-
Arthroscopy Techniques Aug 2023The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a common cause of shoulder pain. Biceps tenodesis is commonly used to address biceps and superior labrum pathology, reducing...
The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a common cause of shoulder pain. Biceps tenodesis is commonly used to address biceps and superior labrum pathology, reducing pain and restoring function. There are numerous techniques for biceps tenodesis, and it is unclear as to which single technique and approach provides significantly superior outcomes. In this technical note, we present an arthroscopic suprapectoral approach with release of the LHB from the bicipital groove and subsequent fixation with suture anchor. This technique simplifies the technique to be performed from standard arthroscopic portals and aims to maximize outcomes and minimize common complications associated with biceps tenodesis.
PubMed: 37654886
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.002 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Sep 2023Treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial. Numerous reconstruction techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this...
BACKGROUND
Treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial. Numerous reconstruction techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to describe the complication profile in a large cohort of patients who underwent surgical management of AC joint separations using a variety of reconstruction strategies.
METHODS
All patients who underwent surgery for AC joint injuries from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution were identified. Chart review was performed to capture patient demographics, radiographic measurements, operative techniques, postoperative complications, and revision surgery. Structural failure was defined as a radiographic loss of reduction of greater than 50% when comparing immediate and final postoperative imaging. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications and revision surgery.
RESULTS
Of the 279 patients included in the study, 66 (24%) had type III separations, 20 (7%) type IV, and 193 (69%) type V. Fifty-three percent underwent surgery acutely (<6 weeks of injury), and 40% were chronic (>3 months). A total of 252 of the 279 surgeries (90%) were performed open and 27 (10%) were arthroscopically assisted. Allograft was used in 164 of 279 (59%) cases. Specific operative techniques (with or without allograft) included hook plating (1%), modified Weaver Dunn (16%), cortical button fixation (18%), and suture fixation (65%). At mean 28-week follow-up, 108 complications were identified in 97 patients (35%). Complications were identified at mean 20 ± 21 weeks. Sixty-nine structural failures (25%) were identified. Persistent AC joint pain requiring injection, clavicle fracture, adhesive capsulitis, and hardware complications were the other most common complications. Twenty-one patients (8%) underwent unplanned revision surgery at mean 38 ± 28 weeks after the index procedure, with the most common indication for structural failure, hardware complications, or fracture of the clavicle or coracoid. Patients who had surgery after 6 weeks from injury had a significantly greater risk of having a complication (odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.77, P = .009) and a significantly greater risk of having structural failure (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.38-5.28, P = .004). Patients who had an arthroscopic technique had a greater risk of structural failure (P = .002). Complications, structural failure, and revision surgery were not significantly correlated with use of allograft or specific operative techniques.
CONCLUSION
Surgical management of AC joint injuries is associated with a relatively high complication profile. Loss of reduction in the postoperative period is common. However, the revision surgery rate is low. These findings are important for patient preoperative counseling.
Topics: Humans; Acromioclavicular Joint; Joint Dislocations; Clavicle; Postoperative Complications; Fractures, Bone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37075939
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.019 -
Clinics in Sports Medicine Oct 2023Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common shoulder injuries in contact/collision athletes. There are a number of different surgical options that can be... (Review)
Review
Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common shoulder injuries in contact/collision athletes. There are a number of different surgical options that can be used to treat these injuries. The majority of these injuries can be treated nonoperatively with an early return to play for type I and II injuries. Surgical intervention and AC/CC (coracoclavicular) ligament reconstruction have excellent postoperative outcomes if complications can be avoided. This review will focus on the pearls and pitfalls for anatomic AC and CC ligament reconstruction for high-grade AC joint injuries.
