-
Clinical NeuropharmacologyAcute traumatic brain injury is one of the most common causes of death and disability. Reduction in the level of consciousness is a significant complication that can...
OBJECTIVES
Acute traumatic brain injury is one of the most common causes of death and disability. Reduction in the level of consciousness is a significant complication that can impact morbidity. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most widely used method of assessing the level of consciousness. Neurostimulants such as amantadine and modafinil are common pharmacologic agents that increase GCS in patients with brain trauma. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these 2 drugs.
METHODS
This systematic review obtained articles from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Extensive searches were conducted separately by 4 individuals in 3 stages. Ultimately, 16 clinical trials, cohort studies, case reports, and case series articles were obtained after reading the title, abstract, and full text and considering the exclusion criteria. The data of the final article were entered into the analysis table. This study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334409) and conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
Amantadine seems to be associated with a higher overall response rate. In contrast, modafinil is associated with the most remarkable change in GCS score during treatment. However, the number of clinical trials with high quality and sample size has not been satisfactory to compare the effectiveness of these 2 drugs and their potential side effects.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors recommend additional double-blind clinical trials are needed to be conducted with a larger sample size, comparing amantadine with modafinil to delineate the efficacy and adverse effects, both short and long term.
Topics: Humans; Modafinil; Consciousness; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Amantadine; Brain Injuries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37962310
DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000577 -
Chemistry and Physics of Lipids Aug 2024Amantadine, a small amphilphic organic compound that consists of an adamantane backbone and an amino group, was first recognized as an antiviral in 1963 and received...
Amantadine, a small amphilphic organic compound that consists of an adamantane backbone and an amino group, was first recognized as an antiviral in 1963 and received approval for prophylaxis against the type A influenza virus in 1976. Since then, it has also been used to treat Parkinson's disease-related dyskinesia and is being considered as a treatment for corona viruses. Since amantadine usually targets membrane-bound proteins, its interactions with the membrane are also thought to be important. Biological membranes are now widely understood to be laterally heterogeneous and certain proteins are known to preferentially co-localize within specific lipid domains. Does amantadine, therefore, preferentially localize in certain lipid composition domains? To address this question, we studied amantadine's interactions with phase separating membranes composed of cholesterol, DSPC (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine), and DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), as well as single-phase DPhPC (1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phos-phocholine) membranes. From Langmuir trough and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements, we determined, respectively, that amantadine preferentially binds to disordered lipids, such as POPC, and lowers the phase transition temperature of POPC/DSPC/cholesterol mixtures, implying that amantadine increases membrane disorder. Further, using droplet interface bilayers (DIBs), we observed that amantadine disrupts DPhPC membranes, consistent with its disordering properties. Finally, we carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on POPC/DSPC/cholesterol membranes with varying amounts of amantadine. Consistent with experiment, MD simulations showed that amantadine prefers to associate with disordered POPC-rich domains, domain boundaries, and lipid glycerol backbones. Since different proteins co-localize with different lipid domains, our results have possible implications as to which classes of proteins may be better targets for amantadine.
Topics: Amantadine; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Lipid Bilayers; Cholesterol; Membrane Lipids
PubMed: 38740276
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2024.105397 -
International Journal of Radiation... Nov 2023Initial report of NRG Oncology CC001, a phase 3 trial of whole-brain radiation therapy plus memantine (WBRT + memantine) with or without hippocampal avoidance (HA),... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001.
PURPOSE
Initial report of NRG Oncology CC001, a phase 3 trial of whole-brain radiation therapy plus memantine (WBRT + memantine) with or without hippocampal avoidance (HA), demonstrated neuroprotective effects of HA with a median follow-up of fewer than 8 months. Herein, we report the final results with complete cognition, patient-reported outcomes, and longer-term follow-up exceeding 1 year.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Adult patients with brain metastases were randomized to HA-WBRT + memantine or WBRT + memantine. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive function failure, defined as decline using the reliable change index on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association, or the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory with Brain Tumor Module and EQ-5D-5L.
