-
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2023Vasomotor symptoms, or hot flashes, are among the most common complaints for menopausal and postmenopausal women. As an alternative to hormone replacement therapy,...
INTRODUCTION
Vasomotor symptoms, or hot flashes, are among the most common complaints for menopausal and postmenopausal women. As an alternative to hormone replacement therapy, paroxetine mesylate became the only non-hormonal treatment approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), despite limited evidence for its efficacy. More specifically, there is uncertainty around paroxetine's unique benefit and the magnitude of the placebo response in clinical trials of paroxetine.
METHODS
Relevant databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of paroxetine to treat hot flashes. The primary outcomes of interest were hot flash frequency and hot flash severity scores. Data was extracted from the published results, and risk of bias assessments were conducted.
RESULTS
Six randomized clinical trials that included a total of 1,486 women were coded and analyzed. The results demonstrated that 79% of the mean treatment response for hot flash frequency is accounted for by a placebo response, resulting in a mean true drug effect of 21% at most. Additionally, 68% of the mean treatment response for hot flash severity is accounted for by a placebo response, resulting in a maximum true drug effect of 32%.
DISCUSSION
The results herein call into question the actual efficacy of the only FDA approved, non-hormonal treatment for hot flashes by demonstrating that a placebo response accounts for the majority of treatment responses for reductions in both hot flash frequency and severity. The findings provide evidence to reevaluate the use of paroxetine to treat postmenopausal hot flashes and emphasize the importance of considering effective, alternative treatments for vasomotor symptoms.
PubMed: 37599891
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204163 -
Molecular Neurobiology Mar 2024The aim of this study is to explore paroxetine's effect on nerve growth factor (NGF), human neurotrophin-4 (NT-4), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in...
The aim of this study is to explore paroxetine's effect on nerve growth factor (NGF), human neurotrophin-4 (NT-4), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in post-stroke depression. Ninety-two post-stroke depression patients from April 2021 to April 2023 in our hospital were selected and numbered 1 to 92 after enrollment. Forty-six patients with odd number and 46 patients with even number were, respectively, included in the control and observation group. In addition to basic treatment, control group was treated with flupentixol melitracen tablets orally, and observation group received paroxetine hydrochloride orally. The levels of NGF, NT-4, BDNF, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), homocysteine (Hcy), noradrenaline (NE), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) changes of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). NGF, NT-4, and BDNF levels were compared between groups at T0, T1, and T2 levels were higher, and the levels at T2 were higher than those at T1, and observation group levels were higher (P < 0.05); NGF, NT-4, and BDNF levels were compared among groups, time, and interaction. 5-HT, Hcy, and NE levels at T0 were compared between groups; 5-HT and NE levels at T1 and T2 were higher than those at T0, the levels at T2 were higher than those at T1, and observation group levels were higher (P < 0.05); Hcy level at T1 and T2 was lower, its level at T2 was lower than those at T1, and observation group levels were lower (P < 0.05); 5-HT, Hcy, and NE levels were compared among groups, time, and interaction (P < 0.05). HAMD and NIHSS at T0 were compared; T1 and T2 were lower than T0, T2 was lower than T1, and observation group was lower (P < 0.05); HAMD and NIHSS were compared among groups, time, and interaction (P < 0.05). For post-stroke depression, paroxetine treatment can effectively improve NGF, NT-4, BDNF, 5-HT, Hcy, and NE levels and effectively reduce the degree of neurological damage and depression, which has high clinical application value.
PubMed: 38443730
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-024-04084-w -
Cureus Mar 2024Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a severe reaction to antipsychotic medications characterized by fever, muscle rigidity, altered mental status, and autonomic...
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a severe reaction to antipsychotic medications characterized by fever, muscle rigidity, altered mental status, and autonomic dysfunction. Here, we describe the case of a 58-year-old female who presented with altered mental status two days after open reduction and internal fixation of the hip. A rapid response team was called when the patient appeared agitated with increased respiratory demand. After being intubated and moved to the ICU, she became febrile and rigid. A preliminary diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy of unknown origin was made. Before being transported to the ICU, the patient was given multiple haloperidol doses in addition to her continued at-home medication, paroxetine, for major depressive disorder. The differential diagnosis included a workup for NMS, serotonin syndrome, and infectious processes. Once NMS was determined as the most likely etiology, all antipsychotic and serotonergic medications were discontinued. Then dantrolene and amantadine were administered, which resulted in clinically significant improvement. This case report demonstrates the importance of early identification of and intervention for NMS.
