-
Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) Sep 2023Methadone (Met) is the most common treatment for opioid addiction. Although Met is effective for treatment of opioid dependence, sexual dysfunctions and infertility have...
Methadone (Met) is the most common treatment for opioid addiction. Although Met is effective for treatment of opioid dependence, sexual dysfunctions and infertility have been reported as a major problem in patients under Met treatment. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of melatonin and N-acetylcysteine (N) on morphine and Met-induced oxidative stress, apoptosis, suppression of blood sexual hormones, impairment in sperm parameters, and sexual dysfunction. Adult male Wistar rats (n = 66) were randomly divided into 11 equal groups (n = 6) as follows: control, sham, morphine, Met, Met+N, Met+ melatonin, Met+melatonin+N, morphine+ Met, morphine+Met+ melatonin, morphine+Met+N, and morphine+Met+ melatonin+N groups. On day 56 post-treatment, the blood was collected from the tail and the serum levels of sex hormones were evaluated, then the rats were sacrificed, and their bilateral testes and epididymis were retrieved for histological, immunohistochemical, molecular, testicular tissue stress oxidative status, and sperm parameters assays. Exposure to morphine, Met, and shift of morphine to Met resulted in testicular degeneration that can be attributed to generating the stress oxidative-induced- apoptotic testicular cell death and impairing spermatogenesis. Melatonin and N alone and particularly, in combination with each other improved testicular degeneration, sex hormone suppression, and testicular function mediated by increasing the testicular antioxidant capacity and inhibition of the apoptosis pathway. It's suggested that oral administration of antioxidants may be an effective treatment for attenuating some opioid-related testicular dysfunction and degeneration.
Topics: Animals; Male; Rats; Acetylcysteine; Analgesics, Opioid; Antioxidants; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Melatonin; Morphine Derivatives; Oxidative Stress; Rats, Wistar; Semen; Testicular Diseases; Testis
PubMed: 37536455
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108453 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Sep 2023Previous report indicated that nicorandil potentiated morphine antinociception and attenuated hepatic injury in liver fibrotic rats. Herein, the underlying mechanisms of...
Previous report indicated that nicorandil potentiated morphine antinociception and attenuated hepatic injury in liver fibrotic rats. Herein, the underlying mechanisms of nicorandil/morphine interaction were investigated using pharmacological, biochemical, histopathological, and molecular docking studies. Male Wistar rats were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with carbon tetrachloride (CCl, 40%, 2 ml/kg) twice weekly for 5 weeks to induce hepatic fibrosis. Nicorandil (15 mg/kg/day) was administered per os (p.o.) for 14 days in presence of the blockers; glibenclamide (K channel blocker, 5 mg/kg, p.o.), L-N-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, 15 mg/kg, p.o.), methylene blue (MB, guanylyl cyclase inhibitor, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) and naltrexone (opioid antagonist, 20 mg/kg, i.p.). At the end of the 5th week, analgesia was evaluated using tail flick and formalin tests along with biochemical determinations of liver function tests, oxidative stress markers and histopathological examination of liver tissues. Naltrexone and MB inhibited the antinociceptive activity of the combination. Furthermore, combined nicorandil/morphine regimen attenuated the release of endogenous peptides. Docking studies revealed a possible interaction of nicorandil on µ, κ and δ opioid receptors. Nicorandil/morphine combination protected against liver damage as evident by decreased liver enzymes, liver index, hyaluronic acid, lipid peroxidation, fibrotic insults, and increased superoxide dismutase activity. Nicorandil/morphine hepatoprotection and antioxidant activity were inhibited by glibenclamide and L-NAME but not by naltrexone or MB. These findings implicate opioid activation/cGMP versus NO/K channels in the augmented antinociception, and hepatoprotection, respectively, of the combined therapy and implicate provoked cross talk by nicorandil and morphine on opioid receptors and cGMP signaling pathway. That said, nicorandil/morphine combination provides a potential multitargeted therapy to alleviate pain and preserve liver function.
Topics: Rats; Male; Animals; Morphine; Analgesics, Opioid; Nicorandil; NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester; Rats, Wistar; Naltrexone; Glyburide; Molecular Docking Simulation; Pain; Liver Cirrhosis; Adenosine Triphosphate; Nitric Oxide; Cyclic GMP; Analgesics
PubMed: 37392650
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115068 -
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Mar 2024Ketamine is a well-characterized anesthetic agent, and subanesthetic ketamine possesses analgesic effects in both acute and chronic pain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Ketamine is a well-characterized anesthetic agent, and subanesthetic ketamine possesses analgesic effects in both acute and chronic pain.
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review was performed to ascertain the efficacy and safety of ketamine in treating pain for cancer patients.
METHODS
Eight databases were searched from the inception to March 20th, 2023 to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ketamine for treating pain in cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software.
RESULTS
Thirty-five studies were included, involving 2279 patients with cancer pain. The results of meta-analysis showed that ketamine could significantly reduce pain intensity. Subgroup analysis revealed that, when compared with control group, ketamine decreased markedly visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in two days after the end of treatment with ketamine, and ketamine administrated by patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was effective. Meanwhile, ketamine could significantly reduce the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) compressions within 24 hours and morphine dosage. Ketamine could not decrease Ramsay sedation score. Additionally, the adverse events significantly decreased in the ketamine group, including nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, lethargy, uroschesis, hallucination, and respiratory depression. In addition, compared with the control group, ketamine could reduce Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score and relieve depressive symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Ketamine may be used as an effective therapy to relieve cancer pain. However, more rigorously designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to verify the above conclusions.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Ketamine; Cancer Pain; Analgesics, Opioid; Morphine; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37972720
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.11.004 -
Pain Physician Sep 2023Optimal intrathecal dosing regimens for hydromorphone are not well established for analgesia after abdominal surgery. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Optimal intrathecal dosing regimens for hydromorphone are not well established for analgesia after abdominal surgery.
OBJECTIVES
We reviewed intrathecal hydromorphone doses and complications because dosing variability has been observed among anesthesiologists. We hypothesized that increasing doses of intrathecal hydromorphone would be associated with improved postoperative analgesia, but with increased rates of opioid-related adverse events.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective analysis.
SETTING
A high-volume academic referral center in the United States.
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted of adults undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia supplemented preoperatively with intrathecal hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia from May 5, 2018, through May 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into 3 hydromorphone dosing groups: low-dose (50-100 µg), middle-dose (101-199 µg), and high-dose (200-300 µg). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess rates of severe postoperative pain, severe opioid-related adverse events, oversedation, and pruritus in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and within 24 hours after PACU discharge.
RESULTS
Of 1,846 patients identified, 1,235 (66.9%) were in the low-dose group; 321 (17.3%), middle-dose group; and 290 (15.7%), high-dose group. Patients receiving the 2 higher doses had more extensive procedures. An unadjusted analysis showed differing rates of severe pain in the PACU by group: 306 (24.8%) in the low-dose, 73 (22.7%) middle-dose, and 45 (15.5%) in the high-dose group (P = 0.003); these differences, however, were no longer significant after an adjusted analysis (P = 0.34). Ten severe opioid-related events occurred; all were recognized in the PACU. Five events each occurred in the low-dose and high-dose groups versus none in the middle-dose group (P = 0.02). No other differences were identified with adjusted analyses.
LIMITATIONS
Limitations of our study include its retrospective design and its conduct at a single center, along with the apparent, but difficult to characterize, treatment biases in hydromorphone dosing.
CONCLUSIONS
No dose response was observed between intrathecal hydromorphone dose and postoperative analgesia, a finding that may reflect treatment bias. Higher rates of severe opioid-related events were detected for patients receiving high-dose hydromorphone in the PACU, but all other safety outcomes were similar between dosing regimens.
KEY WORDS
Drug-related side effects, opioid analgesics, outcome assessment, postoperative pain, spinal injections.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hydromorphone; Analgesics, Opioid; Retrospective Studies; Morphine; Treatment Outcome; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia, Epidural
PubMed: 37774193
DOI: No ID Found -
Pediatric Research Aug 2023We assessed variability of analgesic use across three tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) accounting for early-life pain, quantified as number of invasive...
BACKGROUND
We assessed variability of analgesic use across three tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) accounting for early-life pain, quantified as number of invasive procedures. We also determined whether analgesia exposure modifies associations between early-life pain and neurodevelopment.
METHODS
Multicenter prospective study of 276 very preterm infants (born <24-32 weeks' gestational age [GA]). Detailed data of number of invasive procedures and duration of analgesia exposure were collected in initial weeks after birth. Eighteen-month neurodevelopmental assessments were completed in 215 children with Bayley Scales for Infant Development-Third edition.
