-
Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Jun 2024Priapism is defined as penile erection lasting more than four hours that is unrelated to sexual arousal. Priapism is classified based on the oxygenation of the penile... (Review)
Review
Priapism is defined as penile erection lasting more than four hours that is unrelated to sexual arousal. Priapism is classified based on the oxygenation of the penile tissue into ischemic and non-ischemic subtypes. As the most common form, ischemic priapism is usually associated with pain and carries a significant risk of permanent loss of erectile function; thus, rapid intervention is necessary. Initial therapy consists of corporal aspiration and injection of sympathomimetic agents. If detumescence is not achieved, a cavernosal shunt is necessary. Non-ischemic priapism is less common than the ischemic type and is usually the result of perineal trauma. In this subtype, there is usually no pain and treatment is initially conservative. Recurrent (stuttering) priapism is a variant of the ischemic subtype, but is self-limiting and usually occurs during sleep with a duration of less than three to four hours. In the case of prolonged erection, therapy is analogous to that of the ischemic subtype.
Topics: Humans; Priapism; Male; Penis
PubMed: 38653788
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02338-y -
Translational Andrology and Urology Apr 2024Priapism is a rare condition characterized by persistent erection of the penis that lasts more than 4 hours in the absence of sexual stimulation and is associated with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Priapism is a rare condition characterized by persistent erection of the penis that lasts more than 4 hours in the absence of sexual stimulation and is associated with significant morbidity and complications, including erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis. Surgical management of priapism can be extremely challenging. We herein provide a comprehensive review that aims to evaluate the role of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation in the management of priapism.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of PP implantation in treating priapism and the long-term complications, outcomes, and patients' satisfaction rate.
RESULTS
Out of 717 English-language studies published between 2002 and 2022, 17 were chosen for this review. Majority of patients had a malleable PP (MPP) implant, either early or delayed after the priapism episode. Early placement (EP) of PP is widely defined between studies ranging from less than 72 hours, within 1 week, and within 3 weeks. Most common causes of priapism were sickle cell anemia (SCA), medication-induced, and idiopathic. Studies show a higher satisfaction rate ranging between 80% and 100%, with sexual intercourse achievement ranging between 64.2% and 100%. Based on the GRADE system, included studies rated as very low quality of evidence. Commonly reported complications that arise after PP procedures, include device infection, erosion, curvature, and mechanical malfunction, such as auto-inflation.
CONCLUSIONS
PP can be an effective treatment option for priapism, particularly in cases of ischemic priapism lasting more than 36 hours or recurrent priapism that is medically refractory. However, due to the very low quality of evidence, larger, well-designed studies are warranted where long-term outcomes, patients' satisfaction, and complications following priapism-related PP implantation are measured as endpoints.
PubMed: 38721288
DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-224 -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2023The penile prosthesis has revolutionized the management of erectile dysfunction and is a mainstay in the treatment of this clinical entity. The goal of proper patient... (Review)
Review
The penile prosthesis has revolutionized the management of erectile dysfunction and is a mainstay in the treatment of this clinical entity. The goal of proper patient selection and counseling is to achieve a satisfactory outcome for the patient. Most patients receiving a penile prosthesis are satisfied with their outcome, and while the penile prosthesis generally allows for high satisfaction rates, avenues for dissatisfaction can arise. Our aim is to aid the prosthetic urologist in identifying such avenues by discussing what factors can lead to a dissatisfied patient. Even a technically successful surgical outcome in the improperly counseled patient can have negative consequences for the patient and the patient-physician relationship. Satisfaction in the penile prosthesis arena can be variably defined and viewed from different perspectives. As such, establishing a personalized framework of expectation management, even in the patient who poses challenging factors, is paramount in preparation for penile prosthesis implantation.
