-
The Science of the Total Environment Dec 2023This study utilizes wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) to evaluate spatiotemporal changes in the consumption of antidepressants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic...
This study utilizes wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) to evaluate spatiotemporal changes in the consumption of antidepressants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia. Composite 24-h influent wastewater samples (n = 210) were collected from six wastewater treatment plants between summer 2019 and spring 2021. The samples were extracted using 96-well solid-phase extraction and analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The measured concentrations of target antidepressant biomarkers were then converted to population-normalised mass loads (PNMLs), taking into account flow rate and catchment population. Ten biomarkers, including amitriptyline, bupropion, bupropion-OH, citalopram, norcitalopram, normirtazapine, venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, trazodone, and moclobemide, were above the lower limit of quantification and were included in the spatiotemporal temporal assessment. The highest PNMLs were detected for O-desmethylvenlafaxine (mean ± SD: 82.1 ± 21.2 mg/day/1000 inhabitants) and venlafaxine (38.0 ± 10.6 mg/day/1000 inhabitants), followed by citalopram (27.0 ± 10.7 mg/day/1000 inhabitants). In addition, the mean metabolite/parent compound ratios were comparable with other WBE studies indicating consumption rather than direct disposal. Overall, the results indicated significant spatiotemporal variations depending on the location, and the PNMLs of most biomarkers increased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (spring of 2020). However, no clear spatial patterns were revealed related to the pandemic.
PubMed: 37640073
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166586 -
Neurochemistry International Oct 2023Antidepressants are used to treat depression and some anxiety disorders, including use in pregnant patients. The pharmacological actions of these drugs generally...
Antidepressants are used to treat depression and some anxiety disorders, including use in pregnant patients. The pharmacological actions of these drugs generally determine the uptake and metabolism of a series of neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine, along with an increase in BDNF expression. However, many aspects of antidepressant action remain unknown, particularly whether antidepressants interfere with normal neurodevelopment when taken by pregnant women. In order to reveal cellular and molecular implications crucial to the functioning of pathways related to antidepressant effects, we performed an investigation on neuronally differentiating human SH-SY5Y cells. To our knowledge, this is the first time human SH-SY5Y cells in cultures of purely neuronal cells induced by controlled differentiation with retinoic acid are followed by short-term 48-h exposure to 0.1-10 μM escitalopram or venlafaxine. Treatment with antidepressants (1 μM) did not affect the electrophysiological properties of SH-SY5Y cells. However, the percentage of mature neurons exhibiting voltage-gated sodium currents was substantially higher in cultures pre-treated with either antidepressant. After exposure to escitalopram or venlafaxine, we observed a concentration-dependent increase in activity-dependent BDNF promoter IV activation. The assessment of neurite metrics showed significant down-regulation of neurite outgrowth upon exposure to venlafaxine. Identified changes may represent links to molecular processes of importance to depression and be involved in neurodevelopmental alterations observed in postpartum children exposed to antidepressants antenatally.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Antidepressive Agents; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line, Tumor; Escitalopram; Neuroblastoma; Neuronal Outgrowth; Neurons; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 37451345
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2023.105571 -
Therapie 2024Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a primary concern in both drug development and clinical practice. Although the heart is not a common target for adverse drug reactions,... (Review)
Review
Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a primary concern in both drug development and clinical practice. Although the heart is not a common target for adverse drug reactions, some drugs still cause various adverse cardiac events, with sometimes severe consequences. Direct cardiac toxicity encompasses functional and structural changes of the cardiovascular system due to possible exposure to medicines. This phenomenon extends beyond cardiovascular drugs to include non-cardiovascular drugs including anticancer drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anthracyclines and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as various antipsychotics, venlafaxine, and even some antibiotics (such as macrolides). Cardiac ADRs comprise an array of effects, ranging from heart failure and myocardial ischemia to valvular disease, thrombosis, myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and conduction abnormalities. The underlying mechanisms may include disturbances of ionic processes, induction of cellular damage via impaired mitochondrial function, and even hypercoagulability. To mitigate the impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, multi-stage evaluation guidelines have been established, following the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines for in vitro and in vivo testing. Despite preclinical safeguards, post-marketing surveillance remains critical, as certain cardiotoxic drugs may escape initial scrutiny. Indeed, historical data show that cardiovascular ADRs contribute to almost 10% of market withdrawals. The impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity on cardiac issues, particularly heart failure, is often underestimated, with incidence rates ranging from 11.0% to over 20.0%. We here comprehensively examine different patterns of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, highlighting current concerns and emerging pharmacovigilance signals. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and the associated risk factors is critical in order to promptly identify, effectively manage, and proactively prevent drug-induced cardiac adverse events. Collaborative efforts between physicians and cardiologists, coupled with thorough assessment and close monitoring, are essential to ensuring patient safety in the face of potential drug-induced cardiotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Cardiotoxicity; Heart Diseases; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Heart Failure
PubMed: 37957054
DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.008 -
BMJ Open Dec 2023Investigate risk for falls, fractures and syncope in older adult patients treated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications.