PubMed: 38686249
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57276 -
Biochemical Pharmacology May 2024Treatment of major depressive disorder remains a major unmet clinical need. Given the advantages of intranasal administration for targeted brain delivery, the present...
Treatment of major depressive disorder remains a major unmet clinical need. Given the advantages of intranasal administration for targeted brain delivery, the present study aimed at investigating the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine, after its intranasal instillation and assessing its potential therapeutic effect on female and male mice subjected to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) protocol. IN administration revealed direct nose-to-brain paroxetine delivery but dose- and sex-dependent differences. Pharmacokinetics was nonlinear and paroxetine concentrations were consistently higher in plasma and brain of male mice. Additionally, UCMS decreased animal preference for sucrose in both male and female mice following acute (p < 0.01) and chronic stress (p < 0.05), suggesting anhedonia. Both male and female mice exhibited depressive-like behavior in the forced swimming test. UCMS females displayed a significantly longer immobility time and shorter climbing time than the control group (p < 0.05), while no differences were found between male mice. Two weeks of paroxetine intranasal administration reduced immobility time and lengthened climbing and swimming time, approaching values similar to those observed in the healthy control group. The therapeutic effect was stronger on female mice. Importantly, melatonin plasma levels were significantly decreased in female mice following UCMS (p < 0.05), while males exhibited heightened corticosterone levels. On the other hand, treatment with IN paroxetine significantly increased corticosterone and melatonin levels in both sexes compared to healthy mice (p < 0.05). Intranasal paroxetine delivery undoubtedly ameliorated the behavioral despair, characteristic of depressive-like animals. Despite its efficiency in male and female mice subjected to UCMS, females were more prone to this novel therapeutic strategy.
Topics: Female; Mice; Male; Animals; Paroxetine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Administration, Intranasal; Sex Characteristics; Corticosterone; Melatonin; Depression; Disease Models, Animal; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 38556027
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116184 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Dec 2023Ulotaront is a novel psychotropic agent with agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT) receptors in phase III...
BACKGROUND
Ulotaront is a novel psychotropic agent with agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT) receptors in phase III clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the effect of paroxetine, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 inhibitor, on ulotaront pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy volunteers.
METHODS
Subjects received a single oral dose of 25 mg ulotaront on Day 1 and an oral dose of 20 mg paroxetine once daily from Days 5 to 10 to achieve steady-state plasma paroxetine levels. On Day 11, subjects received another single oral dose of 25 mg ulotaront, with continued daily oral dosing of 20 mg paroxetine from Days 11 to 14. All 24 subjects were CYP2D6 normal metabolizers.
RESULTS
Coadministration of paroxetine increased ulotaront maximum observed plasma concentration (C) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) by 31% and 72%, respectively, and decreased ulotaront apparent clearance (CL/F) by approximately 42%. While coadministration of paroxetine increased AUC of active but minor metabolite SEP-363854 by 32%, it had no effect on SEP-363854 C, or on SEP-363854 to the ulotaront AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC) ratio. Based on the acceptable adverse event profile of ulotaront across previous phase II studies, the increase in ulotaront exposure is unlikely to be clinically meaningful.
CONCLUSIONS
Weak drug-drug interactions were observed between ulotaront and the strong CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine; however, dose adjustment as a precondition when ulotaront is coadministered with strong CYP2D6 inhibitors or administered to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers should not be necessary.
Topics: Humans; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Paroxetine; Healthy Volunteers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Inhibitors; Area Under Curve
PubMed: 37882999
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01317-4 -
L'Encephale Apr 2024Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) was first recognised in July 2013 in the DSM-5 after a long journey to identify its existence. It was not until 1983 that the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) was first recognised in July 2013 in the DSM-5 after a long journey to identify its existence. It was not until 1983 that the US National Institute of Mental Health determined research criteria for the study of PMS. In 1994, the term "premenstrual dysphoric disorder" (PMDD) replaced this term in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic System Manual (DSM). It was listed in the section "Mood Disorder Not Otherwise Specified" and remained under consideration until the DSM-5, in which it appeared in the depressive disorders section. The legitimisation of the psychiatric diagnosis as well as the determination of clear symptomatology criteria in 2013 opened up possibilities for management, development of clinical, pathophysiological, therapeutic and psychotherapeutic studies. This disabling disorder can affect personal, social, family and professional life. In 2019, the ICD-11 in turn introduced the diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder, which solidifies the recognition of the disorder.
