-
BMC Anesthesiology Nov 2023Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of dexamethasone and ramosetron on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in low-risk patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
BACKGROUND
Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics in patients at low risk of developing PONV.
METHODS
In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 177 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups. Patients allocated to group C (control group) received 2 mL of intravenous 0.9% saline, those allocated to group R (ramosetron group) received 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron, and those allocated to group DR (ramosetron plus dexamethasone group) received 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron.
RESULTS
Finally, 174 patients completed the study, and the types of surgeries were orthopedic (n = 80), rhinologic (n = 47), urologic (n = 29), and others (n = 18). The incidence of PONV up to 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in group DR than in group C. The incidence of PONV up to 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. The usage pattern of rescue antiemetics was consistent with the incidence of PONV. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of dexamethasone and ramosetron demonstrated a superior effect in preventing PONV for 48 h after surgery under general anesthesia than saline in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Compared with saline injections, ramosetron injections yielded better outcomes for the incidence of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical trial registration number: [email protected], KCT0006749.
Topics: Humans; Analgesics; Antiemetics; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 37936053
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02334-3 -
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2023Although multiple myeloma is still incurable, an abundance of novel treatments have become available for relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Direct... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although multiple myeloma is still incurable, an abundance of novel treatments have become available for relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Direct head-to-head comparisons between the novel treatments are lacking. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate immediate effects such as response quality of current novel-drugs combined therapeutic regimens, with the aim to identify treatments that could be more effective than others in RRMM.
METHODS
We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials receiving novel-drugs combined treatments as means of interventions. The primary endpoint was objective response rates (ORRs). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to sequence treatments. Totally, 22 randomized controlled trials were identified for final evaluation. With the aim to include all regimens within one network analysis, we divided the treatment schemes into 13 categories according to the use of novel drugs.
RESULTS
Carfilzomib-, daratumumab-, and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than bortezomib combined dexamethasone and lenalidomide combined dexamethasone. Daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than pomalidomide combined dexamethasone. According to the SUCRA, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based triple-drug regimens had higher probabilities of achieving better ORRs, followed by carfilzomib, elotuzumab, venetoclax, selinexor, ixazomib, vorinostat, pomalidomide, panobinostat, lenalidomide.
CONCLUSIONS
Our network meta-analysis performed a complete review of the ORRs of all current available novel-drugs based regimens for RRMM. By using the clinical data all from randomized controlled studies, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments were identified to be the best treatments receiving better response quality.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Lenalidomide; Network Meta-Analysis; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37343159
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2225342 -
American Journal of Respiratory Cell... Nov 2023Abnormal lung development is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a common birth defect (1:2,500) of largely...
Abnormal lung development is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a common birth defect (1:2,500) of largely unknown pathobiology. Recent studies discovered that inflammatory processes, and specifically NF-κB-associated pathways, are enriched in human and experimental CDH. However, the molecular signaling of NF-κB in abnormal CDH lung development and its potential as a therapeutic target require further investigation. Using sections and hypoplastic lung explant cultures from the nitrofen rat model of CDH and human fetal CDH lungs, we demonstrate that NF-κB and its downstream transcriptional targets are hyperactive during abnormal lung formation in CDH. NF-κB activity was especially elevated in the airway epithelium of nitrofen and human CDH lungs at different developmental stages. Fetal rat lung explants had impaired pseudoglandular airway branching after exposure to nitrofen, together with increased phosphorylation and transcriptional activity of NF-κB. Dexamethasone, the broad and clinically applicable antiinflammatory NF-κB antagonist, rescued lung branching and normalized NF-κB signaling in hypoplastic lung explants. Moreover, specific NF-κB inhibition with curcumenol similarly rescued lung hypoplasia and restored NF-κB signaling. Last, we showed that prenatal intraperitoneal dexamethasone administration to pregnant rat dams carrying fetuses with hypoplastic lungs significantly improves lung branching and normalizes NF-κB . Our results indicate that NF-κB is aberrantly activated in human and nitrofen CDH lungs. Antiinflammatory treatment with dexamethasone and/or specific NF-κB inhibition should be investigated further as a therapeutic avenue to target lung hypoplasia in CDH.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Rats; Animals; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital; NF-kappa B; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Lung; Lung Diseases; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 37552822
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2023-0138OC -
Current Opinion in Pediatrics Jun 2024Dexamethasone is an essential treatment for common pediatric inflammatory, airway, and respiratory conditions. We aim to provide up-to-date recommendations for treatment... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Dexamethasone is an essential treatment for common pediatric inflammatory, airway, and respiratory conditions. We aim to provide up-to-date recommendations for treatment of anaphylaxis, croup, coronavirus disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and asthma with dexamethasone for use in the pediatric emergency department.
