-
Neurology Jul 2023Observational studies suggested a bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer disease (AD) and epilepsies. However, it remains debated whether and in which direction a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Observational studies suggested a bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer disease (AD) and epilepsies. However, it remains debated whether and in which direction a causal association exists. This study aims to explore the relationship between genetic predisposition to AD, CSF biomarkers of AD (β-amyloid [Aβ] 42 and phosphorylated tau [pTau]), and epilepsies with 2-sample, bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) method.
METHODS
Genetic instruments were obtained from large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis of AD (N = 111,326, N = 677,663), CSF biomarkers of AD (Aβ42 and pTau, N = 13,116), and epilepsy (N = 15,212, N = 29,677) of European ancestry. Epilepsy phenotypes included all epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, generalized epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures, focal epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (focal HS), and lesion-negative focal epilepsy. Main analyses were performed using generalized summary data-based MR. Sensitivity analyses included inverse variance weighted, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, MR-Egger, weighted mode, and weighted median.
RESULTS
For forward analysis, genetic predisposition to AD was associated with an increased risk of generalized epilepsy (odds ratio [OR] 1.053, 95% CI 1.002-1.105, = 0.038) and focal HS (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.004-1.022, = 0.004). These associations were consistent across sensitivity analyses and replicated using a separate set of genetic instruments from another AD genome-wide association study. For reverse analysis, there was a suggestive effect of focal HS on AD (OR 3.994, 95% CI 1.172-13.613, = 0.027). In addition, genetically predicted lower CSF Aβ42 was associated with an increased risk of generalized epilepsy (β = 0.090, 95% CI 0.022-0.158, = 0.010).
DISCUSSION
This MR study supports a causal link between AD, amyloid pathology, and generalized epilepsy. This study also indicates a close association between AD and focal HS. More effort should be made to screen seizure in AD, unravel its clinical implications, and explore its role as a putative modifiable risk factor.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Epilepsy, Generalized; Seizures; Epilepsy, Absence; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 37225432
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207423 -
Epilepsia Open Dec 2023We performed a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis according to a pre-registered protocol (Prospero: CRD42022376561) to identify the evidence associated... (Review)
Review
We performed a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis according to a pre-registered protocol (Prospero: CRD42022376561) to identify the evidence associated with the burden of illness in Dravet syndrome (DS), a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy with neurocognitive and neurobehavioral impairment. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsychInfo, Cochrane's database of systematic reviews, and Epistemonikos from inception to June 2022. Non-interventional studies reporting on epidemiology (incidence, prevalence, and mortality), patient and caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQoL), direct and indirect costs and healthcare resource utilization were eligible. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening. Pre-specified data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Overall, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. The incidence varied from 1:15 400-1:40 900, and the prevalence varied from 1.5 per 100 000 to 6.5 per 100 000. Mortality was reported in 3.7%-20.8% of DS patients, most commonly due to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and status epilepticus. Patient HRQoL, assessed by caregivers, was lower than in non-DS epilepsy patients; mean scores (0 [worst] to 100/1 [best]) were 62.1 for the Kiddy KINDL/Kid-KINDL, 46.5-54.7 for the PedsQL and 0.42 for the EQ-5D-5L. Caregivers, especially mothers, were severely affected, with impacts on their time, energy, sleep, career, and finances, while siblings were also affected. Symptoms of depression were reported in 47%-70% of caregivers. Mean total direct costs were high across all studies, ranging from $11 048 to $77 914 per patient per year (PPPY), with inpatient admissions being a key cost driver across most studies. Mean costs related to lost productivity were only reported in three publications, ranging from approximately $19 000 to $20 000 PPPY ($17 596 for mothers vs $1564 for fathers). High seizure burden was associated with higher resource utilization, costs and poorer HRQoL. The burden of DS on patients, caregivers, the healthcare system, and society is profound, reflecting the severe nature of the syndrome. Future studies will be able to assess the impact that newly approved therapies have on reducing the burden of DS.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Cost of Illness; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Patient Acceptance of Health Care
PubMed: 37750463
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12832 -
Drugs Jul 2023Fenfluramine (Fintepla) is an oral anti-seizure medication (ASM) with a novel mechanism of action consisting of activity in the serotonergic system coupled with positive... (Review)
Review
Fenfluramine (Fintepla) is an oral anti-seizure medication (ASM) with a novel mechanism of action consisting of activity in the serotonergic system coupled with positive allosteric modulation effects at sigma-1 receptors. Originally approved for use at high doses as an appetite suppressant, it was subsequently withdrawn after being linked to valvular heart disease (VHD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), before being investigated for use at low doses as an adjunctive ASM in patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies, including Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) who have pharmacoresistant seizures. In clinical trials, treatment with adjunctive fenfluramine markedly reduced convulsive seizure frequency in patients with DS that were sustained for up to 3 years, and reduced drop seizure frequency in patients with LGS that were sustained for up to 1 year. Notably, fenfluramine was also associated with clinically meaningful improvements in aspects of everyday executive functioning (EF) not entirely explainable by seizure reduction alone. Furthermore, it was generally well tolerated with, importantly, no reports of VHD or PAH. Thus, adjunctive fenfluramine is a novel and effective treatment for pharmacoresistant seizures associated with DS and LGS that may also improve aspects of everyday EF in some patients.
