-
JCO Oncology Practice Jul 2023Biosimilars offer increased patient choice and potential cost-savings, compared with originator biologics. We studied 3 years of prescribed biologics among US physician...
PURPOSE
Biosimilars offer increased patient choice and potential cost-savings, compared with originator biologics. We studied 3 years of prescribed biologics among US physician practices to determine the relationship of practice type and payment source to oncology biosimilar use.
METHODS
We acquired biologic utilization data from 38 practices participating in PracticeNET. We focused on six biologics (bevacizumab, epoetin alfa, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab) for the period from 2019 to 2021. We complemented our quantitative analysis with a survey of PracticeNET participants (prescribers and practice leaders) to reveal potential motivators and barriers to biosimilar use. We implemented logistic regression to evaluate the biosimilar use for each biologic, with covariates including time, practice type, and payment source, and accounted for clusters of practices.
RESULTS
Use of biosimilars increased over the 3-year period, reaching between 51% and 80% of administered doses by the fourth quarter of 2021, depending on the biologic. Biosimilar use varied by practice, with independent physician practices having higher use of biosimilars for epoetin alfa, filgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab. Compared with commercial health plans, Medicaid plans had lower biosimilar use for four biologics; traditional Medicare had lower use for five biologics. The average cost per dose decreased between 24% and 41%, dependent on the biologic.
CONCLUSION
Biosimilars have, through increased use, lowered the average cost per dose of the studied biologics. Biosimilar use differed by originator biologic, practice type, and payment source. There remains further opportunity for increases in biosimilar use among certain practices and payers.
Topics: Aged; Humans; United States; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Filgrastim; Rituximab; Epoetin Alfa; Medicare; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 37084324
DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00618 -
International Journal of Gynecological... Jul 2023To compare response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine administered on day 1 and day 8 (day1&8) versus a...
Efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine administered on day 1 and day 8 (day1&8) versus day 1-only for platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To compare response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine administered on day 1 and day 8 (day1&8) versus a modified day 1-only regimen in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
METHODS
A retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2020 treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine on a 21-day cycle. The impact of dosing schedule on response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities was assessed with univariate and multivariate models.
RESULTS
Of 200 patients, 26% (n=52) completed day 1&8, 21.5% (n=43) started day 1&8 but dropped day 8, and 52.5% (n=105) received day 1-only. There were no differences in demographics. Median starting carboplatin and gemcitabine doses were area under curve (AUC) 5 and 600 mg/m for day 1-only versus AUC4 and 750 mg/m among day 1&8, respectively (p<0.001). A total of 43 patients (45.3%) dropped day 8 primarily due to neutropenia (51.2%) or thrombocytopenia (30.2%). The response rates were 69.3% for day 1&8-completed, 67.5% for day 1&8-dropped, and 67.6% for day 1-only (p=0.92). Median progression-free survival was 13.1, 12.1, and 12.4 months for day 1&8-completed, day 1&8-dropped, and day 1-only, respectively (p=0.29). Median overall survival was 28.2, 33.5, and 34.3 months for the above groups (p=0.42). The rate of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (48.9% vs 31.4%, p=0.002), dose reductions (58.9% vs 33.7%, p<0.001), blood transfusions (22.1% vs 10.5%, p=0.025), and treatment with pegfilgrastim (64.2% vs 51%, p=0.059) were higher among day 1&8 versus day 1-only, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no difference in response rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival for day 1&8 versus day 1-only, regardless of whether day 8 was dropped. Day 1&8 was associated with greater hematologic toxicity. A modified day 1-only regimen may represent an alternative to day 1&8 and warrants prospective study.
Topics: Humans; Female; Gemcitabine; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Platinum; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Deoxycytidine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 37024239
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004199 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2024Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of...
Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Ramucirumab; Docetaxel; Lung Neoplasms; Polyethylene Glycols; Leukopenia; Febrile Neutropenia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Filgrastim
PubMed: 38360906
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54166-x -
International Journal of Radiation... Nov 2023Patients exposed to acute high doses of ionizing radiation are susceptible to dose-dependent bone marrow depression with resultant pancytopenia. Romiplostim (RP; Nplate)...
