-
Skin Research and Technology : Official... Mar 2024The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral and injectable systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine,... (Review)
Review
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral and injectable systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tofacitinib, baricitinib, corticosteroids, statins, zinc, apremilast, etc., for treating vitiligo lesions.
METHOD
Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were meticulously searched for studies spanning from 2010 to August 2023, focusing on systemic oral and injectable therapies for vitiligo, using comprehensive keywords and search syntaxes tailored to each database. Key data extracted included study design, treatment efficacy, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety profiles.
RESULTS
In a total of 42 included studies, oral mini-pulse corticosteroid therapy (OMP) was the subject of six studies (14.2%). Minocycline was the focus of five studies (11.9%), while methotrexate, apremilast, and tofacitinib each were examined in four studies (9.5%). Antioxidants and Afamelanotide were the subjects of three studies each (7.1%). Cyclosporine, simvastatin, oral zinc, oral corticosteroids (excluding OMP) and injections, and baricitinib were each explored in two studies (4.8%). Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and Alefacept were the subjects of one study each (2.4%).
CONCLUSION
Systemic treatments for vitiligo have been successful in controlling lesions without notable side effects. OMP, Methotrexate, Azathioprine, Cyclosporine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Simvastatin, Apremilast, Minocycline, Afamelanotide, Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Antioxidants, and oral/injectable corticosteroids are effective treatment methods. However, oral zinc and alefacept did not show effectiveness.
Topics: Humans; Methotrexate; Azathioprine; Vitiligo; Mycophenolic Acid; Minocycline; Alefacept; Cyclosporine; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Hypopigmentation; Simvastatin; Zinc; Purines; Pyrazoles; Sulfonamides; Azetidines; Thalidomide
PubMed: 38454597
DOI: 10.1111/srt.13642 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Nov 2023Heart transplant recipients experience high rates of skin cancer, likely due to greater length or dosage of immunosuppression. We review the impact of immunosuppressive... (Review)
Review
Heart transplant recipients experience high rates of skin cancer, likely due to greater length or dosage of immunosuppression. We review the impact of immunosuppressive medications on development of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in heart transplant recipients. The authors searched keywords "heart transplant" and "nonmelanoma skin cancer" on PubMed in October 2022 for eligible articles available in English. Articles were selected for inclusion based on relevance to heart transplantation and NMSC. If any cited articles within included articles were related to our search they were also included. Of the 29 identified articles, 18 met the inclusion criteria with a total of 11,699 patients. Two studies found that tacrolimus and azathioprine increased the risk of NMSC. Five studies demonstrated that tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil decreased the risk of NMSC. Three studies described that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone had no significant association with the development in NMSC. Two studies did not specify the correlation between immunosuppressant use and NMSC development. Ten studies did not discuss the association of immunosuppressants use with the development of NMSC. Our review highlights the commonly used immunosuppressive drugs that can impact the development of NMSC in heart transplant recipients. A management strategy in immunosuppression-associated skin cancers may ultimately involve adjusting the immunosuppressive regimen. This review serves as a summary of the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in heart transplant patients and their tumorigenic mechanisms to guide recommendations for dermatologic follow-up in heart transplant recipients.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Azathioprine; Everolimus; Skin Neoplasms; Heart Transplantation; Sirolimus
PubMed: 37256379
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02646-x -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Sep 2023Adding sirolimus to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduced the risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD after... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Adding sirolimus to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduced the risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD after nonmyeloablative (NMA) allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with an HLA-matched unrelated donor in a randomized clinical trial. We analyzed real-life data to investigate the impact of implementing the triple-drug regimen with cyclosporin, MMF and sirolimus as standard GVHD prophylaxis after NMA HSCT with an HLA-matched unrelated donor at our institution. We studied all adult patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent NMA HSCT with an HLA-matched unrelated donor at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark between 2018 and 2021 and received GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporin, MMF and sirolimus (triple-drug group [TDG]). Comparisons were made with a historical cohort who received tacrolimus and MMF as GVHD prophylaxis after HLA-matched unrelated donor NMA HSCT between 2014 and 2017 (control group [CG]). Outcomes were grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). A total of 264 patients were included (TDG, n = 137; CG, n = 127). Median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58 to 69 years) in the TDG and 63 years (IQR, 57 to 68 years) in the CG. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome were the most frequent indications for HSCT in both groups (TDG, 33% and 23%, respectively; CG, 36% and 22%, respectively). The cumulative incidence at day +110 of grade II-IV GVHD was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11% to 23%) in the TDG versus 29% (95% CI, 21% to 37%) in the CG (P = .02, Gray's test) and that of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 3% (95% CI, 0 to 6%) versus 5% (95% CI, 1% to 8%), respectively (P = .4, Gray's test). In a Cox regression model adjusted for age, donor age and female donor to male recipient the risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD was lower in the TDG compared to the CG (hazard ratio [HR], .51; 95% CI .30 to .86; P = .01). The 2-year OS was 77% (95% CI, 70% to 84%) in the TDG and 69% (95% CI, 61% to 77%) in the CG (P = .04), and this difference remained significant after adjustment for age and Karnofsky Performance Status (HR, .65; 95% CI, .42 to .99; P = .04). The 2-year cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD, relapse and NRM were 60% (95% CI, 51% to 69%), 21% (95% CI, 13% to 28%), and 12% (95% CI, 6% to 17%), respectively, in the TDG and 62% (95% CI, 54% to 71%), 27% (95% CI, 19% to 35%) and 14% (95% CI, 8% to 20%), respectively, in the CG. Multivariable analyses revealed no difference in the risk of chronic GVHD (HR, .91; 95% CI, .65 to 1.26; P = .56), relapse (HR, .70; 95% CI, .42 to 1.15; P = .16) or NRM (HR, .56; 95% CI, .31 to 1.05; P = .07). After changing the standard GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing NMA HSCT with an HLA-matched unrelated donor from tacrolimus and MMF to cyclosporin, MMF and sirolimus, we observed a reduction in the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and improved 2-year OS.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Adolescent; Tacrolimus; Unrelated Donors; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Sirolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Cyclosporine; Recurrence
PubMed: 37301257
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.022 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Various immunosuppressive regimens have been developed for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Various immunosuppressive regimens have been developed for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive regimens in adults with LN.
METHODS
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, including conference proceedings, trial registries, and reference lists, from inception until July 10, 2022. The effects of treatment were compared and ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The primary endpoint was total remission. The secondary endpoints were complete remission, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI), relapse, all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), infection, herpes zoster, ovarian failure, myelosuppression, and cancer.
RESULTS
Sixty-two trials reported in 172 studies involving 6,936 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The combination of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and glucocorticoid (GC) provided the best result for the total remission rate (SUCRA, 86.63%) and SLEDAI (SUCRA, 91.00%), while the combination of voclosporin (VCS) , MMF and GC gave the best improvement in the complete remission rate (SUCRA, 90.71%). The combination of cyclophosphamide (CYC), MMF and GC was associated with the lowest risk of relapse (SUCRA, 85.57%) and cancer (SUCRA, 85.14%), while the combination of obinutuzumab (OTB), MMF and GC was associated with the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 84.07%). Rituximab (RTX) plus MMF plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of ESRD (SUCRA, 83.11%), while the risk of infection was lowest in patients treated with azathioprine (AZA) plus CYC plus GC (SUCRA, 68.59%). TAC plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of herpes zoster (SUCRA, 87.67%) and ovarian failure (SUCRA, 73.60%). Cyclosporine (CsA) plus GC was associated with the lowest risk of myelosuppression (SUCRA, 79.50%), while AZA plus GC was associated with the highest risk of myelosuppression (SUCRA, 16.25%).
DISCUSSION
This study showed that a combination of TAC, MMF and GC was the best regimen for improving the total remission rate. The optimal regimen for specific outcomes should be highlighted for high-risk patients.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Cyclophosphamide; Tacrolimus; Azathioprine; Mycophenolic Acid; Glucocorticoids; Bone Marrow Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Recurrence; Herpes Zoster; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37901212
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1232244 -
International Journal of Cancer Jun 2024We assessed whether contemporary immunosuppression agents were associated with cancer among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and if this association varied by age and...
