-
Biomedical Reports Feb 2024Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. There are two distinct types of AIP: AIP type 1 (AIP-1), a pancreatic manifestation of a multi-organ disease linked to... (Review)
Review
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. There are two distinct types of AIP: AIP type 1 (AIP-1), a pancreatic manifestation of a multi-organ disease linked to immunoglobulin (Ig)G4, and AIP type 2 (AIP-2), a pancreas-specific disease unrelated to IgG4. The usual course of treatment for AIP is oral corticosteroid medication. Rituximab has also been recommended for recurrent AIP-1 in order to initiate remission and provide ongoing treatment. Immunomodulators such as azathioprine are used to keep certain patients in remission. Evaluation also takes into account a number of pharmacological alternatives, including biologic drugs like anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, a safe and efficient second-line treatment for AIP-2 relapse or steroid dependence. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which are poorly tolerated due to considerable side effects, are being replaced by other biologic drugs, which may offer a beneficial therapeutic alternative.
PubMed: 38259589
DOI: 10.3892/br.2023.1714 -
Current Rheumatology Reports Oct 2023Discuss the prognostic significance of kidney flares in patients with lupus nephritis, associated risk factors, and possible preventative strategies. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Discuss the prognostic significance of kidney flares in patients with lupus nephritis, associated risk factors, and possible preventative strategies.
RECENT FINDINGS
Recently performed clinical trials and observational cohort studies underscore the high frequency of relapses of kidney disease, following initial response, in patients with proliferative and/or membranous lupus nephritis. Analysis of hard disease outcomes such as progression to chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease, coupled with histological findings from repeat kidney biopsy studies, have drawn attention to the importance of renal function preservation that should be pursued as early as lupus nephritis is diagnosed. In this respect, non-randomized and randomized evidence have suggested a number of factors associated with reduced risk of renal flares such as attaining a very low level of proteinuria (< 700-800 mg/24 h by 12 months), using mycophenolate over azathioprine, adding belimumab to standard therapy, maintaining immunosuppressive/biological treatment for at least 3 to 5 years, and using hydroxychloroquine. Other factors that warrant further clarification include serological activity and the use of repeat kidney biopsy to guide the intensity and duration of treatment in selected cases. The results from ongoing innovative studies integrating kidney histological and clinical outcomes, together with an expanding spectrum of therapies in lupus nephritis, are expected to facilitate individual medical care and long-term disease and patient prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Lupus Nephritis; Immunosuppressive Agents; Azathioprine; Kidney; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37452914
DOI: 10.1007/s11926-023-01109-6 -
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry Mar 2024Several classes of compounds are applied in clinics due to their immunosuppressive properties in transplantology and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Derivatives of...
Several classes of compounds are applied in clinics due to their immunosuppressive properties in transplantology and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Derivatives of mycophenolic acid, corticosteroids and chemotherapeutics bearing heterocyclic moieties like methotrexate, azathioprine, mizoribine, and ruxolitinib are active substances with investigated mechanisms of action. However, improved synthetic approaches of known drugs and novel derivatives are still being reported to attempt better accessibility and therapeutic properties. In this review article, we present the synthesis of the designed chemical structures based on recent literature reports concerning novel compounds as promising immunosuppressive drugs. Moreover, some of the discussed derivers revealed also other types of activities with prospective medicinal potential.
PubMed: 38561615
DOI: 10.2174/0115680266292661240322072908 -
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD May 2024Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as...
Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as second-line choices despite widespread consensus on their efficacy. We aimed to gather real-world data comparing the tolerability and reasons for discontinuation for these agents, by performing a national United Kingdom survey of side effects and reasons for discontinuation of immunosuppressants in myasthenia gravis. Of 235 patients, 166 had taken azathioprine, 102 mycophenolate, and 40 methotrexate. The most common side effects for each agent were liver dysfunction for azathioprine (23 %), diarrhoea for mycophenolate (14 %), and fatigue for methotrexate (18 %). Women were generally more likely to experience side effects of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine was significantly more likely to be discontinued than mycophenolate and methotrexate due to side effects. There was no significant difference in treatment cessation due to lack of efficacy. This study highlights the significant side-effect burden of treatment for myasthenia gravis. Mechanisms to reduce azathioprine toxicity should be utilised, however mycophenolate and methotrexate appear to be good treatment choices if teratogenicity is not a concern. Women are disadvantaged due to higher frequency of side effects and considerations around pregnancy and breastfeeding. Treatments with improved tolerability are needed.
Topics: Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Methotrexate; Female; Mycophenolic Acid; Azathioprine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Adult; Aged; United Kingdom
PubMed: 38626662
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2024.03.010 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Mar 2024
Topics: Humans; Colitis, Ulcerative; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 38466213
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2024.1698c -
Cureus Aug 2023Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by immune-mediated destruction of hepatocytes, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. In recent years,... (Review)
Review
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by immune-mediated destruction of hepatocytes, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. In recent years, significant advances have been made in understanding the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AIH. This comprehensive narrative review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of these advances. The review begins by outlining the historical background of AIH, dating back to its initial recognition in the 1940s, and highlights the evolution of diagnostic criteria and classification based on autoantibody profiles. The epidemiology of AIH is explored, discussing its varying prevalence across different regions and the role of genetic predisposition, viral infections, and drug exposure as risk factors. Furthermore, the review delves into the pathogenesis of AIH, focusing on the dysregulated immune response, involvement of T cells, and potential contribution of the gut microbiome. Clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and liver biopsy as crucial tools for diagnosis are also discussed. Regarding management, the review provides an in-depth analysis of the standard first-line treatments involving glucocorticoids and azathioprine, as well as alternative therapies for non-responsive cases. Additionally, emerging second and third-line treatment options are examined. In conclusion, this narrative review highlights the complexity of AIH and underscores the importance of early diagnosis and individualized treatment approaches to improve patient outcomes. Further research and clinical trials are needed to optimize AIH management and ensure a better long-term prognosis for affected individuals.