PURPOSE
Patients exposed to acute high doses of ionizing radiation are susceptible to dose-dependent bone marrow depression with resultant pancytopenia. Romiplostim (RP; Nplate) is a recombinant thrombopoietin receptor agonist protein that promotes progenitor megakaryocyte proliferation and platelet production and is an approved treatment for patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. The goal of our study was to evaluate the postirradiation survival and hematologic benefits of a single dose of RP with or without pegfilgrastim (PF; Neulasta, granulocyte colony stimulating factor) by conducting a well-controlled, treatment-concealed, good laboratory practice-compliant study in rhesus macaques that was compliant with the United States Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule regulatory approval pathway.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Irradiated male and female rhesus macaques (20/sex in each of 3 groups: control, RP, and RP + PF) were subcutaneously administered vehicle or RP (5 mg/kg, 10 mL/kg) on day 1 in the presence or absence of 2 doses of PF (0.3 mg/kg, 0.03 mL/kg, days 1 and 8). Total body radiation (680 cGy, 50 cGy/min from cobalt-60 gamma ray source) occurred 24 ± 2 hours previously at a dose targeting 70% lethality for the control cohort over 60 days. The study examined 60-day survival postirradiation as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included incidence, severity, and duration of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, other hematology parameters, coagulation parameters, and body weight change to provide insights into potential mechanisms of action.
RESULTS
Compared with sham-treated controls, treated animals demonstrated a 40% to 55% survival benefit compared with controls, less severe clinical signs, reduced incidence of thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia, earlier hematologic recovery, and reduced morbidity from bacterial infection.
CONCLUSIONS
These results were pivotal in obtaining Food and Drug Administration approval in January 2021 for RP's new indication as a single administration therapy to increase survival in adults and pediatric patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Humans; Male; Female; Child; Macaca mulatta; Recombinant Proteins; Thrombocytopenia; Neutropenia; Hematology; Radiation Exposure
PubMed: 37224926
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.008 -
Drug Safety Dec 2023Biosimilars are additional treatment options that are approved based on robust analytical and clinical comparisons with their reference biologic. At the time of initial... (Review)
Review
Long-Term Real-World Post-approval Safety Data of Multiple Biosimilars from One Marketing-Authorization Holder After More than 18 Years Since Their First Biosimilar Launch.
BACKGROUND
Biosimilars are additional treatment options that are approved based on robust analytical and clinical comparisons with their reference biologic. At the time of initial approval, the full safety profile of a biosimilar is inferred from the reference biologic. Nonetheless, there are still lingering concerns related to the long-term safety of biosimilars. Therefore, we reviewed the post-approval pharmacovigilance data for eight marketed biosimilars from one Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) to summarize their safety experience in a real-world setting for up to 18 years since their first biosimilar launch.
METHODS
Post-approval cumulative patient exposure and safety experience for eight Sandoz biosimilars [adalimumab (Hyrimoz), epoetin alfa (Binocrit), etanercept (Erelzi), filgrastim (Zarzio), infliximab (Zessly), pegfilgrastim (Ziextenzo), rituximab (Rixathon), and somatropin (Omnitrope)] was summarized based on the available pharmacovigilance data from Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) and the corresponding health authority-authored PSUR assessment reports, where available, as of 31 January 2023. Exposure to all biosimilars was calculated in patient treatment days (PTD) except for rituximab, which was expressed in number of patient doses (PD).
RESULTS
The combined post-approval cumulative exposure to seven out of the eight marketed Sandoz biosimilars was more than 1.3 billion PTD and for rituximab more than 1.8 million PD. Overall, a critical analysis of the cumulative safety data of all eight Sandoz biosimilar PSURs concluded that the overall benefit-risk profile of each remains favorable and is consistent with the respective reference biologics.