We assessed whether contemporary immunosuppression agents were associated with cancer among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and if this association varied by age and sex. We studied a retrospective province-wide cohort of primary KTR (1997-2016). Employing multivariable Cox models, we estimated associations of cumulative doses of prednisone, mycophenolate and tacrolimus administered over the past 10 years, lagged by 2 years, with the incidence of primary malignant neoplasms (PMN). We assessed interactions with age and sex. To assess the impact of exposure recency, we used weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) modeling. Among 1064 KTR, 108 (10.2%) developed PMN over median follow-up of 73 months (interquartile range: 32-120). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.96 (0.64-1.43), 1.34 (0.96-1.86), and 1.06 (0.88-1.29) were estimated for cumulative daily doses of prednisone (5 mg), mycophenolate (1000 mg), and tacrolimus (2 mg) administered continuously over the past 10 years, respectively. PMN risk associated with cumulative tacrolimus exposure was modified by age (interaction p = .035) and was more pronounced in 15-year and 30-year-old KTR (aHRs of 1.57 [1.08-2.28] and 1.31 [1.03-1.66], respectively) in comparison to older KTR. PMN risk increase associated with higher cumulative mycophenolate dose was more pronounced in females (aHR = 1.86 [1.15-3.00]) than in males (aHR = 1.16 [0.74-1.81]; interaction p = .131). WCE analyses suggested increased PMN risk the higher the mycophenolate doses taken 5-10 years ago. A trend toward increased PMN risk with long-term mycophenolate exposure, particularly in females, and more pronounced risk with long-term tacrolimus exposure in younger KTR, identify opportunities for tailored immunosuppression to mitigate cancer risk.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Adolescent; Tacrolimus; Retrospective Studies; Prednisone; Kidney Transplantation; Mycophenolic Acid; Graft Rejection; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunosuppression Therapy; Enzyme Inhibitors; Neoplasms; Transplant Recipients
PubMed: 38345158
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34875 -
Swiss Medical Weekly Aug 2023The Swiss Autoimmune Hepatitis Cohort Study is a nationwide registry, initiated in 2017, that collects retrospective and prospective clinical data and biological samples...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The Swiss Autoimmune Hepatitis Cohort Study is a nationwide registry, initiated in 2017, that collects retrospective and prospective clinical data and biological samples from patients of all ages with autoimmune hepatitis treated at Swiss hepatology centres. Here, we report the analysis of the first 5 years of registry data.
RESULTS
A total of 291 patients with autoimmune hepatitis have been enrolled, 30 of whom were diagnosed before 18 years of age and composed the paediatric cohort. Paediatric cohort: median age at diagnosis 12.5 years (range 1-17, interquartile range (IQR) 8-15), 16 (53%) girls, 6 (32%) with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, 8 (27%) with autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis, 1 with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome, 4 (15%) with inflammatory bowel disease and 10 (41%) with advanced liver fibrosis at diagnosis. Adult cohort: median age at diagnosis 54 years (range 42-64, IQR 18-81), 185 (71%) women, 51 (20%) with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome, 22 (8%) with primary sclerosing cholangitis variant syndrome, 9 (4%) with inflammatory bowel disease and 66 (32%) with advanced liver fibrosis at diagnosis. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 5.2 years (IQR 3-9.3 years). Treatment in children: 29 (97%) children were initially treated with corticosteroids, 28 of whom received combination treatment with azathioprine. Budesonide was used in four children, all in combination with azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil was used in five children, all of whom had previously received corticosteroids and thiopurine. Treatment in adults (data available for 228 patients): 219 (96%) were treated with corticosteroids, mostly in combination with azathioprine. Predniso(lo)ne was the corticosteroid used in three-quarters of patients; the other patients received budesonide. A total of 78 (33%) patients received mycophenolate mofetil, 62 of whom had previously been treated with azathioprine. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 13 of 19 (68%) children and 137 of 182 (75%) adults with available follow-up data. All children were alive at the last follow-up, and none had undergone liver transplantation. Five (2%) adults underwent liver transplantation, two of whom had a fulminant presentation. Four (2%) adults with autoimmune hepatitis died (two from liver-associated causes).
