-
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jan 2024Duplicating mandibular movement with a semi-adjustable articulator has been reported to lack accuracy. However, although previous studies have analyzed articulator...
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Duplicating mandibular movement with a semi-adjustable articulator has been reported to lack accuracy. However, although previous studies have analyzed articulator movement, few have compared excursive tooth contact on the articulator with tooth contact during actual mandibular movement.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the concordance of semi-adjustable articulator contacts with intraoral contacts during eccentric movements by using a T-scan occlusal analysis system.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Forty-two participants with normal occlusion and without signs of temporomandibular disorder were analyzed for the reproducibility of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator. Maxillary casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator with the facebow. The condylar inclination of the articulator was set by using interocclusal records. Three recordings of right and left excursive mandibular movement and protrusive mandibular movement were made in the supine position by using the T-scan v9.1. The same procedure was then performed with the articulator. The results of complete mandibular movement from T-scan measurements were divided into 4 time points for analysis: T0, T1, T2, and T3. The concordance of intraoral and articulator occlusal contacts was evaluated at each point, and the occlusal force for each tooth was compared. Overall concordance and concordance of the working and nonworking sides were also calculated. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze differences between the concordance of intraoral and articulator contacts according to mandibular movement direction, time, and working and nonworking sides (α=.01).
RESULTS
For all teeth, concordance between the intraoral and articulator occlusal contacts during excursive mandibular movement was greatest at T0, decreasing at T1 and T2, and increasing at T3. No significant differences were found in the concordance among the right lateral, left lateral, and protrusive excursion (P>.01). The concordance of working side occlusal contacts during lateral excursion was significantly lower at T3 than that at T0 (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS
When comparing intraoral and articulator contacts during lateral eccentric mandibular movement, concordance was affected by time and working or nonworking side. Reproducibility of initial eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator appeared to be reliable. However, occlusal adjustment of the working side might be required after prosthesis delivery.
Topics: Humans; Dental Occlusion; Jaw Relation Record; Dental Articulators; Reproducibility of Results; Tooth
PubMed: 35246320
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.026 -
Dental Research Journal 2023Horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) is registered by protrusive interocclusal records but in nonarcon articulators, these records can affect the accuracy. The present...
BACKGROUND
Horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) is registered by protrusive interocclusal records but in nonarcon articulators, these records can affect the accuracy. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of a novel rotation coordinating device (RCD) on condylar guidance setting with protrusive interocclusal records.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was designed as a comparative investigation. Stone maxillary and mandibular casts were mounted on a fully adjustable instrument as the patient. Duplicate casts were mounted on an arcon and a nonarcon articulator with corresponding face bow records and in maximum intercuspation relation. Five different condylar guidance inclinations for both sides (20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°) were set on the fully adjustable instrument and 16 protrusive interocclusal records were established at each setting. HCG was set for arcon, nonarcon articulators, and nonarcon articulators with RCD. Data were analyzed using one-sample -test to compare with actual HCG and one-way analysis of variance ( =0.05).
RESULTS
Mean HCG for studied articulators was 35.40 for arcon, 30.31 for nonarcon without RCD, and 35.61 for nonarcon with RCD which were significantly different from actual HCG ( < 0.05). HCG of the nonarcon with RCD showed no significant difference with arcon articulator ( = 0.71) while both were significantly different from nonarcon without RCD ( < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
"The RCD" compensates the condylar guidance inclination difference between arcon and nonarcon articulators. The device precisely transfers the hinge movement of the upper member of the articulator to the condylar track.
PubMed: 38020259
DOI: No ID Found -
European Journal of Dental Education :... Feb 2024This study evaluated the self-assessment skills of third-year dental students regarding their performance in complete removable prosthodontics (CRP) preclinical course.
INTRODUCTION
This study evaluated the self-assessment skills of third-year dental students regarding their performance in complete removable prosthodontics (CRP) preclinical course.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
This cross-sectional study was conducted on all third-year dental students attending the International Dental College of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The students were requested to self-assess their performance in primary impression making, custom tray fabrication, border moulding, final impression making, master cast fabrication, record-base fabrication and tooth arrangement in CRP preclinical course. The performance of dental students in each step was scored by themselves and their mentors. Data were analysed by the Mann-Whitney U, Pearson's correlation and t-tests (α = 0.05).
