-
Kidney360 May 2024Cisplatin is an effective first line therapy for a variety of cancers. Cisplatin is highly emetogenic and resulting volume depletion can contribute to acute kidney...
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin is an effective first line therapy for a variety of cancers. Cisplatin is highly emetogenic and resulting volume depletion can contribute to acute kidney injury (AKI). Anti-emetic drugs such as 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) are commonly prescribed to prevent this complication. Preclinical studies suggest first generation 5-HT3RAs may alter the renal clearance and increase cisplatin toxicity. This retrospective study evaluated whether different 5-HT3RAs modify the risk of AKI in patients receiving cisplatin.
METHODS
Patients with cancer who received cisplatin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016 were included. Patients over 18 years old with available data for baseline and post-treatment serum creatinine, cisplatin cumulative dose, and administration of 5-HT3RAs including first generation (ondansetron, granisetron, and ramosetron) and second generation (palonosetron) were analyzed. AKI defined as 1.5x increase in serum creatinine. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess univariable associations between baseline covariates and AKI, and logistic regression for multivariable associations with AKI.
RESULTS
Of 8703 patients identified with cisplatin exposure, 6889 were included. A total of 3881 (56.3%) patients received at least one 5-HT3RA, including palonosetron (3750, 54.4%), ondansetron (1399, 20.3%) and granisetron (11, 0.2%). AKI developed in 1666 (24.2%) patients following cisplatin. Patients who received any 5-HT3RAs were less likely to experience AKI as compared to patients that did not (22.6% vs 26.2%, p=0.001). Older age, male gender, African ethnicity, and cumulative cisplatin dose were univariately associated with higher risk for AKI (P<0.001). After adjusting for these variables, use of any of these antiemetic drugs was protective for AKI (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.94; P= 0.003) with no difference detected between type of 5-HT3RA.
CONCLUSION
Nephrotoxicity continues to be a concern following cisplatin therapy. Given its emetogenic nature, use of antiemetic drugs such as 5-HT3RAs can lessen emesis and lower risk of kidney injury. This retrospective analysis supports use of any 5-HT3RAs to lower risk of AKI.
PubMed: 38814726
DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000464 -
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Mar 2024Due to an evidence gap, the emetogenicity of intravenous (IV) pegaspargase was unable to be included in the clinical practice guideline classifying chemotherapy...
Due to an evidence gap, the emetogenicity of intravenous (IV) pegaspargase was unable to be included in the clinical practice guideline classifying chemotherapy emetogenicity in pediatric patients. This single-center, retrospective chart review describes the proportion of pediatric patients who did not vomit during the acute phase (complete response; CR) after receiving IV pegaspargase and provides an emetogenicity classification using a preexisting framework. Of 44 patients who received IV pegaspargase between 2011 and 2020, 13 received a serotonin receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone or palonosetron alone and all experienced a CR. We, therefore, recommend classifying IV pegaspargase as moderately emetogenic.
PubMed: 38454568
DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2024.2311886 -
The Journal of Pharmacology and... Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Palonosetron; Vomiting; Nausea; Neoplasms; Quinuclidines; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 37460159
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.123.001644 -
PloS One 2024The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous palonosetron compared to ondansetron on hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in women undergoing... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous palonosetron compared to ondansetron on hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section.
METHODS
Fifty-four women scheduled for elective cesarean section were, randomly allocated to ondansetron group (n = 27) or palonosetron group (n = 27). Ten minutes prior to the administration of spinal anesthesia, participants received an intravenous injection of either ondansetron or palonosetron. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was initiated immediately following the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The infusion rate was titrated to maintain adequate blood pressure until the time of fetal delivery. The primary outcome was total dose of phenylephrine administered. The secondary outcomes were nausea or vomiting, the need for rescue antiemetics, hypotension, bradycardia, and shivering. Complete response rate, defined as the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and no need for additional antiemetics, were assessed for up to 24 hours post-surgery.
RESULTS
No significant differences were observed in the total dose of phenylephrine used between the ondansetron and palonosetron groups (387.5 μg [interquartile range, 291.3-507.8 μg versus 428.0 μg [interquartile range, 305.0-507.0 μg], P = 0.42). Complete response rates also showed no significant differences between the groups both within two hours post-spinal anesthesia (88.9% in the ondansetron group versus 100% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.24) and at 24 hours post-surgery (81.5% in the ondansetron group versus 88.8% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.7). In addition, there was no difference in other secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Prophylactic administration of palonosetron did not demonstrate a superior effect over ondansetron in mitigating hemodynamic changes or reducing phenylephrine requirements in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl for cesarean section.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anesthesia, Spinal; Cesarean Section; Palonosetron; Adult; Hypotension; Pregnancy; Ondansetron; Antiemetics; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Phenylephrine; Anesthesia, Obstetrical
PubMed: 38917195
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305913 -
Cureus Nov 2023Background Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone (DEX), have been extensively utilized for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)....
