-
American Journal of Orthodontics and... Nov 2023Anterior open bite correction with Invisalign has been claimed to have relatively good predictability because of the proposed function of clear aligners to function as...
INTRODUCTION
Anterior open bite correction with Invisalign has been claimed to have relatively good predictability because of the proposed function of clear aligners to function as occlusal bite-blocks, limiting extrusion of the posterior teeth or possibly even intruding posterior teeth. This proposal, however, remains relatively unsubstantiated. The objective of this study was to investigate and determine the accuracy of Invisalign treatment in correcting anterior open bite by comparing the predicted outcome from ClinCheck to the achieved outcome for the initial aligner sequence.
METHODS
A retrospective study used pretreatment and posttreatment intraoral scans and predicted outcomes (ClinCheck) stereolithography files of 76 adult patients from private specialist orthodontic practices. Inclusion criteria comprised nonextraction treatment, with a minimum of 14 dual arch Invisalign aligners. Geomagic Control X software was used to measure overbite and overjet in the pretreatment, posttreatment, and predicted outcomes stereolithography files for each patient.
RESULTS
Approximately 66.2% of the programmed open bite closure was expressed compared with the prescribed ClinCheck outcome. The use of posterior occlusal bite-blocks and prescribed movement of teeth via anterior extrusion, posterior intrusion, or a combination of the 2 made no difference to the efficacy of open bite closure. Two-week aligner changes resulted in 0.49 mm more bite closure on average.
CONCLUSIONS
The prescribed bite closure in ClinCheck software overestimates the bite closure that is clinically achieved.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Open Bite; Retrospective Studies; Malocclusion; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Tooth Movement Techniques; Overbite
PubMed: 37330726
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.04.017 -
International Orthodontics May 2024The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign®...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign® aligners (Align Technology, San Jose, California) with those planned by orthodontists via its ClinCheck® digital treatment planning facility.
METHODS
Data provided by Align regarding patients who had completed an initial series of Invisalign® aligner treatment and were less than 18-years old were assessed in relation to pre-treatment, planned and achieved overjet and overbite measurements. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Mann Whitney calculations were computed.
RESULTS
A total of 290 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 14.17 (13,15.42) years. The median achieved overjet and overbite changes were less than those planned (p<0.01) with 53.33% of the planned median overjet increase achieved and 52.94% of planned median overjet reduction achieved. Additionally, 58.33% of the planned median overbite increase was achieved and 55.55% of the planned median overbite reduction was achieved. A total of 21.52% patients recorded no change or an increase from pre-treatment to the achieved overjet where reduction was planned, whereas 41.67% recorded no change or a reduction in overjet where increase was planned. A total of 18.72% recorded no change or an increase in overbite where reduction was planned, whereas 20.75% recorded no change or a reduction in overbite where increase was planned.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than 60% of the planned overjet and overbite changes per patient were achieved. Between 18.72 and 41.67% of patients experienced no change or changes in overjet and overbite in the opposite direction to that planned. This is likely to be clinically significant.
PubMed: 38805975
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100888 -
Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.The Angle Orthodontist Nov 2023To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances with miniscrew (FM) during molar intrusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty adults with anterior open bite were randomized into either CA or FM groups. Lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and MBF were collected at pretreatment (T0) and 6 months of treatment (T1). Maxillary molar intrusion in FM were intruded by nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed-coil spring delivered force (150 grams/side) while clear aligners combined with squeezing exercise were performed in CA. Parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
After 6 months of treatment, significant root resorption of 0.21-0.24 mm in CA and 0.38-0.47 mm in FM were found while maxillary molars were intruded 0.68 and 1.49 mm in CA and FM, respectively. CA showed significant less root resorption and intrusion than FM. Overbite, bite closing, and MBF increased significantly. CA showed significantly less overbite and SN-MP changes but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was correlated with the amount of maxillary molar intrusion (r = 0.736, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Maxillary molar intrusion and root resorption in CA were half the amount in FM in 6 months. The amount of maxillary molar root resorption was one-third of the intrusion distance. CA displayed less overbite increase and bite closing but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was positively correlated with the molar intrusion amount.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Root Resorption; Overbite; Open Bite; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Molar; Tooth Movement Techniques; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Maxilla
PubMed: 37922387
DOI: 10.2319/010723-14.1 -
European Journal of Orthodontics Sep 2023To systematically review the available evidence concerning the risk factors for gingival recessions (GR) after orthodontic treatment (OT).
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the available evidence concerning the risk factors for gingival recessions (GR) after orthodontic treatment (OT).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data was obtained and collected by systematically searching 3 data bases: Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until 20 April 2023. Controlled trials, cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies describing GR or clinical crown height (CCH) after OT were included. The risk of bias in the selected studies was evaluated with the methodological index for non-randomized studies.
RESULTS
Forty-eight articles were included, investigating the following six risk factors for GR: 1. OT (n = 21), 2. Type of orthodontic intervention (n = 32), 3. Patient's baseline occlusal and skeletal characteristics (n = 14), 4. Mucogingival characteristics (n = 10), 5. Oral hygiene (n = 9), and 6. Others (n = 12). Significantly higher prevalence, severity and extent of GR were found in orthodontic patients by 10/15, 4/10, and 2/2 articles respectively. 10/16 articles reported significantly more GR and increased CCH in patients where orthodontic incisor proclination was performed. The evidence surrounding maxillary expansion and orthodontic retention was too heterogeneous to allow for? definitive conclusions. Pre-treatment angle classification, ANB, overjet, overbite, arch width and mandibular divergence were found not to be associated with GR (9/14), while pre-treatment crossbite, symphysis height and width were (5/7 studies). A thin gingival biotype, presence of previous GR, baseline width of keratinized gingiva and facial gingival margin thickness were correlated with increased risk of GR after OT by nine articles, while pocket depth was not. Oral hygiene, sex, treatment duration, and oral piercings were found not to be linked with GR in orthodontic patients, while GR was reported to increase with age in orthodontic patients by 50 per cent of the articles investigating this factor. The mean risk of bias for comparative and not comparative studies was 14.17/24 and 9.12/16.
LIMITATIONS
The selected studies were quite heterogeneous regarding study settings, variables reported and included very limited sample sizes.
CONCLUSION
Although studies regarding the risk factors for GR are relatively abundant, they are very heterogeneous concerning design, studied factors, methodology and reporting, which often leads to contradictory results. Uniform reporting guidelines are urgently needed for future research.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42020181661.
FUNDING
This research received no funding.
Topics: Humans; Gingival Recession; Cross-Sectional Studies; Overbite; Malocclusion; Gingiva
PubMed: 37432131
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad026 -
The Angle Orthodontist Jan 2024To determine whether achieved outcome regarding overjet and overbite matched the predicted outcome following treatment with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose,...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether achieved outcome regarding overjet and overbite matched the predicted outcome following treatment with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligner appliances.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data including pretreatment, predicted and achieved overjet, and overbite measurements provided by Align's digital treatment facility, ClinCheck Pro, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum intraclass correlation (ICC) test results were calculated.
RESULTS
From an initial sample of 600, 355 adult patients satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. ICC scores for data input were excellent. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 30.14 (23.33, 39.92) years and most (n = 259; 72.95%) were women. Almost one-third (n = 101; 28.45%) had undergone extraction as part of their treatment. More aligners were prescribed in the initial digital treatment plan for patients (median, 44; IQR: 35, 51.5; minimum, 17; maximum, 92) undergoing extractions as part of their orthodontic treatment than those who were not (median, 24; IQR: 18.25, 32; minimum, 13; maximum, 85) (P < .0001). Planned changes in overjet differed significantly from achieved outcomes (P < .001). Planned increases in overbite resulted in up to more than twice (222.72%) as much increase than predicted. Planned reduction of overbite achieved 8.69% of its predicted reduction in extraction cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Achieved overjet and overbite measurements differed significantly from the predicted outcomes at the end of an initial sequence of aligners. Planned increases in overbite resulted in greater overbite correction than predicted, particularly in extraction cases. Planned overbite reduction was challenging, especially in patients with extractions.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Male; Overbite; Retrospective Studies; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Dental Care
PubMed: 37839803
DOI: 10.2319/030923-161.1 -
BMC Oral Health Jun 2024This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine.
BACKGROUND
This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine.
METHODS
A stratified cluster sample of 1278 schoolchildren (620 males, 658 females, mean age 12 years and 5 months (± 0.5)) were examined. Candidates who had not received any previous orthodontic treatment were only included. Dental anomalies like missing and ectopic teeth were recorded. The anteroposterior occlusal relationship was assessed based on Angle classification. Overjet and overbite were measured. Crowding and spacing were recorded subjectively. In addition, crossbite, openbite, and midline displacement were recorded. The chi-square test and descriptive analysis were used statistically.
RESULTS
The study found Angle Class I molar relationship in 65%, Class II div 1 in 17%, Class II div 2 in 6%, and Class III in 12% of the sample. An overjet (OJ) of more than 4 mm was present in 17%, and 4% had OJ of more than 6 mm; an OJ of at least 0 mm or less in 36%, and 6% had a reverse OJ. A normal overbite was observed in 53%, while 28% had an increase and 19% had a decreased overbite. An anterior openbite (AOB) was present in 9%, and a scissor bite or anterior crossbite in 6% and 14%, respectively. A posterior crossbite was observed in 12% (9% unilateral and 3% bilateral). Midline displacement was found in (9%). Crowding was observed in 35% and 31% and spacing in 24% and 15% of the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. A statistically significant relationship between gender and midline shift, a diastema, spacing in the upper arch, and most dental anomalies was found; males were more affected (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
This study reported a high prevalence of malocclusion among schoolchildren in Palestine. A collaborative effort should be directed to obtain more monitoring and surveillance of malocclusion more frequently to prevent and control the exacerbation of the problem.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Malocclusion; Child; Prevalence; Overbite; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Arabs; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Diastema; Malocclusion, Angle Class I; Middle East; Open Bite; Tooth Eruption, Ectopic; Anodontia; Sex Factors; Adolescent
PubMed: 38849789
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04432-1 -
American Journal of Orthodontics and... Dec 2023This study aimed to quantify the outcomes of adolescent patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Carriere Motion 3D Appliance (CMA) combined with full fixed...
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to quantify the outcomes of adolescent patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Carriere Motion 3D Appliance (CMA) combined with full fixed appliances.
METHODS
Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 22 patients were available before orthodontic treatment (T1), at removal of the CMA (T2), and posttreatment (T3). The average age of the patients was 13.5 ± 1.6 years at T1, 14.1 ± 0.2 years at T2, and 15.6 ± 0.5 years at T3. The 3-dimensional image analysis procedures were performed using ITK-SNAP (version 3.6.0; www.itksnap.org, Hatfield, Pa) and SlicerCMF (version 4.11.0; http://www.slicer.org, Cambridge, Mass); skeletal and dentoalveolar changes relative to cranial base, maxillary, and mandibular regional superimpositions were evaluated.
RESULTS
Changes were analyzed with 1 sample t tests using the mean differences during the CMA phase (T1 to T2) and total treatment time (T1 to T3). Significant skeletal changes included a slight reduction of ANB from T1 to T3, mandibular growth (Co-Gn increment of 1.2 mm and 3.3 mm from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3, respectively), inferior displacement of point A, and anterior and inferior displacement of point B. The mandibular plane did not change significantly during treatment. During the CMA treatment, posterior tipping and distal rotation of the maxillary molars, tip back and inferior displacement of the maxillary canines, significant mesial rotation, and superior displacement of the mandibular molars were observed. These movements rebounded during the full fixed appliance phase except for the molar and canine vertical displacements. Clinically significant dental changes during treatment included a reduction in overjet and overbite, Class II correction of the molar and canine relationship, and proclination of the mandibular incisors.
