-
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology &... Jul 2023Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder that can emerge after an individual experiences a traumatic event such as physical abuse, sexual/relationship... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder that can emerge after an individual experiences a traumatic event such as physical abuse, sexual/relationship violence, combat exposure, witnessing death, or serious injury. This study aimed to identify the most suitable drugs for the management of PTSD based on a network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
Six databases (Ovid Medline, EMBase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Ovid Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 6, 2022.
RESULTS
Thirty articles with a total of 5170 participants were included. Compared with placebo, active drugs including olanzapine (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.13), risperidone (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.03), quetiapine (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.04), venlafaxine (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.16), sertraline (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.11), paroxetine (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.36) and fluoxetine (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.12), significantly reduced the total clinician-administered PTSD scale score.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study support the use of paroxetine, venlafaxine, and quetiapine as first-line treatment for PTSD. In addition, quetiapine is recommended for patients with PTSD affected by symptoms of hyperarousal and re-experience disorder. Clinicians should prescribe medications based on the severity of PTSD symptoms and other conditions to develop the best treatment strategy for this patient population.
Topics: Humans; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Paroxetine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 36934999
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110754 -
CNS Drugs Mar 2024Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain,... (Review)
Review
Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain, Lhermitte's phenomenon, trigeminal neuralgia, and mixed pain. Neuropathic pain is a major concern for individuals with multiple sclerosis as it is directly linked to myelin damage in the central nervous system and the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis is challenging as the options available have limited efficacy and can cause unpleasant side effects. The literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies employed in the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacological options include cannabinoids, muscle relaxants (tizanidine, baclofen, dantrolene), anticonvulsants (benzodiazepines, gabapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine), antidepressants (duloxetine, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants), opioids (naltrexone), and botulinum toxin variants, which have evidence from various clinical trials. Non-pharmacological approaches for trigeminal neuralgia may include neurosurgical methods. Non-invasive methods, physical therapy, and psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction) may be recommended for patients with neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. The choice of treatment depends on the severity and type of pain as well as other factors, such as patient preferences and comorbidities. There is a pressing need for healthcare professionals and researchers to prioritize the development of better strategies for managing multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; Neuralgia; Antidepressive Agents; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 38421578
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01072-5 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023About 30% of major depression disorder patients fail to achieve remission, hence being diagnosed with treatment-resistant major depression (TRD). Opium had been largely...
About 30% of major depression disorder patients fail to achieve remission, hence being diagnosed with treatment-resistant major depression (TRD). Opium had been largely used effectively to treat depression for centuries, but when other medications were introduced, its use was discounted due to addiction and other hazards. In a series of previous studies, we evaluated the antinociceptive effects of eight antidepressant medications and their interaction with the opioid system. Mice were tested with a hotplate or tail-flick after being injected with different doses of mianserin, mirtazapine, trazodone, venlafaxine, reboxetine, moclobemide, fluoxetine, or fluvoxamine to determine the effect of each drug in eliciting antinociception. When naloxone inhibited the antinociceptive effect, we further examined the effect of the specific opioid antagonists of each antidepressant drug. Mianserin and mirtazapine (separately) induced dose-dependent antinociception, each one yielding a biphasic dose-response curve, and they were antagonized by naloxone. Trazodone and venlafaxine (separately) induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, antagonized by naloxone. Reboxetine induced a weak antinociceptive effect with no significant opioid involvement, while moclobemide, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine had no opioid-involved antinociceptive effects. Controlled clinical studies are needed to establish the efficacy of the augmentation of opiate antidepressants in persons with treatment-resistant depression and the optimal dosage of drugs prescribed.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Analgesics, Opioid; Mianserin; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Fluvoxamine; Mirtazapine; Fluoxetine; Reboxetine; Trazodone; Moclobemide; Depression; Antidepressive Agents; Naloxone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 37446323
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241311142 -
Clinical Psychopharmacology and... Aug 2023Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic progressive movement disorder characterized by abnormal sensations, especially at rest and at night, as the need and urge to...
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic progressive movement disorder characterized by abnormal sensations, especially at rest and at night, as the need and urge to move the lower extremity. It has been reported that RLS severity and frequency increase in patients with anxiety and depression. It has been reported that serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline can cause RLS symptoms. No adverse effects of vortioxetine on RLS have been reported in the literature. In this case series, we report the effect of vortioxetine in patients with RLS with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In this case series, the effect of adding vortioxetine to treatment on RLS symptoms is reported in 7 patients (5 female). After the use of vortioxetine, 5 of 7 patients' symptoms regressed without the need to start a separate drug for primary movement disorder. In conclusion, we believe that studies should be conducted to investigate the efficacy of vortioxetine in the treatment of RLS. Therefore, randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the effect and safety of vortioxetine on RLS symptoms.
