-
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Sep 2023The dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) is a pancreatic branch with various anatomical variations. Previous studies mostly focused on the origin of the DPA, and its pathways...
OBJECTIVES
The dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) is a pancreatic branch with various anatomical variations. Previous studies mostly focused on the origin of the DPA, and its pathways and branching patterns have rarely been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the branching patterns and pathways of the DPA.
METHODS
This study included 110 patients who underwent computed tomography scans. We examined the pathways and branching patterns of the DPA.
RESULTS
The DPA was identified in 101 patients (92%), and originated from the splenic artery in 30 patients (31%), the common hepatic artery in 17 patients (17%), the celiac trunk in 10 patients (10%), the superior mesenteric artery in 27 patients (27%), the replaced right hepatic artery in 7 patients (7%), the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery in 5 patients (5%), and other arteries in 3 patients (3%). Four distinct types of branches were identified as follows: the superior branch (32%), the inferior branch (86%), the right branch (80%), and the accessory middle colic artery (12%). Additionally, the arcs of Buhler and Riolan were observed in two patients each and their anastomotic vessels followed almost the same pathway as the DPA.
CONCLUSION
A number of variations of the DPA were observed with regard to its origin and branching pattern; however, the DPA and its branches always ran along the same pathway, as summarized in Fig. 4. The anatomical information gained from this study may contribute to performing safe pancreatic resections.
Topics: Humans; Splenic Artery; Pancreas; Mesenteric Artery, Superior; Celiac Artery; Embryonic Development
PubMed: 37574438
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.07.009 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and... Sep 2023Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms are rare and associated with high mortality rates in cases of rupture. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend...
Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms are rare and associated with high mortality rates in cases of rupture. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend treatment of all superior mesenteric artery aneurysms regardless of size. A 53-year-old woman who was admitted for abdominal pain was found with a 14-cm, ruptured superior mesenteric artery branch aneurysm. Endovascular approach was performed with microvascular plug embolization of a feeding branch and aneurysm sac exclusion with a stent graft. Four months later, the patient demonstrated a 21% regression of the aneurysm and stent patency. Thus, timely diagnosis and treatment of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms with endovascular techniques can reduce potential complications.
PubMed: 37799846
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101227 -
Annals of Surgery Oct 2023To report mid-term outcomes of renal-mesenteric target arteries (TAs) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal and...
Mid-term Renal and Mesenteric Artery Outcomes During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the United States Aortic Research Consortium.
OBJECTIVE
To report mid-term outcomes of renal-mesenteric target arteries (TAs) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.
BACKGROUND
TA instability (TAI) is the most frequent indication for reintervention after FB-EVAR.
METHODS
Data from consecutive patients enrolled in 9 prospective nonrandomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. TA outcomes through 5 years of follow-up were analyzed for vessels incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches (DBs), including TA patency, endoleak, integrity failure, reintervention, and instability.
RESULTS
A total of 1681 patients had 6349 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted using 3720 fenestrations (59%), 2435 DBs (38%), and 194 scallops (3%). Mean follow was 23 ± 21 months. At 5 years, TAs incorporated by fenestrations had higher primary (95 ± 1% vs 91 ± 1%, P < 0.001) and secondary patency (98 ± 1% vs 94 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and higher freedom from TAI (87 ± 2% vs 84 ± 2%, P = 0.002) compared with TAs incorporated by DBs, with no differences in other TA events. DBs targeted by balloon-expandable stent-grafts had significantly lower freedom from TAI (78 ± 4% vs 88 ± 1%, P = 0.006), TA endoleak (87 ± 3% vs 97 ± 1%, P < 0.001), and TA reintervention (83 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1%, P < 0.001) compared with those targeted by self-expandable stent-grafts.
CONCLUSIONS
Incorporation of renal and mesenteric TA during FB-EVAR is safe and durable with high 5-year patency rates and low freedom from TAI. DBs have lower patency rates and lower freedom from TAI than fenestrations, with better performance for self-expandable stent grafts as compared with balloon-expandable stent grafts.
Topics: Humans; United States; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; Endoleak; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Endovascular Procedures; Prosthesis Design; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
PubMed: 37051912
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005859 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and... Sep 2023The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) has often been overlooked in favor of the celiac or superior mesenteric artery in arterial mesenteric ischemia, owing to the...
The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) has often been overlooked in favor of the celiac or superior mesenteric artery in arterial mesenteric ischemia, owing to the typically robust visceral collateral networks. In the present report, we have described a case series of patients in whom "salvage" revascularization of the IMA was performed after attempted celiac or superior mesenteric artery revascularization had been unsuccessful. The restored IMA inflow had resolved the symptoms for three patients. However, sole IMA revascularization was insufficient to reverse the course for two other patients with severe acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. The IMA should be considered for salvage revascularization in the appropriate clinical scenario.
