-
Cureus May 2024Phenytoin is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic medication for the prevention and treatment of tonic-clonic or partial seizures. Thrombocytopenia is a rare and serious...
Phenytoin is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic medication for the prevention and treatment of tonic-clonic or partial seizures. Thrombocytopenia is a rare and serious adverse effect of phenytoin. This case report presents the case of a patient with severe thrombocytopenia induced by phenytoin for the treatment of tonic-clonic seizures. A 63-year-old male received 300 mg/day of phenytoin for the treatment of tonic-clonic seizures. Seven days after receiving the first dose of phenytoin, he was diagnosed with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count 44 x 10/L) without hemorrhage. Phenytoin was discontinued, and seizures were controlled with levetiracetam. Seven days after stopping phenytoin, his daily platelet count improved from 44 to 177 x 10/L. The Naranjo algorithm score of 7 was at a probable level for phenytoin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia is a serious adverse drug reaction that can result in life-threatening bleeding. Phenytoin-induced thrombocytopenia commonly begins 1-90 days after administration, and the recovery time is 3-21 days. The potential mechanism of phenytoin-induced thrombocytopenia is drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia. Drugs that enhance the concentration of phenytoin epoxide may be a contributing factor in phenytoin-induced thrombocytopenia. Phenytoin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but serious hematological complication. It should be recognized early, particularly in patients with a high risk of hemorrhage or concurrently with medications that increase phenytoin epoxide. Regularly consecutive complete blood count tests may be essential in order to detect an early decrease in platelet count in these patients.
PubMed: 38899236
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60669 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. There are several options for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in neonates. However, the ideal choice of first-, second- and third-line ASM is still unclear. Further, many other aspects of seizure management such as whether ASMs should be initiated for only-electrographic seizures and how long to continue the ASM once seizure control is achieved are elusive.
OBJECTIVES
1. To assess whether any ASM is more or less effective than an alternative ASM (both ASMs used as first-, second- or third-line treatment) in achieving seizure control and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with seizures. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 2. To assess maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy after achieving seizure control. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 3. To assess treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos and three databases in May 2022 and June 2023. These searches were not limited other than by study design to trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included neonates with EEG-confirmed or clinically diagnosed seizures and compared (1) any ASM versus an alternative ASM, (2) maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy, and (3) treatment of clinical or EEG seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 18 trials (1342 infants) in this review. Phenobarbital versus levetiracetam as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) Phenobarbital is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after first loading dose (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63 to 3.30; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and after maximal loading dose (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.78 to 4.50; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital when compared to levetiracetam on mortality before discharge (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.52; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), requirement of mechanical ventilation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.91; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.44; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.76; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Phenobarbital versus phenytoin as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) We are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital versus phenytoin on achieving seizure control after maximal loading dose of ASM (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.72; 59 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy in clinically diagnosed neonatal seizures (two trials) We are uncertain about the effect of short-term maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy during the hospital stay (but discontinued before discharge) on the risk of repeat seizures before hospital discharge (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01; 373 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Maintenance therapy with ASM compared to no maintenance therapy may have little or no effect on mortality before discharge (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.22; 373 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.61; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.12; 108 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 14.72; 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates (two trials) Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation (MD -1871.16, 95% CI -4525.05 to 782.73; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality before discharge (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.27; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.73; 35 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. We report data from the most important comparisons here; readers are directed to Results and Summary of Findings tables for all comparisons.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Phenobarbital as a first-line ASM is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after the first loading dose and after the maximal loading dose of ASM (moderate-certainty evidence). Phenobarbital + bumetanide may have little or no difference in achieving seizure control when compared to phenobarbital alone (low-certainty evidence). Limited data and very low-certainty evidence preclude us from drawing any reasonable conclusion on the effect of using one ASM versus another on other short- and long-term outcomes. In neonates who achieve seizure control after the first loading dose of phenobarbital, maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance ASM may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before discharge, mortality by 18 to 24 months, neurodevelopmental disability by 18 to 24 months and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). In neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation, all-cause mortality before discharge and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). All findings of this review apply only to term and late preterm neonates. We need well-designed RCTs for each of the three objectives of this review to improve the precision of the results. These RCTs should use EEG to diagnose seizures and should be adequately powered to assess long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We need separate RCTs evaluating the choice of ASM in preterm infants.
Topics: Infant; Child; Infant, Newborn; Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Phenytoin; Levetiracetam; Epilepsy; Phenobarbital; Seizures
PubMed: 37873971
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014967.pub2 -
Regenerative Therapy Dec 2023We mainly studied the mechanism by which phenytoin promotes osteogenic differentiation of human jawbone marrow stem cells.
BACKGROUND
We mainly studied the mechanism by which phenytoin promotes osteogenic differentiation of human jawbone marrow stem cells.
METHODS
Bone marrow stem cells were extracted from jaw bone tissue debris obtained from 5 subjects undergoing implant restoration. Osteogenic and adipogenic experiments proved cells stemness, and the expression of ALP, RUNX2, and OSX were detected by qPCR and Western blot. High-throughput sequencing was used to extract differentially expressed genes, the network database predicted phenytoin drug targets, GO and KEGG enrichment combined with PPI network diagram to analyze the osteogenesis mechanism.
RESULTS
Calcium nodules and lipid droplet formation were observed in osteogenic and adipogenic experiments. The concentration of phenytoin within 100 mg/L does not produce cytotoxicity. The results of PCR and WB indicated that 50 mg/L phenytoin significantly promoted the expression of ALP and RUNX2, and 25 mg/L phenytoin significantly promoted the expression of OSX. The results of network pharmacology suggest that phenytoin promotes bone formation by up-regulating FGFR2, S1PR1, TGFB3, VCAN core proteins and activating PI3K/Akt pathway.
CONCLUSIONS
Phenytoin activated the PI3K/Akt pathway to regulate the osteogenic differentiation of human jawbone marrow stem cells. https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/t3xstktt93/1.
PubMed: 37448850
DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.06.015 -
Seminars in Neurology Jun 2024Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency that requires timely pharmacological therapy to cease seizure activity. The treatment approach varies based on the... (Review)
Review
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency that requires timely pharmacological therapy to cease seizure activity. The treatment approach varies based on the time and the treatment stage of SE. Benzodiazepines are considered the first-line therapy during the emergent treatment phase of SE. Antiseizure medicines such as phenytoin, valproic acid, and levetiracetam are recommended during the urgent treatment phase. These drugs appear to have a similar safety and efficacy profile, and individualized therapy should be chosen based on patient characteristics. Midazolam, propofol, pentobarbital, and ketamine are continuous intravenous infusions of anesthetic medications utilized in the refractory SE (RSE) period. The most efficacious pharmacotherapeutic treatments for RSE and superrefractory status epilepticus are not clearly defined.
Topics: Status Epilepticus; Humans; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 38580318
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785503 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Jul 2023Dyskinesia is a movement disorder categorized by involuntary movement of muscle. Although dyskinesia can be brought on by taking medications, it can also be a symptom of...
BACKGROUND
Dyskinesia is a movement disorder categorized by involuntary movement of muscle. Although dyskinesia can be brought on by taking medications, it can also be a symptom of a variety of diseases. Antiepileptic drug-induced involuntary movements have been well researched. Rare reports have been made for dyskinesia, a type of dystonia caused by phenytoin. The mechanism of its occurrence must be succinctly studied.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 53-year-old Asian patient taking phenytoin (100 mg twice daily) experienced symptoms of perioral muscle involuntary movement, impaired speech, and generalized tremors and was admitted to the hospital. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed significant development of encephalomalacia and porencephaly. The serum phenytoin levels were in the toxic range (33 g/ml). These were suggestive of phenytoin-induced dyskinesia. Levetiracetam and clonazepam were initiated, and the patient showed significant improvement in the symptoms.
CONCLUSION
This case presented a substantial reference value for the differential diagnosis and treatment prognosis of phenytoin-induced dyskinesia. The phenytoin-induced dyskinesia in this patient was successfully reversed with prompt identification and treatment. According to the case study's findings, such people may benefit from periodic therapeutic drug monitoring.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Anticonvulsants; Levetiracetam; Dystonia
PubMed: 37475012
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-023-04033-6 -
Skin Research and Technology : Official... Jun 2024Severe acne breakouts often lead to atrophic acne scars, which affect millions of people worldwide and can significantly affect a person's self-confidence and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical phenytoin and microneedling with microneedling alone in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A controlled blinded randomized clinical trial.
INTRODUCTION
Severe acne breakouts often lead to atrophic acne scars, which affect millions of people worldwide and can significantly affect a person's self-confidence and self-image. Given the difficulty in treating atrophic acne scars, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of topical phenytoin in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.
METHOD
This split face clinical trial on 25 patients between the ages of 18 and 40 involved the application of microneedling on one side of the face, with three sessions taking place over the course of a month. On the other side, a 1% phenytoin cream was administered three times daily for 1 week following the microneedling procedure. Baseline information was collected for all patients, and follow-up assessments were conducted during the treatment sessions and 2 months after the last session. The assessments included evaluating the number and area of pores and spots, determining scar severity, assessing patient satisfaction, and recording any potential complications.
RESULTS
Among patients, 20 individuals (80%) were females, and the average age of the participants was 35.96 ± 9.23. In terms of the fine pore area, despite the fine pore count, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.03 vs. 0.06). Also, regarding large pore count and area, and the count and area of spots, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). On the other hand, when it comes to acne scar grade and patients' satisfaction, the phenytoin group outperformed the control group in all follow-up sessions and this difference was found to be significant (p: 0.001). It is worth noting that no complications were observed among any of the patients.
CONCLUSION
It appears that combining phenytoin cream with microneedling has a more effective therapeutic outcome in enhancing atrophic acne scars, when compared to microneedling alone, and this method can be regarded as a viable alternative in treating these types of scars.