Retrospective Evaluation of a Dexamethasone Sparing Antiemetic Regimen: An Antiemetic Prophylaxis Study on NEPA (Netupitant Plus Palonosetron) for Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Cancer Patients.
Background Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone (DEX), have been extensively utilized for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). However, their usage is associated with a range of adverse events. In contrast, the combination of Netupitant Plus Palonosetron (NEPA) with a single dose of DEX provides comparable efficacy in preventing CINV over a five-day period following chemotherapy administration. This regimen offers the advantage of reducing the need for additional doses of DEX, particularly in the high-risk setting of HEC (Highly emetic chemotherapy). Objective To evaluate dexamethasone sparing anti-emetic regimen (single dose dexamethasone with NEPA) for prophylaxis of CINV in patients receiving HEC. Methodology This is a retrospective, observational, real-world, single-center study including data of 69 patients who received high-dose emetogenic chemotherapy and were administered DEX (8 or 12 mg) on day 1, with no dose of DEX on days 2, 3, and 4, combined with an oral combination of tablet netupitant 300 mg and palonosetron 0.5 mg. NEPA was taken orally an hour prior to the start of the HEC cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR) which is defined as no nausea, emesis, or no rescue medication during the Acute (< 24 hours) and Delayed Phase (25-120 hours) of chemotherapy. Results The overall CR achieved in the acute and delayed phase for vomiting is 100% at all four follow-ups. The CR achieved in the acute phase is 95.7% whereas 98.6% of patients showed CR in the delayed phase respectively. No patient required any rescue medication. No acute and delayed phase of vomiting was reported. Conclusion A simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX offers effective CINV prevention throughout five days post-chemotherapy with the advantage of sparing patients additional doses of DEX in the high-emetic-risk setting chemotherapy.
PubMed: 38161895
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49763 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HTRA) has long been considered the standard regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting...
Comparison of netupitant/palonosetron with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist in preventing of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
BACKGROUND
The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HTRA) has long been considered the standard regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, their therapeutic outcomes have been unsatisfactory. NEPA, an oral formulation combining the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist netupitant and the 5HTRA palonosetron, has received regulatory approval for the management of highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. This study aims to compare the efficacy of NEPA with that of 5HTRA alone in preventing CINV among patients undergoing multiday conditioning chemotherapy prior to HSCT.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent HSCT between September 2019 and September 2022. Efficacy outcomes were assessed based on the rates of patients achieving complete response (CR: no emesis and no use of rescue medication), complete control (CC: CR without significant nausea), no vomiting, and no significant nausea.
RESULTS
The NEPA group consisted of 106 patients, while the 5HTRA group included 107 patients. The NEPA group exhibited significantly higher rates of CR compared to the 5HTRA group during the overall phase (71.7% vs. 32.7%, P<0.001), acute phase (78.3% vs. 43.0%, P<0.001), and delayed phase (84.9% vs. 58.9%, P<0.001). Similarly, rates of CC, no vomiting, and no significant nausea were significantly better in the NEPA group across all phases (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
NEPA demonstrated superior efficacy compared to 5HTRA in preventing CINV during all phases of multiday conditioning regimens among patients undergoing HSCT.
PubMed: 38074658
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1280336 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... May 2024The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of a 5 mg dosage of olanzapine in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy of low-dose olanzapine in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of a 5 mg dosage of olanzapine in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) among female patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal tract tumors.
METHODS
Patients undergoing the oxaliplatin/irinotecan chemotherapy regimen were enrolled in this prospective controlled study. The olanzapine group received a 5 mg dosage of olanzapine along with palonosetron and dexamethasone, while the control group received a standard two-combination regimen consisting of dexamethasone and palonosetron. The primary endpoints included the total protection (TP) rates for the entire age group and the subgroup aged 60 years and above. Secondary endpoints encompassed the total protection rates during the acute and delayed phases within the two age brackets, as well as the total control (TC) rates and complete remission (CR) rates across all three phases (total, acute, and delayed). Additionally, the study involved the assessment of quality of life and the collection of adverse events associated with the interventions.
RESULTS
1) Regarding the primary endpoint, the total phase TP rates within both the entire age group and the age group exceeding 60 years demonstrated superiority in the olanzapine group when compared to the control group (66.7% vs 37.25%, P = 0.003; 68.8% vs 44.4%, P = 0.044). 2) In terms of secondary endpoints, the olanzapine group exhibited superior acute phase TP rates in both age brackets when compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The olanzapine group also demonstrated higher delayed-phase TP rates, TC rates across all three phases, and CR rates within the two age brackets, although the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the quality of life in the olanzapine group surpassed that of the control group for both age brackets (P < 0.05), characterized by enhanced appetite and a higher incidence of drowsiness in the patients treated with olanzapine when compared to those in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Olanzapine can enhance CINV induced by MEC regimen in female patients across all age groups, including the elderly, and therefore improve the quality of life for these patients.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html , identifier: ChiCTR20000368269, 25/08/2020.
