-
BMC Cancer Apr 2024The treatment for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This retrospective study aimed to compare the local tumor control, survival and...
BACKGROUND
The treatment for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This retrospective study aimed to compare the local tumor control, survival and procedure-related complications in CRC patients undergoing low-dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) versus percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for lung oligometastasis.
METHODS
Patients between November 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in the entire cohort as well as by stratified analysis based on the minimal ablation margin (MAM) around the tumor.
RESULTS
The final analysis included 122 patients: 74 and 48 in the brachytherapy and MWA groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 30.5 and 35.3 months. The 1- and 3-year LTPFS rate was 54.1% and 40.5% in the brachytherapy group versus 58.3% and 41.7% in the MWA group (P = 0.524 and 0.889, respectively). The 1- and 3-year OS rate was 75.7% and 48.6% versus 75.0% and 50.0% (P = 0.775 and 0.918, respectively). Neither LTPFS nor OS differed significantly between the patients with MAM of 5-10 mm versus > 10 mm. Pulmonary complication rate did not differ in the overall analysis, but was significantly higher in the MWA group in the subgroup analysis that only included patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key structures (P = 0.005). The increased complications was primarily bronchopleural fistula.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the caveats associated with radioisotope use in L-SABT, MWA is generally preferable. In patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key pulmonary structures, however, L-SABT could be considered as an alternative due to lower risk of bronchopleural fistula.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Microwaves; Brachytherapy; Treatment Outcome; Lung; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fistula; Liver Neoplasms; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 38627695
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12163-3 -
Cancer Research and Treatment Oct 2023Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or...
PURPOSE
Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or classification. This survey-based study aimed to analyze the differential opinions of colorectal surgeons and radiation oncologists regarding the definition and treatment of OMD from the colorectal primary.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 141 participants were included in this study, consisting of 63 radiation oncologists (44.7%) and 78 colorectal surgeons (55.3%). The survey consisted of 19 questions related to OMD, and the responses were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine statistical differences between the specialties.
RESULTS
The radiation oncologists chose "bone" more frequently compared to the colorectal surgeons (19.2% vs. 36.5%, p=0.022), while colorectal surgeons favored "peritoneal seeding" (26.9% vs. 9.5%, p=0.009). Regarding the number of metastatic tumors, 48.3% of colorectal surgeons responded that "irrelevant, if all metastatic lesions are amendable to local therapy", while only 21.8% of radiation oncologist chose same answer. When asked about molecular diagnosis, most surgeons (74.8%) said it was important, but only 35.8% of radiation oncologists agreed.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that although radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons agreed on a majority of aspects such as diagnostic imaging, biomarker, systemic therapy, and optimal timing of OMD, they also had quite different perspectives on several aspects of OMD. Understanding these differences is crucial to achieving multidisciplinary consensus on the definition and optimal management of OMD.
Topics: Humans; Surveys and Questionnaires; Consensus; Biomarkers; Colorectal Neoplasms; Republic of Korea
PubMed: 37290481
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.479 -
Japanese Journal of Radiology Nov 2023The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in...
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in achieving dose constraints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of patients who underwent on-line adaptive radiation therapy using a 1.5-T MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The workflow in MRgART was established by reviewing the disease site, number of fractions, and re-planning procedures. Five cases of prostate cancer were selected to evaluate the feasibility of the new workflow with respect to achieving dose constraints.
RESULTS
Between December 2021 and September 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent MRgART using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Of these, 20 had prostate cancer, 10 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 had pancreatic cancer, 5 had lymph node oligo-metastasis, 3 had renal cancer, 3 had bone metastasis, 2 had liver metastasis from colon cancer, and 1 had a mediastinal tumor. Among a total of 247 fractions, 235 (95%) were adapt-to-shape (ATS)-based re-planning. The median ATS re-planning time in all 50 cases was 17 min. In the feasibility study, all dose constraint sets were met in all 5 patients by ATS re-planning. Conversely, a total of 14 dose constraints in 5 patients could not be achieved by virtual plan without using adaptive re-planning. These dose constraints included the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc in the planning target volume and the maximum dose of the rectal/bladder wall.
CONCLUSION
A new workflow of 1.5-T MRgART was established and found to be feasible. Our evaluation of the dose constraint achievement demonstrated the effectiveness of the workflow.
Topics: Male; Humans; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Radiotherapy Dosage; Workflow; Retrospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
PubMed: 37354344
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01457-4 -
Current Medical Imaging Mar 2024In the realm of cancer studies,the differences among the biological behavior of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa), localized prostate cancer (LPCa), and widely...
BACKGROUND
In the realm of cancer studies,the differences among the biological behavior of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa), localized prostate cancer (LPCa), and widely prostate cancer (WPCa) are still unclear.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of our study was to assess the clinical and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters of tumor burden in OPCa. In addition, the correlation between clinical and IVIM parameters and the prostate-specific antigen nadir (PSAN) and time to nadir (TTN) during initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in OPCa was explored. It was found that the IVIM parameters could effectively differentiate LPCa and WPCa, as well as LPCa and OPC. Moreover, Gleason score (GS) was positively correlated with PSAN, while prostate volume was positively correlated with TTN.
METHODS
About 54 patients were included in this retrospective study (mean age=74±7.4 years). ADC, D, D*, and f were acquired according to the biexponential Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) model. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the differences in clinical and IVIM parameters among the three groups. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination abilities. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test. Furthermore, Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between clinical and IVIM parameters of PSAN and TTN during initial ADT with OPCa.
RESULTS
There were significant differences among the three groups observed for age, PSA, GS, ADC, D and D* values (P<0.05). Multi-parameter pairwise comparison results showed that significant differences between LPCa and WPCa were observed for the age, PSA, GS, ADC, D and D* values (P<0.05). However, D* was different between the LPCa and OPCa groups (P=0.032). GS showed a significant positive correlation with PSAN (Rho=0.594, P=0.042), and prostate volume showed a significant positive correlation with TTN (Rho=0.777, P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
The IVIM parameters can effectively differentiate LPCa and WPCa, as well as LPCa and OPCa. Moreover, there was a certain trend in their distribution, which could reflect the tumor burden of PCa.
PubMed: 38532603
DOI: 10.2174/0115734056248787231025072754 -
Urologic Oncology Apr 2024Bone metastasis (BM) is considered a poor prognostic factor of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Confusion exists regarding how to deal with RCC patients with bone-only...
BACKGROUND
Bone metastasis (BM) is considered a poor prognostic factor of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Confusion exists regarding how to deal with RCC patients with bone-only metastasis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The clinical data of consecutive RCC patients with bone-only metastasis at Peking University Cancer Hospital between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
Fifty-four eligible patients were screened from an RCC database of 1,878 metastatic patients. After a median follow-up of 43.6 m, 61.1% of the patients were presented with progression of prior BM or new BM. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 16.2 m (95%CI: 11.4-21.0) and 65.2 m, respectively. For the 30 patients with oligo-metastasis (≤3 loci) and 24 ones with multiple-metastasis (>3 loci), the median OS was not reached and 42.0m (95%CI: 12.7-71.2) with statistical difference (P < 0.001). In the oligo-metastasis group, the median PFS of the 15 patients treated with local therapy and of the 13 patients treated with systemic therapy was 14.2 m (95%CI: 5.3-23.3) and 18.0 m (95%CI:15.4-20.6), respectively. In the multiple-metastasis group, the median PFS and OS of the 18 patients treated with systemic therapy was 16.6 m (95%CI: 7.5-25.7) and 63.9 m (95%CI: 21.8-106.0), respectively. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic sites (oligo/multiple) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score, RCC pathological subtype were significantly associated with prognosis (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
RCC patients with bone-only metastases have a favorable prognosis. The number of metastatic sites, IMDC, RCC pathological subtype could serve as survival predictors, which might provide clue of treatment modality.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Prognosis; Bone Neoplasms
PubMed: 38383241
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.030 -
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Jul 2024To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line therapy with palbociclib in a Spanish cohort treated after palbociclib approval. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line therapy with palbociclib in a Spanish cohort treated after palbociclib approval.