CONCLUSION
Patients with autoimmune hepatitis in Switzerland had clinical features similar to those in other cohorts. The proportion of patients diagnosed with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome was higher than expected. Autoimmune hepatitis was managed according to guidelines, except for the use of budesonide in a small proportion of paediatric patients. The outcomes were excellent, but the findings must be confirmed over a longer follow-up period.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Female; Infant; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Middle Aged; Male; Azathioprine; Retrospective Studies; Hepatitis, Autoimmune; Prospective Studies; Switzerland; Cohort Studies; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Mycophenolic Acid; Liver Cirrhosis; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Budesonide
PubMed: 37769636
DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40102 -
Liver Transplantation : Official... Aug 2023Intrahepatic cholangiopathy is a life-threatening sequela of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. We analyzed the clinical impact of pretransplant administration of...
Intrahepatic cholangiopathy is a life-threatening sequela of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. We analyzed the clinical impact of pretransplant administration of mycophenolate mofetil in reducing intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. Patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between 2010 and April 2022 were included. Pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil was started in November 2020. A comparison between patients who experienced intrahepatic cholangiopathy and who did not among ABO-incompatible transplantation was performed. Recipients of ABO-incompatible transplantations were categorized based on donor surgery into open, laparoscopy without pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil, and laparoscopy with pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil groups. Cox analysis of intrahepatic cholangiopathy was performed. A total of 234 ABO-incompatible transplantations were included. Intrahepatic cholangiopathy occurred in 1.1% (n=1/94), 13.3% (n=12/90), and 2.0% (n=1/50) of patients who received an ABO-incompatible liver with open surgery, laparoscopic donor surgery without pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil and laparoscopic donor surgery with pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil. ( p = 0.001) Multivariable analysis showed that transplantations involving a donor who underwent a laparoscopic hepatectomy and a recipient who did not receive pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil were associated with a higher risk of intrahepatic cholangiopathy (HR=13.449, CI=1.710-105.800, p = 0.02) compared with transplantations from donors who underwent open surgery. Transplantations involving a donor who underwent laparoscopic donor surgery and a recipient who received pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil resulted in no increased risk compared with transplantations from donors who underwent open surgery. (HR=5.307, CI=0.315-89.366, p = 0.25) Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy was a risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation, while pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil was related to risk reduction of intrahepatic cholangiopathy.
Topics: Humans; Liver Transplantation; Mycophenolic Acid; Living Donors; Blood Group Incompatibility; Kidney Transplantation; ABO Blood-Group System; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 36695301
DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000070 -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Oct 2023The Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment web site aids clinicians and pharmacologists involved in the care of transplant recipients; it proposes dose adjustments...
BACKGROUND
The Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment web site aids clinicians and pharmacologists involved in the care of transplant recipients; it proposes dose adjustments based on the estimated area under the concentration-time curve (AUCs). Three concentrations (T 20 min , T 1 h , and T 3 h ) are sufficient to estimate mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC 0-12 h in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study investigates mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses and MPA AUC values in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, and target exposure attainment when the proposed doses were followed, through a large-scale analysis of the data set collated since the inception of the Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment web site.
METHODS
In this study, 4051 MMF dose adjustment requests, corresponding to 1051 patients aged 0-18 years, were retrospectively analyzed. AUC calculations were performed in the back office of the Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment using published Bayesian and population pharmacokinetic models.
RESULTS
The first AUC request was posted >12 months posttransplantation for 41% of patients. Overall, only 50% had the first MPA AUC 0-12 h within the recommended 30-60 mg.h/L range. When the proposed dose was not followed, the proportion of patients with an AUC in the therapeutic range for MMF with cyclosporine or tacrolimus at the subsequent request was lower (40% and 45%, respectively) than when it was followed (58% and 60%, respectively): P = 0.08 and 0.006, respectively. Furthermore, 3 months posttransplantation, the dispersion of AUC values was often lower at the second visit when the proposed doses were followed, namely, P = 0.03, 0.003, and 0.07 in the 4 months-1 year, and beyond 1 year with <6-month or >6-month periods between both visits, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Owing to extreme interindividual variability in MPA exposure, MMF dose adjustment is necessary; it is efficient at reducing such variability when based on MPA AUC.