PubMed: 37424427
DOI: 10.9758/cpn.22.1021 -
International Journal of Radiation... Jul 2023Given the paucity of level 1 evidence, the optimal regimen to control oral mucositis pain remains unclear. Although national guidelines allow consideration of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of Prophylactic High-Dose Gabapentin and Venlafaxine on Reducing Oral Mucositis Pain Among Patients Treated With Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institution, Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial.
PURPOSE
Given the paucity of level 1 evidence, the optimal regimen to control oral mucositis pain remains unclear. Although national guidelines allow consideration of prophylactic gabapentin, prior trials showed improved pain control with venlafaxine among patients with diabetic neuropathy. We sought to investigate the role of prophylactic high-dose gabapentin with venlafaxine to reduce oral mucositis pain among patients with head and neck cancer.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We performed a single-institution, phase 2 randomized trial on nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with chemoradiation. Patients were randomized to either prophylactic gabapentin (3600 mg daily) with or without venlafaxine (150 mg daily). Primary endpoint was differences in pain levels at the end of chemoradiation. Secondary endpoint was toxicity profiles, quality of life changes, opioid use, and feeding tube placement. Differences between the 2 arms at multiple time points were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed regression model with Sidak correction.
RESULTS
Between May 2018 and March 2021, a total of 62 patients were enrolled and evaluable for analysis (n = 32 for the gabapentin alone arm, n = 30 for the gabapentin + venlafaxine arm). Over 90% of patients tolerated gabapentin well. Head and neck pain level showed a mean value of 45 (standard deviation, 23) and 43 (standard deviation, 21) for the gabapentin alone and the gabapentin + venlafaxine arms, respectively (P = .65). No statistically significant differences were observed in adverse events, opioid use, feeding tube placement, or quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of venlafaxine to prophylactic gabapentin did not result in improvements in pain control and quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer.
Topics: Humans; Gabapentin; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Analgesics, Opioid; Quality of Life; Pain; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Mucositis
PubMed: 36736633
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.047 -
Analytical Chemistry Apr 2024In this work, the concept of magnetic particle spray mass spectrometry (MPS-MS) is reported for the first time. Magnetic sorbent particles are used to extract the...
In this work, the concept of magnetic particle spray mass spectrometry (MPS-MS) is reported for the first time. Magnetic sorbent particles are used to extract the analytes from a liquid sample. The particles are magnetically attracted to the tip of a magnetic probe that is positioned at the entrance of the mass spectrometer. A solvent is dispensed on the particles, and a high voltage promotes the formation of the Taylor cone around the particles agglomerate. Analytes are desorbed by the solvent, ionized, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. MPS-MS is totally in consonance with the green chemistry principle. A minimal consumption of sample (100 μL), solvent (34 μL), and magnetic sorbent (500 μg) is needed per analysis for an excellent performance of MPS-MS in terms of sensitivity and selectivity. The determination of amitriptyline, citalopram, clomipramine, chlorpromazine, doxepin, haloperidol, nortriptyline, and venlafaxine in human plasma samples using magnetic restricted-access carbon nanotubes was carried out as a proof of principle. Limits of quantification of 10 μg L and correlation coefficients higher than 0.98 were obtained for all of the analytes. Limits of detection ranged from 0.43 to 2.82 μg L. Precision (as relative standard deviation) and accuracies (as relative error) ranged from 3.6 to 23.6%, as well as -12.8 to 18.7%, respectively. MPS-MS opens a new line of developments in the association of sample preparation with ambient ionization. New sorbents, device configurations, and physical and chemical conditions can also be analyzed for the analysis of many other analytes in different samples.
PubMed: 38551631
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05680 -
Current Topics in Behavioral... Nov 2023The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed...
The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed the landscape of drug therapy for this condition. SSRIs are safer and better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) that they replaced. However, they have limitations that may have placed a ceiling on the expectations of first-line pharmacological treatment. Notable problems with SSRIs include induction of anxiety on treatment initiation, delayed onset of significant therapeutic effect, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbance and overall modest efficacy. The latter is linked with an inability of SSRIs to effectively treat syndromes of anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Combined serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine, have produced some limited improvements over SSRIs in efficacy, at the cost of a greater side-effect burden. Attempts to supplement serotonin reuptake activity with actions at serotonin receptor sub-types have not yet yielded substantial benefits; however, vortioxetine may provide more utility in the management of cognitive impairment. Future advances might come from the development of SNRIs, which more closely mimic the actions of effective TCAs. There may also be possible benefits to be derived from combining SSRIs with 5-HT receptor agonists and 5-HT receptor antagonists.
PubMed: 37922101
DOI: 10.1007/7854_2023_447 -
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Aug 2023Vortioxetine and venlafaxine are antidepressants which have shown established efficacy to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). There are no studies that compared them...
