-
FP Essentials Apr 2024Micronutrients are nutrients the body needs in small quantities, such as vitamins and minerals. Micronutrient deficiencies can occur when an individual is restricting... (Review)
Review
Micronutrients are nutrients the body needs in small quantities, such as vitamins and minerals. Micronutrient deficiencies can occur when an individual is restricting calorie intake for weight loss or management, not consuming an adequate amount of food to meet energy requirements due to poor appetite or illness, eliminating one or more food groups from the diet on a regular basis, or consuming a diet low in micronutrient-rich foods despite adequate or excessive energy intake. Patient groups at risk include older adults, pregnant patients, patients with alcohol use disorder, patients with vegetarian or vegan diets, and patients with increased requirements secondary to medical conditions or long-term drug use that alters nutrient absorption, metabolism, or excretion. The micronutrients that most commonly require supplementation are vitamin D, iron, vitamin A, zinc, folate, and iodine. Results of large-scale randomized trials have shown no overall benefit of multivitamins for the majority of patients. However, a daily multivitamin may be beneficial, particularly for patients who do not consistently consume a well-balanced diet. Although dietary supplements can be helpful in correcting deficiencies, higher than recommended doses can cause adverse effects. Patients should be advised to take recommended dosages of supplements and consult their physician if they notice any adverse effects. Physicians should advise patients to consult drug labels and/or pharmacists about potential supplement interactions with drugs or other supplements.
Topics: Humans; Micronutrients; Dietary Supplements; Vitamins; Female; Nutritional Requirements; Pregnancy; Zinc
PubMed: 38648170
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2023Approximately 30% of dogs with idiopathic epilepsy (IE) are drug-resistant. Recent studies have suggested cannabidiol (CBD) may be an effective anticonvulsant in dogs...
BACKGROUND
Approximately 30% of dogs with idiopathic epilepsy (IE) are drug-resistant. Recent studies have suggested cannabidiol (CBD) may be an effective anticonvulsant in dogs with IE.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the addition of CBD to antiseizure drugs (ASDs) on seizure frequency and to report adverse events in dogs with drug-resistant IE.
ANIMALS
Fifty-one dogs. Dogs having at least 2 seizures per month while receiving at least 1 ASD were included in the trial.
METHODS
Double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover study. The 5 mg/kg/day dosage met futility requirements after 12 dogs, and a dosage of 9 mg/kg/day was used in the next 39 dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive CBD or placebo for 3 months, with a 1-month washout period between oils. Total numbers of seizures and seizure days were recorded. Diagnostic testing was performed periodically throughout the trial.
RESULTS
At the 9 mg/kg/day dose, the decrease in total seizure frequency was significant compared with placebo. A 24.1% decrease in seizure days occurred in dogs receiving CBD and a 5.8% increase occurred in dogs receiving placebo (P ≤ .05). No significant difference was found in the number of responders (≥50% decrease in total seizures or seizure days). Liver enzyme activities increased at both dosages. Decreased appetite and vomiting were more common in the CBD phase (P ≤ .05).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
Cannabidiol decreased total seizures and seizure days compared to placebo when administered to dogs PO at 9 mg/kg/day. Liver enzymes should be monitored with administration of CBD in dogs.
Topics: Dogs; Animals; Cannabidiol; Cross-Over Studies; Seizures; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Dog Diseases
PubMed: 37889215
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16912 -
Heart (British Cardiac Society) Apr 2024In clinical practice, patients with eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) may forgo the gold standard diagnostic procedure, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), although it is highly...
OBJECTIVE
In clinical practice, patients with eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) may forgo the gold standard diagnostic procedure, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), although it is highly recommended in guidelines. This systematic review aims to summarise current approaches in diagnosing and treating EM with a particular emphasis on the utilisation and value of alternative diagnostic methods.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for all peer-reviewed articles using the keywords "eosinophilic myocarditis" from their inception to 10 September 2022.
RESULTS
We included 239 articles, including 8 observational studies and 274 cases, in this review. The median patient age was 45 years. Initial presentations were non-specific, including dyspnoea (50.0%) and chest pain (39.4%). The aetiologies of EM were variable with the most common being idiopathic (28.8%) and eosinophilic granulomatosis polyangiitis (19.3%); others included drug-induced (13.1%) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (12.8%). 82.4% received an EM diagnosis by EMB while 17.6% were diagnosed based on clinical reasoning and cardiac MRI (CMR). CMR-diagnosed patients exhibited a better risk profile at diagnosis, particularly higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less need for inotropic or mechanical circulatory supports. Glucocorticoids were the primary treatment with variability in dosages and regimens.
CONCLUSION
EMB is the mainstay for diagnostic testing for EM. CMR is potentially helpful for screening in appropriate clinical scenarios. Regarding treatment, there is no consensus regarding the optimal dosage of corticosteroids. Large clinical trials are warranted to further explore the utility of CMR in the diagnosis of EM and steroid regimen in treating EM.
