline. Data were taken from pivotal phase III randomized controlled and post-surveillance studies, when available, that directly led to FDA-approval.
EXPERT OPINION
No strong evidence exists to support use of a specific adjunctive treatment for improving Off time. Only one medication has demonstrated improvement in dyskinesia in levodopa-treated PD patients; however, every patient cannot tolerate it and therefore adjunctive therapy should be tailored to an individual's symptoms and risk for specific adverse effects.
Topics: Humans; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Dyskinesias
PubMed: 37401865
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2227096 -
Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs Mar 2024Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an early-onset disorder with a prevalence of 1% among children and reported disability-adjusted life years of 4.31 million.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an early-onset disorder with a prevalence of 1% among children and reported disability-adjusted life years of 4.31 million. Irritability is a challenging behavior associated with ASD, for which medication development has lagged. More specifically, pharmacotherapy effectiveness may be limited against high adverse effects (considering side effect profiles and patient medication sensitivity); thus, the possible benefits of pharmacological interventions must be balanced against potential adverse events in each patient.
AREAS COVERED
After reviewing the neuropathophysiology of ASD-associated irritability, the benefits and tolerability of emerging medications in its treatment based on randomized controlled trials were detailed in light of mechanisms and targets of action.
EXPERT OPINION
Succeeding risperidone and aripiprazole, monotherapy with memantine may be beneficial. In addition, N-acetylcysteine, galantamine, sulforaphane, celecoxib, palmitoylethanolamide, pentoxifylline, simvastatin, minocycline, amantadine, pregnenolone, prednisolone, riluzole, propentofylline, pioglitazone, and topiramate, all adjunct to risperidone, and clonidine and methylphenidate outperformed placebo. These effects were through glutamatergic, γ-aminobutyric acidergic, inflammatory, oxidative, cholinergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic systems. All medications were reported to be safe and tolerable. Considering sample size, follow-up, and effect size, further studies are necessary. Along with drug development, repositioning and combining existing drugs supported by the mechanism of action is recommended.
Topics: Child; Humans; Risperidone; Antipsychotic Agents; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Aripiprazole; Riluzole
PubMed: 38296815
DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2024.2313650 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Oct 2023The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a severe need for effective antiviral treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess if pre-emptive treatment with amantadine... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a severe need for effective antiviral treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess if pre-emptive treatment with amantadine for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized persons ≥40 years or adults with comorbidities was able to prevent disease progression and hospitalization. Primary outcomes were clinical status on day 14.
METHODS
Between 9 June 2021 and 27 January 2022, this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-centre clinical trial included 242 subjects with a follow-up period of 90 days. Subjects were randomly assigned 1:1 to either amantadine 100 mg or placebo twice daily for 5 days. The inclusion criteria were confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and at least one of (a) age ≥40 years, age ≥18 years and (b) at least one comorbidity, or (c) body mass index ≥30. The study protocol was published at www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov (unique protocol #02032021) and at www.clinicaltrialregister.eu (EudraCT-number 2021-001177-22).
RESULTS
With 121 participants in each arm, we found no difference in the primary endpoint with 82 participants in the amantadine arm, and 92 participants in the placebo arm with no limitations to activities, respectively, and 25 and 37 with limitations to activities in the amantadine arm and the placebo arm, respectively. No participants in either group were admitted to hospital or died. The OR of having state severity increased by 1 in the amantadine group versus placebo was 1.8 (CI 1.0-3.3, [p 0.051]). On day 7, one participant was hospitalized in each group; throughout the study, this increased to five and three participants for amantadine versus placebo treatment (p 0.72). Similarly, on day 7, there was no difference in the status of oropharyngeal swabs. Most participants (108 in each group) were SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive (p 0.84).
CONCLUSION
We found no effect of amantadine on disease progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Pandemics; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; RNA, Viral; Amantadine; Treatment Outcome; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37353078
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.023 -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Sep 2023Most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) receiving levodopa (LD)/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors develop motor fluctuations with an increasing amount of OFF time,... (Review)
Review
Most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) receiving levodopa (LD)/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors develop motor fluctuations with an increasing amount of OFF time, negatively impacting patient quality of life. Herein, we review the evidence supporting the substantial, yet underappreciated contribution of delays in time to ON (including delayed ON and no ON) to total daily OFF time. Most clinical studies use patient diaries that do not capture time to ON and wearing OFF separately as related to LD dosing, and consequently, most OFF time has generally been attributed to wearing OFF. Hence, most treatment regimens focus on reducing wearing OFF by changing LD dosing/formulations and/or using "ON-extenders" (eg, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, extended-release amantadine, and adenosine A receptor antagonists). However, the literature describing approved treatments for PD that has focused on delays in time to ON is sparse and suggests this type of OFF may comprise more than twice the amount of total daily OFF time as wearing OFF. Here, we advocate for the importance of measuring and adequately addressing delays in time to ON and build support for the consistent inclusion of the time to ON measurement in future clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents; Quality of Life; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Levodopa
PubMed: 37517986
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105495 -
PM & R : the Journal of Injury,... Dec 2023To quantify the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury.
OBJECTIVE
To quantify the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury.
METHODS
Secondary outcome data from a randomized controlled multisite trial of amantadine 100 mg twice daily were used to calculate number-needed-to-treat (NNT). Given prior findings of positive clinician-perceived effects and low incidence of adverse events, we hypothesized low number-needed-to-treat for benefit (NNTB; high benefit) and high number-needed-to-treat for harm (NNTH; low risk) based on the clinician ratings, supporting the use of amantadine in clinical practice. Specifically, NNTB values were calculated using number of individuals with improvement on the Clinician Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale (GI). NNTB values were computed using number of individuals with worsening on the GI and experiencing serious and any adverse events.
RESULTS
Based on clinician ratings, on average for every six patients treated with amantadine rather than placebo, one extra patient would be expected to improve (NNTB = 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.3-76.8]). More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group, but the result was not statistically significant (NNTH = -92.4; 95% CI: [NNTB -32.9 to infinity to NNTH -19.2]). The amantadine and placebo groups did not differ on the numbers of adverse events experienced during the trial.
CONCLUSION
Clinician ratings suggest modest benefit of amantadine 100 mg twice daily with low risk to appropriately selected patients with adequate renal clearance. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.
PubMed: 38145314
DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13122 -
BMJ Case Reports Jan 2024
Topics: Humans; Livedo Reticularis; Amantadine; Parkinson Disease; Antiparkinson Agents
PubMed: 38216170
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257492