BACKGROUND
Vortioxetine and venlafaxine are antidepressants which have shown established efficacy to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). There are no studies that compared them for their efficacy in cognitive symptoms of depression. The study aimed to compare the effect of vortioxetine and venlafaxine on the change in cognitive scores in adults with MDD.
METHODS
The present study was an open-label, active-controlled parallel design randomized clinical trial. After randomization, baseline clinical evaluations by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) were done and coding (subset of WAIS-IV), WCST, TMT, Stroop test, PGI memory were used to assess cognition in 100 unmedicated MDD patients. They were reassessed after eight weeks of monotherapy with vortioxetine or venlafaxine.
RESULTS
Primary cognitive measure (coding score) was found to be significantly higher (Mean Difference = 0.680; 95% CI:.202 to 1.158; = 0.006) in vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine. Stroop test scores (word score, color score, color-word score) were also found to be significantly higher with vortioxetine. In other cognitive measures (WCST scores: total trials, total errors score, total perseverative responses score, total perseverative errors scores; TMT-A and B scores), a significant decrease in scores with vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine were observed. A significant decrease in MADRS and increase in SOFAS scores were observed with vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine. Both the drugs alleviated the symptoms of depression but vortioxetine was better tolerated.
CONCLUSION
Our study findings suggest that improvement in cognitive scores is significantly higher with vortioxetine than venlafaxine over the eight weeks of monotherapy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CTRI/2020/07/026819 (Registered with Clinical Trials Registry- India).
PubMed: 37736222
DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_160_23 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Jun 2024Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors are gaining attention in treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Due to their effects on... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors are gaining attention in treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Due to their effects on norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin neurotransmission, they benefit both ADHD and comorbid disorders and have some other advantages including longer duration of action and fewer adverse effects compared to stimulants. There is continued interest in these agents with novel mechanisms of action in treatment of ADHD.
AREAS COVERED
The authors conducted a PubMed literature search using the following key words: 'ADHD' AND 'adrenergic reuptake inhibitors' OR 'nonstimulants' OR 'atomoxetine' OR 'Viloxazine' OR 'Dasotraline' OR 'Centanafadine' OR 'PDC-1421' OR 'Reboxetine' OR 'Edivoxetine' OR 'Bupropion' OR 'Venlafaxine' OR 'Duloxetine.' They reviewed FDA fact sheets of available medications for safety/tolerability studies and reviewed published clinical studies of these medications for treatment of ADHD.
EXPERT OPINION
Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors fit the diverse needs of children and adolescents with ADHD with 1) poor tolerability to stimulants (e.g. due to growth suppression, insomnia, rebound irritability, co-morbid depression, anxiety and tic disorders, substance abuse or diversion concerns), 2) cardiac risks, and/or 3) need for extended duration of action. Their differences in receptor affinities and modulating effects support the unique benefits of individual agents.
Topics: Humans; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Animals; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 38900676
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2369197 -
International Journal of Clinical... Oct 2023Pharmacogenetics (PGx), especially in regard to CYP2D6, is gaining more importance in routine clinical settings. Including phenoconversion effects (PC) in result...
BACKGROUND
Pharmacogenetics (PGx), especially in regard to CYP2D6, is gaining more importance in routine clinical settings. Including phenoconversion effects (PC) in result interpretation could maximize its potential benefits. However, studies on genetics of pharmacokinetic genes including the functional enzyme status are lacking.
AIM
The retrospective analyses of clinical routine data aimed to investigating how the CYP2D6 functional enzyme status affects serum concentrations and metabolite-to-parent ratios of seven common psychotropic drugs and allows an evaluation of the relevance of this information for patient care.
METHOD
Two patient cohorts (total n = 316; 44.2 ± 15.4 years) were investigated for the CYP2D6 functional enzyme status and its associations with drug exposure and metabolism of venlafaxine, amitriptyline, mirtazapine, sertraline, escitalopram, risperidone and quetiapine.
RESULTS
We found an increase in intermediate and poor metabolizers, as well as a decrease in normal metabolizers of CYP2D6 when including PC. Moreover, we found associations between amitriptyline exposure with the phenoconversion-corrected activity score of CYP2D6 (Spearman correlation; p = 0.03), and risperidone exposure with CYP2D6 functional enzyme status (Kruskal-Wallis test; p = 0.01), as well as between metabolite-to-parent ratio of venlafaxine and risperidone with CYP2D6 functional enzyme status (Kruskal-Wallis test; p < 0.001; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The data stress the relevance of PC-informed PGx in psychopharmacological treatment and suggest that PC should be included in PGx result interpretation when PGx is implemented in routine clinical care, especially before initiating amitriptyline- or risperidone-treatment, to start with a dose adequate to the respective CYP2D6 functional enzyme status. Moreover, PGx and therapeutic drug monitoring should be used complementary but not alternatively.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Pharmacogenetics; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Amitriptyline; Genotype; Phenotype; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 37166747
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01588-8