-
Annals of Hematology Apr 2024Diallyl disulfide (DADS), one of the main components of garlic, is well known to have anticancer effects on multiple cancers. However, its efficacy in treating multiple...
Diallyl disulfide (DADS), one of the main components of garlic, is well known to have anticancer effects on multiple cancers. However, its efficacy in treating multiple myeloma (MM) is yet to be determined. We explored the effects of DADS on MM cells and investigated the synergistic effects of DADS when combined with five anti-MM drugs, including melphalan, bortezomib, carfilzomib, doxorubicin, and lenalidomide. We analyzed cell viability, cell apoptosis, and DNA damage to determine the efficacy of DADS and the drug combinations. Our findings revealed that DADS induces apoptosis in MM cells through the mitochondria-dependent pathway and increases the levels of γ-H2AX, a DNA damage marker. Combination index (CI) measurements indicated that the combination of DADS with melphalan has a significant synergistic effect on MM cells. This was further confirmed by the increases in apoptotic cells and DNA damage in MM cells treated with the two drug combinations compared with those cells treated with a single drug alone. The synergy between DADS and melphalan was also observed in primary MM cells. Furthermore, mechanistic investigations showed that DADS decreases reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in MM cells. The addition of GSH is effective in neutralizing DADS cytotoxicity and inhibiting the synergy between DADS and melphalan in MM cells. Taken together, our study highlights the effectiveness of DADS in treating MM cells and the promising therapeutic potential of combining DADS and melphalan for MM treatment.
Topics: Humans; Reactive Oxygen Species; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; DNA Damage; Apoptosis; Drug Combinations; Allyl Compounds; Disulfides; 4-Acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic Acid
PubMed: 38148345
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05592-w -
Lasers in Medical Science Oct 2023Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is widely used in oncology settings, but lack of assessment standardization is the main barrier to optimization of clinical protocols....
Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is widely used in oncology settings, but lack of assessment standardization is the main barrier to optimization of clinical protocols. This study analyzed three PBMT protocols for preventing oral and oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT) and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This is a preliminary randomized blind clinical trial. Group 1 received intraoral prophylactic PBMT, Group 2 received intraoral and oropharyngeal PBMT, and Group 3 received intraoral, oropharyngeal, and extraoral PBMT. The applications were from the first day of CT to day + 10. Clinicodemographic data, CT regimens, types of HSCT, hematological exams, occurrence/severity of OM, odynophagia, and OM-related opportunistic infections were assessed. Sixty participants (age range: 18-74 years) were included; 70% of them underwent CT and 30% HSCT. About 43.3% of patients had OM, while odynophagia was reported by 23.3%. Both Groups 1 and 2 revealed better results. Multivariate analysis showed that HSCT directly influenced the occurrence of OM. Individuals who had undergone allogeneic HSCT were 1.93 times more likely to develop OM (p < 0.001). Group 3 exhibited a higher frequency of OM, albeit of lower grades. This group consisted of half the population who had undergone HSCT, had the highest percentage of melphalan use, and had the lowest mean leukocyte count. The three proposed protocols were effective in preventing and reducing OM, with good tolerance and no reported adverse effects. PBMT is a safe and effective approach to OM prophylaxis in adults undergoing CT/HSCT.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Humans; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Low-Level Light Therapy; Melphalan; Mucositis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomatitis
PubMed: 37889325
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03916-w -
Cancers Dec 2023The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem... (Review)
Review
Upfront or Deferred Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Triplet and Quadruplet Induction and Minimal Residual Disease/Risk-Adapted Therapy.
The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT.
PubMed: 38136255
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245709 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Aug 2023Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment option for patients with acute leukemia who relapse after a first HSCT. Although...
Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment option for patients with acute leukemia who relapse after a first HSCT. Although myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens before the first HSCT are considered superior to reduced- intensity conditioning (RIC) in terms of disease control in acute leukemia patients, the optimal conditioning regimen for the second allogeneic HSCT remains controversial. The most important prognostic factors are the remission disease phase at the time of the second HSCT and an interval >12 months from the first HSCT to the second HSCT. Total marrow irradiation (TMI) is an advanced high-precision radiation treatment that delivers therapeutic doses over extensively selected targets while substantially reducing radiation to vital organs compared to conventional total body irradiation (TBI). Here we report the results of a retrospective analysis of second allogeneic HSCT treated with TMI as an MAC regimen with the intent of limiting toxicity. We investigated the efficacy of high dose per fraction TMI in combination with thiotepa, fludarabine, and melphalan in 13 consecutive patients with acute leukemia who had relapsed after a first allogeneic HSCT treated between March 2018 and November 2021. Donor type was haploidentical in 10 patients, unrelated in 2 patients, and HLA-identical sibling in 1 patient. The conditioning regimen consisted of 8 Gy TMI in 5 patients on days -8 and -7 and 12 Gy TMI in 8 patients on days -9 to -7, plus thiotepa 5 mg/kg on day -6, fludarabine 50 mg/day on days -5 to -3, and melphalan 140 mg/day on day -2. The TMI was delivered at the dosage og 4 GY for 2 consecutive days (total = 8 GY) or for 3 consecutive days (total = 12 GY). The median patient age was 45 years (range, 19 to 70 years); 7 patients were in remission, and 6 had active disease at the time of their second allogeneic HSCT. The median time to a neutrophil count of >.5 × 10/L was 16 days (range, 13 to 22 days), and the median time to a platelet count of >20 × 10/L was 20 days (range, 14 to 34 days). All patients showed complete donor chimerism on day +30 post-transplantation. The cumulative incidence of grade I-II acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 43%, and that of chronic GVHD was 30%. The median duration of follow-up was 1121 days (range, 200 to 1540 days). Day +30 and +100 transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 0. The overall cumulative incidence of TRM, relapse rate, and disease free-survival were 27%, 7%, and 67%, respectively. This retrospective study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of a hypofractionated TMI conditioning regimen in patients with acute leukemia undergoing second HSCT with encouraging outcomes in terms of engraftment, early toxicity, GVHD, and relapse.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Bone Marrow; Melphalan; Thiotepa; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Acute Disease; Recurrence
PubMed: 37094701
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.014 -
Blood Mar 2024Genomic instability contributes to cancer progression and is at least partly due to dysregulated homologous recombination (HR). Here, we show that an elevated level of...
Genomic instability contributes to cancer progression and is at least partly due to dysregulated homologous recombination (HR). Here, we show that an elevated level of ABL1 kinase overactivates the HR pathway and causes genomic instability in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Inhibiting ABL1 with either short hairpin RNA or a pharmacological inhibitor (nilotinib) inhibits HR activity, reduces genomic instability, and slows MM cell growth. Moreover, inhibiting ABL1 reduces the HR activity and genomic instability caused by melphalan, a chemotherapeutic agent used in MM treatment, and increases melphalan's efficacy and cytotoxicity in vivo in a subcutaneous tumor model. In these tumors, nilotinib inhibits endogenous as well as melphalan-induced HR activity. These data demonstrate that inhibiting ABL1 using the clinically approved drug nilotinib reduces MM cell growth, reduces genomic instability in live cell fraction, increases the cytotoxicity of melphalan (and similar chemotherapeutic agents), and can potentially prevent or delay progression in patients with MM.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Melphalan; Genomic Instability; Pyrimidines; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 37992230
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023021225 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Mar 2024There is a limited body of evidence for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in older patients. Previous studies have used a high...
Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Demonstrates Long Term Survival, Results from Australia and New Zealand Transplant and Cellular Therapies.