Adverse drug events associated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications in an older adult population: a retrospective cohort study in Southern California.
OBJECTIVE
Investigate risk for falls, fractures and syncope in older adult patients treated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING
The electronic medical record and prescription drug database of a large integrated healthcare system in Southern California.
PARTICIPANTS
Ambulatory patients, age ≥65 years diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorder or peripheral neuropathy, dispensed one or more of ten study medications between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
HR for falls, fractures and syncope with exposure to study medications adjusted for patient demographic variables and comorbidities.
RESULTS
Among 195 207 subjects, 19 305 falls, 15 088 fractures and 11 313 episodes of syncope were observed during the study period. Compared with the reference medication, nortriptyline, the adjusted HRs (aHRs) for falls were statistically significantly greater for: paroxetine (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.57), amitriptyline (1.20, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.33), venlafaxine (1.44, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.56), duloxetine (1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.40), fluoxetine (1.51, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.59), sertraline (1.53, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.62), citalopram (1.61, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.71) and escitalopram (1.37, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.54), but not gabapentin (0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.02). For fractures, compared with nortriptyline, aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram and gabapentin, with aHRs ranging from 1.30 for gabapentin to 1.82 for escitalopram; risk was statistically similar for amitriptyline. For syncope, the aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, sertraline and citalopram, with aHRs ranging from 1.19 for fluoxetine and paroxetine up to 1.30 for citalopram and sertraline; risk was similar for amitriptyline, duloxetine, escitalopram and gabapentin.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with therapeutic alternatives, nortriptyline was found to represent a lower risk for falls, fractures and syncope, versus comparator medications, except for a few instances that had equivalent risk. The risk for these adverse events from paroxetine was comparable to the alternative medications.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Paroxetine; Nortriptyline; Citalopram; Fluoxetine; Sertraline; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Amitriptyline; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Escitalopram; Gabapentin; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Syncope
PubMed: 38154883
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076028 -
Psychopharmacology Feb 2024The selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine is among the most prescribed antidepressant drugs worldwide and, according to guidelines, its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine is among the most prescribed antidepressant drugs worldwide and, according to guidelines, its dose titration should be guided by drug-level monitoring of its active moiety (AM) which consists of venlafaxine (VEN) plus active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV). This indication of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), however, assumes a clear concentration/effect relationship for a drug, which for VEN has not been systematically explored yet.
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between blood levels, efficacy, and adverse reactions in order to suggest an optimal target concentration range for VEN oral formulations for the treatment of depression.
METHODS
Four databases (MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched in March 2022 for relevant articles according to a previously published protocol. Reviewers independently screened references and performed data extraction and critical appraisal.
RESULTS
High-quality randomized controlled trials investigating concentration/efficacy relationships and studies using a placebo lead-in phase were not found. Sixty-eight articles, consisting mostly of naturalistic TDM studies or small noncontrolled studies, met the eligibility criteria. Of them, five cohort studies reported a positive correlation between blood levels and antidepressant effects after VEN treatment. Our meta-analyses showed (i) higher AM and (ii) higher ODV concentrations in patients responding to VEN treatment when compared to non-responders (n = 360, k = 5). AM concentration-dependent occurrence of tremor was reported in one study. We found a linear relationship between daily dose and AM concentration within guideline recommended doses (75-225 mg/day). The population-based concentration ranges (25-75% interquartile) among 11 studies (n = 3200) using flexible dosing were (i) 225-450 ng/ml for the AM and (ii) 144-302 ng/ml for ODV. One PET study reported an occupancy of 80% serotonin transporters for ODV serum levels above 85 ng/ml. Based on our findings, we propose a therapeutic reference range for AM of 140-600 ng/ml.
CONCLUSION
VEN TDM within a range of 140 to 600 ng/ml (AM) will increase the probability of response in nonresponders. A titration within the proposed reference range is recommended in case of non-response at lower drug concentrations as a consequence of VEN's dual mechanism of action via combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Drug titration towards higher concentrations will, however, increase the risk for ADRs, in particular with supratherapeutic drug concentrations.
