-
International Wound Journal Mar 2024This research is intended to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in osteoporotic vertebral compression... (Review)
Review
This research is intended to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), which is associated with post-operative pain. Eligible studies were screened by searching multiple databases and sources such as PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE for search terms updated to October 2023, and relevant literature sources were searched. Randomized, controlled, prospective or retrospective, and cohort studies were eligible. For the analysis of the primary results, an analysis of the data was carried out, such as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). In the present research, 1933 research was screened in 4 databases, and 30 articles were chosen to be examined under strict exclusion criteria. No statistical significance was found in the use of bone cement in the PVP group and PKP (MD, -0.60; 95% CI, -1.40, 0.21, p = 0.15); PKP was associated with a reduced risk of cement leak compared with PVP group (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.38, 3.46, p = 0.0009); no statistical significance was found in the wound VAS score in PVP operation compared with that of PKP (MD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.07, 0.40, p = 0.17); no statistical significance was found between the time of PVP operation and the time of PKP operation (MD, -2.65; 95% CI, -8.91, 3.60, p = 0.41). Compared with PVP technology, the PKP treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures reduces post-operative cement leakage, but there is no significant difference in the number of operative cement and wound VAS after operation. Nor did there appear to be a statistically significant difference in time between the two operations.
Topics: Humans; Bone Cements; Fractures, Compression; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pain, Postoperative; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 38484743
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14745 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2023Wound complications are commonly seen after surgeries for metastatic spine tumors. While numerous studies have pinpointed various risk factors, there is ongoing debate....
Wound complications are commonly seen after surgeries for metastatic spine tumors. While numerous studies have pinpointed various risk factors, there is ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aimed to verify various factors that are still under debate utilizing the comprehensive Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We identified and retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 3001 patients who underwent one of five surgical treatments (corpectomy, decompression and instrumentation, instrumentation only, decompression only, and vertebroplasty) for newly diagnosed spinal metastasis between 2009 and 2017. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors. A total of 197 cases (6.6%) of wound revision were found. Only the surgical method and Charlson comorbidity index were significantly different between the group that underwent wound revision and the group that did not. Regarding surgical methods, the adjusted hazard ratios for decompression only, corpectomy, instrumentation and decompression, and instrumentation only were 1.3, 2.2, 2.2, and 2.4, with these ratios being compared to the vertebroplasty group ( for trend = 0.02). In this regard, based on a sizable South Korean cohort, both surgical methods and medical comorbidity were found to be associated with the wound revision rate among spinal surgery patients for spinal metastasis.
PubMed: 37998455
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222962 -
Academic Radiology Oct 2023To compare the clinical and radiographic results of bipedicular and unipedicular approaches(UPK and BPK) in the management of metastatic vertebral lesions MATERIALS AND...
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
To compare the clinical and radiographic results of bipedicular and unipedicular approaches(UPK and BPK) in the management of metastatic vertebral lesions MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with 159 metastatic vertebral lesions who underwent UPK(25 cases, 69 lesions) or BPK(57 cases, 90 lesions) were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical results were assessed mainly depending on the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) and Quality of Life(QoL). Radiographic outcomes were evaluated primarily on the basis of bone cement distribution and changes in vertebral body height(VBH). Major and minor complications were systematically evaluated and compared to assess the safety of the 2 procedures.
RESULTS
No statistically significant differences were observed in age, sex, types of lesions, location of lesions, posterior vertebral body and/or pedicle involvement, percentage of vertebra invasion between the groups(p=0.17-0.83). The radiographic parameter VBH was similarly improved in both groups(p=0.26-0.93). There was a significant improvement in the clinical parameters VAS score, ODI, and QoL at each follow-up examination compared with the preoperative results(p<0.001). Significant improvement was observed in the VBH at each follow-up point(p<0.05) compared to pre-procedure. UPK was superior to BPK in terms of the operative duration(p<0.001), cement volume(p=0.004), and surgical complications(p=0.04).