There is a limited body of evidence for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in older patients. Previous studies have used a high proportion of bone marrow-derived grafts and a variety of conditioning regimens. In Australia and New Zealand, haplo-HCST is predominantly performed using peripheral blood (PB) with universal use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). To characterize the outcomes of older recipients undergoing haplo-HSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Data were collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients aged 65 or older receiving a PB haplo-HSCT for AML/MDS between January 2010 and July 2020. A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 377 days. The median age was 68 (range 65-74) with a median Karnofsky performance status of 90. Thirty patients (68.2%) had AML, whereas 14 (31.8%) had MDS. The median donor age was 40. The most common conditioning regimen was nonmyeloablative fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (75%); the remainder of the patients received either melphalan- or busulfan-based regimens, and the majority were reduced intensity, with only 2 patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning. All patients received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, with the majority also receiving tacrolimus (90.5%) and the remainder receiving cyclosporine (9.5%). No patients received anti-thymocyte globulin. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in 97.6% of patients at a median of 18 days, whereas platelet engraftment was achieved in 92.7% of patients at a median of 28 days. The cumulative incidences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and CMV disease were 52.5% and 5.1% at 1 year. The incidence of grade 2-4 acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) was 18.2%. The incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years was 40.7%, with extensive chronic GVHD occurring in 17.7% of patients. The incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years were 8.8% and 20.7% respectively. The leading causes of death were infection (64.7%) followed by relapse (14.2%). The 2-year overall survival was 74%. Relapse free survival and GVHD free, relapse free survival at 2 years was 70% and 48%. Haplo-HSCT using a peripheral blood graft and PTCy GVHD prophylaxis demonstrates long-term disease control with acceptable rates of NRM for older patients with AML/MDS.
Topics: Humans; Aged; New Zealand; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Cyclophosphamide; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Recurrence; Cytomegalovirus Infections
PubMed: 38029962
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.11.018 -
The Lancet. Haematology May 2024Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD30 are safe and have promising activity when preceded by lymphodepleting chemotherapy. We aimed to determine the...
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD30 are safe and have promising activity when preceded by lymphodepleting chemotherapy. We aimed to determine the safety of anti-CD30 CAR T cells as consolidation after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with CD30 lymphoma at high risk of relapse.
METHODS
This phase 1 dose-escalation study was performed at two sites in the USA. Patients aged 3 years and older, with classical Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma with CD30 disease documented by immunohistochemistry, and a Karnofsky performance score of more than 60% planned for autologous HSCT were eligible if they were considered high risk for relapse as defined by primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months of initial therapy or extranodal involvement at the start of pre-transplantation salvage therapy. Patients received a single infusion of CAR T cells (2 × 10 CAR T cells per m, 1 × 10 CAR T cells per m, or 2 × 10 CAR T cells per m) as consolidation after trilineage haematopoietic engraftment (defined as absolute neutrophil count ≥500 cells per μL for 3 days, platelet count ≥25 × 10 platelets per L without transfusion for 5 days, and haemoglobin ≥8 g/dL without transfusion for 5 days) following carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) and HSCT. The primary endpoint was the determination of the maximum tolerated dose, which was based on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity in patients who received CAR T-cell infusion. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02663297) and enrolment is complete.
FINDINGS
Between June 7, 2016, and Nov 30, 2020, 21 patients were enrolled and 18 patients (11 with Hodgkin lymphoma, six with T-cell lymphoma, one with grey zone lymphoma) were infused with anti-CD30 CAR T cells at a median of 22 days (range 16-44) after autologous HSCT. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed, so the highest dose tested, 2 × 10 CAR T cells per m, was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose. One patient had grade 1 cytokine release syndrome. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (two [11%] of 18) and leukopenia (two [11%] of 18). There were no treatment-related deaths. Two patients developed secondary malignancies approximately 2 years and 2·5 years following treatment (one stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer and one testicular cancer), but these were judged unrelated to treatment. At a median follow-up of 48·2 months (IQR 27·5-60·7) post-infusion, the median progression-free survival for all treated patients (n=18) was 32·3 months (95% CI 4·6 months to not estimable) and the median progression-free survival for treated patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (n=11) has not been reached. The median overall survival for all treated patients has not been reached.
INTERPRETATION
Anti-CD30 CAR T-cell infusion as consolidation after BEAM and autologous HSCT is safe, with low rates of toxicity and encouraging preliminary activity in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma at high risk of relapse, highlighting the need for larger studies to confirm these findings.