PubMed: 37363142
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.08.031 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Nov 2023Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) arises from the inability to achieve adequate intestinal blood flow after meals, leading to an imbalance between oxygen and metabolite... (Review)
Review
Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) arises from the inability to achieve adequate intestinal blood flow after meals, leading to an imbalance between oxygen and metabolite supply and demand. The true incidence of CMI remains uncertain. However, the occurrence of mesenteric artery occlusive disease (MAOD) is relatively common among the elderly population. Delays in diagnosing CMI can often be attributed to several factors, including the variability in patient symptoms and the range of potential causes for chronic abdominal pain with weight loss. Mikkelson pioneered the introduction of a surgical treatment for occlusive lesions of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 1957. The inaugural performance of endovascular revascularization (ER) for visceral vessels took place in 1980. The literature has documented two types of endovascular revascularization (ER) methods: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and primary stenting (PMAS). Despite the limited quality of available evidence, the consensus among experts is strongly in favor of PMAS over PTA alone for the treatment of atherosclerotic mesenteric artery stenosis. There are several key areas of focus for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) treatment. Randomized controlled trials comparing different stent types, such as covered stents versus bare metal stents, are needed to evaluate efficacy, patency rates, and long-term outcomes in CMI patients.
PubMed: 38002726
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227112 -
Surgical Endoscopy Dec 2023The use of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in pancreatic head cancer remains controversial, and an appropriate surgical approach can help improve...
A comparative study of the "superior mesenteric artery first" approach versus the conventional approach in short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
BACKGROUND
The use of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in pancreatic head cancer remains controversial, and an appropriate surgical approach can help improve perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of the superior mesenteric artery first (SMA-first) approach in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing LPD.
METHODS
The data of 91 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent LPD from June 2014 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, the modified SMA-first approach group, using a combined posterior and anterior approach, and the conventional approach group. Perioperative outcomes, pathologic results, and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed.
RESULTS
The number of lymph nodes harvested was greater in the SMA-first approach group (19 vs. 15, P = 0.021), as did the results in the matched cohort (21 vs. 15, P = 0.046). No significant difference was observed in the R0 resection rate (93.3% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.197), but the involvement of the SMA margin was indeed lower in the SMA-first approach group (0 vs. 13%). There were no obvious variances between the two groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, overall and major postoperative complication rates, and mortality in either the original cohort or matched cohort. The median OS was 21.8 months in the SMA-first group, whereas it was 19.8 months in the conventional group (P = 0.900). Survival also did not differ in the matched cohort (P = 0.558). TNM stage, resection margin, overall complications, and adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors affecting OS.
CONCLUSION
The modified SMA-first approach is safe and feasible for PDAC patients undergoing LPD. It had a slight advantage in specimen quality, but OS was not significantly prolonged.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Mesenteric Artery, Superior; Retrospective Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37891371
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10470-7 -
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA Aug 2023Knowledge of anatomical variations is important in all interventional procedures. This study aims to evaluate the variations and prevalence of celiac trunk (CeT) and its...
PURPOSE
Knowledge of anatomical variations is important in all interventional procedures. This study aims to evaluate the variations and prevalence of celiac trunk (CeT) and its branches.
METHODS
The computerized tomography-angiography (CT-A) findings of 941 adult patients were evaluated retrospectively. Variations of the CeT and common hepatic artery (CHA) were evaluated according to the number of branches and their origin. Findings were compared with classical classification methods. A new classification model has been defined.
RESULTS
Normal (complete) trifurcation was detected in 856 (90.9%) of them, where left gastric artery (LGA), splenic artery (SpA) and CHA branches were derived from the CeT. Among 856 complete trifurcation cases, 773 (90.3%) had non-classical trifurcation patterns. The rate of classic trifurcation was 8.8%, while non-classic trifurcation was 82.1% in all cases. In one case (0.1%), LGA and left hepatic artery together and right hepatic artery and SpA together appeared as a double bifurcation. Complete celiacomesenteric trunk was observed only in 4 (0.42%) cases. In seven cases (0.7%), LGA, SpA and CHA were coming out of abdominal aorta (AAo) independently. CHA normal anatomy (Michels Type I) was detected in 618 (65.5%) patients. We found that 49 (5.2%) of our cases were ambiguous according to the Michels Classification. We have described five different variations of hepatic arteries directly arising from the AAo.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative recognition of anatomical variations of CeT, superior mesenteric artery and CHA is of primary importance in both surgical and radiological procedures. With careful evaluation of CT-angiographies, it is possible to detect rare variations.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Celiac Artery; Hepatic Artery; Retrospective Studies; Computed Tomography Angiography; Angiography
PubMed: 37340150
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-023-03180-1 -
Cancers Dec 2023Within the intricate field of rectal cancer surgery, the contentious debate over the optimal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) persists as an... (Review)
Review
Within the intricate field of rectal cancer surgery, the contentious debate over the optimal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) persists as an ongoing discussion, influencing surgical approaches and patient outcomes. This narrative review incorporates historical perspectives, technical considerations, and functional as well as oncological outcomes, addressing key questions related to anastomotic leakage risks, genitourinary function, and oncological concerns, providing a more critical understanding of the well-known inconclusive evidence. Beyond the dichotomy of high versus low tie, it navigates the complexities of colorectal cancer surgery with a fresh perspective, posing a transformative question: "Is low tie ligation truly reproducible?" Considering a multidimensional approach that enhances patient outcomes by integrating the surgeon, patient, technique, and technology, instead of a rigid and categorical statement, we argued that a balanced response to this challenging question may require compromise.
PubMed: 38201499
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010072