-
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Oct 2023Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC. We hypothesized that SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases would...
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC. We hypothesized that SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases would achieve high rates of local control with acceptable toxicity and that patients with oligometastatic disease may achieve prolonged survival following SBRT.
MATERIALS/METHODS
This retrospective review included consecutive patients at our institution treated with SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated using a competing risks framework.
RESULTS
We identified 66 patients treated to 95 pulmonary metastases with SBRT. The median follow-up from the time of SBRT was 36 months (95% CI 34 - 53 months). The cumulative incidence of LF at 12 and 24 months was 3.1% (95% CI 0.9 - 10.6%) and 7.4% (95% CI 4.0% - 13.9%), respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival was 74% (95% CI 64 - 86%) and 49% (38 - 63%), respectively. Oligometastatic disease, intrathoracic only disease, and performance status were associated with improved survival on univariable analysis. Three patients had grade 2 pneumonitis, and one patient had grade 2 esophagitis. No patients had ≥ grade 3+ toxicities.
CONCLUSION
To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients treated with SBRT for pulmonary sarcoma metastases. We observed that SBRT offers an effective alternative to surgical resection with excellent local control and low proportions of toxicity.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Radiosurgery; Lung Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma
PubMed: 37532104
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109824 -
Stroke Aug 2023Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are...
BACKGROUND
Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation.
METHODS
This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome.
RESULTS
The cohort comprised 505 patients (254 [50.3%] males; median [interquartile range] age, 34 [15] years) from 14 centers. The median clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was 52 (interquartile range, 61) and 47 (interquartile range, 52) months, respectively. At last follow-up, favorable outcome was achieved by 268 (53.1%) patients (5-year probability, 50% [95% CI, 45%-55%]) and obliteration by 300 (59.4%) patients (5-year probability, 56% [95% CI, 51%-61%]). Twenty-eight patients (5.6%) experienced post-SRS hemorrhage with an annual incidence rate of 1.38 per 100 patient-years. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes were evident in 28 (5.6%) patients, with most occurring in the first 3 years. Larger nidus volumes (between 2 and 4 cm, subdistribution hazard, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]; =0.005; >4 cm, subdistribution hazard, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.7]; <0.001) and brainstem/basal ganglia involvement (subdistribution hazard, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.45-0.81]; <0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Female; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies; Radiosurgery; Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations
PubMed: 37350270
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042515 -
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Dec 2023The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score has the best accuracy among prognostic scales for patients with brain metastases (BM). A wide range of GPA-derived scales... (Review)
Review
The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score has the best accuracy among prognostic scales for patients with brain metastases (BM). A wide range of GPA-derived scales have been established to different types of primary tumor BM. However, there is a high variability between them, and their characteristics have not been described altogether yet. We aim to summarize the features of the existent GPA-derived scales and to compare their predictor factors and their uses in clinical setting. Medline was searched from inception until January 2023 to identify studies related to the development, update, or validation of GPA. The initial search yielded 1,083 results. 16 original studies and 16 validation studies were included, comprising a total of 33,348 patients. 13 different scales were assessed, including: GPA, Diagnosis-Specific GPA, Extracranial Score, Lung-molGPA, Updated Renal GPA, Updated Gastrointestinal GPA, Modified Breast GPA, Integrated Melanoma GPA, Melanoma Mol GPA, Sarcoma GPA, Hepatocellular Carcinoma GPA, Colorectal Cancer GPA, and Uterine Cancer GPA. The most prevalent prognostic predictors were age, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of BM, and presence or absence of extracranial metastases. Treatment modalities consisted of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, cranial radiotherapy, gamma knife radiosurgery, and BRAF inhibitor therapy. Median survival rates with no treatment and with a specific treatment ranged from 6.1 weeks to 33 months and from 3.1 to 21 months, respectively. Original GPA and GPA-derived scales are valid prognostic tools, but with heterogeneous survival results when compared to each other. More studies are needed to improve scientific evidence of these scales.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Melanoma; Karnofsky Performance Status; Combined Modality Therapy; Brain Neoplasms; Radiosurgery
PubMed: 37819546
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10237-3 -
Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic... Jul 2023Radiation therapy (RT) is a clinical modality treatment that uses ionizing radiation in the approach of malignant tumors, (and occasionally benign diseases). Since its... (Review)
Review
Radiation therapy (RT) is a clinical modality treatment that uses ionizing radiation in the approach of malignant tumors, (and occasionally benign diseases). Since its inception, the goal of RT has been to cure cancer without excessive side effects. The most important factors affecting the results of RT are the tumor histology, its location and regional extent, the anatomic area of involvement and the geometric accuracy with which a calculated radiation dose is delivered. Radiotherapy is one of the basic treatment modalities in thoracic malignancies and is used across all histology types and stages. Technical developments of radiotherapy have further strengthened and redefined its place in the management of lung cancer. High precision intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), coupled with management of tumor motion and on-board imaging, increased efficacy and markedly decreased treatment-related toxicity. With this brief review, the authors pretend to present basic concepts and recent techniques advances in the use of radiation therapy for thoracic malignancies.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
PubMed: 37418765
DOI: 10.48729/pjctvs.355 -
Epilepsy Research Dec 2023Several surgical options are available for treating hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy but their respective efficacy and safety profiles are poorly defined. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Several surgical options are available for treating hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy but their respective efficacy and safety profiles are poorly defined.
