-
Current Opinion in Virology Oct 2023The effectiveness of early COVID-19 vaccines in reducing the severity of the disease has led to a focus on developing next-generation vaccines that can prevent infection... (Review)
Review
The effectiveness of early COVID-19 vaccines in reducing the severity of the disease has led to a focus on developing next-generation vaccines that can prevent infection and transmission of the virus. One promising approach involves the induction of mucosal immunity through nasal administration and a variety of mucosal vaccine candidates using different platforms are currently in development. Live-attenuated viruses, less pathogenic versions of SARS-CoV-2, have promising features as a mucosal vaccine platform and have the potential to induce hybrid immunity in individuals who have already received mRNA vaccines. This review discusses the potential benefits and considerations for the use of live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2 intranasal vaccines and highlights the authors' work in developing such a vaccine platform.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; Immunity, Mucosal; COVID-19
PubMed: 37604085
DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2023.101347 -
Toxins Sep 2023Vaccines are one of the most effective strategies to prevent pathogen-induced illness in humans. The earliest vaccines were based on live inoculations with low doses of... (Review)
Review
Vaccines are one of the most effective strategies to prevent pathogen-induced illness in humans. The earliest vaccines were based on live inoculations with low doses of live or related pathogens, which carried a relatively high risk of developing the disease they were meant to prevent. The introduction of attenuated and killed pathogens as vaccines dramatically reduced these risks; however, attenuated live vaccines still carry a risk of reversion to a pathogenic strain capable of causing disease. This risk is completely eliminated with recombinant protein or subunit vaccines, which are atoxic and non-infectious. However, these vaccines require adjuvants and often significant optimization to induce robust T-cell responses and long-lasting immune memory. Some pathogens produce protein toxins that cause or contribute to disease. To protect against the effects of such toxins, chemically inactivated toxoid vaccines have been found to be effective. Toxoid vaccines are successfully used today at a global scale to protect against tetanus and diphtheria. Recent developments for toxoid vaccines are investigating the possibilities of utilizing recombinant protein toxins mutated to eliminate biologic activity instead of chemically inactivated toxins. Finally, one of the most contemporary approaches toward vaccine design utilizes messenger RNA (mRNA) as a vaccine candidate. This approach was used globally to protect against coronavirus disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2019, due to its advantages of quick production and scale-up, and effectiveness in eliciting a neutralizing antibody response. Nonetheless, mRNA vaccines require specialized storage and transport conditions, posing challenges for low- and middle-income countries. Among multiple available technologies for vaccine design and formulation, which technology is most appropriate? This review focuses on the considerable developments that have been made in utilizing diverse vaccine technologies with a focus on vaccines targeting bacterial toxins. We describe how advancements in vaccine technology, combined with a deeper understanding of pathogen-host interactions, offer exciting and promising avenues for the development of new and improved vaccines.
Topics: Humans; Pandemics; COVID-19; Vaccines, Attenuated; Vaccines, Synthetic; Toxins, Biological; Bacterial Vaccines; Tetanus Toxoid
PubMed: 37755989
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15090563 -
Journal of Molecular Biology Aug 2023Although one member of the poxvirus family, variola virus, has caused one of the most devastating human infections worldwide, smallpox, the knowledge gained over the... (Review)
Review
Although one member of the poxvirus family, variola virus, has caused one of the most devastating human infections worldwide, smallpox, the knowledge gained over the last 30 years on the molecular, virological and immunological mechanisms of these viruses has allowed the use of members of this family as vectors for the generation of recombinant vaccines against numerous pathogens. In this review, we cover different aspects of the history and biology of poxviruses with emphasis on their application as vaccines, from first- to fourth-generation, against smallpox, monkeypox, emerging viral diseases highlighted by the World Health Organization (COVID-19, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, Ebola and Marburg virus diseases, Lassa fever, Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome, Nipah and other henipaviral diseases, Rift Valley fever and Zika), as well as against one of the most concerning prevalent virus, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, the causative agent of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. We discuss the implications in human health of the 2022 monkeypox epidemic affecting many countries, and the rapid prophylactic and therapeutic measures adopted to control virus dissemination within the human population. We also describe the preclinical and clinical evaluation of the Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara and New York vaccinia virus poxviral strains expressing heterologous antigens from the viral diseases listed above. Finally, we report different approaches to improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of poxvirus-based vaccine candidates, such as deletion of immunomodulatory genes, insertion of host-range genes and enhanced transcription of foreign genes through modified viral promoters. Some future prospects are also highlighted.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Communicable Diseases, Emerging; COVID-19; Genetic Vectors; Mpox (monkeypox); Poxviridae; Smallpox; Vaccines, Attenuated; Vaccinia virus; Viral Vaccines; Virus Diseases; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection
PubMed: 37301278
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168173 -
Live-Attenuated CHIKV Vaccine with Rearranged Genome Replicates and Induces Immune Response in Mice.BioRxiv : the Preprint Server For... Sep 2023Chikungunya fever virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes wide-spread human infections and epidemics in Asia, Africa and recently, in the Americas....