Topics: Humans; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Fenfluramine; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Treatment Outcome; Seizures; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 37316680
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01881-w -
Journal of Neurology Oct 2023To compare the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs), both as monotherapies and adjunctive therapies, for idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs), both as monotherapies and adjunctive therapies, for idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) and related entities.
METHODS
Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials from December 2022 to February 2023. Studies on the efficacy and safety of ASM monotherapies or adjunctive therapies for IGEs and related entities-including juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), juvenile absence epilepsy, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone (GTCA)-were included. Efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients remaining seizure free for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; safety outcomes were the proportions of any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Network meta-analyses were performed in a random-effects model to obtain odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Rankings of ASMs were based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). This study is registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42022372358).
RESULTS
Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials containing 4282 patients were included. As monotherapies, all ASMs were more effective than placebo, and valproate and ethosuximide were significantly better than lamotrigine. According to the SUCRA for efficacy, ethosuximide ranked first for CAE, whereas valproate ranked first for other types of IGEs. As adjunctive therapies, topiramate ranked best for GTCA as well as overall for IGEs, while levetiracetam ranked best for myoclonic seizures. For safety, perampanel ranked best (measured by any TEAE).
CONCLUSIONS
All of the studied ASMs were more effective than placebo. Valproate monotherapy ranked best overall for IGEs, whereas ethosuximide ranked best for CAE. Adjunctive topiramate and levetiracetam were most effective for GTCA and myoclonic seizures, respectively. Furthermore, perampanel had the best tolerability.
Topics: Humans; Child; Valproic Acid; Topiramate; Network Meta-Analysis; Levetiracetam; Ethosuximide; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy, Generalized; Seizures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37378757
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11834-8 -
Brain : a Journal of Neurology Dec 2023Dravet syndrome is a severe epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by (febrile) seizures, behavioural problems and developmental delay. Eighty per cent of patients with...
Dravet syndrome is a severe epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by (febrile) seizures, behavioural problems and developmental delay. Eighty per cent of patients with Dravet syndrome have a mutation in SCN1A, encoding Nav1.1. Milder clinical phenotypes, such as GEFS+ (generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus), can also arise from SCN1A mutations. Predicting the clinical phenotypic outcome based on the type of mutation remains challenging, even when the same mutation is inherited within one family. This clinical and genetic heterogeneity adds to the difficulties of predicting disease progression and tailoring the prescription of anti-seizure medication. Understanding the neuropathology of different SCN1A mutations may help to predict the expected clinical phenotypes and inform the selection of best-fit treatments. Initially, the loss of Na+-current in inhibitory neurons was recognized specifically to result in disinhibition and consequently seizure generation. However, the extent to which excitatory neurons contribute to the pathophysiology is currently debated and might depend on the patient clinical phenotype or the specific SCN1A mutation. To examine the genotype-phenotype correlations of SCN1A mutations in relation to excitatory neurons, we investigated a panel of patient-derived excitatory neuronal networks differentiated on multi-electrode arrays. We included patients with different clinical phenotypes, harbouring various SCN1A mutations, along with a family in which the same mutation led to febrile seizures, GEFS+ or Dravet syndrome. We hitherto describe a previously unidentified functional excitatory neuronal network phenotype in the context of epilepsy, which corresponds to seizurogenic network prediction patterns elicited by proconvulsive compounds. We found that excitatory neuronal networks were affected differently, depending on the type of SCN1A mutation, but did not segregate according to clinical severity. Specifically, loss-of-function mutations could be distinguished from missense mutations, and mutations in the pore domain could be distinguished from mutations in the voltage sensing domain. Furthermore, all patients showed aggravated neuronal network responses at febrile temperatures compared with controls. Finally, retrospective drug screening revealed that anti-seizure medication affected GEFS+ patient- but not Dravet patient-derived neuronal networks in a patient-specific and clinically relevant manner. In conclusion, our results indicate a mutation-specific excitatory neuronal network phenotype, which recapitulates the foremost clinically relevant features, providing future opportunities for precision therapies.
Topics: Humans; NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Retrospective Studies; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Mutation; Epilepsy, Generalized; Phenotype; Seizures, Febrile; Neurons
PubMed: 37467479
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad245 -
Medicina Sep 2023Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) is a group of epilepsies age-dependent, a subgroup of EGG genetic generalized epilepsies, with electro-clinical features and... (Review)
Review
Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) is a group of epilepsies age-dependent, a subgroup of EGG genetic generalized epilepsies, with electro-clinical features and polygenic inheritance. Four syndromes comprising the IGEs: childhood absence epilepsy (CAD), juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), and generalized tonic-clonic seizures epilepsy. Clinically characterized by the presence of one or a combination of absence seizures, myoclonus, tonic-clonic, or myoclonictonic- clonic with common electroencephalographic patterns of 2.5-5.5 Hz generalized spike-wave and activated by hyperventilation or photic stimulation. They generally have a good prognosis for seizure control, not evolve to an epileptic encephalopathy. Frequent clinical overlap between the first three, being able to evolve between them; the probability and age of remission varies in each one. About 80% responding to broad-spectrum anti-seizure drugs such as valproic acid, may worsen with sodium or GABAergic blockers. Development is typically normal; however, they are frequently associated with mood disorders, attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and learning disabilities, but do not have cognitive deficits. The recognition of this group of EGI is important for the adequate use of the resources, avoiding unnecessary studies, adequate orientation of the prognosis and an optimal treatment.
Topics: Humans; Child; Epilepsy, Generalized; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Dysfunction; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 37714126
DOI: No ID Found