METHODS
A literature search identified English-language articles reporting series of patients (minimum 3 patients with a follow-up ≥12 months) operated on by either microsurgery, endoscopic surgery, radiosurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation or laser interstitial thermal therapy for hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy. The unit of analysis was each selected study. Pooled rates of seizure freedom and of neurological and endocrinological complications were analyzed using meta-analysis to calculate both fixed and random effects. The results of meta-analyses were compared.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included. There were 568 and 514 participants for seizure outcome and complication analyses, respectively. The pairwise comparison showed that: i) the proportion of seizure-free cases was significantly lower for radiosurgery as compared to microsurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation, and significantly lower for endoscopic surgery as compared to radiofrequency thermocoagulation; ii) the proportion of permanent hypothalamic dysfunction was significantly higher for microsurgery as compared to all other techniques, and significantly lower for endoscopic surgery as compared to radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation; iii) the incidence of permanent neurological disorders was significantly higher for microsurgery as compared to endoscopic surgery, radiosurgery and radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and significantly lower for radiosurgery as compared to laser ablation.
CONCLUSIONS
Minimally invasive surgical techniques, including endoscopic surgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation and laser ablation, represent an acceptable compromise between efficacy and safety in the treatment of hypothalamic hamartoma-related epilepsy. Microsurgery and radiosurgery should be considered in carefully selected cases.
Topics: Humans; Epilepsy; Hypothalamic Diseases; Hamartoma; Seizures; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 38006630
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107261 -
BMC Cancer Oct 2023Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. Concerns include an increasing number of brain metastases being associated with poor survival, the lack of prospective, randomised data and an increased risk of toxicity.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall survival of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery as primary therapy. The search strings were applied to MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Log hazard ratios and standard errors were estimated from each included study. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was applied using the derived log hazard ratios and standard errors on studies which included a control group.
RESULTS
15 studies were included for systematic review. 12 studies were used for pooled analysis for overall survival at set time points, with a predicted 12 month survival of 20-40%. The random-effects meta-analysis in five studies of overall survival comparing ten or greater metastases against control showed statistically worse overall survival in the 10 + metastases group (1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18, p-value = < 0.01, I = 6%). A funnel plot showed no evidence of bias. There was insufficient information for a meta-analysis of toxicity.
DISCUSSION
Overall survival outcomes of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with SRS is acceptable and should not be a deterrent for its use. There is a lack of prospective data and insufficient real-world data to draw conclusions on toxicity.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42021246115.
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Cranial Irradiation; Brain Neoplasms; Combined Modality Therapy; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37858075
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11452-7 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Oct 2023Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with primary or secondary lung malignancies represents an appealing definitive approach, but its...
BACKGROUND
Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with primary or secondary lung malignancies represents an appealing definitive approach, but its feasibility and safety are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) and toxicity for patients receiving reirradiation with SBRT.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Eligible patients with recurrence of primary or secondary lung malignancies from our hospital were subjected to reirradiation with SBRT, and PubMed- and Embase-indexed articles were reviewed. The patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric details, local tumor control, and toxicities were extracted. The logistic dose-response models were compared for TCP and overall survival (OS) in terms of the physical dose and three-, four-, and five-fraction equivalent doses.
RESULTS
The data of 17 patients from our hospital and 195 patients extracted from 12 articles were summarized. Reirradiation with SBRT yielded 2-year estimates of 80% TCP for doses of 50.10 Gy, 55.85 Gy, and 60.54 Gy in three, four, and five fractions, respectively. The estimated TCP with common fractionation schemes were 50%, 60%, and 70% for 42.04 Gy, 47.44 Gy, and 53.32 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the 2-year estimated OS was 50%, 60%, and 70% for 41.62 Gy, 46.88 Gy, and 52.55 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Central tumor localization may be associated with severe toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
Reirradiation with SBRT doses of 50-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions is feasible for appropriately selected patients with recurrence of peripheral primary or secondary lung malignancies, but should be carefully considered for centrally-located tumors due to potentially severe toxicity. Further studies are warranted for optimal dose/fractionation schedules and more accurate selection of patients suitable for reirradiation with SBRT.