RESULTS
Between July 2015 and March 2018, 518 patients were randomized. The median follow-up for living patients was 12.1 months. The addition of HA to WBRT + memantine prevented cognitive failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74, P = .016) and was associated with less deterioration in TMT-B at 4 months (P = .012) and HVLT-R recognition at 4 (P = .055) and 6 months (P = .011). Longitudinal modeling of imputed data showed better preservation of all HVLT-R domains (P < .005). Patients who received HA-WBRT + Memantine reported less symptom burden at 6 (P < .001 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .026 using complete-case data; P < .001 using imputed data), less symptom interference at 6 (P = .003 using complete-case data; P = .0016 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .0027 using complete-case data; P = .0014 using imputed data), and fewer cognitive symptoms over time (P = .043 using imputed data). Treatment arms did not differ significantly in overall survival, intracranial progression-free survival, or toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
With median follow-up exceeding 1 year, HA during WBRT + memantine for brain metastases leads to sustained preservation of cognitive function and continued prevention of patient-reported neurologic symptoms, symptom interference, and cognitive symptoms with no difference in survival or toxicity.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Brain Neoplasms; Memantine; Cranial Irradiation; Cognition; Brain; Hippocampus
PubMed: 37150264
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.030 -
Science Advances Dec 2023Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a promising target for neuroprotective therapy in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We explored the effect of NMDA receptor...
Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a promising target for neuroprotective therapy in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We explored the effect of NMDA receptor antagonism on electrically triggered CSDs in healthy and brain-injured animals. Rats received either one moderate or four daily repetitive mild closed head impacts (rmTBI). Ninety-three animals underwent craniectomy with electrocorticographic (ECoG) and local blood flow monitoring. In brain-injured animals, ketamine or memantine inhibited CSDs in 44 to 88% and 50 to 67% of cases, respectively. Near-DC/AC-ECoG amplitude was reduced by 44 to 75% and 52 to 67%, and duration by 39 to 87% and 61 to 78%, respectively. Daily memantine significantly reduced spreading depression and oligemia following CSD. Animals ( = 31) were randomized to either memantine (10 mg/kg) or saline with daily neurobehavioral testing. Memantine-treated animals had higher neurological scores. We demonstrate that memantine improved neurovascular function following CSD in sham and brain-injured animals. Memantine also prevented neurological decline in a blinded, preclinical randomized rmTBI trial.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Memantine; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain; Electrocorticography; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
PubMed: 38091390
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj2417 -
Medicine Apr 2024Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Dementia severity was assessed mainly through cognitive function, psychobehavioral symptoms, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Dementia severity was assessed mainly through cognitive function, psychobehavioral symptoms, and daily living ability. Currently, there are not many drugs that can be selected to treat mild to moderate AD, and the value of drugs remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), memantine, and sodium oligomannate (GV-971) in the treatment of patients with AD. Additionally, molecular docking analysis will be used to investigate the binding affinities of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine with key receptor proteins associated with AD, including beta-amyloid (Abeta), microtubule-associated protein (MAP), apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4), and Mitofusin-2 (MFN2), to further validate the results of the meta-analysis.
METHODS
We obtained clinical trials characterized by randomization, placebo control, and double-blinded methodologies concerning ChEIs, memantine, and GV-971. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. Molecular docking was also conducted to evaluate the results.
RESULTS
All drugs improved the cognitive function, with the effect value ranging from -1.23 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.30) for 20 mg memantine to -3.29 (95% CI -4.14 to -2.45) for 32 mg galantamine. Although 32 mg galanthamine and GV-971 did not improve the clinicians' Global Impression of Change scale, other drugs showed significant results compared with placebo. On NPI, only 10 mg of donepezil and 24 mg of galantamine had improvement effects. On ADCS/ADL, only 20 mg memantine and 900 mg GV-971 had no significant difference from the placebo. Donepezil 5 mg and GV-971 900 mg did not increase the drug withdrawal rates due to various reasons or adverse reactions when compared to the placebo. Donepezil demonstrated superior binding to the protein and exhibited greater efficacy compared to other drugs.
CONCLUSION
ChEIs, memantine, and GV-971 all can slow the progression of AD but have different effects on respective assessments. Donepezil and GV-971 were relatively well tolerated.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Donepezil; Galantamine; Memantine; Molecular Docking Simulation; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Rivastigmine
PubMed: 38640313
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037799 -
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy Aug 2023There are few updated studies on the prevalence and management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which could be underdiagnosed or undertreated. The COVID-19 pandemic may have...
