-
American Journal of Ophthalmology Mar 2024This study aims to investigate the relationship between the type and severity of refractive error and anisometropia development in preschool children.
PURPOSE
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the type and severity of refractive error and anisometropia development in preschool children.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS
Data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel's second-largest Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), were analyzed. The study included all isometropic children aged 1 to 6 years, re-examined for refraction at least 2 years following their initial examination between 2012 and 2022. Anisometropia was defined as a ≥1 diopter interocular difference in spherical equivalent. Relationships were assessed using logistic regression models adjusted for key sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS
Among 33,496 isometropic children (51.2% male, mean age 3.2 ± 1.5 years), the prevalences of emmetropia, myopia, and hyperopia were 26.7% (n = 8944), 4.2% (n = 1397), and 69.1% (n = 23,155), respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 5.1 ± 2.4 years, 2593 children (7.7%) were diagnosed with anisometropia. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for anisometropia gradually increased with baseline refractive error severity, reaching 13.90 (5.32-36.34) in severe myopia and 4.19 (3.42-5.15) in severe hyperopia. This pattern was also evident in cylindrical anisometropia, where ORs increased with greater baseline astigmatism, peaking at 12.10 (9.19-15.92) in children with high astigmatism (≥3 D). Associations remained consistent in sensitivity and subgroup analyses including across both sexes and when using a stricter anisometropia criterion.
CONCLUSIONS
Children aged 1 to 6 years, initially without anisometropia but showing increasing severity of myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism, are more likely to develop anisometropia. This underscores the importance of follow-up refractive measurements within this population to promptly diagnose and treat anisometropia and prevent potential visual complications.
PubMed: 38552933
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.03.008 -
Survey of Ophthalmology May 2024Amblyopia is a form of visual cortical impairment that arises from abnormal visual experience early in life. Most often, amblyopia is a unilateral visual impairment that... (Review)
Review
Amblyopia is a form of visual cortical impairment that arises from abnormal visual experience early in life. Most often, amblyopia is a unilateral visual impairment that can develop as a result of strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of these conditions that result in discordant binocular experience. Characterized by reduced visual acuity and impaired binocular function, amblyopia places a substantial burden on the developing child. Although frontline treatment with glasses and patching can improve visual acuity, residual amblyopia remains for most children. Newer binocular-based therapies can elicit rapid recovery of visual acuity and may also improve stereoacuity in some children. Nevertheless, for both treatment modalities full recovery is elusive, recurrence of amblyopia is common, and improvements are negligible when treatment is administered at older ages. Insights derived from animal models about the factors that govern neural plasticity have been leveraged to develop innovative treatments for amblyopia. These novel therapies exhibit efficacy to promote recovery, and some are effective even at ages when conventional treatments fail to yield benefit. Approaches for enhancing visual system plasticity and promoting recovery from amblyopia include altering the balance between excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms, reversing the accumulation of proteins that inhibit plasticity, and harnessing the principles of metaplasticity. Although these therapies have exhibited promising results in animal models, their safety and ability to remediate amblyopia need to be evaluated in humans.
PubMed: 38763223
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.04.006 -
The British Journal of Ophthalmology Aug 2023To investigate the association between the myopic severity and retinal microvascular density, choroidal vascularity and retrobulbar blood flow in adult anisomyopes.
AIMS
To investigate the association between the myopic severity and retinal microvascular density, choroidal vascularity and retrobulbar blood flow in adult anisomyopes.
METHODS
This study comprised 90 eyes of 45 myopic anisomyopes who were recruited for Colour Doppler imaging (CDI) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). The superficial vessel density (SVD), deep vessel density (DVD), choroidal thickness (ChT) and choroidal vascularity, including total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA) and Choroidal Vascularity Index (CVI), were measured using OCTA. Moreover, the Pulsatile Index, peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) of posterior ciliary artery (PCA), central retinal artery (CRA) and ophthalmic artery (OA) were quantified by CDI, and all parameters were compared between two eyes and the correlations among parameters were analysed.
RESULTS
The mean difference of spherical equivalent (SE) and axial lengths (AL) between eyes were -6.00±2.94 D and 2.48±1.31 mm, respectively. The SVD, DVD, ChT, TCA, LA, SA and CVI were significantly lower in more myopic eyes compared with the contralateral eyes. In more myopic eyes, CDI parameters of CRA and PSV and EDV of PCA were also significantly lower. After adjusting for age and sex, the binocular asymmetry in LA and ChT was independent risk factor affecting interocular difference in both AL and SE.
CONCLUSION
Retinal microvascular density, choroidal vascularity and retrobulbar blood flow were simultaneously lower in adult myopic anisomyopes with more myopic eyes and disturbed choroid circulation was related to the severity of myopia. Further longitudinal study was helped to identify the effect of choroidal parameters for myopic progression.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Anisometropia; Longitudinal Studies; Retina; Myopia; Angiography; Choroid
PubMed: 35443997
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320597 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the... (Review)
Review
Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure.
PubMed: 37568424
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155021 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023There is a particular anisometropia occurring in one eye with myopia, while the other eye has very low myopia, emmetropia, or very low hyperopia. It is unclear how the...
PURPOSE
There is a particular anisometropia occurring in one eye with myopia, while the other eye has very low myopia, emmetropia, or very low hyperopia. It is unclear how the binocular axial length changes when these children wear unilateral OK lenses only in the more myopic eyes. This study investigates the changes in the axial elongation of both eyes.
METHODS
This is a 1-year retrospective study. In total, 148 children with myopic anisometropia were included. The more myopic eyes were wearing orthokeratology lenses (treated eyes), whereas the contralateral eyes were not indicated for visual correction (untreated eyes). The untreated eyes were classified into three subgroups based on the spherical equivalent refraction (SER): low myopia (≤ -0.50 D, = 37), emmetropia (+0.49 to -0.49 D, = 76), and low hyperopia (≥0.50 D, = 35). Changes in the axial length (AL) were compared between the untreated and treated eyes and among the three subgroups.
RESULTS
The axial elongation was 0.14 ± 0.18 mm and 0.39 ± 0.27 mm in all treated and untreated eyes, respectively ( < 0.001). The interocular AL difference decreased significantly from 1.09 ± 0.45 mm at the baseline to 0.84 ± 0.52 mm at 1 year ( < 0.001). The baseline median (Q1, Q3) SER of the untreated eyes were -0.75 D (-0.56, -0.88 D), 0.00 D (0.00, -0.25 D), and +0.75 D (+1.00, +0.62 D) in low myopia, emmetropia, and low hyperopia subgroups, respectively. The axial elongation was 0.14 ± 0.18 mm, 0.15 ± 0.17 mm, and 0.13 ± 0.21 mm ( = 0.92) in the treated eyes and 0.44 ± 0.25 mm, 0.35 ± 0.24 mm, and 0.41 ± 0.33 mm in the untreated eyes ( = 0.11) after 1 year. Multivariate linear regression analyses only showed significant differences in axial elongation between the emmetropia and low myopia subgroups of untreated eyes ( = 0.04; > 0.05 between other subgroups).
CONCLUSION
Unilateral orthokeratology lenses effectively reduced axial elongation in the more myopic eyes and reduced interocular AL differences in children with myopic anisometropia. The refractive state of the untreated eyes did not affect the axial elongation of the more myopic eye wearing the orthokeratology lens. In the untreated eyes, AL increased faster in the low myopia subgroup than in the emmetropia subgroup.
PubMed: 38020088
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1266354 -
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2023To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the treatment of anisometropia, and to explore the...
AIM
To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the treatment of anisometropia, and to explore the personalized design scheme of SMILE in correcting adult myopia anisometropia based on the nomogram.
METHODS
It's a prospective cohort study. Patients with anisometropic myopia of refractive difference ≥ 2.0 diopters (D) who underwent SMILE between September 2020 and March 2021 were enrolled. Clinical features and visual function were assessed preoperatively and at 1wk, 1, 3, and 6mo after the operation. The examination included tests for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive errors, effectiveness index (preoperative CDVA/postoperative UDVA), safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA), nomogram and stereoscopic function. Paired -test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for continuous variables, and Pearson Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.
RESULTS
The study involved 45 consecutive patients (average age: 25.0±6.9y; 82 out of 90 eyes underwent SMILE, while 8 eyes were not operated). The average preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.74±0.22 D. Six months after surgery, the effectiveness index was 1.05±0.12, and the safety index was 1.09±0.11. Seventy eyes (85.4%) exhibited SE correction error within ±0.5 D. The percentage of eyes with Titmus stereoscopic function equal to or less than 200″ significantly increased from 55.6% preoperatively to 88.9% postoperatively (<0.05). There was statistically significant difference between higher myopia eyes and contralateral eyes in average nomogram value/spherical refraction ratio.
CONCLUSION
SMILE is safe, effective and predictable in correcting myopic anisometropia, and it improves stereoscopic visual function of anisometropia patients. The precise and individualized design of the nomogram is a vital element to ensure the balance of both eyes after SMILE.
PubMed: 38028522
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.11.16 -
Ophthalmic Epidemiology Aug 2023To evaluate the agreement between non-cycloplegic autorefraction (NCAR) and cycloplegic autorefraction (CAR) in an ethnically diverse population of preschool-aged...
PURPOSE
To evaluate the agreement between non-cycloplegic autorefraction (NCAR) and cycloplegic autorefraction (CAR) in an ethnically diverse population of preschool-aged children and the validity of the screening criteria used to refer for further evaluation.
METHODS
This study included data from 7,073 preschoolers who underwent NCAR and CAR, which enabled refractive error classification based on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) 2013 criteria. Right eye data of sphere and cylinder were used to compare NCAR to CAR via paired t-testing and vector analyses, and left eye data for an analysis on anisometropia. The sensitivity and specificity of screening referral criteria for refractive error were calculated.
RESULTS
Mean values of sphere differed between NCAR and CAR by 1.95 ± 1.45 D (p < .05) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -0.94 to 4.85 D, with less discrepancy found in myopic eyes. The mean values of cylinder differed by -0.08 ± 0.43 D (p < .05) with 95% LoA of -0.93 to 0.77 D. Power vector results reflected a similar lack of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of our screening referral criteria were, respectively, 66% and 84% for myopia, 66% and 98% for hyperopia, and 98% and 58% for astigmatism.
CONCLUSION
NCAR is insufficient in preschoolers for spherical refractive error referrals. Level of agreements was lower for spherical (15.5% within 0.5D) and higher for cylindrical refractive errors (89.6%) compared to CAR. In the absence of cycloplegic examination, screening programs using NCAR should utilize low referral thresholds for spherical refractive error.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Mydriatics; Los Angeles; Vision Screening; Refractive Errors; Refraction, Ocular; Myopia
PubMed: 36168672
DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2127786 -
International Ophthalmology Dec 2023To reveal refractive errors, the relationship between refractive errors and optical parameters, and the effect of prematurity and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) on...
PURPOSE
To reveal refractive errors, the relationship between refractive errors and optical parameters, and the effect of prematurity and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) on ocular development in school children with a history of prematurity.
METHODS
Premature children aged 8-12 years were divided into 3 groups as those without ROP (Group 1), with ROP that did not require treatment (Group 2), and with laser-treated ROP (Group 3). Age-matched full-term healthy children were included in the control group. Demographic features were recorded. A detailed ophthalmologic examination was performed. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), iris thickness (IT), lens thickness (LT), vitreous body length (VBL), axial length (AL) were measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The results were compared between groups.
RESULTS
Group 3 had the lowest best corrected visual acuity (0.81 ± 0.31 SL), the highest rates of myopia (55.9%) and astigmatism (50.0%). In the premature groups, ACD (p < 0.001), TIA (p < 0.001), IT (p = 0.016), VBL (p < 0.001) and AL (p < 0.001) were lower; LT (p < 0.001) was higher than in the control group. As birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) increased, ACD, TIA, VBL and AL increased, and LT decreased (p < 0.001). In the group 3, 35.2% anisometropia, 17.6% of esotropia and 5.9% of exotropia were detected.
CONCLUSIONS
The frequency of myopia, astigmatism, hyperopia and anisometropia is increasing in premature children, especially in cases with laser-treated ROP. Premature cases are characterized by thicker lens, shallower ACD, narrower TIA and shorter AL. Refractive errors, anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus are important causes of visual impairment in children with laser-treated ROP.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Child; Humans; Retinopathy of Prematurity; Astigmatism; Anisometropia; Turkey; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors; Gestational Age; Myopia; Biometry
PubMed: 37847477
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02884-y -
Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the... Sep 2023To survey paediatric eye care providers to identify current patterns of prescribing for hyperopia.
PURPOSE
To survey paediatric eye care providers to identify current patterns of prescribing for hyperopia.
METHODS
Paediatric eye care providers were invited, via email, to participate in a survey to evaluate current age-based refractive error prescribing practices. Questions were designed to determine which factors may influence the survey participant's prescribing pattern (e.g., patient's age, magnitude of hyperopia, patient's symptoms, heterophoria and stereopsis) and if the providers were to prescribe, how much hyperopic correction would they prescribe (e.g., full or partial prescription). The response distributions by profession (optometry and ophthalmology) were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov cumulative distribution function test.
RESULTS
Responses were submitted by 738 participants regarding how they prescribe for their hyperopic patients. Most providers within each profession considered similar clinical factors when prescribing. The percentages of optometrists and ophthalmologists who reported considering the factor often differed significantly. Factors considered similarly by both optometrists and ophthalmologists were the presence of symptoms (98.0%, p = 0.14), presence of astigmatism and/or anisometropia (97.5%, p = 0.06) and the possibility of teasing (8.3%, p = 0.49). A wide range of prescribing was observed within each profession, with some providers reporting that they would prescribe for low levels of hyperopia while others reported that they would never prescribe. When prescribing for bilateral hyperopia in children with age-normal visual acuity and no manifest deviation or symptoms, the threshold for prescribing decreased with age for both professions, with ophthalmologists typically prescribing 1.5-2 D less than optometrists. The threshold for prescribing also decreased for both optometrists and ophthalmologists when children had associated clinical factors (e.g., esophoria or reduced near visual function). Optometrists and ophthalmologists most commonly prescribed based on cycloplegic refraction, although optometrists most commonly prescribed based on both the manifest and cycloplegic refraction for children ≥7 years.
CONCLUSION
Prescribing patterns for paediatric hyperopia vary significantly among eye care providers.
Topics: Child; Humans; Hyperopia; Mydriatics; Refractive Errors; Astigmatism; Optometry
PubMed: 37334937
DOI: 10.1111/opo.13184