RESULTS
Totally 25 male (55.6%) and 20 female (44.4%) dental students were evaluated. Significant differences were noted between male and female dental students in self-assessment scores regarding adequate extension of the custom tray (p = .027), the correct position of tray handle (p = .020), visibility of vestibular width and depth on the cast (p = .011), the coincidence of upper and lower midlines (p = .005) and correct orientation of maxillary and mandibular planes in the articulator (p = .036). The mean self-assessment score of female students was significantly higher than that of male students (p = .01). The scores given by the mentors were not significantly different for male and female students (p = .975). The difference between the self-assessment score of students and the mentor score was not significant (p = .067) either in males or in females (p > .05).
CONCLUSION
Undergraduate dental students favourably self-assessed their performance in all steps of the preclinical course of CRP, comparable with their mentor assessment.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Self-Assessment; Students, Dental; Prosthodontics; Cross-Sectional Studies; Education, Dental; Iran
PubMed: 37145242
DOI: 10.1111/eje.12909 -
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Huaxi... Feb 2024This clinical study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a fully digital technique for measuring sagittal condylar inclination (SCI), as well as validating whether...
OBJECTIVES
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a fully digital technique for measuring sagittal condylar inclination (SCI), as well as validating whether differences existed between the left and right SCI values of the same participant, to provide a reference for clinical practice.
METHODS
Ten participants with good occlusal relationship and normal temporomandibular joint were recruited. Three methods were used to measure the SCI values of the participants, namely, A (mechanical facebow transferring and mechanical articulator-based measuring method with physical protrusive interocclusal registration), B (face scan-based virtual facebow and virtual articulator-based measuring method with digital protrusive interocclusal registration), and C (jaw motion tracking system-based measuring method). With the group subjected to methods A and C as the control, the SCI values obtained by the three methods were statistically analyzed. The left and right SCI values of the same participant were also compared.
RESULTS
The left and right SCI values measured by method A were 41.70°±7.09° and 42.80°±8.62°, those by method B were 35.09°±12.49° and 37.63°±12.10°, and those by method C were 39.43°±8.72° and 38.45°±6.91°. No significant difference existed among the SCI values measured by the three methods (>0.05). Meanwhile, no statistical difference existed between the SCI values on the left and right sides of the same participant (>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of the virtual facebow and digital protrusive occlusal registration based SCI measuring method was the same as that of mechanical facebow based and jaw motion tracking system-based methods. The SCI values on the left and right sides of the same participant were similar. Clinically, an appropriate SCI measurement and setting strategy can be selected based on the actual situations.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Condyle; Jaw Relation Record; Temporomandibular Joint; Dental Articulators; Extraoral Traction Appliances
PubMed: 38475953
DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023242 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Sep 2023Although different digital occlusal analyzers have been marketed, comparative studies are lacking.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Although different digital occlusal analyzers have been marketed, comparative studies are lacking.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the repeatability and reproducibility of 2 different digital occlusal analyzers (T-Scan and OccluSense) for measuring the right- and left-side balance of occlusal contact forces.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The repeatability and reproducibility of the 2 digital occlusal analyzers for measuring the balance of occlusal contact forces were determined and compared by using the Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility tests based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 5725-2 and ISO 5725-3 standards. Ten different dental casts were mounted in the maximum intercuspation position on a semi-adjustable articulator. Then, the balance of occlusal contact forces in each of the 10 articulated dental casts was measured 24 times with each of the 2 digital occlusal analyzers. In addition, as the OccluSense, unlike the T-Scan, does not have a centering support for the piezoelectric film sensor, measurements with it were performed without and with a custom-designed and manufactured centering support. Finally, the repeatability and reproducibility of both digital occlusal analyzers were determined and compared using the Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility tests.
RESULTS
The repeatability and reproducibility tests revealed that only 0.8% of the variance of the measurements obtained with the T-Scan was due to repeatability and reproducibility (0.4% repeatability, 0.4% reproducibility). In contrast, 12% of the variance of the measurements obtained with the OccluSense was due to repeatability and reproducibility (2.2% repeatability, 9.8% reproducibility). However, when using OccluSense with the centering support, the variance decreased to 6.4% (2.8% repeatability, 3.6% reproducibility). According to the Automotive Industry Action Group classification, the repeatability and reproducibility of the T-Scan were good, those of the OccluSense poor, and those of the OccluSense with the centering support medium.
