-
Psychological Medicine Nov 2023Major depressive disorder (MDD) is clinically documented to co-occur with multiple gastrointestinal disorders (GID), but the potential causal relationship between them... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is clinically documented to co-occur with multiple gastrointestinal disorders (GID), but the potential causal relationship between them remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the potential causal relationship of MDD with 4 GID [gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)] using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design.
METHODS
We obtained genome-wide association data for MDD from a meta-analysis ( = 480 359), and for GID from the UK Biobank ( ranges: 332 601-486 601) and FinnGen ( ranges: 187 028-218 792) among individuals of European ancestry. Our primary method was inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR, with a series of sensitivity analyses to test the hypothesis of MR. Individual study estimates were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Meta-analyses IVW MR found evidence that genetically predicted MDD may increase the risk of GERD, IBS, PUD and NAFLD. Additionally, reverse MR found evidence of genetically predicted GERD or IBS may increase the risk of MDD.
CONCLUSIONS
Genetically predicted MDD may increase the risk of GERD, IBS, PUD and NAFLD. Genetically predicted GERD or IBS may increase the risk of MDD. The findings may help elucidate the mechanisms underlying the co-morbidity of MDD and GID. Focusing on GID symptoms in patients with MDD and emotional problems in patients with GID is important for the clinical management.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Depression; Genome-Wide Association Study; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 37183395
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291723000867 -
Lancet (London, England) Jun 2024Annual prevalence estimates of peptic ulcer disease range between 0·12% and 1·5%. Peptic ulcer disease is usually attributable to Helicobacter pylori infection, intake... (Review)
Review
Annual prevalence estimates of peptic ulcer disease range between 0·12% and 1·5%. Peptic ulcer disease is usually attributable to Helicobacter pylori infection, intake of some medications (such as aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications), or being critically ill (stress-related), or it can be idiopathic. The clinical presentation is usually uncomplicated, with peptic ulcer disease management based on eradicating H pylori if present, the use of acid-suppressing medications-most often proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)-or addressing complications, such as with early endoscopy and high-dose PPIs for peptic ulcer bleeding. Special considerations apply to patients on antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents. H pylori treatment has evolved, with the choice of regimen dictated by local antibiotic resistance patterns. Indications for primary and secondary prophylaxis vary across societies; most suggest PPIs for patients at highest risk of developing a peptic ulcer, its complications, or its recurrence. Additional research areas include the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers and H pylori vaccination; the optimal approach for patients at risk of stress ulcer bleeding requires more robust determinations of optimal patient selection and treatment selection, if any. Appropriate continuation of PPI use outweighs most possible side-effects if given for approved indications, while de-prescribing should be trialled when a definitive indication is no longer present.
PubMed: 38885678
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00155-7 -
The Surgical Clinics of North America Dec 2023Gastric and small bowel emergencies are often seen in the emergency department and require rapid assessment and intervention as patients can deteriorate quickly. Some of... (Review)
Review
Gastric and small bowel emergencies are often seen in the emergency department and require rapid assessment and intervention as patients can deteriorate quickly. Some of the more frequently seen gastric emergencies include gastric volvulus and peptic ulcer disease, which can present with ischemia, strangulation, perforation, or severe bleeding. Swift diagnosis is crucial to ensuring the proper management whether that is endoscopic or with surgical exploration. Perforated peptic ulcers that are not contained will require surgical intervention, whereas bleeding ulcers can often be controlled with endoscopic interventions.
Topics: Humans; Duodenal Ulcer; Emergencies; Peptic Ulcer Perforation; Intestine, Small
PubMed: 37838458
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.05.012 -
The Journal of the Association of... Aug 2023In the last 3 decades, omeprazole has proved its mettle in managing acid peptic diseases (APDs). It has established itself as the first line of therapy for duodenal and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In the last 3 decades, omeprazole has proved its mettle in managing acid peptic diseases (APDs). It has established itself as the first line of therapy for duodenal and gastric ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), ulcers due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES).
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this literature review is to assess the effectiveness of omeprazole as compared to the other proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) currently in use and its safety and efficacy in special populations, including the pediatric and geriatric populations.
RESULTS
Omeprazole was found to be the most effective PPI in the management of APDs due to its rapid action, good antioxidant effects, and effectiveness against nocturnal acid breakthroughs. Its safety and tolerance have been proved in various randomized controlled trials.
CONCLUSION
Omeprazole is the prototypical drug in the management of APDs and has withstood the test of time. After 3 decades, omeprazole remains the drug of choice in managing APD.
Topics: Humans; Child; Aged; Omeprazole; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Stomach Ulcer; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
PubMed: 37651247
DOI: 10.59556/japi.71.0322 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Dec 2023An association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and common psychiatric conditions, most notably anxiety and depression, has been reported. However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
An association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and common psychiatric conditions, most notably anxiety and depression, has been reported. However, the magnitude of this association is poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess this issue.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched multiple bibliographic databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to May 15, 2023. We retrieved observational studies that reported the prevalence of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms diagnosed by validated questionnaires in ≥100 adults (aged 18 years or older) with GERD. We also included cohort studies that explored the risk of incident GERD in subjects with anxiety/depression vice versa scenario. Finally, we included Mendelian randomization studies that assessed the cause-and-effect relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD. The extracted data were combined using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
In total, 36 eligible studies were included. The pooled prevalences of anxiety and depressive symptoms were 34.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7-44.2; I2 = 99.4%) and 24.2% (95% CI 19.9-28.5; I2 = 98.8%) in subjects with GERD based on 30 studies, respectively. Both anxiety and depressive symptoms were more common in subjects with GERD compared with those in healthy controls (odds ratio = 4.46 [95% CI 1.94-10.25] and odds ratio = 2.56 [95% CI 1.11-5.87], respectively). According to 3 cohort studies, subjects with GERD were at an increased risk of developing anxiety/depression and vice versa. Finally, 3 Mendelian randomization studies showed that genetic liability to these mood disorders is linked to an increased risk of developing GERD and vice versa.
DISCUSSION
Up to 1 in 3 subjects with GERD experience anxiety and depression. There is likely a bidirectional causal relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Depression; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Esophagitis, Peptic; Risk Factors; Anxiety
PubMed: 37463429
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002411