RESULTS
Multivariable linear regressions revealed significant differences in morphine use across sites, for a given exposure to early-life pain (interaction p < 0.001). Associations between early-life pain and motor scores differed by duration of morphine exposure (interaction p = 0.01); greater early-life pain was associated with poorer motor scores in infants with no or long (>7 days) exposure, but not short exposure (≤7 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Striking cross-site differences in morphine exposure in very preterm infants are observed even when accounting for early-life pain. Negative associations between greater early-life pain and adverse motor outcomes were attenuated in infants with short morphine exposure. These findings emphasize the need for further studies of optimal analgesic approaches in preterm infants.
IMPACT
In very preterm neonates, both early-life exposure to pain and analgesia are associated with adverse neurodevelopment and altered brain maturation, with no clear guidelines for neonatal pain management in this population. We found significant cross-site variability in morphine use across three tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Canada. Morphine use modified associations between early-life pain and motor outcomes. In infants with no or long durations of morphine exposure, greater early-life pain was associated with lower motor scores, this relationship was attenuated in those with short morphine exposure. Further trials of optimal treatment approaches with morphine in preterm infants are warranted.
Topics: Infant; Child; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Pain Management; Prospective Studies; Pain; Analgesia; Morphine; Analgesics; Gestational Age
PubMed: 36859445
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02536-y -
Scientific Reports Jul 2023Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is associated with tremendous morbidity and mortality. Despite this burden, current pharmacotherapies for OUD are ineffective or intolerable...
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is associated with tremendous morbidity and mortality. Despite this burden, current pharmacotherapies for OUD are ineffective or intolerable for many patients. As such, interventions aimed at promoting resilience against OUD are of immense clinical interest. Treatment with a Bioactive Dietary Polyphenol Preparation (BDPP) promotes resilience and adaptive neuroplasticity in multiple models of neuropsychiatric disease. Here, we assessed effects of BDPP treatment on behavioral and molecular responses to repeated morphine treatment in male mice. BDPP pre-treatment alters responses for both locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference. Most notably, polyphenol treatment consistently reduced formation of preference at low dose (5 mg/kg) morphine but enhanced it at high dose (15 mg/kg). In parallel, we performed transcriptomic profiling of the nucleus accumbens, which again showed a dose × polyphenol interaction. We also profiled microbiome composition and function, as polyphenols are metabolized by the microbiome and can act as prebiotics. The profile revealed polyphenol treatment markedly altered microbiome composition and function. Finally, we investigated involvement of the SIRT1 deacetylase, and the role of polyphenol metabolites in behavioral responses. These results demonstrate polyphenols have robust dose-dependent effects on behavioral and physiological responses to morphine and lay the foundation for future translational work.
Topics: Mice; Male; Animals; Morphine; Nucleus Accumbens; Polyphenols
PubMed: 37500710
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39334-9 -
Fitoterapia Jan 2024The chemical structure of sinoacutine is formed by a phenanthrene nucleus and an ethylamine bridge. Because it has a similar parent structure to morphine, it is...
The chemical structure of sinoacutine is formed by a phenanthrene nucleus and an ethylamine bridge. Because it has a similar parent structure to morphine, it is subdivided into morphinane. At present, all reports have pointed out that the basic skeleton of morphine alkaloids is salutaridine (the isomer of sinoacutine), which is generated by the phenol coupling reaction of (R)-reticuline. This study shows that the biosynthetic precursors of sinoacutine and salutaridine are different. In this paper, the sinoacutine synthetase (SinSyn) gene was cloned from Sinomenium acutum and expressed SinSyn protein. Sinoacutine was produced by SinSyn catalyzed (S)-reticuline, according to the results of enzyme-catalyzed experiments. The optical activity, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectrum of sinoacutine and salutaridine were analyzed. The classification and pharmacological action of isoquinoline alkaloids were discussed. It was suggested that sinoacutine should be separated from morphinane and classified as sinomenine alkaloids.
Topics: Molecular Structure; Morphinans; Alkaloids; Morphine Derivatives
PubMed: 37949304
DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2023.105713 -
Behavioural Pharmacology Apr 2024Prescription opioids are the gold standard for treating moderate to severe pain despite their well-documented adverse effects. Of all prescription medications, opioids...