CONCLUSIONS
This is one of the largest reviews of post-approval biosimilar pharmacovigilance data to date by one MAH. The real-world experience of all eight marketed Sandoz biosimilars for up to 18 years demonstrates that Sandoz biosimilars can be used as safely as their respective reference biologics. Therefore, patients and healthcare providers can be confident in the clinical benefit and safety of Sandoz biosimilars. It is reasonable to believe that similar conclusions about safety may be reached for other biosimilars developed and approved to the high standards as are already in place by major health authorities such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The long-term safety of biosimilars demonstrated here provides strong support for the concept of biosimilarity.
Topics: Humans; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Rituximab; Infliximab; Adalimumab; Epoetin Alfa; Marketing; Drug Approval
PubMed: 37902937
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01371-8 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jan 2024Evaluate the safety and efficacy of efbemalenograstim alfa for neutrophil support in breast cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy in a phase 2,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efbemalenograstim alfa not inferior to pegfilgrastim in providing neutrophil support in women with breast cancer undergoing myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a phase 2 randomized, multicenter, open-label trial.
PURPOSE
Evaluate the safety and efficacy of efbemalenograstim alfa for neutrophil support in breast cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy in a phase 2, dose-finding, open-label study (NCT01648322, ClinicalTrials.gov, 2012-07-19).
METHODS
232 patients received up to 4 cycles of chemotherapy, 141 patients with docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC) and 91 patients with docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (TAC). Patients were randomized to efbemalenograstim alfa (80, 240, or 320 µg/kg [TC]; 240 or 320 µg/kg [TAC]) or pegfilgrastim (6 mg) on Day 2 of each cycle.
RESULTS
Efbemalenograstim alfa was non-inferior to pegfilgrastim in duration of moderate and severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 1.0 × 10/L) in TAC Cycle 1 (mean [SD] of 2.1 [1.58] and 2.1 [1.46] days for 240 µg/kg and 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa, respectively, and 1.8 [1.28] days for pegfilgrastim), with a difference (95% CI) of 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1) days. ANC nadir occurred between Days 7-8 of TAC Cycle 1, with mean [SD] of 0.68 [1.064], 0.86 [1.407] and 0.78[1.283] × 10/L for 240 µg/kg, 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, respectively. Time to ANC recovery post nadir (defined as an ANC > 2.0 × 10/L after the expected ANC nadir) was 2.0-2.4 and 1.9 days for TAC patients treated with efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, respectively. No significant difference was found between any dose of efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim in TAC Cycle 1 for incidence of moderate to severe neutropenia (76%-77% of patients) or incidence of severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 × 10/L; 63%-72%). Efbemalenograstim alfa exhibited similar safety profile to pegfilgrastim. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 (1.8%) patients, 2 patients each for 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, with no event considered related to study drug.
CONCLUSION
Efbemalenograstim alfa was comparable to pegfilgrastim in efficacy and safety.
GOV IDENTIFIER
NCT01648322.
Topics: Humans; Female; Neutrophils; Breast Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Neutropenia; Cyclophosphamide
PubMed: 38194162
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08260-x -
Thoracic Cancer Dec 2023Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia...
BACKGROUND
Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P-PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second-line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P-PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P-PEG (n = 21) and non-P-PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1-39 cycles) in P-PEG group and four (range: 1-15 cycles) in non-P-PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P-PEG group than in the non-P-PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression-free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P-PEG and non-P-PEG groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
AMR with P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P-PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC.
Topics: Humans; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37873674
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15140 -
EClinicalMedicine Dec 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus platinum-based chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however,...
Efficacy and safety of second-line therapy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (SCORPION): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus platinum-based chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no prospective clinical trials of docetaxel (DTX) plus ramucirumab (RAM) following first-line ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy has been reported.
METHODS
In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients with NSCLC from eight centres in Japan. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICI were eligible for the study. Patients were intravenously treated with 60 mg/m of DTX and 10 mg/kg of RAM on day 1 with a strong recommendation of pegfilgrastim administration on day 2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in efficacy analysis population. Safety was assessed in all patients treated at least one dose. The ORR of the null and alternative hypotheses were 10% and 30%, with α error of 0.1 and β error of 0.1. This trial is registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jCRTs041190077.