OBJECTIVE
(I) to review the existing treatments, both medicinal and psychotherapeutic, and (II) to review their effectiveness. At the end of this work we will formulate recommendations for the management of these patients.
METHODOLOGY
A bibliographic search was carried out from 7 June 2021 to 7 July2021 on the databases (bases de données) Psychinfo APA, Scopus, PubMed, as well as the bases de données of the Cochrane organisation and the recommendation documents of the Haute Autorité de la santé. After an initial selection based on keywords, the full text of all articles were read to arrive at the final selection of 32 articles.
RESULTS
Antidepressants and Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (CBT) appear to be the most commonly recommended treatments for PMDD. Other research shows the effectiveness of oral contraceptives including drospirenone. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were identified as an effective treatment for PMDD. These data are consistent with the current etiological hypothesis of PMDD which has a negative impact of natural hormonal fluctuations on certain neurotransmitters. CBT showed positive results in reducing the functional impact of PMDD.
DISCUSSION
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants were reported to be first-line treatments for PMDD (sertraline 50-150 mg/d, fluoxetine 10-20 mg/d, escitalopram 10-20 mg/d, paroxetine 12.5-25 mg/d). Drospirenone (EE 3 mg and EE 20 mg/d 24 days of hormonal pills, 4 days inactive) appears to have been a first or second line treatment depending on the articles. Current results clearly point to the effectiveness of CBT in helping to reduce: functional impairment, depressed mood, feelings of hopelessness, anxiety, mood swings, sensitivity, irritability, insomnia, conflict with others, impact of premenstrual symptoms on daily life, intensity of symptoms experienced, and symptom handicap. CBTs could also become a first-line treatment if there were to be more evidence of their effectiveness. In the future, it would seem useful to offer a psychotherapeutic treatment that can be reproduced and to multiply research with a high level of scientific comparability in order to clarify the place of CBT in the management of PMDD. Research on the etiopathology of the disorder and the optimal drug regimen is still ongoing. There is a need to develop appropriate psychotherapeutic techniques to support and accompany these patients.
CONCLUSION
In order to better evaluate treatments for PMDD, there is a need to homogenise studies on the subject at several levels: design, treatment doses, psychotherapeutic techniques, and evaluation measures. At present, some studies include both premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and PMDD patients. PMS and PMDD do not include the same symptoms, nor the same severity and potentially the same aetiology in the patients studied. In order to propose rigorous research that evaluates the effectiveness of treatments for PMDD and to properly support people with both these disorders, it seems essential to distinguish the two conditions. The role of the health practitioner is to be able to identify PMDD by differentiating it from other clinically related disorders. The patient must then be accompanied to make a choice of treatment adapted to her symptoms, their severity, her history, her plans for procreation, contraindications and her preferences. In 2021, the French National Authority for Health did not offer any guidelines or recommendations for the management of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. There is a need to develop research in France.
Topics: United States; Female; Humans; Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder; Premenstrual Syndrome; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; Fluoxetine; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 37821319
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.08.007 -
Scientific Reports Oct 2023The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, psychological status, sleep quality, and quality of life of patients with functional anorectal...
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, psychological status, sleep quality, and quality of life of patients with functional anorectal pain (FAP). The study also assessed the treatment efficacy of paroxetine in alleviating FAP symptoms. A retrospective comparative study of forty-three patients with FAP who were first treated with an anal plug compound glycolate suppository versus paroxetine combined with anal plug compound glycolate suppository between November 2021 and August 2022. Pain, quality of life, depression, anxiety and sleep quality were assessed before and after treatment by the Chinese version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), Health-related quality of life scale (The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-12), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). A total of 46.5% of patients with FAP were found to have anxiety symptoms (HAMA ≥ 7), 37.2% of patients with FAP were found to have depressive symptoms (HDRS ≥ 8). A total of 32.6% of patients with FAP had sleep disorders (PSQI > 10). Within 1 week after drug withdrawal, the short-term efficacy rate of oral paroxetine was 95.5%. After treatment, the symptom pain score (VAS) and sleep score were lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01). In the areas of vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), and Mental Health (MH), the difference between the pre-treatment and 8 weeks posttreatment scores of the study group and the control group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). FAP patients have obvious symptoms of anxiety and depression, and the incidence of sleep disturbance is prevalent. Paroxetine, a typical serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), was able to alleviate depression, anxiety, and pain symptoms in FAP, which might have clinical application prospects.