METHODS
PALBOSPAIN is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study evaluating real-world patterns and outcomes with 1 L palbociclib in men and women (any menopausal status) with advanced HR/HER2- BC diagnosed between November 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rw-PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), the real-world response rate (rw-RR), the clinical benefit rate, palbociclib dose reduction, and safety.
RESULTS
A total of 762 patients were included. The median rw-PFS and OS were 24 months (95% CI 21-27) and 42 months (40-not estimable [NE]) in the whole population, respectively. By cohort, the median rw-PFS and OS were as follows: 28 (95% CI 23-39) and 44 (95% CI 38-NE) months in patients with de novo metastatic disease, 13 (95% CI 11-17) and 36 months (95% CI 31-41) in patients who experienced relapse < 12 months after the end of ET, and 31 months (95% CI 26-37) and not reached (NR) in patients who experienced relapse > 12 months after the end of ET. rw-PFS and OS were longer in patients with oligometastasis and only one metastatic site and those with non-visceral disease. The most frequent hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (72%; grade ≥ 3: 52.5%), and the most common non-hematologic adverse event was asthenia (38%).
CONCLUSION
These findings, consistent with those from clinical trials, support use of palbociclib plus ET as 1 L for advanced BC in the real-world setting, including pre-menopausal women and men.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04874025 (PALBOSPAIN). Date of registration: 04/30/2021 retrospectively registered.
Topics: Humans; Pyridines; Female; Piperazines; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Aged; Adult; Male; Retrospective Studies; Receptor, ErbB-2; Aged, 80 and over; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 38561577
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07287-w -
Advances in Radiation Oncology Jul 2024Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival benefits. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the addition of local therapy to systemic treatments in patients with advanced EC.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Key eligibility criteria included studies that enrolled patients with histologically confirmed EC or esophagogastric junction cancer with metastasis or recurrence and compared survival benefits between the combined local and systemic treatment group and the systemic treatment alone group. Survival outcomes, represented by hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were pooled using a random effects model. The MINORS score was adopted for quality assessment. Risk of bias was statistically examined by Begg's and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 qualified retrospective studies including 14,489 patients were identified. Addition of local therapy to systemic treatment significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; < .001) and OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; < .0001) compared with systemic treatment alone. The subgroup analysis revealed that combined local and systemic treatment conferred a significant survival advantage in both patients with oligometastasis (PFS: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; < .0001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; < .0001) and recurrence (OS: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; = .002).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, addition of local treatment to systemic therapy can improve survival in patients with advanced EC, particularly in those with oligometastasis or recurrent diseases.
PubMed: 38826154
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101522 -
Cureus Apr 2024The present study aimed to evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its metastases and define the criteria for eligibility....
BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its metastases and define the criteria for eligibility. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who had a histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, had progressed to stage IV, and underwent PBT for both the primary and some metastatic lesions between 2017 and 2022. PBT was performed using the passive scattering technique.
RESULTS
Sixteen patients (median age, 72 years; range, 55-85 years) were enrolled. All patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at the initiation of PBT. The median duration from the date of stage IV diagnosis to the initiation of PBT was 5.8 (range, 0.4-13.5) months. Three patients had been diagnosed as having recurrent stage IV cancer at other institutions before their referral to our hospital because they had local recurrence and distant metastases after the resection of the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was as follows: pre-PBT, 0, 1, 2, and 3 lines in 4, 7, 4, and 1 patients, respectively; concurrent with PBT, 0 and 1 line in 11 and 5 patients, respectively; post-PBT, 0 and 1 line in 5 and 5 patients, respectively; and unknown, 6 patients. The median survival times (MSTs) from the date of stage IV diagnosis for the with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumor were 11.4 and 20.1 months, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the performance status (PS) levels ( < 0.01), the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 tumor marker levels ( < 0.01), active tumors not treated with irradiation ( = 0.02), and with or without post-PBT chemotherapy ( < 0.01) were statistically significant factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the CA 19-9 tumor marker levels (= 0.04), the number of metastatic lesions ( = 0.049), and with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumors ( = 0.02) were significant factors.
