-
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Sep 2023In the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with obesity (STEP) trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg plus lifestyle intervention reduced body weight and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
In the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with obesity (STEP) trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg plus lifestyle intervention reduced body weight and improved cardiometabolic parameters in adults with obesity (or overweight with weight-related comorbidities). Effects on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) require investigation.
METHODS
STEP 1 (68 weeks) and 5 (104 weeks) randomized participants to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo. STEP 4 included a 20-week semaglutide run-in followed by randomization to 48 weeks of continued semaglutide or withdrawal (placebo). Ten-year T2D risk scores were calculated post hoc using Cardiometabolic Disease Staging.
RESULTS
In STEP 1 (N = 1583), relative risk score reductions were greater with semaglutide versus placebo (semaglutide: -61.1%; placebo: -12.9%; p < 0.0001). These reductions were maintained to week 104 in STEP 5 (N = 295; semaglutide: -60.0%; placebo: 3.5%; p < 0.0001). Risk scores during the STEP 4 run-in period (N = 776) were reduced from 20.6% to 11.1% and further to 7.7% at week 68 with continued semaglutide, increasing to 15.4% with withdrawal (relative risk score change: semaglutide: -32.1%; placebo: +40.6%; p < 0.0001). Risk score reductions mirrored weight loss.
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiometabolic Disease Staging risk assessment suggests that once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg may substantially lower 10-year T2D risk in people with overweight or obesity.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Obesity; Overweight
PubMed: 37605636
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23842 -
Sleep Jul 2023Although recent investigations combining noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs have shown promising short-term results to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
STUDY OBJECTIVES
Although recent investigations combining noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs have shown promising short-term results to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the mid-term effect and optimal dosage remain uncertain. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of 1 week of 5 mg oxybutynin and 6 mg reboxetine (oxy-reb) on OSA versus placebo.
METHODS
We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing the effect of 1 week of oxy-reb versus 1 week of placebo on OSA severity. At-home polysomnography was performed at baseline and after each week of intervention.
RESULTS
Fifteen participants (male 66.7%) aged 59 [44-62] years (median [interquartile range]) with a mean body mass index of 33.1 ± 6.6 kg/m2 were included. No significant difference in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was observed between conditions (estimated marginal means [95% confidence interval] at baseline: 39.7 [28.5-55.3]; oxy-reb: 34.5 [22.7-52.3]; placebo: 37.9 [27.1-52.9]; p = 0.652), but oxy-reb improved average oxygen desaturation (p = 0.016) and hypoxic burden (p = 0.011) and lowered sleep efficiency (p = 0.019) and rapid eye movement sleep (p = 0.002). Moreover, participants reported reduced sleep quality during the week of oxy-reb compared to the week of placebo (4.7 [3.5; 5.9] vs. 6.5 [5.5; 7.5] on a 0-10 visual analogic scale, respectively; p = 0.001). No significant differences in sleepiness, vigilance, and fatigue were observed. No serious adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS
Administration of oxybutynin 5 mg and reboxetine 6 mg did not improve OSA severity assessed by AHI, but did alter sleep architecture and sleep quality. Reduced average oxygen desaturation and hypoxic burden were also observed.
CLINICAL TRIAL
ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04394143.
Topics: Humans; Male; Reboxetine; Cross-Over Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Oxygen; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 36861433
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad051 -
Nature Reviews. Rheumatology Oct 2023Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis worldwide, affecting ~500 million people, yet there are no effective treatments to halt its progression. Without... (Review)
Review
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis worldwide, affecting ~500 million people, yet there are no effective treatments to halt its progression. Without any structure-modifying agents, management of OA focuses on ameliorating pain and improving function. Treatment approaches typically have modest efficacy, and many patients have contraindications to recommended pharmacological treatments. Drug development for OA is hindered by the gradual and progressive nature of the disease and the targeting of established disease in clinical trials. Additionally, new medications for OA cannot receive regulatory approval without demonstrating improvements in both structure (pathological features of OA) and symptoms (reduced pain and/or improved function). In clinical trials, people with OA show high 'placebo responses', which hamper the ability to identify new effective treatments. Placebo responses refer to the individual variability in response to placebos given in the context of clinical trials and other settings. Placebo effects refer specifically to short-lasting improvements in symptoms that occur because of physiological changes. To mitigate the effects of the placebo phenomenon, we must first understand what it is, how it manifests, how to identify placebo responders in OA trials and how these insights can be used to improve clinical trials in OA. Leveraging placebo responses and effects in clinical practice might provide additional avenues to augment symptom management of OA.
Topics: Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Placebo Effect; Pain; Treatment Outcome; Drug Development
PubMed: 37697077
DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-01021-4 -
Journal of Cardiac Failure Dec 2023Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is associated with polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, or both. The effects of eplontersen on cardiac structure and function...
BACKGROUND
Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is associated with polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, or both. The effects of eplontersen on cardiac structure and function were assessed.