Chikungunya fever virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes wide-spread human infections and epidemics in Asia, Africa and recently, in the Americas. There is no approved vaccine and CHIKV is considered a priority pathogen by CEPI and WHO. Previously, we developed immunization DNA (iDNA) plasmid capable of launching live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine . Here we report the use of CHIKV iDNA plasmid to prepare a novel, live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine V5040 with rearranged RNA genome for improved safety. In V5040, genomic RNA was rearranged to encode capsid gene downstream from the glycoprotein genes. To secure safety profile, attenuated mutations derived from experimental CHIKV 181/25 vaccine were also engineered into E2 gene of V5040. The DNA copy of rearranged CHIKV genomic RNA with attenuated mutations was cloned into iDNA plasmid pMG5040 downstream from the CMV promoter. After transfection in vitro, pMG5040 launched replication of V5040 virus with rearranged genome and attenuating E2 mutations. Furthermore, V5040 virus was evaluated in experimental murine models for safety and immunogenicity. Vaccination with V5040 virus subcutaneously resulted in elicitation of CHIKV-specific, virus-neutralizing antibodies. The results warrant further evaluation of V5040 virus with rearranged genome as a novel live-attenuated vaccine for CHIKV.
PubMed: 37745520
DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.16.558061 -
Current Microbiology Apr 2024Francisella tularensis is a facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen that affects both humans and animals. It was developed into a biological warfare weapon as a... (Review)
Review
Francisella tularensis is a facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen that affects both humans and animals. It was developed into a biological warfare weapon as a result. In this article, the current status of tularemia vaccine development is presented. A live-attenuated vaccine that was designed over 50 years ago using the less virulent F. tularensis subspecies holarctica is the only prophylactic currently available, but it has not been approved for use in humans or animals. Other promising live, killed, and subunit vaccine candidates have recently been developed and tested in animal models. This study will investigate some possible vaccines and the challenges they face during development.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Tularemia; Vaccines
PubMed: 38564047
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-024-03658-0 -
Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton,... 2024Available prophylactic vaccines help prevent many infectious diseases that burden humanity. Future vaccinology will likely extend these benefits by more effectively... (Review)
Review
Available prophylactic vaccines help prevent many infectious diseases that burden humanity. Future vaccinology will likely extend these benefits by more effectively countering newly emerging pathogens, fighting currently intractable infections, or even generating novel treatment modalities for non-infectious diseases. Instead of applying protein antigen directly, RNA vaccines contain short-lived genetic information that guides the expression of protein antigen in the vaccinee, like infection with a recombinant viral vector. Upon decades of research, messenger RNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccines have proven clinical value in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic as they combine benefits of killed subunit vaccines and live-attenuated vectors, including flexible production, self-adjuvanting effects, and stimulation of humoral and cellular immunity. RNA vaccines remain subject to continued development raising high hopes for broader future application. Their mechanistic versatility promises to make them a key tool of vaccinology and immunotherapy going forward. Here, I briefly review key developments in RNA vaccines and outline the contents of this volume of Methods in Molecular Biology.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; mRNA Vaccines; Nanoparticles; Lipids; Vaccines, Synthetic; Liposomes
PubMed: 38814388
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3770-8_1 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2023Live vaccines (measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] and varicella-zoster virus [VZV]) have not been recommended after solid organ transplant due to concern for inciting vaccine...