PubMed: 37622052
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43973 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Dec 2023The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of systemic nonsteroidal immunomodulators (SNSI) for oral lichen planus (OLP) treatment. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of systemic nonsteroidal immunomodulators (SNSI) for oral lichen planus (OLP) treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021243524). Consulted databases were Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria was as follows: clinical trials, case series, prospective, and retrospective studies conducted with participants presenting OLP of any sex and age.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies were selected, assessing 9 different SNSI: methotrexate, dapsone, levamisole, hydroxychloroquine, thalidomide, metronidazole, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and colchicine. Methotrexate and dapsone were the drugs with the best evidence among the options included, regarding number and quality of studies. Methotrexate resulted in significant improvement in the clinical condition and remission of symptoms, ranging between 63 and 93% of cases. Dapsone presented a similar effect to the use of topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus CONCLUSION: Among SNSI therapeutic options, methotrexate, and dapsone showed promising efficacy and safety. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials are still needed.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
SNSI have been used in the treatment of recalcitrant OLP; however, so far, it is not clear which are the best options. This scoping review highlights the potential use of methotrexate and dapsone.
Topics: Humans; Lichen Planus, Oral; Methotrexate; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Immunologic Factors; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Dapsone
PubMed: 37921879
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05357-9 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... Jun 2024We report the case of a 58-year-old male patient presenting with clinical and laboratory findings indicative of acute hepatitis. Abdominal ultrasound excluded biliary...
We report the case of a 58-year-old male patient presenting with clinical and laboratory findings indicative of acute hepatitis. Abdominal ultrasound excluded biliary tract abnormalities. Two weeks prior, the patient had contracted COVID-19. Viral hepatitis was ruled out, and the presence of autoantibodies was confirmed. Liver biopsy findings were consistent with autoimmune hepatitis and grade 1 fibrosis. Initial treatment with budesonide was ineffective, leading to a switch to prednisone, with maintenance therapy comprising prednisone and azathioprine. COVID-19 infection may act as a trigger for the development of autoimmune hepatitis.
PubMed: 38832588
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10532/2024 -
Clinical Rheumatology Nov 2023Cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains one of the most common causes of death and is caused by several factors, including... (Review)
Review
Cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains one of the most common causes of death and is caused by several factors, including both traditional and disease-specific risk factors. We aimed to systematically appraise the evidence of cardiovascular disease risk factors focusing on the SLE population. The protocol for this umbrella review is registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42020206858). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to June 22, 2022, for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes that examined cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with SLE. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies using the "Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTER 2)" tool. Of the 102 identified articles, nine systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review. All included systematic reviews were assessed as critically low quality according to the AMSTER 2 tool. The traditional risk factors identified in this study were older age, male sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and a family history of cardiovascular disease. SLE-specific risk factors were long-term disease duration, lupus nephritis, neurological disorders, high disease activity, organ damage, use of glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. This umbrella review identified some cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with SLE; however, the study quality of all included systematic reviews was critically low. Key Points • We examined the evidence of cardiovascular disease risk factors focusing on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. • We found that long-term disease duration, lupus nephritis, neurological disorders, high disease activity, organ damage, use of glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, were cardiovascular disease risk factors among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. • The review indicates the need for well-validated and high-quality future reviews that assess major adverse cardiovascular events as an outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Humans; Male; Cardiovascular Diseases; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Lupus Nephritis; Antibodies, Anticardiolipin; Azathioprine; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Risk Factors; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Nervous System Diseases
PubMed: 37142864
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06608-6 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Nov 2023Heart transplant recipients experience high rates of skin cancer, likely due to greater length or dosage of immunosuppression. We review the impact of immunosuppressive... (Review)
Review
Heart transplant recipients experience high rates of skin cancer, likely due to greater length or dosage of immunosuppression. We review the impact of immunosuppressive medications on development of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in heart transplant recipients. The authors searched keywords "heart transplant" and "nonmelanoma skin cancer" on PubMed in October 2022 for eligible articles available in English. Articles were selected for inclusion based on relevance to heart transplantation and NMSC. If any cited articles within included articles were related to our search they were also included. Of the 29 identified articles, 18 met the inclusion criteria with a total of 11,699 patients. Two studies found that tacrolimus and azathioprine increased the risk of NMSC. Five studies demonstrated that tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil decreased the risk of NMSC. Three studies described that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone had no significant association with the development in NMSC. Two studies did not specify the correlation between immunosuppressant use and NMSC development. Ten studies did not discuss the association of immunosuppressants use with the development of NMSC. Our review highlights the commonly used immunosuppressive drugs that can impact the development of NMSC in heart transplant recipients. A management strategy in immunosuppression-associated skin cancers may ultimately involve adjusting the immunosuppressive regimen. This review serves as a summary of the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in heart transplant patients and their tumorigenic mechanisms to guide recommendations for dermatologic follow-up in heart transplant recipients.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Azathioprine; Everolimus; Skin Neoplasms; Heart Transplantation; Sirolimus
PubMed: 37256379
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02646-x