METHODS AND RESULTS
NEURO-TTRansform was an open-label trial involving 144 adults with ATTRv polyneuropathy (49 patients [34%] with cardiomyopathy) receiving eplontersen throughout and compared with a historical placebo group (n = 60; 30 patients [50%] with cardiomyopathy) from the NEURO-TTR trial at week 65. Treatment effect (eplontersen vs placebo), presented as mean difference (95% confidence interval) was analyzed after adjusting for age, sex, region, baseline value, ATTRv disease stage, previous ATTRv treatment, and V30M transthyretin variant. There were notable differences at baseline between the eplontersen group and historical placebo. In the cardiomyopathy subgroup, 65 weeks of eplontersen treatment was associated with improvement from baseline relative to placebo in left ventricular ejection fraction of 4.3% (95% confidence interval 1.40-21.01; P = .049) and stroke volume 10.64 mL (95% confidence interval 3.99-17.29; P = .002) while the remainder of echocardiographic parameters remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS
Eplontersen was associated with stable or improved measures of cardiac structure and function vs historical placebo in patients with ATTRv polyneuropathy and cardiomyopathy. Further investigation into eplontersen's effect on transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is being conducted in the CARDIO-TTRansform trial.
PubMed: 38065307
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.11.016 -
Cephalalgia : An International Journal... Dec 2023Treatments in medicine impact individuals beyond their intended effects, due to phenomena such as the placebo and nocebo effects. The placebo effect arises from the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Treatments in medicine impact individuals beyond their intended effects, due to phenomena such as the placebo and nocebo effects. The placebo effect arises from the positive expectation of a treatment being beneficial, while the nocebo effect stems from the negative expectation of a treatment causing harm. Both in real-world practice and clinical trials, treatments can lead to outcomes unrelated to their intended mechanism of action, which we categorize as placebo and nocebo responses. These responses, combined with the inherent fluctuation in a condition's natural progression, regression to the mean, and random comorbidities, make up a significant part of the therapeutic experience. Particularly in pain management, placebo and nocebo effects play a substantial role. By addressing modifiable contextual factors such as patient expectations, lifestyle choices, and the therapeutic relationship, healthcare providers can enhance the effectiveness of migraine treatments, paving the way for a more comprehensive, individualized approach to patient care. We must also consider non-modifiable factors like personal experiences, beliefs, and information from social media and the internet.
CONCLUSION
This review offers a summary of our current understanding of the placebo and nocebo effects in migraine management.
Topics: Humans; Nocebo Effect; Migraine Disorders; Placebo Effect; Pain Management
PubMed: 38041833
DOI: 10.1177/03331024231218392 -
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue... Jul 2023Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a major mental health condition with a lifetime prevalence rate of 1.3% among adults. While placebo effects are well described for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a major mental health condition with a lifetime prevalence rate of 1.3% among adults. While placebo effects are well described for conditions such as depressive and anxiety disorders, they have not been systematically characterized in OCD.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to determine the impact of placebos in improving different symptom domains in patients with OCD.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases/search engine from inception to January 2021 for randomized controlled trials of treatments for OCD with a placebo arm. A modified Cohen's effect size (ES) was calculated using change in baseline to endpoint scores for different measurement scales within placebo arms to estimate placebo effects and to investigate their correlates by random-effects model meta-analyses.
RESULTS
Forty-nine clinical trials (placebo group = 1993), reporting 80 OCD specific (153 measures in general) were included in the analysis. Overall placebo ES (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.32 (0.22-0.41) on OCD symptoms, with substantial heterogeneity (I-square = 96.1%). Among secondary outcomes, general scales, ES: 0.27 (95%CI: 0.14-0.41), demonstrated higher ES than anxiety and depression scales, ES: 0.14 (95%CI: -0.4 to 0.32) and 0.05 (95%CI: -0.05 to 0.14), respectively. Clinician-rated scales, ES: 0.27(95%CI: 0.20-0.34), had a higher ES than self-reported scales, ES: 0.07 (95%CI: -0.08 to 0.22). More recent publication year, larger placebo group sample size, shorter follow-up duration, and younger age of participants were all associated with larger placebo ES. Egger's test reflected possible small-study effect publication bias ( = 0.029).