Topics: Humans; Acromioclavicular Joint; Athletes; Ligaments, Articular; Shoulder Injuries
PubMed: 37716726
DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.05.011 -
European Journal of Medical Research Jul 2023Shoulder is vulnerable to dislocation owing to its anatomical structure and the increasing popularity of contact sports in young population. The management of first-time... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Shoulder is vulnerable to dislocation owing to its anatomical structure and the increasing popularity of contact sports in young population. The management of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in this group is still controversial and the prognosis are varied. This review aimed to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and conservative management for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients.
METHODS
Databases were searched till November 2021, and comparative studies between arthroscopic Bankart repair and conservative management for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young population were selected. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Back Review Group 12-item scale. Outcome measures included recurrence of instability, return to play, subsequent instability surgery, and shoulder functional scores.
RESULTS
The search returned 12 eligible trials with 786 participants. All the trials were of prospective design. After arthroscopic Bankart repair, patients experienced significantly less re-dislocation (7.5% vs. 53.0%, p < 0.00001, I = 0%), subluxation (3.1% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.0001, I = 0%), positive apprehension test (7.3% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.002, I = 11%), and subsequent surgical treatment for instability (5.6% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.00001, I = 0%) when compared with those underwent conservative management. And more patients returned to play (83.5% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.03, I = 81%) after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Outcomes regarding the functional scores did not reach a significant difference between the two cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
Arthroscopic Bankart repair showed superiority over conservative management in terms of recurrence, return to play, and subsequent instability surgery during the follow-up in young active patients that encountered first episode of dislocation. As long-term prognosis is comparable, an immediate surgical stabilization might not be suitable for everyone.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder Dislocation; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Conservative Treatment; Joint Instability; Arthroscopy; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37501089
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01160-0 -
Journal of Medicine and Life Aug 2023Inflammation and hypertrophy of the ankle joint's synovial lining can occur due to various causes. Chronic pain and degenerative changes may be due to synovitis causing...
Inflammation and hypertrophy of the ankle joint's synovial lining can occur due to various causes. Chronic pain and degenerative changes may be due to synovitis causing clinical manifestations through traction on the joint capsule. The failure of conservative treatment for at least six months indicates arthroscopic debridement, which can provide significant pain relief without the morbidity of extensive surgical exposures. This study was therefore conducted to establish the functional results of arthroscopic debridement of the ankle joint in synovitis. Fifteen patients with chronic ankle pain who had not responded to conservative treatment for approximately six months were included in the study. Arthroscopic debridement was performed using a shaver blade, followed by a postoperative ankle physiotherapy regimen. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the AOFAS, FADI, and VAS scores, with a mean follow-up period of 26 months. There was a significant improvement in the final clinical outcomes of the patients. The post-operative VAS score improved to 2.20±0.56 (2-4) (p-value=0.001), the AOFAS score was 86±8.25 (65-98) (p-value-0.001), and the FADI Score was 86.93±7.35(70-96) (p-value=0.001). Thirteen patients (86.67%) achieved outstanding or good results, while two had fair results, according to Meislin's criterion. One patient reported a superficial wound infection, which subsided with antibiotic therapy. The study findings indicate that arthroscopic ankle debridement is an efficient method to treat persistent ankle discomfort induced by synovitis, and it has a low postsurgical complications rate, quicker recovery, and less joint stiffness.
Topics: Humans; Ankle; Ankle Joint; Debridement; Synovitis; Pain; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38024814
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0117 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Dec 2023Anterior shoulder instability surgery has evolved over the decades, including both anatomic and nonanatomic repairs and reconstructions. Surgeons are continually...
Editorial Commentary: Both Bristow and Latarjet Procedures Result in Low Rates of Recurrent Shoulder Instability Despite Potential for Bone Resorption and Lack of Graft Healing.
