-
The Kurume Medical Journal Jul 2023Reflux esophagitis and gastric tube ulcer sometimes cause severe clinical problems in patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We previously...
Reflux esophagitis and gastric tube ulcer sometimes cause severe clinical problems in patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We previously reported that acidity in the gastric tube was decreased for 1 year after esophagectomy, and that lower acidity levels were associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, the long-term changes in gastric acidity remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the long-term changes in gastric acidity after surgery. Eighty-nine patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer were analyzed. They underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, serum gastrin measurement, and H. pylori infection examination before surgery, at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The gastric acidity at 1 month and 1 year after surgery was significantly lower than that before surgery (p=0.003, p=0.003). However, there was no difference in gastric acidity before and 2 years after surgery. The gas tric acidity in H. pylori-infected patients was significantly lower in comparison to non-infected patients at each time point (p=0.0003, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). In H. pylori-infected patients, gastric acid ity was decreased for 1 year after surgery, and recovered within 2 years after surgery. However, no significant differences were observed in the acidity levels of non-infected patients during the 2-year follow-up period. The serum gastrin level increased after esophagectomy. The acidity levels in the gastric tube recovered within 2 years after surgery. Periodic endoscopy examination is recommended for early detection of acid-related disease, such as reflux esophagitis or gastric tube ulcer, after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.
Topics: Humans; Esophagectomy; Esophagitis, Peptic; Gastrins; Ulcer; Esophageal Neoplasms; Helicobacter Infections
PubMed: 37005290
DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682005 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Jan 2024GERD is common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Selective sparing of oblique fibers may reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis after POEM. In this study, we... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
GERD is common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Selective sparing of oblique fibers may reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis after POEM. In this study, we compared the incidence of GERD between conventional myotomy (CM) versus oblique fiber-sparing (OFS) myotomy in patients with achalasia.
METHODS
Eligible patients with type I and II achalasia who underwent POEM from January 2020 to October 2020 were randomized into 2 groups (CM and OFS myotomy). Exclusion criteria were type III achalasia, sigmoid esophagus, and history of Heller's myotomy. The primary study outcome was incidence of reflux esophagitis (at least grade B) in the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were reflux symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, clinical success, and adverse events.
RESULTS
One hundred fifteen patients were randomized into CM (n = 58) and OFS myotomy (n = 57) groups. POEM was technically successful in all patients. Overall, reflux esophagitis was found in 56 patients (48.7%). The incidence of at least grade B esophagitis was similar in both groups (CM vs OFS myotomy: 25.9% vs 31.6%, P = .541). The mean number of reflux episodes (48.2 ± 36.6 vs 48.9 ± 40.3, P = .933), increased esophageal acid exposure >6% (45.5% vs 31.7%, P = .266), and high DeMeester scores (38.6% vs 41.5%, P = .827) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic reflux (GERD questionnaire score >7) or use of proton pump inhibitors at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS
Sparing of sling fibers has no significant impact on the incidence of significant reflux esophagitis after POEM. Novel strategies need to be explored to prevent reflux after POEM. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04229342.).
Topics: Humans; Esophageal Achalasia; Esophagitis, Peptic; Cardia; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Myotomy; Treatment Outcome; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower
PubMed: 37598863
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.007 -
Cureus Feb 2024Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content, with esophageal motility playing a pivotal...
BACKGROUND
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content, with esophageal motility playing a pivotal role in its pathophysiology. This study employs a cross-sectional design to investigate the interplay between esophageal motility, the severity of esophagitis, and age in individuals presenting with GERD symptoms.
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective is to assess proximal and distal esophageal contractions in individuals with GERD symptoms, exploring potential correlations with the severity of esophageal lesions and age.
METHODS
A total of 47 patients reporting heartburn and acid regurgitation underwent diagnostic investigations, including esophageal manometry, radiological examinations, and endoscopy. Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence and severity of esophagitis. Esophageal contractions were monitored using a manometric method at various distances from the UES after swallowing 5 mL of water.
RESULTS
Patients with severe esophagitis (SE) exhibited a reduced distal esophageal contraction amplitude compared to those without esophagitis (WE) or with moderate esophagitis (ME). No significant age-related differences were observed in esophageal contractions. Analyses included contraction amplitude, duration, area under the curve (AUC), and propagation time.
CONCLUSION
This study provides insights into the nuanced relationship between esophageal motility, esophagitis severity, and age in GERD patients. The findings highlight the significance of distal esophageal contractions in SE cases, suggesting potential implications for disease progression. Age did not emerge as a significant factor influencing esophageal motility in this patient cohort.
PubMed: 38468980
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53979 -
Diseases of the Esophagus : Official... Jul 2023Though most known for heartburn and regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is attributed to countless atypical, extra-esophageal (EE) manifestations like...
Though most known for heartburn and regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is attributed to countless atypical, extra-esophageal (EE) manifestations like cough and throat clearing. While GERD has been studied extensively, the relationship between reflux character and symptom manifestation remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine proximal reflux frequency and its relationship with typical or atypical symptoms. 540 (75.1% female, 24.9% male) pH-impedance monitoring studies from the last 3-years were divided by symptom indication and retrospectively reviewed for proximal reflux frequency, total acid exposure time, mean nocturnal baseline impedance, and total reflux episodes in both abnormal and normal, and borderline studies. Baseline characteristics were also collected. Both total reflux events and mean proximal reflux frequency were found to differ significantly between those with typical versus atypical symptoms. Total reflux events [median (IQR)] were 43.5 (24.0-74.0) in typical patients and 35.0 (20.0-57.0) in atypical patients (P-value 0.0369). Proximal reflux frequency [median (IQR)] was 12.0 (4.0-19.0) typical and 7.0 (3.0-17.0) atypical (P-value 0.0348). Results for exclusively abnormal studies also favored typical patients but not significantly. Baseline characteristics and use of gastric acid control did not differ significantly. Proximal reflux frequency was observed to increase among those with typical GERD symptoms. Total acid reflux events were also significantly higher on average with typical patients. Our findings that proximal reflux frequency is reduced in patients with atypical symptoms compared with patients with typical symptoms suggest that proximal reflux exposure may play a significant role in the symptom presentation of typical classic heartburn and regurgitation symptoms. The differential diagnosis for atypical EE symptoms is vast and can be multifactorial. Our results indicate proximal reflux events may contribute to atypical EE symptoms less than previously reported.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Heartburn; Retrospective Studies; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Esophagitis, Peptic; Esophageal pH Monitoring
PubMed: 36572402
DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac106 -
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Oct 2023Postoperative reflux esophagitis represents a major complication of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with Billroth-I reconstruction (LDGBI). This study aimed to...
INTRODUCTION
Postoperative reflux esophagitis represents a major complication of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with Billroth-I reconstruction (LDGBI). This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional effect and preoperative risk factors of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LDGBI for gastric cancer.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with (reflux [+]) and without (reflux [-]) postoperative reflux esophagitis who underwent LDGBI in our institution. Patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and perioperative nutritional status were compared. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative reflux esophagitis were also evaluated.
RESULTS
Between January 2009 and December 2016, 242 patients underwent LDG for gastric cancer. Of these, 218 underwent Billroth-I reconstruction. Seventy-three patients were excluded because of nutritional or oncological reasons. Finally, 23 patients were enrolled as the reflux (+) group and 122 as the reflux (-) group. Although the preoperative/postoperative bodyweight ratio and albumin and hemoglobin values plateaued beyond 6 months postoperatively in the reflux (-) group, these parameters continued to decrease beyond this time in the reflux (+) group. The mean ± SD bodyweight ratios at 3 years postoperatively were 82.83% ± 9.73% and 89.45% ± 8.04% for the reflux (+) and reflux (-) group, respectively (P = .0006). Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative reflux esophagitis was associated with postoperative body weight loss. Another multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hiatal hernia as an independent predictive factor for postoperative reflux esophagitis.
CONCLUSION
The risk of reflux esophagitis after LDGBI in patients with hiatal hernia should be considered when deciding therapeutic approaches for such patients.
Topics: Humans; Esophagitis, Peptic; Stomach Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Hernia, Hiatal; Gastrectomy; Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Laparoscopy; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37406670
DOI: 10.1111/ases.13225 -
Clinical and Translational... Jan 2024Currently, the diagnosis of achalasia mainly relies on invasive or radioactive examinations. This study aimed to develop a noninvasive diagnostic method for achalasia...
INTRODUCTION
Currently, the diagnosis of achalasia mainly relies on invasive or radioactive examinations. This study aimed to develop a noninvasive diagnostic method for achalasia based on specific serum markers.
METHODS
Serum levels of profilin-1, galectin-10, immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-9, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, and transgelin-2 were measured in patients with achalasia and controls by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The diagnostic values and thresholds were determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Then, patients with dysphagia were prospectively enrolled to validate the ability of these molecules for achalasia diagnosing.
RESULTS
A total of 142 patients with achalasia and 50 nonachalasia controls (healthy volunteers and patients with reflux esophagitis) were retrospectively included. The serum levels of profilin-1, galectin-10, and transgelin-2 in patients with achalasia were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteers and patients with reflux esophagitis ( P all < 0.001). Profilin-1, galectin-10, and transgelin-2 were of good performance in diagnosing achalasia, with optimal thresholds of 2,171.2, 33.9, and 1,630.6 pg/mL, respectively. Second, 40 patients with dysphagia were prospectively enrolled to the validation of achalasia. For profilin-1, the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were 100.0%, 64.5%, 45.0%, and 100.0%, respectively. The figures for transgelin-2 were 65.5%, 90.9%, 95.0%, and 50.0%. When both increased, the positive predictive value reached to 100.0%. When both indexes were normal, the negative predictive value was 100.0%.
DISCUSSION
Profilin-1 and transgelin-2 were promising biomarkers for achalasia diagnosis and performed better in combination. Further multicenter studies are necessary to verify their application as preliminary screening tools for achalasia.
Topics: Humans; Esophageal Achalasia; Deglutition Disorders; Profilins; Esophagitis, Peptic; Retrospective Studies; Biomarkers; Galectins
PubMed: 37787436
DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000651 -
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 2024Reflux esophagitis is a condition characterized by inflammation and irritation of the esophagus, resulting from the backflow of stomach acid and other gastric contents...
PURPOSE
Reflux esophagitis is a condition characterized by inflammation and irritation of the esophagus, resulting from the backflow of stomach acid and other gastric contents into the esophagus. Columbianadin is a coumarin derivative that exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. In this study, we tried to scrutinize the protective effect of Columbianadin against acute reflux esophagitis in rats.
METHODS
RAW 264.7 cells were utilized to assess cell viability and measure the production of inflammatory parameters. The rats received anesthesia, and reflux esophagitis was induced via ligation of pylorus and fore stomach and corpus junction. Rats received the oral administration of Columbianadin (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) and omeprazole (20 mg/kg). The gastric secretion volume, acidity, and pH were measured. Additionally, the levels of oxidative stress parameters, cytokines, and inflammatory markers were determined. At the end of the study, mRNA expression was assessed.
RESULTS
Columbianadin remarkably suppressed the cell viability and production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and prostaglandin (PGE2). Columbianadin treatment remarkably suppressed the secretion of gastric volume, total acidity and enhanced the pH level in the stomach. Columbianadin remarkably altered the level of hydrogen peroxidase, free iron, calcium, and plasma scavenging activity, sulfhydryl group; oxidative stress parameters like malonaldehyde, glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase; inflammatory cytokines viz., TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; inflammatory parameters including PGE2, iNOS, COX-2, and nuclear kappa B factor (NF-κB). Columbianadin remarkably (P < 0.001) suppressed the mRNA expression TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.
CONCLUSIONS
Columbianadin demonstrated a protective effect against acute reflux esophagitis via NF-κB pathway.
Topics: Animals; Esophagitis, Peptic; NF-kappa B; Male; Rats; Oxidative Stress; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Cell Survival; Acute Disease; RAW 264.7 Cells; Mice; Rats, Wistar; Signal Transduction; Antioxidants; Anti-Inflammatory Agents
PubMed: 38716957
DOI: 10.1590/acb391824 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Feb 2024The symptoms of reflux in achalasia patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are believed to result from gastroesophageal reflux, and the current treatment...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The symptoms of reflux in achalasia patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are believed to result from gastroesophageal reflux, and the current treatment primarily focuses on acid suppression. Nevertheless, other factors such as nonreflux acidification caused by fermentation or stasis might play a role. This study aimed to identify patients with "true acid reflux" who actually require acid suppression and fundoplication.
METHODS
In this prospective large cohort study, the primary objective was to assess the incidence and risk factors for true acid reflux in achalasia patients undergoing POEM. Acid reflux with normal and delayed clearance defined true acid reflux, whereas other patterns were labeled as nonreflux acidification patterns on manual analysis of pH tracings. These findings were corroborated with a symptom questionnaire, esophagogastroscopy, esophageal manometry, and timed barium esophagogram at 3 months after the POEM procedure.
RESULTS
Fifty-four achalasia patients aged 18 to 80 years (mean age, 41.1 ± 12.8 years; 59.3% men; 90.7% with type II achalasia) underwent POEM, which resulted in a significant mean Eckardt score improvement (6.7 to 1.6, P < .05). True acid reflux was noted in 29.6% of patients as compared with 64.8% on automated analysis. Acid fermentation was the predominant acidification pattern seen in 42.7% of patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, increasing age (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.27; P = .04) and preprocedural integrated relaxation pressure (IRP; odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.30; P = .02) were significantly associated with true acid reflux in patients after undergoing POEM.
CONCLUSIONS
A manual review of pH tracings helps to identify true acid reflux in patients with achalasia after undergoing POEM. Preprocedural IRP can be a predictive factor in determining patients at risk for this outcome. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04951739.).
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Cohort Studies; Esophageal Achalasia; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Esophagitis, Peptic; Esophagoscopy; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Manometry; Myotomy; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Adolescent; Young Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 37598862
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.008 -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Jan 2024The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is continuously increasing worldwide. Current guidelines in China recommend average-risk individuals starting CRC...
BACKGROUND
The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is continuously increasing worldwide. Current guidelines in China recommend average-risk individuals starting CRC screening at age 50.
AIMS
To investigate the relationship between the gastric histopathology and colorectal neoplasms to identify CRC risk factors which potentially guide earlier colonoscopy in individuals aged < 50 years.
METHODS
A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 8819 patients younger than age 50 who underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy simultaneously between November 7, 2020 and November 14, 2022. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate whether various gastric histopathology are risk factors for different types of colorectal polyps, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 3390 cases (38.44%) under 50 years old were diagnosed as colorectal polyps. Advanced age (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.57-1.76), male sex (OR 2.67, 95%CI 2.33-3.08), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.24-1.65), gastric polyps (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.10-1.52), and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) (OR 2.52, 95%CI 1.39-4.57) were independent risk factors for colorectal adenomas. For non-adenomatous polyps, reflux esophagitis (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.11-1.71) was also an independent risk factor. Besides, older age (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.66-2.18), male sex (OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.60-2.87), and H. pylori infection (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.24-2.24) were associated with a higher risk of advanced neoplasms (advanced adenoma and CRC).
CONCLUSIONS
Earlier colonoscopy for identification and screening may need to be considered for individuals younger than 50 years old with H. pylori infection, LGIN, gastric polyps, and reflux esophagitis. Risk-adapted CRC screening initiation age allows a personalized and precise screening.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Colonic Polyps; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Esophagitis, Peptic; Colonoscopy; Risk Factors; Colorectal Neoplasms; Adenoma; Carcinoma in Situ; Early Detection of Cancer
PubMed: 37989896
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08158-y -
Surgical Endoscopy Mar 2024There is no optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. The valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy can reduce postoperative reflux esophagitis, but it is...
Safety and short-term outcomes of a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy versus gastric tube anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND
There is no optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. The valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy can reduce postoperative reflux esophagitis, but it is technically complex with a long operation time. The gastric tube anastomosis is technically simple, but the incidences of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture are higher.
METHODS
We have devised a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG), the arch-bridge anastomosis. After reviewing our prospectively maintained gastric cancer database, 43 patients who underwent LAPG from November 2021 to April 2023 were included in this cohort study, with 25 patients received the arch-bridge anastomosis and 18 patients received gastric tube anastomosis. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups to evaluate the efficacy of the arch-bridge anastomosis. Reporting was consistent with the STROCSS 2021 guideline.
RESULTS
The median operation time was 180 min in the arch-bridge group, significantly shorter than the gastric tube group (p = 0.003). In the arch-bridge group, none of the 25 patients experienced anastomotic leakage, while one patient (4%) experienced anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic balloon dilation. The postoperative length of stay was shorter in the arch-bridge group (9 vs. 11, p = 0.034). None of the patients in the arch-bridge group experienced gastroesophageal reflux and used proton pump inhibitor (PPI), while four (22.2%) patients in the gastric tube group used PPI (p = 0.025). The incidence of reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles grade B or more severe) by endoscopy was lower in the arch-bridge group (0% vs. 25.0%).
CONCLUSION
The arch-bridge anastomosis is a safe, time-saving, and feasible reconstruction method. It can reduce postoperative reflux and anastomotic stricture incidences in a selected cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy.
Topics: Humans; Esophagitis, Peptic; Cohort Studies; Retrospective Studies; Constriction, Pathologic; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Stomach Neoplasms; Anastomosis, Surgical; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38272976
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10663-0