IMPORTANCE
Live vaccines (measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] and varicella-zoster virus [VZV]) have not been recommended after solid organ transplant due to concern for inciting vaccine strain infection in an immunocompromised host. However, the rates of measles, mumps, and varicella are rising nationally and internationally, leaving susceptible immunocompromised children at risk for life-threating conditions.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the safety and immunogenicity of live vaccines in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study included select pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients who had not completed their primary MMR and VZV vaccine series and/or who displayed nonprotective serum antibody levels at enrollment between January 1, 2002, and February 28, 2023. Eligibility for live vaccine was determined by individual US pediatric solid organ transplant center protocols.
EXPOSURES
Exposure was defined as receipt of a posttransplant live vaccine. Transplant recipients received 1 to 3 doses of MMR vaccine and/or 1 to 3 doses of VZV vaccine.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE
Safety data were collected following each vaccination, and antibody levels were obtained at 0 to 3 months and 1 year following vaccination. Comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U test, and factors associated with development of postvaccination protective antibodies were explored using univariate analysis.
RESULTS
The cohort included 281 children (270 [96%] liver, 9 [3%] kidney, 2 [1%] liver-kidney recipients) from 18 centers. The median time from transplant to enrollment was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-11.1 years). The median age at first posttransplant vaccine was 8.9 years (IQR, 4.7-13.8 years). A total of 202 of 275 (73%) children were receiving low-level monotherapy immunosuppression at the time of vaccination. The majority of children developed protective antibodies following vaccination (107 of 149 [72%] varicella, 130 of 152 [86%] measles, 100 of 120 [83%] mumps, and 124 of 125 [99%] rubella). One year post vaccination, the majority of children who initially mounted protective antibodies maintained this protection (34 of 44 [77%] varicella, 45 of 49 [92%] measles, 35 of 42 [83%] mumps, 51 of 54 [94%] rubella). Five children developed clinical varicella, all of which resolved within 1 week. There were no cases of measles or rubella and no episodes of graft rejection within 1 month of vaccination. There was no association between antibody response and immunosuppression level at the time of vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The findings suggest that live vaccinations may be safe and immunogenic after solid organ transplant in select pediatric recipients and can offer protection against circulating measles, mumps, and varicella.
Topics: Child; Humans; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Viral Vaccines; Chickenpox; Chickenpox Vaccine; Mumps; Vaccines, Combined; Transplant Recipients; Cohort Studies; Rubella; Measles; Vaccines, Attenuated
PubMed: 37824141
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37602 -
The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health Dec 2023Scant evidence exists on the real-world effectiveness of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV-4) in younger children. We aimed to assess the real-world...
Effectiveness of the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine against influenza-related hospitalisations and morbidity among children aged 2 to 6 years in Denmark: a nationwide cohort study emulating a target trial.
BACKGROUND
Scant evidence exists on the real-world effectiveness of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV-4) in younger children. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of LAIV-4 against influenza-related hospital contacts and admission and morbidity.
METHODS
Using nationwide Danish health-care registries, we designed a cohort study that emulates a target trial, comparing LAIV-4 to no vaccination in children aged 2-6 years. Eligible children vaccinated from Oct 1, 2021, to Jan 15, 2022, were matched to unvaccinated controls in a 1:1 ratio according to demographic characteristics and risk groups for influenza, and followed-up until May 31, 2022. Primary study outcomes any hospital contact for influenza and influenza-related hospital admissions more than 12 h in duration, while hospital admission for respiratory tract infections, or for wheezing or asthma, and antibiotic prescriptions were evaluated as secondary outcomes. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs using Poisson regression for each outcome. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1 - IRR.