Topics: Humans; Female; Phenytoin; Adult; Acne Vulgaris; Male; Cicatrix; Young Adult; Needles; Adolescent; Treatment Outcome; Patient Satisfaction; Administration, Cutaneous; Combined Modality Therapy; Atrophy; Administration, Topical; Percutaneous Collagen Induction
PubMed: 38807440
DOI: 10.1111/srt.13766 -
Neurology Apr 2024To undertake a systematic review of the available literature to examine the relationship between prenatal antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure and adverse postnatal...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
To undertake a systematic review of the available literature to examine the relationship between prenatal antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure and adverse postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes, focusing on social, emotional, behavioral, and adaptive domains of human function, and the frequency of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in ASM-exposed offspring.
METHODS
Electronic searches of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and EMBASE were conducted and limited to studies published between 1990 and 2023 in English. Studies were eligible if they prospectively or retrospectively reported neurodevelopmental outcomes of ASM-exposed offspring. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to conduct methodologic quality assessments of included studies, and a narrative synthesis integrated the review findings.
RESULTS
Forty-three studies were included. Valproate has been consistently associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 2- to 5-fold increased risk of intellectual disability (ID), and poor adaptive functioning. Growing evidence indicates that topiramate is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of ASD and 3- to 4-fold increased risk of ID. The risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes for valproate and topiramate seem to be dose dependent. Phenobarbital has been suggested to be associated with deleterious neurodevelopmental effects, but data are limited. Levetiracetam has recently been linked with an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders in a single study. Carbamazepine has been associated with variable neurodevelopmental outcomes. Lamotrigine seems to be "safe" in terms of postnatal neurodevelopment. Data for oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, and clonazepam are limited but seem to have little-to-no risk of adverse outcomes. Evidence for the remaining ASMs, including gabapentin, pregabalin, lacosamide, zonisamide, clobazam, perampanel, ethosuximide, or brivaracetam, is lacking. Several methodologic limitations impeded data synthesis, including heterogeneity in outcome measures and small samples of monotherapy exposures.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this review support the conclusion that valproate and topiramate use during pregnancy is associated with a significantly increased risk of neurodevelopmental effects on the fetus. Apart from lamotrigine, which seems to be free of adverse neurodevelopmental effects, data for the other ASMs are mixed or inadequate to draw definite conclusions. Further research into the neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to ASMs, including most newer agents, is much needed.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Valproic Acid; Lamotrigine; Topiramate; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Retrospective Studies; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 38531021
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209175 -
CNS Drugs Mar 2024Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain,... (Review)
Review
Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain, Lhermitte's phenomenon, trigeminal neuralgia, and mixed pain. Neuropathic pain is a major concern for individuals with multiple sclerosis as it is directly linked to myelin damage in the central nervous system and the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis is challenging as the options available have limited efficacy and can cause unpleasant side effects. The literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies employed in the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacological options include cannabinoids, muscle relaxants (tizanidine, baclofen, dantrolene), anticonvulsants (benzodiazepines, gabapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine), antidepressants (duloxetine, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants), opioids (naltrexone), and botulinum toxin variants, which have evidence from various clinical trials. Non-pharmacological approaches for trigeminal neuralgia may include neurosurgical methods. Non-invasive methods, physical therapy, and psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction) may be recommended for patients with neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. The choice of treatment depends on the severity and type of pain as well as other factors, such as patient preferences and comorbidities. There is a pressing need for healthcare professionals and researchers to prioritize the development of better strategies for managing multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; Neuralgia; Antidepressive Agents; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 38421578
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01072-5 -
Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) Jun 2024Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option.
ESSENTIAL POINTS
As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.
Topics: Humans; Status Epilepticus; Anticonvulsants; Male; Female; Disease Management; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 38830068
DOI: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001445 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Jun 2024Systemic antifungal therapy is critical for reducing the mortality from many invasive and chronic fungal infections. Triazole antifungals are the most frequently... (Review)
Review
Systemic antifungal therapy is critical for reducing the mortality from many invasive and chronic fungal infections. Triazole antifungals are the most frequently prescribed antifungals but require attention to dosing and drug interactions. Nearly 600 severe drug-drug interactions and over 1100 moderate interactions requiring dose modifications are described or anticipated with systemic antifungal agents (see https://www.aspergillus.org.uk/antifungal-drug-interactions/). In this article, we address the common and less common, but serious, drug interactions observed in clinical practice with triazole antifungals, including a group of drugs that cannot be prescribed with all or most triazole antifungals (ivabradine, ranolazine, eplerenone, fentanyl, apomorphine, quetiapine, bedaquiline, rifampicin, rifabutin, sirolimus, phenytoin and carbamazepine). We highlight interactions with drugs used in children and new agents introduced for the treatment of haematological malignancies or graft versus host disease (midostaurin, ibrutinib, ruxolitinib and venetoclax). We also summarize the multiple interactions between oral and inhaled corticosteroids and triazole antifungals, and the strategies needed to optimize the therapeutic benefits of triazole antifungal therapy while minimizing potential harm to patients.
Topics: Drug Interactions; Humans; Antifungal Agents; Triazoles; Mycoses; Adrenal Cortex Hormones
PubMed: 38629250
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae103