-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Mar 2024Enthusiasm for the use of hormones to ameliorate symptoms of perimenopause and menopause has waxed and waned over the years. Both treatment for symptoms and training of...
Enthusiasm for the use of hormones to ameliorate symptoms of perimenopause and menopause has waxed and waned over the years. Both treatment for symptoms and training of women's health care practitioners in the management of menopause have sharply declined since publication of the Women's Health Initiative initial results in 2002. Findings from that trial, which treated a population of older, asymptomatic patients, have been extrapolated over the past 21 years to all estrogen products, all menopausal women, and all delivery mechanisms. Our patients deserve a more nuanced, individualized approach. Conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate are no longer the predominant medications or medications of choice available for management of menopausal symptoms. All hormones are not equivalent any more than all antiseizure medications or all antihypertensives are equivalent; they have different pharmacodynamics, duration of action, and affinity for receptors, among other things, all of which translate to different risks and benefits. Consideration of treatment with the right formulation, at the right dose and time, and for the right patient will allow us to recommend safe, effective, and appropriate treatment for people with menopausal symptoms.
PubMed: 38484309
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005553 -
Menopause (New York, N.Y.) Dec 2023Use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) fell precipitously after 2002, largely as a result of the Women's Health Initiative's report claiming that the combination of... (Review)
Review
Use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) fell precipitously after 2002, largely as a result of the Women's Health Initiative's report claiming that the combination of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate increased breast cancer risk and did not improve quality of life. More recently, Women's Health Initiative (WHI) publications acknowledge HT as the most effective treatment for managing menopausal vasomotor symptoms and report that CEE alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% while reducing breast cancer death by 40%. Their sole remaining concern is a small increase in breast cancer incidence with CEE and medroxyprogesterone acetate (1 per 1,000 women per year) but with no increased risk of breast cancer mortality. This article closely examines evidence that calls even this claim of breast cancer risk into serious question, including the WHI's reporting of nonsignificant results as if they were meaningful, a misinterpretation of its own data, and the misleading assertion that the WHI's findings have reduced the incidence of breast cancer in the United States. A generation of women has been deprived of HT largely as a result of this widely publicized misinterpretation of the data. This article attempts to rectify this misunderstanding, with the goal of helping patients and physicians make informed joint decisions about the use of HT.
Topics: Female; Humans; United States; Breast Neoplasms; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Quality of Life; Women's Health; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP); Menopause; Estrogen Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 37847875
DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002267 -
JAMA May 2024Approximately 55 million people in the US and approximately 1.1 billion people worldwide are postmenopausal women. To inform clinical practice about the health effects... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Approximately 55 million people in the US and approximately 1.1 billion people worldwide are postmenopausal women. To inform clinical practice about the health effects of menopausal hormone therapy, calcium plus vitamin D supplementation, and a low-fat dietary pattern, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) enrolled 161 808 postmenopausal US women (N = 68 132 in the clinical trials) aged 50 to 79 years at baseline from 1993 to 1998, and followed them up for up to 20 years.
OBSERVATIONS
The WHI clinical trial results do not support hormone therapy with oral conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate for postmenopausal women or conjugated equine estrogens alone for those with prior hysterectomy to prevent cardiovascular disease, dementia, or other chronic diseases. However, hormone therapy is effective for treating moderate to severe vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms. These benefits of hormone therapy in early menopause, combined with lower rates of adverse effects of hormone therapy in early compared with later menopause, support initiation of hormone therapy before age 60 years for women without contraindications to hormone therapy who have bothersome menopausal symptoms. The WHI results do not support routinely recommending calcium plus vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in all postmenopausal women. However, calcium and vitamin D are appropriate for women who do not meet national guidelines for recommended intakes of these nutrients through diet. A low-fat dietary pattern with increased fruit, vegetable, and grain consumption did not prevent the primary outcomes of breast or colorectal cancer but was associated with lower rates of the secondary outcome of breast cancer mortality during long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
For postmenopausal women, the WHI randomized clinical trials do not support menopausal hormone therapy to prevent cardiovascular disease or other chronic diseases. Menopausal hormone therapy is appropriate to treat bothersome vasomotor symptoms among women in early menopause, without contraindications, who are interested in taking hormone therapy. The WHI evidence does not support routine supplementation with calcium plus vitamin D for menopausal women to prevent fractures or a low-fat diet with increased fruits, vegetables, and grains to prevent breast or colorectal cancer. A potential role of a low-fat dietary pattern in reducing breast cancer mortality, a secondary outcome, warrants further study.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Calcium; Calcium, Dietary; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diet, Fat-Restricted; Dietary Supplements; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP); Hot Flashes; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Postmenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vitamin D; Women's Health; United States
PubMed: 38691368
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.6542 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Oct 2023To assess the associations between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and endometrial cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the associations between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and endometrial cancer.
METHODS
This multicenter case-control study was conducted among tertiary hospitals in Thailand. Patients were women with endometrial cancer. Controls were women admitted for other conditions, matched for age within 5 years of the patients' age. The controls had to have no abnormal vaginal bleeding, history of hysterectomy, or cancers of the other organs. A standardized questionnaire was used to gather information. Conditional logistic regression was applied to calculate adjusted odds ratio (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
During 2015 to 2021, 378 patients and 1134 controls were included. Ever use of DMPA was associated with a 70% decreased overall risk of endometrial cancer (aOR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.21-0.42]). Endometrial cancer risk declined by 3% (aOR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.98]) for every 3 months of DMPA use. The magnitude of the decline in endometrial cancer risk did not vary appreciably by cancer subtypes (aOR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.17-0.41] and 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.65] for low-grade and high-grade tumors, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use was inversely associated with endometrial cancer risk in a duration-dependent manner. This association was independent of cancer subtype.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child, Preschool; Male; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Case-Control Studies; Endometrial Neoplasms; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Endometrium; Delayed-Action Preparations
PubMed: 37183712
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14846 -
World Journal of Clinical Cases Aug 2023Endometrial cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed gynecological cancers worldwide, and early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Adjuvant...
BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed gynecological cancers worldwide, and early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Adjuvant treatments after surgery, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have been widely used in clinical practice to improve patient survival. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestogen that has been reported to have potential anticancer effects in endometrial cancer. However, its efficacy, safety, and long-term prognostic benefits as an adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to observe the efficacy and prognostic impact of adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer and evaluate its safety.
AIM
To observe the efficacy and prognosis of adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer with medroxyprogesterone acetate and to evaluate its safety.
METHODS
We collected the clinical data of 200 patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. The control group (100 patients) underwent conventional surgical treatment, and the study group (100 patients) was administered adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets on top of the control group. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the possible factors influencing the 5-year cumulative survival rate in the patients. The Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the factors influencing the survival prognosis of endometrial cancer.
RESULTS
According to the Cox regression analysis, age [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.636, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.411-15.237], pathological type (HR = 6.943, 95%CI: 2.299-20.977), molecular typing (HR = 5.789, 95%CI: 3.305-10.141), and myometrial infiltration (HR = 5.768, 95%CI: 1.898-17.520) were factors influencing the prognosis of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSION
Age, pathological type, molecular typing, and myometrial infiltration were all relevant factors affecting the prognosis of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer. The potential long-term prognostic benefit of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer is worthy of clinical consideration.
PubMed: 37637703
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i23.5447 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Apr 2024Short-acting progestin-only injectables containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) are a safe method of contraception. Although DMPA has been available for... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Short-acting progestin-only injectables containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) are a safe method of contraception. Although DMPA has been available for several decades, there is little data on its influence on the risk of breast cancer. Hence, the aim of this paper was to provide an overview of the existing studies and create clarity regarding a possible association with breast cancer.
METHODS
Literature searches were executed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Search terms were related to DMPA and breast cancer. After elimination of duplicates, 3'850 studies were identified and assessed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, ten studies were selected and included in this review.
RESULTS
All the selected papers were case-control-studies, except for one pooled analysis and one study comparing observed and expected number of cancer cases. Most of the included studies found no overall elevated breast cancer incidence in DMPA users, only one study found a slightly increased risk and two studies concluded with a significant increase for the overall breast cancer risk.
CONCLUSION
There is little evidence that DMPA may increase the overall risk for breast cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer is possibly increased in current and more recent users, especially in women younger than 35 years. Long-term use did not result in any risk increase. Nevertheless, further studies will be necessary to confirm these findings and weigh up the individual risks and benefits of this contraceptive method.
Topics: Female; Humans; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Delayed-Action Preparations; Breast Neoplasms; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Progestins
PubMed: 37966517
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07265-5 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Nov 2023Generally, risk stratification models for cancer use effect estimates from risk/protective factor analyses that have not assessed potential interactions between these...
Generally, risk stratification models for cancer use effect estimates from risk/protective factor analyses that have not assessed potential interactions between these exposures. We have developed a 4-criterion framework for assessing interactions that includes statistical, qualitative, biological, and practical approaches. We present the application of this framework in an ovarian cancer setting because this is an important step in developing more accurate risk stratification models. Using data from 9 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of interactions among 15 unequivocal risk and protective factors for ovarian cancer (including 14 non-genetic factors and a 36-variant polygenic score) with age and menopausal status. Pairwise interactions between the risk/protective factors were also assessed. We found that menopausal status modifies the association among endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, breastfeeding, and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and disease risk, highlighting the importance of understanding multiplicative interactions when developing risk prediction models.
Topics: Humans; Female; Ovarian Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Risk Assessment; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 37436712
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad137 -
Cureus Apr 2024Introduction In India, one of the world's most populous and swiftly growing countries, it is crucial to prioritize the utilization of safe and effective contraception,...
Introduction In India, one of the world's most populous and swiftly growing countries, it is crucial to prioritize the utilization of safe and effective contraception, as contraceptive strategies play a pivotal role in bolstering community health. It is widely acknowledged that ensuring appropriate timing and spacing of pregnancies is crucial for the well-being of reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health. Adoption of reversible or spacing contraceptive methods can significantly enhance women's health outcomes by reducing the occurrence of undesired, closely timed, and mistimed pregnancies. Consequently, in response to the pressing need for dependable contraception in India, this study seeks to assess the acceptance, adherence, and side effects of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) among its users. Methods This prospective observational study was done at the State Government Taluk Hospital in the Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu from July 2022 to October 2022. A total of 40 women of reproductive age who opted for DMPA as their contraceptive method and met the inclusion criteria were recruited through a purposive sampling method. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Results The majority of the participants were women aged 21-25 years (n=14; 35%). The participants were predominantly Hindu (n=39; 97.5%), and 35 (87.5%) had completed higher secondary education. All participants (n=40; 100%) resided in rural areas and the majority were homemakers. A significant proportion of the participants had two children (n=21; 52.5%), and all of them received information on DMPA primarily from health personnel. At the initial point of data collection, three-fourths of them took the first dose (n=13; 32.5%) and only a few took more than three doses (n=3; 7.5%). In the third month, the results showed a drop in DMPA use, which indicates a lower adherence particularly linked to side effects like irregular bleeding (n=15; 37.5%) and amenorrhea (n=9; 22.5%). Furthermore, 35 (87.5%) of the women chose DMPA for birth spacing due to its efficacy and convenience, with few initiating it during postpartum (n=4; 10%) and post-abortal (n=1; 2.5%) periods. The reasons for continuing DMPA use included efficacy (n=20; 50%), discreet usage (n=15; 37.5%), and curiosity (n=13; 32.5%). Half of the participants reported no side effects. The study identified associations between DMPA users and the number of living children and occupational status inferring that DMPA contraception is used for spacing births. Conclusion The results of this study imply that the use and adherence to injectable contraceptive DMPA need to be strengthened among rural women. Thus, the study suggests incorporating information, education, and communication strategies, to enhance awareness among rural women about injectable contraceptives.
PubMed: 38779259
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58700