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Re-Irradiation; Lung Neoplasms; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Probability; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 37480993
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109817 -
Neurosurgery Jan 2024Median survival for all patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBMs) has increased in the era of targeted therapy (TT) and with improved local control of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Median survival for all patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBMs) has increased in the era of targeted therapy (TT) and with improved local control of intracranial tumors using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and surgical resection. However, detailed characterization of the patients with long-term survival in the past 5 years remains sparse. The aim of this article is to characterize patients with BCBM who achieved long-term survival and identify factors associated with the uniquely better outcomes and to find predictors of mortality for patients with BCBM.
METHODS
We reviewed 190 patients with breast cancer with 931 brain tumors receiving SRS who were followed at our institution with prospective data collection between 2012 and 2022. We analyzed clinical, molecular, and imaging data to assess relationship to outcomes and tumor control.
RESULTS
The median overall survival from initial SRS and from breast cancer diagnosis was 25 months (95% CI 19-31 months) and 130 months (95% CI 100-160 months), respectively. Sixteen patients (17%) achieved long-term survival (survival ≥5 years from SRS), 9 of whom are still alive. Predictors of long-term survival included HER2+ status ( P = .041) and treatment with TT ( P = .046). A limited number of patients (11%) died of central nervous system (CNS) causes. A predictor of CNS-related death was the development of leptomeningeal disease after SRS ( P = .025), whereas predictors of non-CNS death included extracranial metastases at first SRS ( P = .017), triple-negative breast cancer ( P = .002), a Karnofsky Performance Status of <80 at first SRS ( P = .002), and active systemic disease at last follow-up ( P = .001). Only 13% of patients eventually needed whole brain radiotherapy. Among the long-term survivors, none died of CNS progression.
CONCLUSION
Patients with BCBM can achieve long-term survival. The use of TT and HER2+ disease are associated with long-term survival. The primary cause of death was extracranial disease progression, and none of the patients living ≥5 years died of CNS-related disease.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Central Nervous System; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37581437
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002640 -
BMC Cancer Sep 2023Ultra-hypofractionated regimens for definitive prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy are increasingly utilized due in part to promising safety and efficacy data... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Ultra-hypofractionated regimens for definitive prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy are increasingly utilized due in part to promising safety and efficacy data complemented by greater patient convenience from a treatment course requiring fewer sessions. As such, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is rapidly emerging as a standard definitive treatment option for patients with localized PCa. The commercially available magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-LINAC) integrates MR imaging with radiation delivery, providing several theoretical advantages compared to computed tomography (CT)-guided radiotherapy. MR-LINAC technology facilitates improved visualization of the prostate, real-time intrafraction tracking of prostate and organs-at-risk (OAR), and online adaptive planning to account for target movement and anatomical changes. These features enable reduced treatment volume margins and improved sparing of surrounding OAR. The theoretical advantages of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) have recently been shown to significantly reduce rates of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities as reported in the prospective randomized phase III MIRAGE trial, which compared MR-LINAC vs CT-based 5 fraction SBRT in patients with localized PCa (Kishan et al. JAMA Oncol 9:365-373, 2023). Thus, MR-LINAC SBRT-utilizing potentially fewer treatments-is warranted and clinically relevant for men with low or intermediate risk PCa electing for radiotherapy as definitive treatment.
METHODS/DESIGN
A total of 136 men with treatment naïve low or intermediate risk PCa will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 5 or 2 fractions of MR-guided SBRT using permuted block randomization. Randomization is stratified by baseline Expanded PCa Index Composite (EPIC) bowel and urinary domain scores. Patients undergoing 5 fractions will receive 37.5 Gy to the prostate over 10-14 days and patients undergoing 2 fractions will receive 25 Gy to the prostate over 7-10 days. The co-primary endpoints are GI and GU toxicities as measured by change scores in the bowel and urinary EPIC domains, respectively. The change scores will be calculated as pre-treatment (baseline) score subtracted from the 2-year score.
DISCUSSION
FORT is an international, multi-institutional prospective randomized phase II trial evaluating whether MR-guided SBRT delivered in 2 fractions versus 5 fractions is non-inferior from a gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity standpoint at 2 years post-treatment in men with low or intermediate risk PCa.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04984343 . Date of registration: July 30, 2021.
PROTOCOL VERSION
4.0, Nov 8, 2022.
Topics: Male; Humans; Radiosurgery; Prostate; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostate-Specific Antigen
PubMed: 37777738
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11430-z -
Head & Neck Oct 2023We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT.
BACKGROUND
We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT.
METHODS
Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA).
RESULTS
Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.
Topics: Humans; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37602655
DOI: 10.1002/hed.27488