CONCLUSION
Placebo effects are modest in OCD trials and are larger in clinician ratings, for younger patients, and early in the treatment course. These findings underscore the need for clinicians and scientists to be mindful of placebo effects when formulating treatments or research trials for OCD.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42019125979.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Placebo Effect; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Anxiety Disorders
PubMed: 35876317
DOI: 10.1177/07067437221115029 -
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Sep 2023
Topics: Humans; Crohn Disease; Remission Induction; Placebo Effect
PubMed: 36426807
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac240 -
JCI Insight Nov 2023BACKGROUNDAlcohol use disorder has a detrimental impact on global health and new treatment targets are needed. Preclinical studies show attenuating effects of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUNDAlcohol use disorder has a detrimental impact on global health and new treatment targets are needed. Preclinical studies show attenuating effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists on addiction-related behaviors in rodents and nonhuman primates. Some trials have shown an effect of GLP-1 agonism on reward processes in humans; however, results from clinical studies remain inconclusive.METHODSThis is a predefined secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the GLP-1 agonist dulaglutide as a therapy for smoking cessation. The main objective was to assess differences in alcohol consumption after 12 weeks of treatment with dulaglutide compared to placebo. The effect of dulaglutide on alcohol consumption was analyzed using a multivariable generalized linear model.RESULTSIn the primary analysis, participants out of the cohort (n = 255) who reported drinking alcohol at baseline and who completed 12 weeks of treatment (n = 151; placebo n = 75, dulaglutide n = 76) were included. The median age was 42 (IQR 33-53) with 61% (n = 92) females. At week 12, participants receiving dulaglutide drank 29% less (relative effect = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97, P = 0.04) than participants receiving placebo. Changes in alcohol consumption were not correlated with smoking status at week 12.CONCLUSIONThese results provide evidence that dulaglutide reduces alcohol intake in humans and contribute to the growing body of literature promoting the use of GLP-1 agonists in treatment of substance use disorders.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03204396.FUNDINGSwiss National Foundation, Gottfried Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, Hemmi Foundation, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Swiss Academy of Medical Science.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Alcohol Drinking; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Hypoglycemic Agents; Smoking Cessation; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37991022
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.170419 -
Complementary Therapies in Clinical... Nov 2023To understand the placebo response of acupuncture and its effect on migraine and optimize the design of future acupuncture clinical trials on migraine treatment. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To understand the placebo response of acupuncture and its effect on migraine and optimize the design of future acupuncture clinical trials on migraine treatment.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials with sham acupuncture as a control in migraine treatment were searched in four English databases from inception to September 1, 2022. The primary outcome was placebo response rate. Secondary outcomes were migraine symptoms, emotional condition, and quality of life. Factors associated with placebo response were also explored. Results were combined using risk difference (RD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with a random effects model.
RESULTS
The final analysis included 21 studies involving 1177 patients. The pooled response rate of sham acupuncture was 0.34 (RD, 95% CI 0.23-0.45, I 89.8%). The results (SMD [95% CI]) showed significant improvements in migraine symptoms (pain intensity -0.56 [-0.73 to -0.38], and episode conditions -0.55 [-0.75 to -0.35]); emotional condition (anxiety scale -0.49 [-0.90 to -0.08] and depression scale -0.21 [-0.40 to -0.03]); and quality of life on the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (restrictive 0.78 [0.61-0.95]; preventive 0.52 [0.35-0.68]; and emotional 0.45 [0.28-0.62]) and on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (physical 0.48 [0.34-0.62] and mental 0.21 [0.02-0.41]). Only acupuncture treatment frequency had a significant impact on the placebo response rate (RD 0.49 vs. 0.14; p = 0.00).
CONCLUSIONS
The effect sizes for placebo response of sham acupuncture varied across migraine treatment trials. Further studies should routinely consider adjusting for a more complete set of treatment factors.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Acupuncture Therapy; Migraine Disorders; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Placebo Effect; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37793307
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101800 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Apr 2024To quantify the placebo effect in randomized clinical trials treating tinnitus with oral or intratympanic placebo treatment. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To quantify the placebo effect in randomized clinical trials treating tinnitus with oral or intratympanic placebo treatment.
DATA SOURCES
CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for articles from conception to October 2022. MESH and key terms such as "tinnitus," "placebo," and "medication" were used to find randomized, placebo-controlled trials. The search was limited to articles in English.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials with adult subjects evaluating tinnitus pretreatment and posttreatment with an oral or intratympanic medication versus a placebo arm were included. Crossover studies, studies involving middle/inner ear operations or devices, and studies that exclusively included nonidiopathic etiologies of tinnitus were excluded. Mean tinnitus symptom survey scores for the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Severity Index, Tinnitus Functional Index, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scales for tinnitus Intensity/Loudness (VAS-L), Annoyance (VAS-An), and Awareness (VAS-Aw) were extracted for both placebo and experimental groups.
RESULTS
953 studies were screened with 23 studies being included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis of mean difference (MD) was calculated using RevMan 5.4. MD between pretreatment and posttreatment THI scores of the placebo arms was 5.6 (95% confidence interval, 3.3-8.0; p < 0.001). MD between pretreatment and posttreatment VAS scores of the placebo groups for Loudness, Annoyance, and Awareness were 0.8 (0.0 to 1.6, p = 0.05), 0.2 (-0.2 to 0.5, p = 0.34), and 0.3 (-0.0 to 0.7, p = 0.08), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Placebo treatment has shown effectiveness in improving patient-reported evaluations of tinnitus when using some standardized metrics such as THI and VAS-L; however, the improvement is not as substantial as nonplacebo treatment.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Tinnitus; Placebo Effect; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 38361332
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004139