CONCLUSIONS
The repeatability and reproducibility of the T-Scan were significantly better than those of the OccluSense for measuring the balance of occlusal contact forces. Furthermore, the repeatability and reproducibility of the OccluSense were significantly improved when used with a device to center the piezoelectric film sensor between the incisors. Nevertheless, the repeatability and reproducibility of the T-Scan were better.
PubMed: 37661548
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.026 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Nov 2023BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess and compare the vertical/horizontal dimensions and occlusal accuracy of non-working/opposing casts obtained from three...
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess and compare the vertical/horizontal dimensions and occlusal accuracy of non-working/opposing casts obtained from three different impression materials and 3D print cast. MATERIAL AND METHODS Dentulous Master models simulating a case of a fixed dental prosthesis were mounted on an articulator (control group). Opposing mandibular casts obtained from three different impression materialsand 3-dimensional print constituted test groups , ,and , respectively. Three points, anterior vertical (AV), posterior vertical (PV), and anteroposterior (AP) were compared for dimensional accuracy among casts. Occlusal accuracy was analyzed on Medit Link software at 3 teeth (#13, #17, and #27). After calculating means for each group, the differences were calculated at probability value of P≤0.05 using the single-sample t test, ANOVA, and Tukey test. RESULTS The dimensions were significantly different from those of the mounted master models except in Gp AL(E) and Gp AL(F) at AV dimension and Gp AL(E) at AP dimension (P>0.05). A statistically significant difference of the error of means among the 4 tested groupswere detected only at 2 dimensions (AV and PV) between the Gp AL(E) and Gp 3D-C and between Gp AL(F) and Gp 3D-C groups. Other groups showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS The opposing casts obtained from the extended-pour alginate and alginate alternative impression materials showed higher occlusal accuracy compared to conventional alginate and 3D printed casts.
Topics: Humans; Alginates; Mandible; Models, Dental; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Software
PubMed: 37924203
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941654 -
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Oct 2023This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the conventional facebow system and the newly developed POP (PNUD (Pusan National University Dental School) Occlusal Plane)...
PURPOSE
This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the conventional facebow system and the newly developed POP (PNUD (Pusan National University Dental School) Occlusal Plane) bow system for occlusal plane transfer in asymmetric ear position.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two dentists participated in this study, one was categorized as Experimenter 1 and the other as Experimenter 2 based on their clinical experience with the facebow (1F, 2F) and POP bow (1P, 2P) systems. The vertical height difference between the two ears of the phantom model was set to 3 mm. Experimenter 1 and Experimenter 2 performed the facebow and POP bow systems on the phantom model 10 times each, and the transfer accuracy was analyzed. The accuracy was evaluated by measuring the angle between the reference virtual plane (RVP) of the phantom model and the experimental virtual plane (EVP) of the upper mounting plate through digital superimposition. All data were statistically analyzed using a paired -test ( < .05).
RESULTS
Regardless of clinical experience, the POP bow system (0.53° ± 0.30 (1P) and 0.19° ± 0.18 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) was significantly more accurate than the facebow system (1.88° ± 0.50 (1F) and 1.34° ± 0.25 (2F), respectively) in the frontal view ( < .05). In the sagittal view, no significant differences were found between the POP bow system (0.92° ± 0.50 (1P) and 0.73° ± 0.42 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) and the facebow system (0.82° ± 0.49 (1F) and 0.60° ± 0.39 (2F), respectively), regardless of clinical experience ( > .05).
CONCLUSION
In cases of asymmetric ear position, the POP bow system may transfer occlusal plane information more accurately than the facebow system in the frontal view, regardless of clinical experience.
PubMed: 37936837
DOI: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.5.271 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Apr 2024With the development of digital dental technologies, a complete digital workflow without using physical casts has become possible. However, for certain clinical and...