Topics: Humans; Myocarditis; Eosinophilia; Biopsy; Myocardium
PubMed: 37963727
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323225 -
Clinical Drug Investigation Aug 2023Avacopan is a relatively novel drug with complement antagonizing properties, and it has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating antineutrophil cytoplasmic... (Review)
Review
Avacopan is a relatively novel drug with complement antagonizing properties, and it has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. This review article seeks to investigate the current standard of care for ANCA vasculitis with the combination of avacopan. The current standard therapy involves the usage of daily corticosteroids in addition to either cyclophosphamide or rituximab; however, prolonged use of corticosteroids is known to be associated with various adverse effects. Avacopan was introduced as a possible substitution to alleviate high-corticosteroid dosages. It functions through competitive inhibition of the C5a receptor in the complement system and results in the reduction of neutrophil activation and migration to sites of inflammation. Clinical trials have observed the efficacy of avacopan both in conjunction with standard therapy with corticosteroids and without corticosteroids. The use of avacopan was able to achieve disease remission and improve renal function in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Additionally, the novel treatment did not increase the risk of adverse events during treatment, while also lowering the toxic effects associated with corticosteroid usage. In summary, current evidence supports the success and safety of administering avacopan to treat patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Additional clinical trials are warranted to identify optimal dosage and method in using avacopan in the clinical setting.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Receptor, Anaphylatoxin C5a; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Inflammation
PubMed: 37596445
DOI: 10.1007/s40261-023-01298-z -
Theranostics 2023Mineral particles have been widely used in bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. Despite their benefits, mineral...
Mineral particles have been widely used in bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. Despite their benefits, mineral particles can induce undesirable inflammation and subsequent bone resorption. Aspirin (Asp) is an inexpensive and widely used anti-inflammatory drug. The goal of this study is to assess the synergistic effect of Asp and optimized mineral particle coating in macroporous scaffolds to accelerate endogenous bone regeneration and reduce bone resorption in a critical-sized bone defect model. Four commonly used mineral particles with varying composition (hydroxyapatite v.s. tricalcium phosphate) and size (nano v.s. micro) were used. Mineral particles were coated onto gelatin microribbon (µRB) scaffolds. Macrophages (Mφ) were cultured on gelatin µRB scaffolds containing various particles, and Mφ polarization was assessed using PCR and ELISA. The effect of conditioned medium from Mφ on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) osteogenesis was also evaluated . Scaffolds containing optimized mineral particles were then combined with varying dosages of Asp to assess the effect in inducing endogenous bone regeneration using a critical-sized cranial bone defect model. characterization and cell studies were performed to elucidate the effect of tuning Asp dosage on Mφ polarization, osteoclast (OC) activity, and MSC osteogenesis. Micro-sized tricalcium phosphate (mTCP) particles were identified as optimal in promoting M2 Mφ polarization and rescuing MSC-based bone formation in the presence of conditioned medium from Mφ. When implanted , incorporating Asp with mTCP-coated µRB scaffolds significantly accelerated endogenous bone formation in a dose-dependent manner. Impressively, mTCP-coated µRB scaffolds containing 20 µg Asp led to almost complete bone healing of a critical-sized cranial bone defect as early as week 2 with no subsequent bone resorption. Asp enhanced M2 Mφ polarization, decreased OC activity, and promoted MSC osteogenesis in a dosage-dependent manner . These results were further validated using cell studies. Here, we demonstrate Asp and mineral particle-coated microribbon scaffold provides a promising therapy for repairing critical-sized cranial bone defects via immunomodulation. The leading formulation supports rapid endogenous bone regeneration without the need for exogenous cells or growth factors, making it attractive for translation. Our results also highlight the importance of optimizing mineral particles and Asp dosage to achieve robust bone healing while avoiding bone resorption by targeting Mφ and OCs.
Topics: Humans; Culture Media, Conditioned; Gelatin; Bone Regeneration; Immunomodulation; Bone Resorption; Aspirin
PubMed: 37649612
DOI: 10.7150/thno.85946 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Nov 2023The new definitions of antimicrobial susceptibility categories proposed by EUCAST in 2020 require the definition of standard and high dosages of antibiotic. For...
BACKGROUND
The new definitions of antimicrobial susceptibility categories proposed by EUCAST in 2020 require the definition of standard and high dosages of antibiotic. For injectable β-lactams, standard and high dosages have been proposed for short-infusion regimens only.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate dosages for β-lactams administered by prolonged infusion (PI) and continuous infusion (CI).
METHODS
Monte Carlo simulations were performed for seven injectable β-lactams: aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, piperacillin and temocillin. Various dosage regimens based on short infusion, PI or CI were simulated in virtual patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PTAs were obtained based on reference population PK models, as well as PK/pharmacodynamic targets and MIC breakpoints proposed by EUCAST. Alternative dosage regimens associated with PTA values similar to those of recommended dosages up to the breakpoints were considered acceptable.
RESULTS
Adequate PTAs were confirmed for most EUCAST short-infusion dosage regimens. A total of 9 standard and 14 high dosages based on PI (3 to 4 h) or CI were identified as alternatives. For cefepime and aztreonam, only PI and CI regimens could achieve acceptable PTAs for infections caused by Pseudomonas spp.: 2 g q8h as PI of 4 h or 6 g/24 h CI for cefepime; 2 g q6h as PI of 3 h or 6 g/24 h CI for aztreonam.
CONCLUSIONS
These alternative standard and high dosage regimens are expected to provide antibiotic exposure compatible with new EUCAST definitions of susceptibility categories and associated MIC breakpoints. However, further clinical evaluation is necessary.
Topics: Humans; Cefepime; Aztreonam; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Piperacillin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Monte Carlo Method
PubMed: 37796958
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad300