-
Journal of Dentistry Jun 2024To review the developments in intraoral scanner (IOS) technologies applied in implant prosthodontics, emphasizing their influence on the accuracy of digital impressions,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To review the developments in intraoral scanner (IOS) technologies applied in implant prosthodontics, emphasizing their influence on the accuracy of digital impressions, occlusal registrations, and the fit of implant-supported restorations.
DATA
A collection of published articles related to implant prosthodontics, the accuracy of digital impressions, occlusal registration, and the fit of implant-supported fixed restorations.
SOURCES
Three search engines were selected: Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane. A manual search was also conducted.
STUDY SELECTION
A literature search screened relevant databases and journals for studies on IOS applications in digital implant prosthodontic workflows from Dec 2018 to Dec 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized control trials, clinical trials, case series, and in vitro research focused on the use of IOS in digital implant prosthodontics.
CONCLUSIONS
The increased utilization of digital dental technologies has led to significant integration of digital implant prosthodontic workflows into clinicians' clinical practice. Several variables affect the accuracy of digital impressions generated by IOS. Generally, the prevailing opinion in academic papers is that digital workflows are suitable for addressing short-span implant-supported restorations. However, when it comes to long-span defects, the accuracy of digital workflows is still a matter of debate. Digital bite registration is an integral part of the workflow. It depends mainly on the defect size and location, scan strategy, anatomical tooth variations, overbite and other factors. The overall fit of digitally prefabricated implant restorations comprises of proximal, occlusal contacts and how accurately the restoration connects with implants. Research methodologies need standardization for further validation.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
In clinical practice, it is essential to have a thorough and up-to-date comprehension of various factors that can affect the accuracy of digital impressions and the fit of the final prosthesis in implant prosthodontics.
PubMed: 38909643
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105152 -
International Orthodontics May 2024The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign®...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign® aligners (Align Technology, San Jose, California) with those planned by orthodontists via its ClinCheck® digital treatment planning facility.
METHODS
Data provided by Align regarding patients who had completed an initial series of Invisalign® aligner treatment and were less than 18-years old were assessed in relation to pre-treatment, planned and achieved overjet and overbite measurements. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Mann Whitney calculations were computed.
RESULTS
A total of 290 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 14.17 (13,15.42) years. The median achieved overjet and overbite changes were less than those planned (p<0.01) with 53.33% of the planned median overjet increase achieved and 52.94% of planned median overjet reduction achieved. Additionally, 58.33% of the planned median overbite increase was achieved and 55.55% of the planned median overbite reduction was achieved. A total of 21.52% patients recorded no change or an increase from pre-treatment to the achieved overjet where reduction was planned, whereas 41.67% recorded no change or a reduction in overjet where increase was planned. A total of 18.72% recorded no change or an increase in overbite where reduction was planned, whereas 20.75% recorded no change or a reduction in overbite where increase was planned.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than 60% of the planned overjet and overbite changes per patient were achieved. Between 18.72 and 41.67% of patients experienced no change or changes in overjet and overbite in the opposite direction to that planned. This is likely to be clinically significant.
PubMed: 38805975
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100888 -
European Journal of Orthodontics Nov 2023To compare the reliability, reproducibility, and time-based efficiency of automatic digital (AD) and manual digital (MD) model analyses using intraoral scan models.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the reliability, reproducibility, and time-based efficiency of automatic digital (AD) and manual digital (MD) model analyses using intraoral scan models.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Two examiners analysed 26 intraoral scanner records using MD and AD methods for orthodontic modelling. Tooth size reproducibility was confirmed using a Bland-Altman plot. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare the model analysis parameters (tooth size, sum of 12-teeth, Bolton analysis, arch width, arch perimeter, arch length discrepancy, and overjet/overbite) for each method, including the time taken for model analysis.
RESULTS
The MD group exhibited a relatively larger spread of 95% agreement limits when compared with AD group. The standard deviations of repeated tooth measurements were 0.15 mm (MD group) and 0.08 mm (AD group). The mean difference values of the 12-tooth (1.80-2.38 mm) and arch perimeter (1.42-3.23 mm) for AD group was significantly (P < 0.001) larger than that for the MD group. The arch width, Bolton, and overjet/overbite were clinically insignificant. The overall mean time required for the measurements was 8.62 min and 0.56 min for the MD and AD groups, respectively.
LIMITATIONS
Validation results may vary in different clinical cases because our evaluation was limited to mild-to-moderate crowding in the complete dentition.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant differences were observed between AD and MD groups. The AD method demonstrated reproducible analysis in a considerably reduced timeframe, along with a significant difference in measurements compared to the MD method. Therefore, AD analysis should not be interchanged with MD, and vice versa.
Topics: Humans; Overbite; Reproducibility of Results; Artificial Intelligence; Malocclusion; Models, Dental; Dental Arch
PubMed: 37418746
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad032 -
Korean Journal of Orthodontics Nov 2023: This study aimed to three-dimensionally evaluate the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) of patients with anterior open bite (AOB) by using cone-beam computed tomography...
OBJECTIVE
: This study aimed to three-dimensionally evaluate the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) of patients with anterior open bite (AOB) by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compare the findings with those obtained in individuals with normal occlusion.
METHODS
: The open bite group (OBG, n = 25) consisted of patients with an anterior overbite of -3 mm or less, while the control group (n = 25) consisted of age- and sex-matched individuals with an anterior overbite of 1-3 mm, Angle Class I malocclusion (1° ≤ point A-nasion-point B angle ≤ 4°), and a normodivergent profile (22° ≤ Frankfort mandibular plane angle ≤ 28°). After the CBCT data were reconstructed into a three-dimensional image, the PAS was segmented into four parts, and the volume of each part was measured. Pharyngeal airway length (PAL) and the area and transverse width of the part showing minimal constriction were also measured. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between changes in the PAS and the amount of anterior overbite.
RESULTS
: The OBG showed a significantly narrower airway space in the nasopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and total airway volumes. The OBG also showed a significantly smaller area and transverse width of the part with minimal constriction. The OBG showed a significantly longer PAL, but there was no correlation between the amount of anterior overbite and the changes in PAS.
CONCLUSIONS
: The PAS was associated with AOB. Patients with AOB had a narrower PAS and a smaller part showing minimal constriction.
PubMed: 36718119
DOI: 10.4041/kjod22.187 -
Clinical and Experimental Dental... Aug 2023The aim of this article is to establish a comprehensive nationwide prevalence of malocclusion traits on the sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes of space in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this article is to establish a comprehensive nationwide prevalence of malocclusion traits on the sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes of space in the Turkish population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was supplemented by manual searches of Google Scholar and the reference lists of included studies. Original Turkish health studies of any age were included. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology assessed study quality and bias (STROBE). Sagittal, vertical, and transverse malocclusion features were retrieved and gathered.
RESULTS
Eleven studies were selected from 434 titles. Two studies showed a high risk of bias, eight low and one moderate. Thirteen thousand two hundred seventy-one individuals were investigated from early childhood to late adulthood. Most studies were sampled from universities and dental (nonorthodontic) clinics. The pooled malocclusion prevalence was 56% for Class I (95% confidence interval (CI): 44-68%), 31% for Class II (CI: 6-42%), and 11% for Class III (CI: 21-37%). The other common types of malocclusions were crowding (41%, CI: 18-65%), overjet (34%, CI: 21-50%), negative overjet (13%, CI: 7-20%), and crossbite (11%, CI: 7-15%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in Class I (relative risk [RR] = 1.00, [0.96-1.05]), Class II ([RR] = 0.97, [0.92-1.03]), and Class III ([RR] = 1.08, [0.96-1.225]) malocclusion by gender.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed Class I malocclusion has a high prevalence among the Turkish population followed by Class II and Class III malocclusions. In addition, crowding and overjet were the most prevalent malocclusions among Turkish individuals. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of malocclusions between males and females.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Male; Female; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Adult; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Prevalence; Malocclusion; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Overbite
PubMed: 37574975
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.771 -
International Journal of Oral and... Oct 2023The digital articulation of dental models is gradually replacing the conventional physical approach for occlusal prediction planning. This study was performed to compare...