Topics: Humans; Child; Mycophenolic Acid; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Bayes Theorem; Transplant Recipients; Immunosuppressive Agents; Area Under Curve
PubMed: 36823705
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001087 -
Swiss Medical Weekly Feb 2024Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease leading to microvascular and fibrotic manifestations in multiple organs. Several treatment options...
OBJECTIVES
Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease leading to microvascular and fibrotic manifestations in multiple organs. Several treatment options and recommendations from different European countries are available. In this study, for which the ambit is Switzerland specifically, we aim to describe the treatment patterns of systemic sclerosis patients with fibrotic manifestations.
METHODS
Systemic sclerosis patients were selected from six Swiss tertiary centres recorded in the multicentre, prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. Patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR systemic sclerosis classification criteria at baseline were included. To determine the differences in treatment of varying degrees of fibrosis, four groups were identified: (1) patients with a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) >0; (2) those with mRSS ≥7; (3) those with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), diagnosed by either chest X-Ray or high-resolution computed tomography; and (4) patients fulfilling one of the additional criteria for extensive interstitial lung disease, defined as interstitial lung disease involvement of >20% in high-resolution computed tomography, dyspnea NYHA-stage 3/4, or a predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%.
RESULTS
A total of 590 patients with systemic sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 421 (71.4%) had mRSS >0, of whom 195 (33.1%) had mRSS ≥7; interstitial lung disease was diagnosed in 198 of 456 (43.4%), of whom 106 (18.0 %) showed extensive interstitial lung disease. Regarding non-biologic disease-modifying medications (DMARDs), the most frequently prescribed was methotrexate, followed by hydroxychloroquine and mycophenolate mofetil. Rituximab and tocilizumab were most frequently used among the biologic DMARDs. Specifically, 148/372 (39.8%) of treated patients with skin fibrosis received methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, and 80/177 (45.2%) with interstitial lung disease received cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. Most patients received a proton-pump inhibitor, and few patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
CONCLUSION
Overall, in Switzerland, a wide range of medications is prescribed for systemic sclerosis patients. This includes modern, targeted treatments for which randomised controlled clinical trial have been recently reported.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Rituximab; Methotrexate; Mycophenolic Acid; Prospective Studies; Switzerland; Scleroderma, Systemic; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Fibrosis; Antirheumatic Agents
PubMed: 38579324
DOI: 10.57187/s.3630 -
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology Jul 2024ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV), classified into granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV), classified into granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis represent a group of disorders characterized by necrotizing vasculitis of small vessels, endothelial injury and tissue damage. The outcomes and prognosis of AAV have undergone significant changes with the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil). The enhanced understanding of pathogenesis has subsequently led to the incorporation into clinical practice of drugs targeting specific therapeutic targets.
AREAS COVERED
After an extensive literature search of Pubmed, Medline, Embase of the most recent evidence, we provide an overview of available treatments, highlighting how newer drugs have integrated into standard protocols. Our review also explores potential new therapeutic targets, including B cell depletion and inhibition, T cell inhibition, complement inhibition, and IL-5 and IgE inhibition.
EXPERT OPINION
There is hope that the new treatment targets currently under study in AAV may enable a faster and more lasting clinical response, ensuring the reduction of possible side effects from therapies. Moreover, numerous aspects necessitate further exploration in the future, such as tailoring of GCs, integration of GCs-sparing agents, efficacy of combination therapy, optimal maintenance therapy, to reduce organ-damage and improve quality of life.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Immunosuppressive Agents; Glucocorticoids; B-Lymphocytes; T-Lymphocytes; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Interleukin-5; Animals
PubMed: 38445642
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2024.2326628