Topics: Male; Humans; Penile Prosthesis; Patient Selection; Patient Satisfaction; Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Implantation; Counseling
PubMed: 37607962
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00735-z -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2023Priapism is a persistent or prolonged erection, in the absence of sexual stimulation, that fails to subside. Prolonged ischaemic or low flow priapism is defined as a... (Review)
Review
Priapism is a persistent or prolonged erection, in the absence of sexual stimulation, that fails to subside. Prolonged ischaemic or low flow priapism is defined as a full or partial erection persisting for more than 4 h and unrelated to sexual interest or stimulation, characterised by little or no cavernous blood flow. Low flow priapism leads to progressive corporal fibrosis, which could, in turn, lead to long-lasting erectile dysfunction if left untreated. Penile prosthesis implantation is recognised as a management option in refractory and delayed low flow priapism for restoring erectile function with high patient satisfaction rates. However, the ensuing corporal fibrotic scarring poses a surgical challenge to clinicians, given the higher complication rates in this patient subset. Postoperative patient satisfaction has been closely linked to preoperative expectations and perceived loss of penile length. Therefore, thorough patient counselling concerning the risk and benefits of penile implants should be a priority for all clinicians. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the ideal prosthesis choice and procedural timing in refractory low flow priapism. In this review, we will examine the existing literature on penile implants in patients with priapism and discuss the options for managing complications associated with penile prosthesis surgery.
Topics: Male; Humans; Priapism; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Penile Implantation; Erectile Dysfunction; Fibrosis
PubMed: 37898653
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00787-1 -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2023
Review
Topics: Male; Humans; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Erectile Dysfunction; Educational Status; Patient Satisfaction
PubMed: 36966226
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00688-3 -
Translational Andrology and Urology Oct 2023Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals may seek gender-affirming phalloplasty with specific functional goals, including erectile function sufficient for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals may seek gender-affirming phalloplasty with specific functional goals, including erectile function sufficient for penetrative sexual intercourse. Individuals seeking penile prosthesis placement must accept the potential risks to their phallic anatomy.
METHODS
We review current practices at our center and narrative review of literature discussing techniques for penile prosthesis and testicular prosthesis placement after phalloplasty and scrotoplasty, as well as surgical outcomes, and quality of life outcomes where available.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
Early discussion of a staged approach to phallic construction with a last step of implant placement is important during initial phalloplasty counseling. Pre-operative counseling at our multi-disciplinary center includes: discussion of surgical history, complications, goals and priorities; physical exam to evaluate phallic size and position, scrotal size, and other anatomic findings that may influence prosthesis selection; urinary evaluation, including uroflowmetry with post-void residual, and a cystoscopy with retrograde urethrogram if indicated based on symptoms or urinary studies, and discussion of surgical risks, benefits and alternatives. Although none of the commercially available penile prosthesis devices in the United States are designed for phalloplasty, modern inflatable and malleable prostheses are adapted for use in the post-phalloplasty setting. Due to the lack of native corpora cavernosa, highly variable phallic anatomy, and the need to adapt implants designed for natal penile anatomy, complication rates of prosthesis placement after phalloplasty remain high, with reported ranges of complications from 20% to 80%.
CONCLUSIONS
Major complications requiring surgical revision are common relative to implant placement in natal penile anatomy, and include: infection requiring explantation, device extrusion, erosion, migration or malposition, inadequate rigidity, poor aesthetic result, pain, decrease or loss of erogenous and/or tactile sensation, device failure, injury to the urethra, and injury to the neurovascular supply of the penis with resultant partial or complete flap loss. This broad range of complication rates represents the variability with which results are reported and reflect a lack of clear reporting guidelines, significant variability in techniques, and need for more standardization. To optimize outcomes, it is important that surgeons have an in-depth understanding of phalloplasty anatomy and are equipped to manage potential complications in the short- and long-term.
PubMed: 37969769
DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-122 -
Urology May 2024
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Microbiota; Biomedical Research; Prosthesis-Related Infections
PubMed: 38494141
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.024 -
International Journal of Impotence... Jun 2024The treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) using penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has recently garnered significant interest, but reports of bibliometric analyses of... (Review)
Review
The treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) using penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has recently garnered significant interest, but reports of bibliometric analyses of studies on PPI have yet to appear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use visualization techniques to statistically and qualitatively assess the state of knowledge, current research topics, and trends in this field. The Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was searched for publications about PPI from the inception of the database to 2023. VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.2. R2), and Excel (version 2021) were used for the data analysis. The results show a total of 1015 original articles and reviews on PPI published over this nearly 50 years, with an increasing trend in the number of studies published each year. The United States is the country with the most published studies (n = 578). Mayo Clinic is the organization with the most publications overall (n = 46). The Journal of Sexual Medicine has the most publications (n = 184). The most prolific author is Wilson, Steven K (n = 31). The most commonly used terms were erectile dysfunction (n = 509), penile prosthesis (n = 332), implantation (n = 207), satisfaction (n = 201), surgery (n = 200), infection (n = 134), outcomes (n = 128), Peyronie's disease (n = 121), men (n = 115), and experience (n = 109). Current research focuses on four main areas: complications of PPI, the current status of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the use of PPI in radical prostatectomy and Peyronie's disease populations, and patient satisfaction after PPI. Improving patient satisfaction with PPI through improved mechanical design and surgical techniques is a key concern for future research.
PubMed: 38851852
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00927-1 -
Urology Nov 2023Penile length loss is often observed in patients with erectile dysfunction and obesity. In patients with a prominent infrapubic fat pad, the excess fat can further...
BACKGROUND
Penile length loss is often observed in patients with erectile dysfunction and obesity. In patients with a prominent infrapubic fat pad, the excess fat can further reduce perceived penile length. As others have reported, concurrent suprapubic lipectomy and placement of a penile implant has been shown to be an effective way of exposing phallic length in this challenging patient population. OBJECTIVE: In this video, we present surgical technique and initial outcomes of concurrent suprapubic lipectomy and 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement in patients that have erectile dysfunction and lipodystrophy of the mons pubis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed an institutional review board-approved prosthetic database of male patients that underwent placement of a 3-piece IPP and concurrent suprapubic lipectomy from 2020 to 2023. Intraoperative complications and postoperative outcomes were collated and analyzed. To perform this operation, an elliptical incision is made around the suprapubic fat pad that extends to the base of the penis inferiorly. Laterally the incision is carried just medial to the inferior margin of the iliac crest. Sharp dissection and electrocautery are used to dissect the fat pad free. A layer of areolar tissue is preserved above the layer of the fascia to prevent seroma formation. For larger blood vessels, vascular clips are used to ensure adequate hemostasis. After removal of the fat pad, placement of the penile prosthesis can proceed as one would through an infrapubic approach. After the device is placed, the tissue flaps based on the external pudendal vessels are inspected for adequate vascularity. Penetrating towel clamps are used to approximate the skin edges from lateral to medial so that the midline closure can be approximated accurately. 0-PDS is used to anchor the flap superiorly into the lower edge of the abdominal fold. The incision is then closed in multiple layers of absorbable suture from lateral to medial. A skin stapler or suture is then used to approximate the skin and the penis is wrapped with a compressive dressing.
RESULTS
Nine patients underwent the combined surgery. There were no intraoperative complications. In follow-up, 1 patient developed an infection-related complication that required device removal and immediate replacement. The remaining 8 did well postoperatively with improved dorsal phallic length with no infection or device-related complications.
CONCLUSION
Concurrent suprapubic lipectomy and placement of a 3-piece IPP is a safe and reproducible technique for the treatment of suprapubic lipodystrophy, buried penis, and refractory ED.
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Lipectomy; Erectile Dysfunction; Retrospective Studies; Intraoperative Complications; Lipodystrophy
PubMed: 37549696
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.07.029