The digital articulation of dental models is gradually replacing the conventional physical approach for occlusal prediction planning. This study was performed to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of free-hand articulation of two groups of digital and physical dental models, 12 Class I (group 1) and 12 Class III (group 2). The models were scanned using an intraoral scanner. The physical and digital models were independently articulated 2 weeks apart by three orthodontists to achieve the maximum inter-digitation, with coincident midlines and a positive overjet and overbite. The occlusal contacts provided by the software color-coded maps were assessed and the differences in the pitch, roll, and yaw were measured. The reproducibility of the achieved occlusion of both the physical and digital articulation was excellent. The z-axis displayed the smallest absolute mean differences of 0.10 ± 0.08 mm and 0.27 ± 0.24 mm in the repeated physical and repeated digital articulations, respectively, both in group 2. The largest discrepancies between the two methods of articulation were in the y-axis (0.76 ± 0.60 mm, P = 0.010) and in roll (1.83° ± 1.72°, P = 0.005). The overall measured differences were< 0.8 mm and< 2°. Despite the steep learning curve, digital occlusal planning is accurate enough for clinical applications.
Topics: Humans; Orthognathic Surgery; Reproducibility of Results; Software; Dental Occlusion; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Computer-Aided Design
PubMed: 36941160
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.03.001 -
The Saudi Dental Journal Sep 2023An anterior bite plane (ABP) is an orthodontic appliance that prevents posterior teeth from making contact. This appliance's functional concept is to reduce muscle...
OBJECTIVES
An anterior bite plane (ABP) is an orthodontic appliance that prevents posterior teeth from making contact. This appliance's functional concept is to reduce muscle activity, overcome deep overbite, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (TMD). However, ABP treatment for malocclusion frequently results in unfavorable reversible and irreversible long-term effects. This problem presents difficulties for dentists in developing an appropriate treatment modification plan in order to achieve the best results. As a result, the goal of this study is to observe the effects of different ABP types on the TMJ and mandible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-six three-month-old male Wistar strain rats were divided into three groups: control, upper flat, and upper-lower inclined ABP. The overbite and body weight were measured. TMJ was examined histologically using hematoxylin and eosin (HE). To observe the entire mandibular bone in response to ABP, mandibular planes and angulations were measured.
RESULTS
After 7 days, the upper-lower inclined ABP group has significantly lower body weight than the control group. On days 7 and 14, overbite was significantly reduced in both the upper flat and upper-lower inclined ABP groups. The superficial layer of the condyle was depleted in both ABP groups, according to HE analysis. Mandibular angle analysis revealed that the upper-lower inclined ABP group had a greater incisal and ramus angle. Furthermore, lower incisor (Li)-condyle (Co) mandibular points increased significantly more in the upper-lower inclined ABP group than in the control group.
CONCLUSION
According to this study, various forms of ABP may have an impact on the TMJ and mandibular morphology, specifically on the length, angulation, and superficial surface of the condyle.
PubMed: 37823082
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.06.002 -
BMC Oral Health Jun 2024This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine.
BACKGROUND
This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine.
METHODS
A stratified cluster sample of 1278 schoolchildren (620 males, 658 females, mean age 12 years and 5 months (± 0.5)) were examined. Candidates who had not received any previous orthodontic treatment were only included. Dental anomalies like missing and ectopic teeth were recorded. The anteroposterior occlusal relationship was assessed based on Angle classification. Overjet and overbite were measured. Crowding and spacing were recorded subjectively. In addition, crossbite, openbite, and midline displacement were recorded. The chi-square test and descriptive analysis were used statistically.