FINDINGS
Among 308 520 Danish children aged 2-6 years, 95 434 vaccinated children were matched with 95 434 unvaccinated children who acted as controls. Receipt of LAIV-4 compared with no vaccination was associated with a reduced IRR of 0·36 (95% CI 0·27 to 0·46) and estimated vaccine effectiveness of 64·3% (53·6 to 72·6) against influenza-related hospital contacts (76 vs 210 events). The corresponding IRR and vaccine effectiveness against influenza-related hospital admissions were 0·63 (0·38 to 1·05) and 36·9% (-5·2 to 62·1; 24 vs 38 events), respectively. LAIV-4 was not associated with reductions in admission rates for respiratory tract infections (IRR 1·14, 95% CI 0·94 to 1·38), wheezing or asthma (1·04, 0·83 to 1·31), or antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections (0·97, 0·93 to 1·00). Vaccine effectiveness assessed across risk groups for influenza showed similar effectiveness in children with and without coexisting risk factors for severe influenza.
INTERPRETATION
LAIV-4 offered moderate protection in younger children against influenza-related hospital contacts during a season dominated by influenza A(H3N2); however vaccination was not associated with reductions in secondary outcomes. This real-world study thereby supports trial evidence of moderate vaccine effectiveness of LAIV-4 against influenza-related outcomes when implementing broad vaccination schedules in younger children.
FUNDING
Beckett-Fonden.
Topics: Child; Humans; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Cohort Studies; Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype; Respiratory Sounds; Hospitalization; Vaccines, Attenuated; Morbidity; Asthma; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Denmark
PubMed: 37898144
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00225-0 -
Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) Dec 2023The use of live attenuated vaccines in patients with immunosuppressive agents is contraindicated in package inserts and guidelines in Japan and other countries. However,... (Review)
Review
The use of live attenuated vaccines in patients with immunosuppressive agents is contraindicated in package inserts and guidelines in Japan and other countries. However, patients receiving immunosuppressants have a high risk of infectious disease becoming severe, and the necessity to prevent infectious disease is high. To date, 2,091 vaccinations have been reported in 25 reports of live attenuated vaccines in people receiving immunosuppressants. Twenty-three patients (1.1%) became infected with the virus strain used in the vaccine, which was varicella virus in 21 patients. No reports have described life-threatening complications. A prospective study at the National Center for Child Health and Development conducted under certain immunological conditions (CD4 cell count ≥ 500/mm, stimulation index of lymphocyte blast transformation by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) ≥ 101.6, serum immunoglobulin G ≥ 300 mg/dL) confirmed the serological effectiveness and safety. The evidence suggests that live attenuated vaccines can be used even in combination with immunosuppressants. Further evidence must be gathered and immunological criteria investigated to determine the conditions for safe use. Depending on the results of these investigations, the wording in package inserts and guidelines may need to be revised.
Topics: Child; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Vaccines, Attenuated; Prospective Studies; Immune System Diseases; Communicable Diseases
PubMed: 37076756
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-05969-z -
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao = Chinese... Sep 2023Development of a vaccine that can simultaneously induce effective mucosal immunity and systemic immunity is an ideal goal to prevent mucosal pathogenic infections. The... (Review)
Review
Development of a vaccine that can simultaneously induce effective mucosal immunity and systemic immunity is an ideal goal to prevent mucosal pathogenic infections. The digestive tract has many sites for inducing mucosal immunity, including the mouth, stomach and small intestine. An ideal oral viral vaccine can not only induce better local and distal mucosal immunity, but also produce better systemic immunity. The oral viral vaccine has also attracted much attention because of its painless vaccination, self-administration and other advantages. Due to the complexity of human digestive tract environment and mucosal immunity, only three oral attenuated live vaccines have been successfully marketed for human use. This review summarizes the characteristics of gastrointestinal mucosal immunity, the current types and research status of oral viral vaccines, and the challenges faced by oral viral vaccines, with the hope to facilitate the research and development of oral viral vaccines for human use in China.
Topics: Humans; Viral Vaccines; Vaccination; Immunity, Mucosal; Vaccines, Attenuated; Vaccine Development
PubMed: 37805837
DOI: 10.13345/j.cjb.220960