FUNDING
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, University Cancer Research Fund at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Transplantation, Autologous; Adult; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Ki-1 Antigen; Aged; Adolescent; Hodgkin Disease; Young Adult; Child; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Melphalan; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Carmustine; Etoposide; Child, Preschool; Cytarabine
PubMed: 38555923
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00064-4 -
Advances in Clinical and Experimental... Apr 2024Several novel drugs for multiple myeloma, including monoclonal and bispecific antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, and newer-generation proteasome inhibitors, have been... (Review)
Review
Several novel drugs for multiple myeloma, including monoclonal and bispecific antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, and newer-generation proteasome inhibitors, have been introduced over the last decade. Based on the results of randomized clinical trials, the drugs have been incorporated into current treatment recommendations, with the most substantial changes observed in patients under the age of 75. However, new therapeutic options have been indirectly proposed for patients over 75, despite the lack of conclusive data from randomized prospective trials. This paper outlines the development of myeloma therapy and summarizes the current treatment recommendations for patients over 75 by systematically reviewing the most crucial studies involving this group of individuals, with a focus on evaluating treatment safety and efficacy. Melphalan-prednisone (MP), bortezomib plus MP (VMP), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd), and bortezomib plus Rd (VRd) regimens have evolved over the past few years as therapies of choice for the first-line treatment of these patients. A breakthrough came with daratumumab, which increased response rates, extended median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the absence of significantly increased toxicity when added to the above regimens.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37589225
DOI: 10.17219/acem/168685 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Aug 2023Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone in the treatment of both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and various non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes. BEAM...
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a cornerstone in the treatment of both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and various non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes. BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is the most frequently used conditioning regimen; however, owing due to limited availability and toxicity of carmustine, thiotepa-containing regimens have been suggested. We previously reported encouraging results in ASCT with a TECAM (thiotepa, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen from 2000 to 2013. We aimed to update our experience with the TECAM regimen by adding our experience from 2013 to 2020 to the previously reported cohort. Moreover, we aimed to use the detailed data for the 2 transplant cohorts to identify improvements in ASCT outcomes in the recent era. We retrospectively analyzed all lymphoma patients who underwent ASCT at our center between January 2000 and December 2020. A total of 353 lymphoma patients were included (142 in the newer cohort added to 211 previously reported patients), all of whom were treated with our standard TECAM conditioning regimen. The cohort included 127 patients with HL, 107 with DLBCL, and 119 with other NHL subtypes. The newer cohort was characterized by significantly poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) prior to ASCT (45.7% versus 19.3% with ECOG-PS ≥1; P < .01), whereas a higher proportion of patients entered transplantation in complete response (CR) (71.9% versus 47.8%; P < .01). The median follow-up after ASCT was 136.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.4 to 181.4 months). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates post-ASCT for the entire cohort were 59.8% and 79.3%, respectively. Evaluating the 303 of 353 patients (86.4%) who entered ASCT with a responsive disease-a population that represents today's approach to the selection of patients for ASCT-the 3-year PFS and OS rates were 61.5% and 81.9%, respectively. In this population, the 3-year PFS rate was 62.2% for HL, 62.6% for DLBCL, 64.3% for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and the 3-year OS rate were 90.1%, 75.2%, and 78.6%, respectively. OS was significantly better in the newer cohort (P < .01), but not when evaluating only patients who entered ASCT with responsive disease. Dose reductions, poor disease status, and poor ECOG-PS at ASCT entry were associated with worse outcomes across all lymphoma subtypes. In accordance with our previous report, patients entering transplantation for DLBCL with a partial response achieved similar outcomes as those with a CR. Eighteen patients died within the first 100 days, 8 due to disease progression and 10 due to transplantation-related complications (2.8%). There were no cases of interstitial pneumonitis syndrome. Twenty-two cases (6.2%) of secondary malignancies were documented. Our results confirm that TECAM is an effective and safe conditioning regimen for ASCT in patients with HL and various NHLs, including favorable results in PCNSL. Despite a higher proportion of frail patients, the newer cohort's outcomes were favorable, driven by better lymphoma control pretransplantation. In the DLBCL cohort, ECOG-PS had more prognostic value than achieving a CR pre-ASCT, a finding relevant to the optimal allocation of patients to different treatment options in the era of chimeric antigen receptor T cell availability.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Etoposide; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Hodgkin Disease; Lymphoma; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Melphalan; Retrospective Studies; Thiotepa; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 37160229
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.022 -
Haematologica Mar 2024Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study.
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Dexamethasone; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms, Plasma Cell; Neutropenia; Phenylalanine; Proteasome Inhibitors; Transplantation, Autologous; United States; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37646660
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283509