RESULTS
The study found Angle Class I molar relationship in 65%, Class II div 1 in 17%, Class II div 2 in 6%, and Class III in 12% of the sample. An overjet (OJ) of more than 4 mm was present in 17%, and 4% had OJ of more than 6 mm; an OJ of at least 0 mm or less in 36%, and 6% had a reverse OJ. A normal overbite was observed in 53%, while 28% had an increase and 19% had a decreased overbite. An anterior openbite (AOB) was present in 9%, and a scissor bite or anterior crossbite in 6% and 14%, respectively. A posterior crossbite was observed in 12% (9% unilateral and 3% bilateral). Midline displacement was found in (9%). Crowding was observed in 35% and 31% and spacing in 24% and 15% of the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. A statistically significant relationship between gender and midline shift, a diastema, spacing in the upper arch, and most dental anomalies was found; males were more affected (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
This study reported a high prevalence of malocclusion among schoolchildren in Palestine. A collaborative effort should be directed to obtain more monitoring and surveillance of malocclusion more frequently to prevent and control the exacerbation of the problem.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Malocclusion; Child; Prevalence; Overbite; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Arabs; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Diastema; Malocclusion, Angle Class I; Middle East; Open Bite; Tooth Eruption, Ectopic; Anodontia; Sex Factors; Adolescent
PubMed: 38849789
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04432-1 -
Clinical and Experimental Dental... Dec 2023Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of clinical conditions involving muscles of mastication, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and related structures or both. TMD...
OBJECTIVES
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of clinical conditions involving muscles of mastication, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and related structures or both. TMD is characterized by facial pain in TMJ and muscles of mastication, limitation or deviation of jaw movement, and TMJ sounds during jaw movement and function. The highest risk of TMD prevalence is between 18 and 24 years, and a relationship is between chronic TMD and psychological disorders such as stress and depression. The knowledge of the function of this joint and those with TMD symptoms when visiting the dentist will help to provide an ideal treatment plan for the patient. Therefore, if the therapist is familiar with the various etiological factors of this disorder, he will provide better treatment, especially if the simultaneous effect of psychological factors such as stress and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) along with occlusal factors such as posterior cross-bite, overjet, and overbite is measured, it can be a valuable guide for clinicians.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
In this study, 385 patients were examined by DASS42 and Maudsley's test and classified into normal, with stress, and stress plus OCD groups. TMJ was examined for each of them by the TMD-RDC test. The presence or absence of TMD was noted in their file.
RESULTS
The prevalence of TMD was 20.7% in the normal group, 30.70% in the stress group, and 44.68% in the stress and OCD group. After analyzing the data by SPSS 24 and performing analysis of variance and Duncan tests, no significant difference was found between the probability of TMD in normal and stressed groups, but the stress and OCD group has a higher chance of TMD.
CONCLUSION
Although the co-occurrence of stress and OCD is associated with the prevalence of TMD, it cannot be considered a cause of TMD.
Topics: Male; Humans; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Temporomandibular Joint; Facial Pain; Mastication; Overbite; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
PubMed: 37840225
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.798 -
BMC Oral Health Mar 2024Refinements are very common in clear aligner treatments. The aim of this study is to assess whether the predictability of deep overbite correction is similar over...
BACKGROUND
Refinements are very common in clear aligner treatments. The aim of this study is to assess whether the predictability of deep overbite correction is similar over several refinements using clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) and examine the accuracy of vertical movement and inclination change of individual teeth.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 20 deep bite patients (7M and 13F; 32.63 ± 11.88 years old; an initial overbite of 5.09 ± 0.98 mm), consecutively treated from September 2016 and March 2023, who completed at least two sets of aligners, including refinements. The initial, predicted, and achieved models were exported from ClinCheck or OrthoCAD (Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) and superimposed via best-fit surface-based registration using SlicerCMF (version 4.9.0; cmf.slicer.org). We also examined 15 out of 20 patients who completed treatments. The overbite correction and changes in vertical movement and inclination for individual teeth were measured. Descriptive statistics and a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The mean accuracy of overbite correction was 37.63% after 1 set, followed by 11.19%, 6.32%, and 13.80% (2-4 sets), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the predicted and achieved vertical movements and inclination changes for all teeth for the 1 and 2 sets. For the completed cases, the mean overbite correction was 38.54% compared to the initially planned overbite correction, which is similar to one of the 1 set. Still, the vertical movements and inclination changes of all teeth present statistically significant differences between the initially planned and finally achieved movements except for maxillary lateral incisor torque.
CONCLUSIONS
The most overbite correction occurs during the 1 set of aligners, and refinement treatment does not significantly improve the deep bite correction.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Overbite; Retrospective Studies; Tooth Movement Techniques; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
PubMed: 38491450
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04099-8