Topics: Humans; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Norepinephrine; Reference Values; Serotonin; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 37857898
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06484-7 -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Dec 2023Limited evidence from case reports suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may interact with the treatment outcomes of psychiatric medications....
BACKGROUND
Limited evidence from case reports suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may interact with the treatment outcomes of psychiatric medications. Apart from clozapine, reports on the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on other psychotropic agents are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the plasma levels of different psychotropic drugs using therapeutic drug monitoring.
METHODS
Plasma levels of psychotropic agents, including agomelatine, amisulpride, amitriptyline, escitalopram, fluoxetine, lamotrigine, mirtazapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertraline, trazodone, and venlafaxine, from inpatients with a broad spectrum of psychiatric diseases receiving COVID-19 vaccinations were collected at 2 medical centers between 08/2021 and 02/2022 under steady-state conditions before and after vaccination. Postvaccination changes were estimated as a percentage of baseline.
RESULTS
Data from 16 patients who received COVID-19 vaccination were included. The largest changes in plasma levels were reported for quetiapine (+101.2%) and trazodone (-38.5%) in 1 and 3 patients, respectively, 1 day postvaccination compared with baseline levels. One week postvaccination, the plasma levels of fluoxetine (active moiety) and escitalopram increased by 31% and 24.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides the first evidence of major changes in the plasma levels of escitalopram, fluoxetine, trazodone, and quetiapine after COVID-19 vaccination. When planning COVID-19 vaccination for patients treated with these medications, clinicians should monitor rapid changes in bioavailability and consider short-term dose adjustments to ensure safety.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; Fluoxetine; SARS-CoV-2; Trazodone; COVID-19; Escitalopram; Quetiapine Fumarate; Cohort Studies; Psychotropic Drugs; Vaccination
PubMed: 37296505
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001118 -
Pharmacopsychiatry Mar 2024CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 functional status as defined by genotype is modulated by phenoconversion (PC) due to pharmacokinetic interactions. As of today, there is no data on...
INTRODUCTION
CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 functional status as defined by genotype is modulated by phenoconversion (PC) due to pharmacokinetic interactions. As of today, there is no data on the effect size of PC for CYP2C19 functional status. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PC on CYP2C19 functional status.
METHODS
Two patient cohorts (total n=316; 44.2±15.4 years) were investigated for the functional enzyme status of CYP2C19 applying two different correction methods (PC, PC) as well as serum concentration and metabolite-to-parent ratio of venlafaxine, amitriptyline, mirtazapine, sertraline, escitalopram, risperidone, and quetiapine.
RESULTS
There was a decrease in the number of normal metabolizers of CYP2C19 and an increase in the number of poor metabolizers. When controlled for age, sex, and, in the case of amitriptyline, venlafaxine, and risperidone, CYP2D6 functional enzyme status, an association was observed between the CYP2C19 phenotype/functional enzyme status and serum concentration of amitriptyline, sertraline, and escitalopram.
DISCUSSION
PC of CYP2C19 changes phenotypes but does not improve correlations with serum concentrations. However, only a limited number of patients received perturbators of CYP2C19. Studies with large numbers of patients are still lacking, and thus, it cannot be decided if there are minor differences and which method of correction to use. For the time being, PC is relevant in individual patients treated with CYP2C19-affecting drugs, for example, esomeprazole. To ensure adequate serum concentrations in these patients, this study suggests the use of therapeutic drug monitoring.
Topics: Humans; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Amitriptyline; Pharmacogenetics; Sertraline; Risperidone; Escitalopram; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype
PubMed: 38354747
DOI: 10.1055/a-2248-6924 -
American Journal of Translational... 2023To determine the efficacy of venlafaxine combined with agomelatine in elderly patients with depression and observe the changes in S-100 calcium binding protein B...
OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy of venlafaxine combined with agomelatine in elderly patients with depression and observe the changes in S-100 calcium binding protein B (S-100B) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) before and after treatment.
METHODS
The data of 142 elderly patients with depression treated in Affiliated Hospital of Gansu Medical College between January 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively studied. Among the patients, 62 treated with venlafaxine were assigned to a control group, and 80 treated with agomelatine combined with venlafaxine were assigned to an observation group. In addition, 50 patients with suspected meningitis who were treated in Affiliated Hospital of Gansu Medical College over the same time span were enrolled into a normal group. The two groups of patients were compared in terms of clinical efficacy after treatment and the changes in S100B and GFAP before and after treatment. The diagnostic value of S100B and GFAP in patients with depression was explored. Additionally, the changes in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the adverse drug reaction rate was also compared.