CONCLUSIONS
The CMA is an effective treatment modality for Class II correction in growing patients because of a combination of mesial movement of the mandibular molar, distal rotation of the maxillary molar, and anterior displacement of the mandible.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Child; Cephalometry; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Overbite; Mandible; Maxilla; Orthodontic Appliance Design
PubMed: 37598337
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.05.031 -
Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences Apr 2024Class II malocclusions are a common orthodontic problem, often requiring comprehensive treatment to achieve proper occlusion and facial harmony. Early orthodontic...
BACKGROUND
Class II malocclusions are a common orthodontic problem, often requiring comprehensive treatment to achieve proper occlusion and facial harmony. Early orthodontic intervention in the mixed dentition phase has been advocated to address these issues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 150 patients with class II malocclusions who underwent early orthodontic treatment between the ages of 7 and 10 years. The treatment included fixed or removable appliances, headgear, and functional appliances, depending on individual needs. Records of their initial malocclusion severity, treatment modalities, and long-term follow-up data (mean follow-up duration of 10 years) were collected and analyzed. Stability was assessed by evaluating overjet and overbite changes from post-treatment to the long-term follow-up.
RESULTS
The initial mean overjet and overbite values were 8.5 mm and 4.0 mm, respectively. Following early orthodontic intervention, these values were significantly reduced to 3.0 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively ( < 0.001). At the long-term follow-up, the mean overjet and overbite remained stable at 3.2 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. Analysis revealed that 85% of patients maintained their corrected class II occlusion within clinically acceptable limits, while 15% experienced minor relapse requiring minimal additional treatment.
CONCLUSION
Early orthodontic treatment in class II malocclusions can lead to significant improvements in overjet and overbite, and these corrections tend to remain stable over the long term.
PubMed: 38882812
DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1171_23 -
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi =... Apr 2024Improper diagnosis and design, misusing orthodontic technique, relapse after orthodontic treatment, and poor patient compliance may lead to treatment failure, requiring...
Improper diagnosis and design, misusing orthodontic technique, relapse after orthodontic treatment, and poor patient compliance may lead to treatment failure, requiring orthodontic retreatment. While in such cases, patients usually have already had their teeth extracted, or are with periodontal, joint, and other dental problems, which often require multidisciplinary treatment. The retreatment of orthodontic patients is difficult, and the treatment options are limited. The characteristics of clear aligner treatment, such as comfortable and beautiful appearance, high degree of digital precision, and personalized tooth arrangement to simulate the final outcome, make it popular in the orthodontic retreatment. This article discusses and summarizes the details of orthodontic design, case monitoring, and the application of clear aligner in orthodontic retreatment of failed cases. Before starting treatment, the difficulty assessment tool (clear aligner treatment complexity assessment tool) can be used to evaluate the difficulty of clear aligner treatment. Orthodontists are recommended to treat orthodontic patients with clear aligners within their ability to avoid treatment failure. The key to the success of the extraction case treatment with clear aligner is to make the correct diagnosis and select the right cases. In the treatment planning, attention should be paid to the restoration of anterior tooth torque, making good use of molar distalization to obtain the space, vertical control, and improving posterior tooth relationship. Proper selection of cases and reasonable design in clear aligner treatment are expected to obtain tooth alignment, good intercuspation, normal overbite and overjet, periodontal health, parallel roots, and to achieve the goal of aesthetic, functional, stable, and healthy orthodontic treatment.
Topics: Humans; Esthetics, Dental; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Tooth Movement Techniques; Dental Care; Retreatment
PubMed: 38548599
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240109-00017