Topics: Humans; Olanzapine; Female; Middle Aged; Nausea; Vomiting; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Prospective Studies; Oxaliplatin; Irinotecan; Aged; Adult; Antiemetics; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Palonosetron; Quality of Life; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 38806870
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05712-7 -
Cureus Mar 2024Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common and unpleasant treatment-related side effect reported by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy....
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Observational Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Akynzeo® in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in India.
Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common and unpleasant treatment-related side effect reported by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Akynzeo® or NEPA (NEtupitant + PAlonosetron) is the first fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron that targets both critical pathways involved in emesis while providing a convenient, single oral dose therapy. The current study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of NEPA in a real-world setting in India. Methodology This was an open-label, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study conducted at six different locations across India. The study included patients of either gender, aged ≥18 years, naive to chemotherapy, scheduled to receive highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC/MEC), and scheduled to receive oral NEPA, as determined by the investigator. Results A total of 360 people were screened and enrolled in the study. HEC was prescribed to 289 (81.64%) patients, while MEC was prescribed to 65 (18.36%) patients. Complete response was achieved in 94.92% of patients during the acute phase, 95.20% during the delayed phase, and 93.22% during the overall phase. During the overall phase, 92.73% and 95.38% of patients on the HEC and MEC regimens, respectively, achieved complete response. Adverse events were reported in 3.88% of patients. Conclusions Oral NEPA was found to be effective in the Indian real-world setting, eliciting a >90% complete response with HEC and MEC regimens across the acute, delayed, and overall phases.
PubMed: 38638750
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56447 -
Scientific Reports Apr 2024Lung cancer, a global mortality leader, often necessitates Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery. However, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Lung cancer, a global mortality leader, often necessitates Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery. However, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, highlighting a need for effective management and prevention strategies in this context. A retrospective case-control study at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital evaluated patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer between May and September 2022. Patients were categorized based on PONV prevention methods, and data encompassing demographics, surgical history, and postoperative adverse events s were analyzed to assess the association between prophylactic protocols and PONV incidence. The Netupitant and Palonosetron Hydrochloride (NEPA) group showed a significant reduction in PONV occurrences post-surgery compared to Ondansetron (ONDA) and Control groups, emphasizing NEPA's efficacy in alleviating PONV symptoms (P < 0.05). Furthermore, following VATS radical resection of lung cancer, NEPA markedly reduced the intensity of PONV symptoms in patients. Both univariate and multivariate logistic analyses corroborated that NEPA independently reduces PONV risk, with its protective effect also apparent in susceptible populations like females and non-smokers. NEPA utilization markedly reduced both the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer, serving as an independent protective factor in mitigating PONV risk post-surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Male; Lung Neoplasms; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Antiemetics; Ondansetron; Palonosetron
PubMed: 38684769
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59687-z -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Mar 2024The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients receiving BEAM therapy. This phase II, prospective, intention-to-treat, single-center, single-arm study involved 43 adult patients who received NEPA and dexamethasone for the prevention of CINV due to BEAM conditioning chemotherapy. An interim analysis, performed after 13 patients, determined utility versus futility, and supported continuation to full enrollment. Descriptive statistics were used to report complete response (CR), complete protection, incidence of emesis, and administration of rescue agents. A Kaplan-Meier curve depicted time to first emesis and first rescue medication. Patients self-reported levels of daily nausea descriptively via a CINV Questionnaire. By study end, 13 of 43 patients achieved a CR with an average of 10.6 emesis-free days (SD 0.95) over the 11-day observation period, with no emetic events in any patient during the acute/chemotherapy phase. Nausea was well-controlled throughout the acute therapy phase (Day 1-6) and increased during the delayed phase (Day 7-11) with a peak mean level of 2.79/10 at Day 10. Aside from lower grade (≤2), headaches, constipation, and diarrhea were the most widely reported adverse effects. : The combination of NEPA and dexamethasone is safe and effective for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving BEAM conditioning therapy prior to HCT. The regimen demonstrated greater effectiveness in the acute phase versus the delayed phase, with low levels of nausea throughout the study period and complete emesis prevention during chemotherapy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Palonosetron; Antiemetics; Prospective Studies; Vomiting; Nausea; Quinuclidines; Dexamethasone; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Transplantation; Piperazines; Pyridines; Benzeneacetamides
PubMed: 37151021
DOI: 10.1177/10781552231173863