Topics: Humans; Paroxetine; Retrospective Studies; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Pelvic Pain; Glycolates
PubMed: 37865675
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45401-y -
Contact Dermatitis May 2024
Topics: Humans; Citalopram; Patch Tests; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Depression
PubMed: 38354423
DOI: 10.1111/cod.14504 -
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2023The tight structure of the blood-brain barrier severely limits the level of drug therapy for central nervous system disorders. In this study, a novel composite delivery...
INTRODUCTION
The tight structure of the blood-brain barrier severely limits the level of drug therapy for central nervous system disorders. In this study, a novel composite delivery system combining nanocarrier and microneedle technology was prepared to explore the possibility of transdermal delivery of drugs to work in the brain.
METHODS
Nanoparticle solutions containing paroxetine and rhodamine-B were prepared using PLGA as a carrier by the emulsification-solvent volatilization method. Then, they were mixed with hyaluronic acid and the PLGA nanoparticulate-based microneedle system (Rh-NPs-DMNs) was prepared by a multi-step decompression-free diffusion method. The particle size, zeta potential, and micromorphology of the nano solution were measured; the appearance, mechanical strength, dissolution properties, and puncture effect of the Rh-NPs-DMNs were evaluated; also, it was evaluated for in vivo live imaging properties and in vitro skin layer transport and distribution properties.
RESULTS
The mean particle size of Rh-NPs was 96.25 ± 2.26 nm; zeta potential of 15.89 ± 1.97 mV; PDI of 0.120 ± 0.079. Rh-NPs-DMNs had a high needle content of 96.11 ± 1.27% and a tip height of 651.23 ± 1.28 μm, with excellent mechanical properties (fracture force of 299.78 ± 1.74 N). H&E skin tissue staining showed that Rh-NPs-DMNs produced micron-sized mechanical pores approximately 550 μm deep immediately after drug administration, allowing for efficient circulation of the drug; and the results of in vivo imaging showed that Rh-B NPs DMNs had a faster transport rate than Rh-B DMNs, with strong fluorescent signals in both brain (<0.01) and hippocampus (<0.05) 48 h after drug administration.
CONCLUSION
Nanoparticles can prolong blood circulation time and intracerebral retention time and have certain brain-targeting properties due to their excellent physical properties. The use of microneedle technology combined with nanocarriers provides new ideas for delivery systems for the treatment of central neurological diseases.
Topics: Skin; Administration, Cutaneous; Skin Absorption; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Brain; Nanoparticles; Drug Carriers; Particle Size
PubMed: 37457799
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S415728 -
Urology Mar 2024To identify which medications are mostly associated with ejaculatory disorders through a disproportionality analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To identify which medications are mostly associated with ejaculatory disorders through a disproportionality analysis.
METHODS
The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA-FAERS) and the Eudra-Vigilance (EV) database were queried to identify medications more commonly associated to ejaculatory disorders from September 10, 2012 to June 1, 2023. Proportional Reported Ratios (PRRs) were computed for all the selected drugs.
RESULTS
Overall, 7404 reports of ejaculatory disorders reports were identified, and of these, 6854 cases (92.6%) were attributed to ten specific medications. On FDA-FAERS and EV databases, Paroxetine and Tamsulosin were the main responsible of delayed ejaculation (103/448 events, 23.0%) and retrograde ejaculation (366/1033 events, 35.4%), respectively. Finasteride was mostly related to painful ejaculation and ejaculation failure, with 150 events (7.8%) and 735 events (38.4%) respectively. Within the group of high-risk medications, Sildenafil presented higher risk of ejaculatory disorders than Tadalafil (PRR=5.85 (95%CI 5.09-6.78), P < .01).
CONCLUSION
Ten drugs were recognized to display significant reporting levels of ejaculatory disorders. Among them, Finasteride and Sildenafil were responsible for the most reports in FDA-FAERS and in EV databases, respectively. Physicians should thoroughly counsel patients treated with these drugs about the risk of ejaculatory disorders. Further integration into clinical trials is needed to enhance the applicability and significance of these results.
Topics: Male; United States; Humans; Finasteride; Sildenafil Citrate; United States Food and Drug Administration; Pharmacovigilance; Tamsulosin; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 38331221
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.021