BACKGROUND
There are few updated studies on the prevalence and management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which could be underdiagnosed or undertreated. The COVID-19 pandemic may have worsened the deficiencies in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Electronic medical records (EMR) offer an opportunity to assess the impact and management of medical processes and contingencies in the population.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate AD prevalence in Spain over a 6-year period, based on treated patients, according to usual clinical practice. Additionally, to describe the management of AD-treated patients and the evolution of that treatment during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
Retrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA EMR database. Patients treated with donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and/or memantine were included in the study. Annual AD prevalence (2015-2020) was estimated and extrapolated to the national population level. Most frequent treatments and involved specialties were described. To assess the effect of COVID-19, the incidence of new AD cases in 2020 was calculated and compared with newly diagnosed cases in 2019.
RESULTS
Crude AD prevalence (2015-2020) was estimated at 760.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and age-standardized prevalence (2020) was 664.6 (male 595.7, female 711.0). Monotherapy was the most frequent way to treat AD (86.2%), in comparison with dual therapy (13.8%); rivastigmine was the most prescribed treatment (37.3%), followed by memantine (36.4%) and donepezil (33.0%). Rivastigmine was also the most utilized medication in newly treated patients (46.7%), followed by donepezil (29.8%), although donepezil persistence was longer (22.5 vs. 20.6 months). Overall, donepezil 10 mg, rivastigmine 9.5 mg, and memantine 20 mg were the most prescribed presentations. The incidence rate of AD decreased from 148.1/100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 147.0-149.2) in 2019 to 118.4/100,000 (95% CI 117.5-119.4) in 2020.
CONCLUSIONS
The obtained prevalence of AD-treated patients was consistent with previous face-to-face studies. In contrast with previous studies, rivastigmine, rather than donepezil, was the most frequent treatment. A decrease in the incidence of AD-treated patients was observed during 2020 in comparison with 2019, presumably due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on both diagnosis and treatment. EMR databases emerge as valuable tools to monitor in real time the incidence and management of medical conditions in the population, as well as to assess the health impact of global contingencies and interventions.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Alzheimer Disease; Donepezil; Rivastigmine; Memantine; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Pandemics; Prevalence; Piperidines; Phenylcarbamates; Indans; COVID-19; Galantamine
PubMed: 37537656
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01271-0 -
Toxicology in Vitro : An International... Jun 2024Amantadine (AMA) is a useful drug in neuronal disorders, but few studies have been performed to access its toxicological profile. Conversely, doxorubicin (Dox) is a...
Amantadine (AMA) is a useful drug in neuronal disorders, but few studies have been performed to access its toxicological profile. Conversely, doxorubicin (Dox) is a well-known antineoplastic drug that has shown neurotoxic effects leading to cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic effects of AMA, as well as its possible protective actions against deleterious effects of Dox. The Salmonella/microsome assay was performed to assess mutagenicity while cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were evaluated in SH-SY5Y cells using MTT and comet assays. Possible modulating effects of AMA on the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and mutagenicity induced by Dox were evaluated through cotreatment procedures. Amantadine did not induce mutations in the Salmonella/microsome assay and decreased Dox-induced mutagenicity in the TA98 strain. AMA reduced cell viability and induced DNA damage in SH-SY5Y cells. In cotreatment with Dox, AMA attenuated the cytotoxicity of Dox and showed an antigenotoxic effect. In conclusion, AMA does not induce gene mutations, although it has shown a genotoxic effect. Furthermore, AMA decreases frameshift mutations induced by Dox as well as the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of Dox in SH-SY5Y cells, suggesting that AMA can interfere with Dox mutagenic activity and attenuate its neurotoxic effects.
PubMed: 38851604
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2024.105874 -
Epilepsia Dec 2023N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are expressed at synaptic sites, where they mediate fast excitatory neurotransmission. NMDA receptors are critical to brain...
OBJECTIVE
N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are expressed at synaptic sites, where they mediate fast excitatory neurotransmission. NMDA receptors are critical to brain development and cognitive function. Natural variants to the GRIN1 gene, which encodes the obligatory GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor, are associated with severe neurological disorders that include epilepsy, intellectual disability, and developmental delay. Here, we investigated the pathogenicity of three missense variants to the GRIN1 gene, p. Ile148Val (GluN1-3b[I481V]), p.Ala666Ser (GluN1-3b[A666S]), and p.Tyr668His (GluN1-3b[Y668H]).