Prescription opioids are the gold standard for treating moderate to severe pain despite their well-documented adverse effects. Of all prescription medications, opioids are abused most widely, and fatal overdoses have reached epidemic levels. One strategy for improving the margin of safety of opioids is combining them with non-opioid drugs to decrease the opioid dose needed for pain relief, thereby reducing adverse effects that occur with larger doses. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine has been used safely as an analgesic but only under a very limited range of conditions. The current studies characterized the antinociceptive, behavioral suppressant, and gastrointestinal effects of morphine and ketamine alone and in mixtures to determine their interaction in 24 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8 per assay). Given alone, both morphine and ketamine produced antinociception, decreased responding for food, and reduced gastrointestinal transit (i.e. produced constipation). The effects of morphine:ketamine mixtures generally were additive, except for the antinociceptive effects of 1:1 mixtures for which the difference in slope (i.e. non-parallel shift) between the observed and predicted effects suggested synergy at smaller doses and additivity at larger doses. The potency of morphine to produce constipation was not enhanced by administration of morphine:ketamine mixtures with antinociceptive effects. The nature of the interaction between morphine and ketamine for adverse effects such as dependence, withdrawal, abuse, or respiratory depression remains unknown but also might be related to the ratio of each drug in mixtures. It will be important to identify conditions that produce the largest potential therapeutic window in humans.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Rats; Animals; Morphine; Ketamine; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Analgesics, Opioid; Pain
PubMed: 38451024
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000761 -
The American Journal of Emergency... Aug 2023P2Y inhibitor and morphine are widely used in caring for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are some concerns about the combination use due to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
P2Y inhibitor and morphine are widely used in caring for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are some concerns about the combination use due to interaction in metabolism. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether using morphine with antiplatelets in patients with ACS affects the clinical outcomes based on currently available evidence.
METHODS
Three databases were searched for comparative studies on this topic by using relevant keywords of ACS and morphine. Two authors independently extracted study information, mortality, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), major bleeding, and length of hospital stay. Then, they evaluated the quality of evidence independently. Meta-analysis was planned to be conducted in random-effects model. Risk ratio (RR) was used for most outcomes except hospital stay, and Peto odds ratio (POR) was used if there were any zero cells. Pooled estimate was presented with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies (n = 73,033) met eligibility criteria, and there was non-significant difference in mortality between antiplatelet with and without morphine (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.78 to 1.64). Antiplatelet therapy without morphine significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.67 to 0.89; I-square = 0%), but increased the odds of major bleeding (POR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.04 to 3.35; I-square = 0%) as compared with the combined use of antiplatelet therapy and morphine.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, there is no statistically significant difference in mortality in patients with ACS using morphine or not, but clinicians ought to make a trade-off between a lower risk of MACE and a higher risk of major bleeding before adding morphine to antiplatelet therapy.
Topics: Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Morphine; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage
PubMed: 37270851
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.010 -
Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior Aug 2023Approximately 90 % of individuals undergoing treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) report comorbid use of nicotine. As such, further investigation into underlying...
Approximately 90 % of individuals undergoing treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) report comorbid use of nicotine. As such, further investigation into underlying mechanisms contributing to the extreme comorbidity between nicotine and opioid use are warranted. Nicotine administration significantly escalates self-administration of opioids and this increase in motivational efficacy persists despite contingent punishment of opioid consumption. Additionally, both systemic and intra-insular administration of nicotine produces a rightward shift in the dose-response function in both morphine-induced conditioned place preference and taste avoidance paradigms, particularly at higher doses (5-20 mg/kg). Two possible interpretations arise from these outcomes. One is that nicotine may specifically affect learning about the malaise-inducing effects of morphine thus facilitating acceptance of higher doses of morphine. Another interpretation is that it more generally reduces sensitivity to the interoceptive effects of morphine such that higher doses are needed to produce comparable effects in nicotine-treated, relative to control, rats. To further address these possibilities, we asked whether nicotine administration interfered with the ability to discriminate the morphine interoceptive state, irrespective of its hedonic evaluation, at a dose that is impacted by nicotine in avoidance conditioning paradigms. First, we demonstrated that systemic nicotine pretreatment significantly attenuates taste avoidance induced by a low dose of morphine (3 mg/kg). Next, we used an occasion setting paradigm with this same dose of morphine to test whether systemic nicotine pretreatment interferes with the ability to discriminate between saline- and morphine-induced interoceptive states. Within this task, nicotine had no effect on the ability to effectively discriminate between the interoceptive effects of morphine and saline. Collectively, these data suggest that nicotine may be specifically altering the overall hedonic assessment of morphine perhaps by interfering with learning about its deleterious consequences.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Nicotine; Analgesics, Opioid; Conditioning, Operant; Morphine; Conditioning, Classical; Avoidance Learning; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 37487952
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173604