CONCLUSION
PBT is indicated when the number of metastases is limited to ≤ 4 lesions and all tumors can be irradiated within the smallest possible number of irradiation fields that can be performed within the patient's tolerable time, which is a subjective duration that depends on the patient's reaction during each session. It may be a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.
PubMed: 38716033
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57771 -
The Laryngoscope Jul 2024Evidence suggests that distant metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a spectrum of disease. Previous studies show that oligometastasis has favorable...
OBJECTIVE
Evidence suggests that distant metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a spectrum of disease. Previous studies show that oligometastasis has favorable survival compared with polymetastasis. The quality of life of patients with oligometastasis remains unknown. To further solidify the position of oligometastasis as a separate entity, we hypothesized that oligometastatic patients experience better quality of life than polymetastatic patients.
METHODS
Patients with distant metastasis were stratified into three groups: oligometastasis (≤3 metastatic foci in ≤2 anatomic sites), explosive metastasis (≥4 metastatic foci at one anatomic site), and explosive-disseminating metastasis (spread to ≥3 anatomic sites). Quality of life was assessed every 2 months post distant metastasis diagnosis.
RESULTS
Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, a total of 161 patients with distant metastasis were identified, with a total of 397 measurements. In this group, 57 (35.4%) patients had oligometastasis, 35 (21.7%) patients had explosive metastasis, and 69 (42.9%) patients had explosive-disseminating metastasis. Their median post-distant metastasis survivals were 8.5 months, 3.2 months, and 3.2 months respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly better overall quality of life was observed in the oligometastasis group compared with the polymetastatic groups (+0.75 out of 7, p < 0.05). Furthermore, oligometastatic patients performed better in the subdomains of "physical functioning," "fatigue," and "pain."
CONCLUSION
Results from this study underscore that subgroups exist regarding quality of life and survival within distant metastasis, with polymetastatic patients performing worse than oligometastatic patients. This highlights the significance of tailored interventions that consider the unique challenges faced by each metastatic group of patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3, retrospective cohort study Laryngoscope, 134:3170-3176, 2024.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Adult
PubMed: 38326981
DOI: 10.1002/lary.31325 -
Chest May 2024Prolonged survival of patients with metastatic disease has furthered interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Prolonged survival of patients with metastatic disease has furthered interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).
RESEARCH QUESTION
There is a paucity of data comparing lung MDT modalities. Do outcomes among sublobar resection (SLR), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and percutaneous ablation (PA) for lung metastases vary in terms of local control and survival?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Medical records of patients undergoing lung MDT at a single cancer center between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Overall survival, local progression, and toxicity outcomes were collected. Patient and lesion characteristics were used to generate multivariable models with propensity weighted analysis.
RESULTS
Lung MDT courses (644 total: 243 SLR, 274 SBRT, 127 PA) delivered to 511 patients were included with a median follow-up of 22 months. There were 47 local progression events in 45 patients, and 159 patients died. Two-year overall survival and local progression were 80.3% and 63.3%, 83.8% and 9.6%, and 4.1% and 11.7% for SLR, SBRT, and PA, respectively. Lesion size per 1 cm was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.24; P = .003) and LP (hazard ratio, 1.50; P < .001). There was no difference in overall survival by modality. Relative to SLR, there was no difference in risk of local progression with PA; however, SBRT was associated with a decreased risk (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .023). Rates of severe toxicity were low (2.1%-2.6%) and not different among groups.
INTERPRETATION
This study performs a propensity weighted analysis of SLR, SBRT, and PA and shows no impact of lung MDT modality on overall survival. Given excellent local control across MDT options, a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for patient triage and longitudinal management.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Pneumonectomy; Treatment Outcome; Survival Rate; Propensity Score
PubMed: 38103730
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.013