FINDINGS
Between 16 January, 2020, and 24 August, 2021, 33 patients (median age 66 [range 42-79] years) were enrolled. Thirteen patients (41%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Twenty-five patients (78%) had an interval of <60 days after the last administration of ICI. In the efficacy analysis population (n = 32), the primary endpoint was met as 11 patients achieved partial response (PR), with ORR of 34.4% (80% CI, 23.1-47.2). Grade ≥3 anaemia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths and no new safety signals were observed.
INTERPRETATION
DTX plus RAM demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients who have progressed on front-line ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The results of this trial can be a helpful reference in conducting further phase III trials of new second-line treatment options.
FUNDING
Eli Lilly Japan K.K.
PubMed: 38034077
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102303 -
Pain Management Nursing : Official... Apr 2024Breast cancer patients on chemotherapy who receive pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia may experience severe bone pain as a side effect. Traditional treatment...
AIMS
Breast cancer patients on chemotherapy who receive pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia may experience severe bone pain as a side effect. Traditional treatment recommendations include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and/or antihistamine use. However, little research was found comparing these interventions. The study aim was to address the gaps in literature and to explore the use of and perceived effectiveness of loratadine versus acetaminophen or NSAIDs in women with breast cancer treated with pegfilgrastim. This study also sought to understand how patients became aware of loratadine or other treatments for management of bone pain.
DESIGN/METHODS
This cross-sectional study used survey methods to collect data from 66 adult female breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim.
RESULTS
The incidence of bone pain was 45% (n = 30) in our sample, but more than half (n = 45; 69%) of the women took either acetaminophen, NSAIDs, or loratadine alone or in combination to prevent bone pain. All medication were rated as effective by patients, with acetaminophen slightly more effective than loratadine, and loratadine more effective than NSAIDs.
CONCLUSIONS
Acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and loratadine are easily available and inexpensive. However, unlike acetaminophen and NSAIDs, loratadine is dosed once a day and well tolerated with minimal adverse effects.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Randomized controlled trials are needed to adequately assess the effectiveness of all three medication options. Because little is known about optimal use of any of these medications for pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain, it is also important to identify the optimal time to initiate treatment and ideal treatment duration.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Loratadine; Acetaminophen; Cross-Sectional Studies; Bone Diseases; Musculoskeletal Pain; Breast Neoplasms; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Filgrastim; Polyethylene Glycols
PubMed: 38216368
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.12.004 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been widely used for preventing febrile neutropenia in various types of cancer treatment. In the present...
Open-labeled, multicenter phase II study of prophylactic administration of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received pomalidomide-based regimens (KMM170).
INTRODUCTION
Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been widely used for preventing febrile neutropenia in various types of cancer treatment. In the present study, we prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim as a primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and infection among patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with pomalidomide-based regimens.
METHODS
Thirty-three patients with RRMM who received pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) with or without cyclophosphamide (PCd) were enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight patients were treated with PCd and 5 patients were treated with Pd. All patients were given pegfilgrastim subcutaneously with a single administration performed on the first day of each cycle as primary prophylaxis until the fourth cycle.
RESULTS
The median age of the patients was 75 (range 56-85), and the median prior line of therapy was 2 (range 2-6). Seventeen patients (51.5%) had any grade of neutropenia and 20 (60.6%) had any grade of thrombocytopenia before starting pomalidomide treatment. During the 4 cycles of treatment, grade 3 or more neutropenia occurred in 17 patients (51.5%), and 4 (12.1%) experienced grade 3 or more febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or more infections occurred in 5 patients (15.2%). Interestingly, the patients with markedly increased ANC of more than 2 x 109/L compared to baseline ANC after 7 days of pegfilgrastim at 1st cycle of treatment showed a significantly lower incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. The most common adverse event of pegfilgrastim was fatigue, and all the adverse events caused by pegfilgrastim were grade 1 or 2. And there was no significant change in the immune cell population and cytokines during the administration of pegfilgrastim.
DISCUSSION
Considering that this study included elderly patients with baseline neutropenia, pegylated G-CSF could be helpful to prevent severe neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, or infection in patients with RRMM.
PubMed: 37965454
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1209110