RESULTS
The patient group showed higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of S100B and GFAP than the control group (P < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUC) of CSF S100B and GFAP for diagnosing depression were 0.833 and 0.925, respectively, and the AUC of the combination of the two was 0.967, which was larger than that of CSF S100B or GFAP alone (P < 0.001). Additionally, the control group showed lower clinical efficacy than the observation group (P < 0.001). After treatment, the observation group exhibited lower CSF levels of S100B and GFAP than the control group (P < 0.001), and demonstrated higher RBANS score than the control group (P < 0.001). The difference in adverse drug reaction rate was not significant between the control group and the observation group (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
S100B and GFAP can be used as diagnostic indicators of depression. Agomelatine plus venlafaxine are superior to venlafaxine alone in the treatment of depression. The combination can contribute to better S100B and GFAP levels, and take a more obvious role in alleviating disease symptoms, thereby improving the cognitive function and overall well-being of patients.
PubMed: 37692959
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Chromatography. A Oct 2023In this work, carboxymethylated maltodextrin (Cm-MD) was successfully synthesized as an efficient anionic chiral selector and applied for the enantiomer separation of...
In this work, carboxymethylated maltodextrin (Cm-MD) was successfully synthesized as an efficient anionic chiral selector and applied for the enantiomer separation of some basic drugs including tramadol, venlafaxine, verapamil, hydroxyzine, citalopram, fluoxetine, and amlodipine by capillary electrophoresis (CE). The synthesized chiral selector was characterized by the nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry. Under the optimized Cm-MD modified CE conditions (background electrolyte: phosphate buffer (pH 5.0, 50 mM) containing 5% (w/v) Cm-MD; applied voltage: 20 kV; and capillary column temperature: 25 °C), successful enantiomer separation of all studied chiral drugs were observed. By comparison of Cm-MD and MD for enantiomer separation of the model drugs, it was revealed that Cm-MD exhibits a higher resolution in comparison to the MD modified CE. This enhanced resolution could be attributed to the electrostatic interactions between the cationic drugs and anionic Cm-MD and opposite direction mobility of the host-guest complex relative to the chiral analyte. The optimized Cm-MD modified CE method was successfully used for the assay of the enantiomers of citalopram and venlafaxine in commercial tablets. The proposed method showed the linear range of 5.0-150.0 mg/L and 10.0-150.0 mg/L for both enantiomers of citalopram and venlafaxine, respectively. The limits of quantification were 5.0 and 10.0 mg/L for the enantiomers of citalopram and venlafaxine, respectively. The limit of detection for all enantiomers was found to be < 3.0 mg/L. Intra- and inter-day RSDs (n = 4) were less than 9.7%. The relative errors were less than 9.4% for all enantiomers. The obtained results in this research show that Cm-MD as a new, efficient and inexpensive chiral selector can be used for enantiomer separation of basic drugs using the CE technique.
Topics: Citalopram; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Electrophoresis, Capillary; Amlodipine
PubMed: 37696127
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464335 -
Cureus Jan 2024An average of 60-80% of all menopausal women experience bothersome vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), such as flushing and sweating, within the first seven years of onset.... (Review)
Review
An average of 60-80% of all menopausal women experience bothersome vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), such as flushing and sweating, within the first seven years of onset. However, despite increasing prevalence, these hot flashes remain hard to treat and have a negative effect on the quality of life. Though hormone replacement therapy is commonly utilized as a standard treatment for VMSs, this therapy is not recommended for all women. Specifically, the oral form of hormone replacement therapy is associated with several contraindications, including a history of thromboembolic disease, migraine headache with aura, liver failure, heart disease, and hormone-dependent cancers. For women with these medical conditions, current literature indicates that nonhormonal therapies such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are suitable alternatives to reduce the frequency and intensity of VMSs. Currently, the only SSRI that is FDA-approved for the treatment of VMSs is paroxetine, but studies show that fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline are also proven to provide similar benefits. Similarly, the SNRI venlafaxine has also been well tolerated and has been shown to reduce the frequency and severity of hot flashes. The present investigation reviews the physiology of VMSs and examines the evidence for the use of nonhormonal pharmacologic therapies as treatment for women experiencing hot flashes. These interventions should be considered whenever hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated, with therapy individualized based on the severity of symptoms.
PubMed: 38371081
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52467