Anterior shoulder instability surgery has evolved over the decades, including both anatomic and nonanatomic repairs and reconstructions. Surgeons are continually advancing their skills and performing more of these procedures using arthroscopic as opposed to open techniques in patients with and without glenoid bone loss. However, there is a steep learning curve and increased technical demands when performing these procedures arthroscopically. Despite high success rates, bone graft resorption or lack of healing after Latarjet and Bristow procedures is well documented, and it is possible that patients develop enough scarring that their shoulders remain stable. Osteoarthritis after these nonanatomic procedures can occur making shoulder arthroplasty and reconstruction technically more challenging because of scarring and the altered anatomy. It remains to be seen whether these arthroscopic techniques as opposed to open surgery lessen the scarring and thus the technical demands of shoulder reconstruction in the small subset of patients who unfortunately develop symptomatic shoulder osteoarthritis. Therefore, in my practice, these techniques are carefully chosen for select patients. My indications for use of the Bristow procedure as a primary procedure for anterior shoulder instability are in patients who perform mixed martial arts fighting and high-level wrestlers without significant glenoid or humeral bone loss. My indications for the Latarjet procedure are in patients with chronic anterior instability and associated anterior glenoid bone loss 15% to 30%, off-track Hill-Sachs lesions, and revision surgery, particularly in high-demand contact and collision athletes. These 2 arthroscopic procedures, despite being nonanatomic, provide surgeons with excellent treatment options for those difficult patients with anterior shoulder instability. Despite high success rates with these arthroscopic procedures, patients should be counseled on the risks of graft resorption, graft nonunion, and possible shoulder osteoarthritis. The appropriate indications for these arthroscopic procedures can enhance the successful outcomes for high-risk patients with shoulder instability while also considering the possible long-term impacts of altering shoulder anatomy and scarring in the rare patient who develops shoulder osteoarthritis.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Shoulder; Cicatrix; Shoulder Joint; Osteoarthritis; Bone Resorption
PubMed: 37981386
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.025 -
Arthroscopy Techniques Apr 2024The Latarjet procedure is a proven and effective operation to treat anterior shoulder instability. Especially in cases with anterior glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet...
The Latarjet procedure is a proven and effective operation to treat anterior shoulder instability. Especially in cases with anterior glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet operation is the most popular procedure to restore glenoid anatomy and avoid further dislocations. Next to the re-creation of the missing glenoid bone, the sling effect of the conjoint tendon transferred between a split in the subscapularis muscle is an important "soft tissue stabilizer" of the humeral head. However, it has been shown that the inferior part of the subscapularis muscle tends to degenerate, leading to fatty infiltration of the muscle itself. Also, exposure through the subscapularis split is technically demanding, and there is a risk of nerve damage due to the pulling forces of the retractors during open surgery. When performing the procedure arthroscopically, extremely low and medial portals are necessary to find a correct angle for the glenoid drilling when approaching from anterior. Neurovascular structures may be at risk during these surgical steps. The aim of the flipped Latarjet procedure is to facilitate a safe and reliable arthroscopic operation to anteriorly stabilize the shoulder by transferring the coracoid to the deficient glenoid without splitting the subscapularis muscle while keeping the benefits of a sling effect of the conjoined tendon.
PubMed: 38690334
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.102899 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2023Rotator cuff tear size, fatty infiltration, and scapular morphology are correlated with tendon healing and functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair; however, the...
BACKGROUND
Rotator cuff tear size, fatty infiltration, and scapular morphology are correlated with tendon healing and functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair; however, the association between anteroposterior acromial coverage and the clinical outcomes of anteroposterior massive rotator cuff tears (AP-MRCTs; involving all 3 tendons) remains unclear.
PURPOSE
To identify the association between AP acromial coverage and functional and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
A total of 98 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs between January 2015 and December 2020 were included in the study and classified according to whether anterior acromial coverage (AAC) was anterior (46 patients; positive AAC group) or posterior (52 patients; negative AAC group) to the scapular line on true lateral shoulder radiographs. Demographic characteristics, surgical details, and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. Acromial morphological features, global tear extension (GTE), the global fatty infiltration index (GFII), tendon integrity after repair, proximal humeral migration, and glenohumeral abduction were measured and calculated on radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging scans preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors of a rotator cuff retear.
RESULTS
The positive AAC group showed larger AAC, posterior acromial tilt, and anterior acromial slope as well as smaller posterior acromial coverage compared with the negative AAC group. Postoperatively, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (82.5 ± 8.3 vs 77.2 ± 11.5, respectively; = .013), active abduction (157.8°± 27.1° vs 142.7°± 39.6°, respectively; = .048), and glenohumeral abduction (45.6°± 10.4° vs 39.7°± 14.9°, respectively; = .041) in the positive AAC group were significantly higher than those in the negative AAC group, while the retear rate (23.9% vs 44.2%, respectively; = .035) and proximal humeral migration (1.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively; = .006) were significantly lower in the positive AAC group than in the negative AAC group. Smaller AAC (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-1.00]; = .040), larger GTE (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; = .017), and a higher GFII (OR, 3.49 [95% CI, 1.09-11.19]; = .036) were associated with an increased risk of a rotator cuff retear.
CONCLUSION
Increased AAC was associated with a lower retear rate and better functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs. A preliminary risk evaluation integrating GTE, the GFII, and AAC is recommended to consider the necessity of additional procedures for patients in need of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Cohort Studies; Radiography; Acromion; Rotator Cuff; Lacerations
PubMed: 37593843
DOI: 10.1177/03635465231187900 -
Arthroscopy Techniques Feb 2024Biceps tenodesis has been proven to be an effective treatment for biceps tendon and superior labral pathology. Many techniques including both open and arthroscopic...
Biceps tenodesis has been proven to be an effective treatment for biceps tendon and superior labral pathology. Many techniques including both open and arthroscopic approaches have been reported. Open techniques afford management of the entire proximal biceps tendon but are limited by wound healing issues, increased bleeding, and increased surgical time. Arthroscopic tenodesis offers benefits in terms of surgical efficiency, cosmesis, and bleeding risk. However, standard arthroscopic tenodesis only addresses intra-articular biceps pathology. In this report we describe an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique at the suprapectoral region of the humerus using knotless suture anchor fixation.
PubMed: 38435253
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.09.017 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Nov 2023Anterior shoulder instability is a common clinical problem; however, conflicting evidence exists regarding optimal treatment algorithms. We perform a comparative... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Anterior shoulder instability is a common clinical problem; however, conflicting evidence exists regarding optimal treatment algorithms. We perform a comparative analysis of stabilization techniques used for recurrent anterior shoulder instability to identify the one associated with the lowest rate of recurrent instability. We additionally explore how glenoid bone loss and osseus lesions affect recurrence rates.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies comparing surgical techniques for anterior shoulder instability. Two team members independently assessed all potential studies for eligibility and extracted data. Each included study underwent a risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias summary tool. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of recurrent instability, which underwent a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Additional analyses were performed relating to the degree of glenoid bone loss and the presence of osseous lesions.
RESULTS
Of 2699 studies screened, 52 studies with 4209 patients were included. Patients who underwent open Latarjet demonstrated the overall lowest rate of recurrent instability [log odds ratio (L) 1.93], whereas patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair demonstrated the highest (L 2.87). When glenoid bone loss was 10% to 20%, open Latarjet had significantly lower recurrent instability (P = .0016) compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair. When glenoid bone loss increased from 0%-10% to 10%-20%, arthroscopic Bankart repair had a significantly increased rate of recurrence (P = .021). In the presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, both open Latarjet (P = .01) and arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (P = .029) had significantly reduced recurrence rates compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair. Finally, regardless of procedure, the presence of a Hill-Sachs or bony Bankart lesion was associated with an increased risk of recurrent instability (r = 0.44, P = .0003, and r = 0.40, P = .006, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The open Latarjet has the overall lowest recurrent instability and significantly lower compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair in the setting of increasing glenoid bone loss. Bone loss between 0% and 10% results in similar outcomes across all procedures.
PubMed: 37541334
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.004