METHODS
Wild-type and variant-containing NMDA receptors were expressed in HEK293 cells and primary hippocampal neurons. Patch-clamp electrophysiology and pharmacology were used to profile the functional properties of the receptors. Receptor surface expression was evaluated using fluorescently tagged receptors and microscopy.
RESULTS
Our data demonstrate that the GluN1(I481V) variant is inhibited by the open pore blockers ketamine and memantine with reduce potency but otherwise has little effect on receptor function. By contrast, the other two variants exhibit gain-of-function molecular phenotypes. Glycine sensitivity was enhanced in receptors containing the GluN1(A666S) variant and the potency of pore block by memantine and ketamine was reduced, whereas that for MK-801 was increased. The most pronounced functional deficits, however, were found in receptors containing the GluN1(Y668H) variant. GluN1(Y668H)/2A receptors showed impaired surface expression, were more sensitive to glycine and glutamate by an order of magnitude, and exhibited impaired block by extracellular magnesium ions, memantine, ketamine, and MK-801. These variant receptors were also activated by either glutamate or glycine alone. Single-receptor recordings revealed that this receptor variant opened to several conductance levels and activated more frequently than wild-type GluN1/2A receptors.
SIGNIFICANCE
Our study reveals a critical functional locus of the receptor (GluN1[Y668]) that couples receptor gating to ion channel conductance, which when mutated may be associated with neurological disorder.
Topics: Humans; Memantine; Dizocilpine Maleate; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Ketamine; HEK293 Cells; Glutamates; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Glycine; Nerve Tissue Proteins
PubMed: 37734923
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17776 -
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2023Fatigue is a common, debilitating and often underestimated symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The exact pathophysiological mechanism of fatigue in MS is... (Review)
Review
Fatigue is a common, debilitating and often underestimated symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The exact pathophysiological mechanism of fatigue in MS is still unknown. However, there are many theories involving different immunological, metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms of fatigue. Owing to the subjective nature of this symptom, its diagnosis is still very limited and is still based only on diagnostic questionnaires. Although several therapeutic agents have been used in the past to try to influence fatigue in MS patients, no single effective approach for the treatment of fatigue has yet been found. This review article aims to provide the reader with information on the current theories on the origin and mechanism of fatigue in MS, as well as diagnostic procedures and, finally, current therapeutic strategies for the management of fatigue in MS patients.
PubMed: 38029042
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S429862 -
Journal of Neurology Oct 2023Monoaminergic network dysfunction may have a role in multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue pathogenesis. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Monoaminergic network dysfunction may have a role in multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue pathogenesis.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate modifications of fatigue severity and resting state (RS) functional connectivity (FC) in monoaminergic networks of 45 fatigued MS patients after different symptomatic treatments.
METHODS
Patients were randomly, blindly assigned to fampridine (n = 15), amantadine (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) treatment and underwent clinical and 3T-MRI evaluations at baseline (t0) and week 4 (w4), i.e. after four weeks of treatment. Fifteen healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. Dopamine-, noradrenaline- and serotonin-related RS FC was assessed by PET-guided constrained independent component analysis.
RESULTS
At t0, MS patients showed widespread monoamine-related RS FC abnormalities. At w4, fatigue scores decreased in all groups (p = range < 0.001-0.002). Concomitantly, fampridine and amantadine patients showed increased insular RS FC in dopamine-related and noradrenaline-related networks (p < 0.001, uncorrected). Amantadine patients also showed increased RS FC of anterior cingulate cortex in dopamine-related and noradrenaline-related networks (p < 0.001, uncorrected). Placebo patients showed increased precuneus/middle cingulate RS FC in the noradrenaline-related network (p < 0.001, uncorrected). In fampridine and placebo patients, just tendencies towards correlations between RS FC and fatigue modifications were found.
CONCLUSIONS
In MS patients, specific RS FC modifications in PET-guided monoaminergic networks were observed, concomitantly with fatigue improvements following treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
EudraCT 2010-023678-38.
Topics: Humans; Dopamine; Multiple Sclerosis; Fatigue; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Amantadine; Brain; Brain Mapping
PubMed: 37462753
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11858-0