-
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2023The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of the ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided techniques in the management of back pain. Using PubMed, Scopus, and... (Review)
Review
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of the ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided techniques in the management of back pain. Using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, we searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before May 2023, which reported relevant data on the topic. The effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided (US-guided) and fluoroscopy-guided (FL-guided) approaches for back pain management was compared in terms of postoperative pain intensity, postoperative functional outcomes, and postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different postoperative periods. Eight studies were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in post-procedural pain relief at one week, two weeks, one month, two months, and three months between the US-guided and FL-guided interventions for back pain management (SMD with 95% CI is -0.01 [-0.11, 0.10]), = 0.91, I = 0%). In terms of the postoperative functional outcomes assessed by the "Oswestry Disability Index" (ODI) functionality score, the model tends to favor the FL-guided injections over the US-guided injections (SMD with 95% CI: 0.13 [-0.00, 0.25], = 0.05, I = 0). Finally, the US-guided and FL-guided injections did not show significantly different results in terms of postoperative complications (RR with 95% CI is 0.99 [0.49, 1.99], = 0.97, I = 0). The subgroup analysis also did not demonstrate differences between the US-guided and FL-guided techniques in the following outcomes: vasovagal reaction, transient headache, and facial flushing. There was no significant difference between the US-guided and FL-guided injections for treating back pain in terms of postoperative pain intensity and complications. Still, the model tends to favor the FL-guided injections over the US-guided injections in terms of functionality.
PubMed: 37998610
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223474 -
Clinical Autonomic Research : Official... Dec 2023Vasovagal syncope is a common clinical condition that lacks effective medical therapies despite being associated with significant morbidity. Current guidelines suggest... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Vasovagal syncope is a common clinical condition that lacks effective medical therapies despite being associated with significant morbidity. Current guidelines suggest that serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors might suppress vasovagal syncope but supporting studies have been small and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors to prevent syncope in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.
METHODS
Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from the MEDLINE and Embase databases without language restriction from inception to August 2022, and ClinicalTrials.gov. All studies were conducted in clinical syncope populations and compared the benefit of serotonin versus placebo. Weighted relative risks were estimated using random effects meta-analysis techniques.
RESULTS
Three studies (n = 204) met inclusion criteria. Patients were 42 ± 13 years of age and 51% female. Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors were found to substantially reduce the likelihood of a patient having at least one recurrence of vasovagal syncope [relative risk (RR) 0.34 (0.20-0.60), p < 0.01] with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I = 0%, p = 0.67). Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors in two reports provided significant protection against clinical presyncope [RR 0.43 (0.24-0.77), p < 0.01], with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I = 0%, p = 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS
Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors may be effective in preventing syncope induced by head-up tilt testing and in syncope in the community in randomized, double-blinded clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Syncope, Vasovagal; Serotonin; Syncope; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Tilt-Table Test
PubMed: 37971641
DOI: 10.1007/s10286-023-01000-5 -
Frontiers in Pain Research (Lausanne,... 2023Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA), a standardized auricular acupuncture protocol, is widely used for pain in the military but is not well-studied in oncology. This study...
INTRODUCTION
Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA), a standardized auricular acupuncture protocol, is widely used for pain in the military but is not well-studied in oncology. This study examined cancer survivors who received BFA for pain.
METHODS
This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that compared the effectiveness of BFA and electroacupuncture vs. usual care for chronic musculoskeletal pain in cancer survivors. This study focused on participants randomized to BFA. Participants received 10 weekly treatments. Needles were placed until one of these stop conditions were satisfied: ten needles were administered; pain severity decreased to ≤1 out of 10; patient declined further needling, or vasovagal reaction was observed. Pain severity was assessed using Brief Pain Inventory. Responders were those with ≥30% pain severity reduction. We examined pain location, BFA stop reason, and pain reduction of participants during the first session. We also examined which factors predicted responder status after the first session (week 1) or the full treatment (week 12).
RESULTS
Among 143 randomized to BFA, most common pain locations were lower back (30.8%) and knee/leg (18.2%). Of 138 who initiated treatment, 41 (30.0%) received ten needles; 81 (59.1%) achieved pain ≤1; 14 (10.2%) declined further needling; and 1 (0.7%) had vasovagal reaction. BFA reduced pain severity by 2.9 points (95% CI 2.6 to 3.2) after the first session ( < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline pain severity, responders at week 1 were 2.5 times more likely to be responders at week 12, compared to those who were non-responders at week 1 (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.11, = 0.04). Among those who achieved pain ≤1, 74% were responders at week 12, a higher proportion compared to the proportion of responders among those who received ten needles (39.5%), those who declined further needling (50%), and those with vasovagal reaction (0.0%) ( = 0.001). Those with pain in proximal joints had a higher proportion of responders at week 12, compared to those with pain in distal joints (64.2% vs. 20%, = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
Specific factors may predict the likelihood of achieving meaningful pain reduction from BFA. Understanding these predictors could inform precision pain management and acupuncture delivery models.
PubMed: 38116187
DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1279420 -
European Heart Journal Jul 2023The traditional nitroglycerin (NTG) head-up tilt test (HUTT) is time-consuming and the test duration is a barrier to widespread utilization in clinical practice. It was...
BACKGROUND
The traditional nitroglycerin (NTG) head-up tilt test (HUTT) is time-consuming and the test duration is a barrier to widespread utilization in clinical practice. It was hypothesized that a short-duration protocol is not inferior to the traditional protocol regarding the positivity rate and has a similar distribution of hemodynamic response.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Patients undergoing HUTT were randomized 1:1 to a 10 min passive phase plus a 10 min 0.3 mg NTG if the passive phase was negative (Fast) or to a 20 min passive phase plus a 15 min 0.3 mg NTG if the passive phase was negative (Traditional). A sample size of 277 patients for each group achieved 80% power to detect an expected difference of 0% with a non-inferiority margin of -10% using a one-sided t-test and assuming a significant level alpha of 0.025. A total of 554 consecutive patients (mean age 46.6 ± 19.3 years, 47.6% males) undergoing HUTT for suspected vasovagal syncope were randomly assigned to the Fast (n = 277) or Traditional (n = 277) protocol. A positive response was defined as the induction of syncope in presence of hypotension/bradycardia, and was observed in 167 (60.3%) patients with Fast and in 162 (58.5%) patients with the Traditional protocol. There was a trend of lesser vasodepressor response (14.8% Fast vs. 20.6% Traditional) which was significant during the passive phase (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The diagnostic value of the Fast HUTT protocol is similar to that of the Traditional protocol and therefore the Fast protocol can be used instead of the Traditional protocol.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Female; Nitroglycerin; Syncope, Vasovagal; Vasodilator Agents; Syncope; Tilt-Table Test; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37264671
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad322 -
Heart Rhythm Apr 2024Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is being increasingly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Bradycardia, in the cardioinhibitory subtype of VVS, results from... (Review)
Review
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is being increasingly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Bradycardia, in the cardioinhibitory subtype of VVS, results from transient parasympathetic overactivity leading to sinus bradycardia and/or atrioventricular block. By mitigating parasympathetic overactivity, CNA has been shown to improve VVS symptoms in clinical studies with relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up periods (<5 years) at selected centers. However, CNA may potentially tip the autonomic balance to a state of sympathovagal imbalance with attenuation of cardiac parasympathetic activity. A higher heart rate is associated with adverse cardiovascular events and increased mortality in healthy populations without cardiovascular diseases. Chronic sympathovagal imbalance may also affect the pathophysiology of spectra of cardiovascular disorders including atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. This review addresses potential long-term pathophysiological consequences of CNA for VVS.
Topics: Humans; Bradycardia; Syncope, Vasovagal; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Heart Atria; Sick Sinus Syndrome
PubMed: 38104955
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.004 -
Clinical Autonomic Research : Official... Dec 2023We compared hemodynamic parameters between subjects with marked, intermediate and minimal cardioinhibition during vasovagal syncope.
PURPOSE
We compared hemodynamic parameters between subjects with marked, intermediate and minimal cardioinhibition during vasovagal syncope.
METHODS
The study included subjects with a decrease in heart rate while experiencing a complete vasovagal syncope during tilt-table testing. The subjects were classified as having marked, intermediate or minimal cardioinhibition, based on tertile values of the decrease in heart rate. Hemodynamic parameters between these groups were compared before tilt in the supine position, shortly after tilt and during cardioinhibition.
RESULTS
A total of 149 subjects with a median age of 43 (interquartile range 24-60) years were included in the study. Among the three groups with different levels of cardioinhibition, the highest heart rate was observed in subjects with marked cardioinhibition both before and shortly after tilt and at the start of cardioinhibition. The heart rate decrease in these subjects was both larger and faster compared to subjects with minimal and intermediate cardioinhibition.
CONCLUSION
Subjects with marked cardioinhibition have both a larger and faster decrease in heart rate compared to subjects with intermediate and minimal cardioinhibition, as early as from the start of cardioinhibition. Marked cardioinhibition is related to differences in hemodynamic profiles already present well before the start of cardioinhibition.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Syncope, Vasovagal; Tilt-Table Test; Hemodynamics; Heart Rate; Triazoles
PubMed: 37874434
DOI: 10.1007/s10286-023-00991-5 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Aug 2023Pacing for vasovagal syncope is established. Two pacing algorithms are available. The rate-drop-response (RDR-Medtronic) is triggered by falling heart rate acting with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Prospective randomized study comparing permanent pacing with rate drop response and closed loop stimulation in patients with vasovagal syncope where permanent pacing is indicated and selected as the appropriate treatment option.
BACKGROUND
Pacing for vasovagal syncope is established. Two pacing algorithms are available. The rate-drop-response (RDR-Medtronic) is triggered by falling heart rate acting with modified rate-hysteresis. The closed loop stimulation or system (CLS-Biotronik) is triggered by impedance changes in the right ventricle reflecting falling volume and rising contractility. These are very different physiologically. Both algorithms carry favorable reports in clinical use.
METHODS
A randomized-controlled superiority trial is proposed to compare the two algorithms for the control of vasovagal syncope in patients for whom pacing is indicated by current guidelines in North America and Europe. Available recent evidence may be seen as supporting superiority of CLS. No comparison between the two algorithms has been made. In this trial, patients will be centrally randomized to one or other algorithm on a 1:1 basis. Two-hundred-seventy-six patients in each group will be recruited. Sample size is determined using a confidence interval of 95%, a power of 90%, and a drop-out rate of 10% to detect an 11% difference between CLS and RDR. Recurrent symptom comparison will be made by an independent committee. The Co-primary endpoints will be recurrent syncope burden compared with that in 24-months preimplant, and occurrence of syncope in 24-months follow-up. Each outcome will be compared between the two algorithms. Secondary endpoints will be program and drug therapy changes over 24-months follow-up and quality of life by questionnaire at baseline,1 and 2 years.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
These are anticipated to clarify the device algorithm choice and, therefore, to improve patient care.
Topics: Humans; Syncope, Vasovagal; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Syncope; Pacemaker, Artificial
PubMed: 37393604
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15991 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Nov 2023The diagnosis of vasovagal syncope (VVS) is mainly based on history-taking and physical examination. However, brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and...
BACKGROUND
The diagnosis of vasovagal syncope (VVS) is mainly based on history-taking and physical examination. However, brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Electroencephalogram (EEG) are commonly used in the diagnostic course of VVS, despite not being indicated in the guidelines. This study aims to find the possible associated factors with the administration of brain MRI and EEG in patients with VVS.
METHODS
Patients with a diagnosis of VVS from 2017 to 2022 were included. Several demographic and syncope features were recorded. The association of these was assessed with undergoing MRI, EEG, and either MRI or EEG. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were also used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
A total of 1882 patients with VVS were analyzed, among which 810 underwent MRI (43.04%), 985 underwent EEG (52.34%), and 1166 underwent MRI or EEG (61.96%). Head trauma (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.80), previous neurologist visit (OR 6.28, 95% CI 4.24 to 9.64), and gaze disturbance during syncope (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.78) were all positively associated to the performance of brain MRI/EEG. Similar results were found for urinary incontinence (OR 2.415, 95% CI 1.494 to 4.055), amnesia (OR 1.421, 95% CI 1.053 to 1.930), headache after syncope (OR 1.321, 95% CI 1.046 to 1.672), and tonic-clonic movements in head-up tilt table test (OR 1.501, 95% CI 1.087 to 2.093). However, male sex (OR 0.655, 95% CI 0.535 to 0.800) and chest pain before syncope (OR 0.628, 95% CI 0.459 to 0.860) had significant negative associations with performing brain MRI/EEG.
CONCLUSION
Based on our findings, performing MRI or EEG was common among VVS patients while it is not indicated in the majority of cases. This should be taken into consideration to prevent inappropriate MRI/EEG when there is a typical history compatible with VVS.
Topics: Humans; Male; Syncope, Vasovagal; Syncope; Tilt-Table Test; Brain; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 37990291
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03615-y -
Transfusion May 2024Therapeutic phlebotomy (TP), a widely used medical procedure, can be performed on diverse patients with iron overload or polyglobulia. However, its adverse events are...
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic phlebotomy (TP), a widely used medical procedure, can be performed on diverse patients with iron overload or polyglobulia. However, its adverse events are not well known as most of the information on phlebotomy is derived from healthy blood donors (0.1%-5.3%). In contrast, TP is applicable to a broader, more complex population with comorbidities and old age. To ascertain the incidence of adverse events in phlebotomies, we conducted a prospective study on patients who attended our Unit.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We prospectively gathered data from patients referred to our Unit for TP. Data regarding demographics, health status, and adverse events within at least 24 h of phlebotomy were gathered via a structured questionnaire during each visit.
RESULTS
Between August 2021 and September 2022, 189 patients underwent 587 procedures. Most patients were men, over 60 (57.3%) had comorbidities, and 93% underwent at least two procedures during the study period. Twenty patients (10.8%) presented 25 adverse events (4.3% of phlebotomies), usually vasovagal reactions, none of which were clinically relevant, and all were managed by nursing staff on site, with full patient recovery.
DISCUSSION
The rate of adverse events (<5%) in patients undergoing TP was low and comparable to that seen in healthy blood donors. Consequently, even old patients and those with some comorbidities can safely undergo TP when the process is carefully managed.
PubMed: 38708765
DOI: 10.1111/trf.17862 -
Transfusion and Apheresis Science :... Dec 2023Vasovagal response (VVR) is the most common adverse reaction during blood donation and it is the main element for the safety of the patients with preoperative autologous...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Vasovagal response (VVR) is the most common adverse reaction during blood donation and it is the main element for the safety of the patients with preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD). Accurate identification high-risk group is of great significance for PABD. Our study aimed to establish a scoring system based on the nomogram to screen the high-risk population and provide evidence for preventing the occurrence of VVRs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A number of 4829 patients underwent PABD between July 2017 and June 2020 in the first medical center of Chinese PLA Hospital were recruited, 3387 of whom were included in the training group (70 %; 108 VVRs patients vs 3279 Non-VVRs patients), 1442 were included in the validation group (30 %; 46 VVRs patients vs 1396 Non-VVRs patients). The data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram of the scoring system was created by using the RMS tool in R software.
RESULTS
Seven variables including BMI, hematocrit, pre-phlebotomy heart rate and systolic blood pressure, history of blood donation, age group and primary disease were selected to build the nomogram, which was shown as prediction model. And the score was 0-1 for BMI, 0-2 for hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and no blood donation history, 0-10 for age, 0-3 for primary disease. When the total cutoff score was 11, the predictive system for identifying VVRs displayed higher diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training group were 0.942, 82.41 % and 97.17 %, respectively, whereas those of the validation group were 0.836, 78.26 % and 78.15 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION
A risk predictive scoring system was successfully developed to identify high-risk VVRs group form PABD patients that performed well.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant; Child, Preschool; Blood Donors; Blood Donation; Syncope, Vasovagal; Hematocrit; Risk Factors; Blood Transfusion, Autologous
PubMed: 37633760
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103791