RECENT FINDINGS
Literature largely continues to support the use of dexamethasone in most of the above conditions, however, recommendations for dosing and duration are evolving.
SUMMARY
The findings discussed in this review will enable pediatric emergency medicine providers to use dexamethasone effectively as treatment of common pediatric conditions and minimize the occurrence of side-effects caused by gratuitous corticosteroid use.
Topics: Humans; Dexamethasone; Child; Emergency Service, Hospital; Croup; Asthma; Anaphylaxis; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Glucocorticoids; COVID-19; Pediatric Emergency Medicine
PubMed: 38655807
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001351 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jan 2024Glioblastomas, the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults, still hold poor prognosis. Corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone, are usually prescribed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Glioblastomas, the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults, still hold poor prognosis. Corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone, are usually prescribed to reduce peritumoral edema and limit neurological symptoms, although potential detrimental effects of these drugs have been described. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the association of dexamethasone with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for pertinent studies following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist. Pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and the heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included, pooling data of 1,257 patients, with age varying from 11 to 81 years. Glioblastoma patients on pre- or peri-operative dexamethasone were associated with a significantly poorer overall survival (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; 7 studies; I: 59.9%) and progression free survival (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.97; 3 studies; I: 71.1%) compared to patients not on dexamethasone. The quality of evidence was moderate for overall survival and low for progression free survival.
CONCLUSION
Dexamethasone appeared to be associated with poor survival outcomes of glioblastoma patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Glioblastoma; Progression-Free Survival; Dexamethasone; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38151699
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04549-3 -
Blood Advances Oct 2023We conducted a phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and KPd with daratumumab (Dara-KPd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The...
We conducted a phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and KPd with daratumumab (Dara-KPd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The primary end points were identification of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of KPd for phase 1, and rates of overall response (ORR) and near complete response (nCR) after 4 cycles of KPd and Dara-KPd, respectively, for phase 2. The MTD for KPd was carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (cycles 1-8) and days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for cycles 9 and beyond; oral pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21; and oral dexamethasone 40 mg weekly in 28-day cycles. Sixty-six patients received KPd, including 34 at the MTD. The ORR after 4 cycles of KPd at the MTD was 27/34 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-91%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months and overall survival (OS) 44 months. Twenty-eight patients received Dara-KPd. The rate of nCR or better after 4 cycles was 11/28 (39%; 95% CI, 22%-59%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. As the best response to Dara-KPd, the ORR was 25/28 (89%) and the rate of measurable residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (10-5) was 17/26 (65%). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the median PFS and OS for Dara-KPd were not reached. Dara-KPd induced deeper and more durable responses than KPd without compromising safety in a predominantly high-risk, lenalidomide-refractory population, warranting further evaluation of this quadruplet. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01665794.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 36763537
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008866 -
European Journal of Medical Research Jul 2023COVID-19 has adversely affected global healthcare infrastructure since 2019. Currently, there are no large-scale published reports on the efficacy of combination therapy...
IMPORTANCE
COVID-19 has adversely affected global healthcare infrastructure since 2019. Currently, there are no large-scale published reports on the efficacy of combination therapy of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and tocilizumab on COVID-19 patients.
OBJECTIVES
Is the combination therapy of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and tocilizumab superior to other treatments on hospitalized COVID-19 patients?
DESIGN
This is a retrospective, comparative effectiveness study.
SETTING
Single-center study PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTIONS: We analyzed different inpatient COVID-19 treatment options available in the United States and their impact on hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Hospitalized COVID-19 were categorized as "mild," "moderate" and "severe'' based on the highest level of oxygen required; room air, nasal cannula, or high flow/PAP/intubation, respectively. Patients were treated in accordance with the availability of medications and the latest treatment guidelines.
MAIN OUTCOMES
The endpoints of the study are hospital discharges and death during hospitalization.
RESULTS
1233 COVID-19 patients were admitted from 2020 to 2021. No treatment combinations showed a statistically significant decrease in hospital LOS in mild COVID-19 patients (p = 0.186). In moderate patients, the combination of remdesivir and dexamethasone slightly decreased LOS by 1 day (p = 0.007). In severe patients, the three-drug combination of remdesivir, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab decreased LOS by 8 days (p = 0.0034) when compared to nonviable treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma transfusion. However, it did not show any statistically significant benefit when compared to two-drug regimens (dexamethasone plus remdesivir) in severe COVID-19 (p = 0.116). No treatment arm appeared to show a statistically significant decrease in mortality for severe COVID-19 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that three-drug combination may decrease LOS in severe COVID-19 patients when compared to two-drug therapy. However, the trend was not supported by statistical analysis. Remdesivir may not be clinically beneficial for mild hospitalized COVID-19 patients; considering its cost, one could reserve it for moderate and severe patients. Triple drug therapies, while potentially reducing LOS for severe patients, do not affect overall mortality. Additional patient data may increase statistical power and solidify these findings.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Length of Stay; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Retrospective Studies; Blood Component Transfusion; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Serotherapy; Plasma; Dexamethasone; Hospitals
PubMed: 37400927
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01201-8 -
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Feb 2024The optimal dose of dexamethasone for severe/critical COVID-19 is uncertain. We compared higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal dose of dexamethasone for severe/critical COVID-19 is uncertain. We compared higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and trial registers until 23 June 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing higher (>6 mg) versus standard doses (6 mg) of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were mortality closest to 90 days; days alive without life support; and the occurrence of serious adverse events/reactions (SAEs/SARs) closest to 1 month. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, risk of random errors using trial sequential analysis, and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
We included eight trials (2478 participants), of which four (1293 participants) had low risk of bias. Higher doses of dexamethasone probably resulted in little to no difference in mortality at 1 month (relative risk [RR] 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19), mortality closest to Day 90 (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.20), and SAEs/SARs (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02). Higher doses of dexamethasone probably increased the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support but had no effect on days alive without renal replacement therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on low to moderate certainty evidence, higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone probably result in little to no difference in mortality, SAEs/SARs, and days alive without renal replacement therapy, but probably increase the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.
Topics: Adult; Humans; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Patients; Dexamethasone; Hypoxia
PubMed: 37881881
DOI: 10.1111/aas.14346 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Oct 2023The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with Kd. A post-hoc analysis of East Asian patients in IKEMA evaluated the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd in this population and was previously published.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to receive Isa-Kd or Kd. The primary endpoint was PFS, and key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Of the IKEMA overall population, 46 patients were of East Asian descent. This is an updated analysis of the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd in East Asian patients, including data through 14 January 2022.
RESULTS
Isa-Kd continued to demonstrate improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, with improved PFS, rate of ≥VGPR, CR rate, and MRD negativity, that was consistent with the overall IKEMA population. The rate of Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events was also consistent with the prior analysis and overall IKEMA population.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this analysis, Isa-Kd is a novel treatment option for East Asian patients with relapsed MM.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; East Asian People; Multiple Myeloma; Recurrence
PubMed: 37479547
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.011 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Oct 2023Glucocorticoids, which are widely prescribed around the world, cause cardiac remodeling in long-term treatment by triggering insulin resistance and increasing blood...
PURPOSE
Glucocorticoids, which are widely prescribed around the world, cause cardiac remodeling in long-term treatment by triggering insulin resistance and increasing blood pressure. However, its role in cardiac remodeling remains unclear. Galectin-3 (gal-3) is a member of a beta-galactoside-binding animal lectins, upregulated as a result of insulin resistance and in the pressure-overloaded myocardium and regulate cardiac remodeling. We hypothesized that gal-3 may be upregulated in the myocardium with prolonged use of glucocorticoids and associated with cardiac hypertrophy.
METHODS
To examine the involvement of glucocorticoids in gal-3 levels in rat myocardium, sixteen female Wistar Albino rats were assigned to control (C; n = 8) and dexamethasone (Dex; n = 8) groups. Daily dexamethasone was injected subcutaneously for 28 days at a dose of 1 mg.kg. Control animals were injected with the same volume of saline. The body weight and heart weights were determined. Gal-3 levels in myocardium were determined by Western blot.
RESULTS
Our data shows that dexamethasone administration resulted in significant increase in heart weight (p < 0.05) and HW/BW ratios (p < 0.001) and 28 days of dexamethasone administration with the dose of 1 mg.kg caused a twofold increase in the gal-3 expression in the left ventricle (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The finding of the current study is the first to show that dexamethasone causes an increase in gal-3 levels in myocardium. Our study provides an important step in the development of possible therapeutics by determining that dexamethasone causes an increase in gal-3 levels in the myocardium and raises awareness about the follow-up of patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy.
Topics: Humans; Rats; Female; Animals; Galectin 3; Glucocorticoids; Ventricular Remodeling; Insulin Resistance; Rats, Wistar; Myocardium; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 35554772
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-022-07344-w