With the development of digital dental technologies, a complete digital workflow without using physical casts has become possible. However, for certain clinical and dental laboratory procedures, especially in complex rehabilitation treatments, physically mounted casts in an ideal location in a mechanical articulator are still necessary for treatment planning and restoration fabrication. This technique report describes a digital approach to fabricating a custom transfer plate to cross mount intraoral scan casts from a virtual articulator to the corresponding mechanical articulator. This technique eliminates the need for conventional physical facebow transfer processes and offers a straightforward approach to integrating virtual procedures with analog workflows.
PubMed: 38604906
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.012 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Apr 2024The alignment of the maxillary and mandibular digital scans obtained with an intraoral scanner (IOS) generates digital interocclusal records. Although the accuracy of...
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The alignment of the maxillary and mandibular digital scans obtained with an intraoral scanner (IOS) generates digital interocclusal records. Although the accuracy of maxillary and mandibular digital scans obtained from an IOS is widely studied, the accuracy of digital interocclusal records obtained with them is not; even less studied is the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the alignment methods that are available to obtain them.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the precision under repeatability conditions (repeatability) of the different alignment methods used to obtain digital interocclusal records.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Digital scans of maxillary and mandibular casts of a dentate healthy adult were acquired with an IOS. Casts were then mounted in maximum intercuspal position in a semi-adjustable mechanical articulator (1801 AR Model PSH Articulator), and left and right occlusal digital scans were acquired with the IOS. Occlusal digital scans were repeated 7 times under repeatability conditions. After obtaining each pair of occlusal digital scans, the software program of the IOS automatically aligned the maxillary and mandibular digital scans with occlusal digital scans (TRI method), resulting in 7 digital interocclusal records composed of aligned maxillary and mandibular digital scans and occlusal digital scans. All 7 sets of aligned digital scans were exported and realigned in a dental computer-aided design software program by means of global and reference alignment methods (EXO-B and EXO-R methods, respectively). To assess the repeatability, the 7 aligned digital scan sets of each group were repositioned in the common coordinate system by aligning maxillary digital scans, and repeatability was calculated in terms of the distance between the vertices of the mandibular digital scans for each of the possible nonrepeating combinations of pairs (C=21). The repeatability was tested by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric distribution followed by the Mann-Whitney U test and Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons (α=.05).
RESULTS
The median with interquartile range for the TRI alignment method was 47 (27) μm for the EXO-B method 41 (25) μm and 16 (5) μm for EXO-R. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistical difference between test groups (P<.05). The post hoc Dunn test with Bonferroni adjustment detected significant statistical differences between the EXO-R-TRI (P<.001) and EXO-R-EXO-B (P<.001) alignment methods.
CONCLUSIONS
This study found that the alignment method could influence the repeatability of digital interocclusal records. The reference best-fit alignment method (EXO-R) provided better repeatability.
Topics: Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Models, Dental; Dental Impression Technique; Software; Computer-Aided Design
PubMed: 36115710
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.014 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Nov 2023The challenges of conventional methods to measure the sagittal condylar inclination and the Bennett angle include patient discomfort and an output of averaged values...
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The challenges of conventional methods to measure the sagittal condylar inclination and the Bennett angle include patient discomfort and an output of averaged values calculated on the arc of mandibular movement. Programming these average values into a mechanical or mathematically simulated articulator may introduce occlusal errors.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle measurements derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical tracking device.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Fifteen dentate participants with at least 12 occluding units, 25 years old and above, participated in the study. Each participant's mandibular movements were recorded by the 2 systems for different condylar guidance values. A conventional tracking device, the Cadiax Compact 2, and an optical tracking device, the MODJAW, were used for this study. Sagittal condylar inclination was measured at 3 mm and 5 mm using protrusive records and the values of the Bennett angle at 3 mm were measured using excursive records along the path traced by mandibular condyles. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the paired data from the 2 methods.
RESULTS
A significant difference was found between right (P=.007) and left sagittal condylar inclinations (P=.010) measured at 3 mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices. A significant difference was found between right (P=.015) and left sagittal condylar inclinations (P=.004) measured at 5 mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices. The right and left Bennett angles measured at 3 mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices were statistically different (P=.043 and P=.035 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle measured at different positions along the path of movement exhibited significant differences. The sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle values obtained from the conventional tracking device were generally significantly less than those derived from the optical tracking device.
PubMed: 38030543
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.034