CONCLUSION
Both UPK and BPK resulted in similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with metastatic vertebral lesions. The UPK had advantages including a shorter operation and lower cement volume than the BPK, which may have played an important role in reducing the incidence of complications. UPK can replace BPK in the treatment of metastatic vertebral lesions.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Quality of Life; Spinal Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Fractures, Compression; Spine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36463087
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.11.015 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Dec 2023This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating osteoporotic vertebral...
PURPOSE
This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with kyphosis.
METHODS
The clinical data included 63 patients in the PVP group and 70 in the PKP group. The study assessed the pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), wedge angle (WA), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and vertebral height.
RESULTS
The operative time was significantly less in the PVP group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, more bone cement was injected into the PKP group (p < 0.05), with significantly higher surgical costs (p > 0.05). Post-operative VAS, ODI, WA, LKA, and vertebral height were significantly improved in PVP and PKP groups compared with pre-operative measurements (p < 0.05). The results revealed insignificant VAS and ODI improvement differences between the two groups at each follow-up time (p > 0.05). Vertebral height, WA, and LKA improved more significantly in the PKP group at day 1 and 3 months post-operatively (p < 0.05), with insignificant group differences at subsequent time points (p > 0.05). The improvements in VAS were unrelated to those in WA, LKA, or vertebral height in either group (p > 0.05). The improvement in VAS was unrelated to the amount of bone cement injected (p > 0.05); the PKP group demonstrated a lower incidence of cement leakage (12.9%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
PVP and PKP can restore partial vertebral height and improve kyphosis with similar clinical outcomes. PVP has a shorter operating time, is more economical, and can represent a therapeutic choice.
PubMed: 38112829
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02416-4 -
European Review For Medical and... Sep 2023This study aimed to compare the relationship of pain relief with the amount and distribution of injected cement in kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare the relationship of pain relief with the amount and distribution of injected cement in kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This cohort study was conducted on 90 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who needed chronic pain medication. Patients underwent kyphoplasty balloon surgery, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or bone cement was injected into the created cavities and the volume of injected cement was recorded. After the surgery, the distribution of cement was measured using a computed tomography (CT) scan in the coronal, sagittal, and axial axes of the vertebra, and the percentage of cement distribution was evaluated using Photoshop software in these three axes, followed by the pattern of cement distribution. The cement was measured in the entire vertebra. The patients were evaluated over a period of 6 months, and the amount of pain improvement was measured by the VAS scale in 24 hours, two weeks, six weeks, and six months after surgery. In this study, the data of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.5±10.9 years were included in the study. The mean volume of cement injected was 1.2±5.8 cc, followed by the mean percentage of cement distribution (47.7±7.4%); the mean pain score before the operation (8.7±1.3), the mean pain score 24 hours after the operation (7.7±1.4), the mean pain score 2 weeks after the operation (4.8±1.3), the mean pain score 6 weeks after the operation (3.6±1.2) and the mean pain score 6 months after the operation (3.5±1.4) were evaluated after collection.
RESULTS
The pain intensity 24 hours after the operation had a significant positive correlation with the percentage of cement distribution and pain intensity before the operation. The intensity of pain 2 weeks after the operation was positively correlated with the age of the patients and the intensity of pain before the operation. The pain intensity 6 weeks after the operation was significantly correlated with the age of the patients and the pain intensity before the operation. The intensity of pain 6 months after the operation was positively linked to the age of the patients and negatively correlated with the percentage of cement distribution. The pain reduction has changed significantly in the 4 measured intervals, and during a period of 6 months, there was a significant improvement in the pain level of the patients continuously. It was found that the rate of recovery of the patient's pain has increased by increased distribution of injected cement. Although this reduction in pain during the 6-month period was not significantly related to the variables of gender, smoking, history of corticosteroid use, and the volume of injected cement.
CONCLUSIONS
The balloon kyphoplasty is a safe and successful method for treating symptomatic vertebral fractures. Kyphoplasty is associated with significant pain relief, improved quality of life, and kyphosis correction. The volume of cement injected had no effect on reducing patients' pain after the operation, but a higher percentage of cement distribution was associated with a better response in patients.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Kyphoplasty; Bone Cements; Cohort Studies; Quality of Life; Fractures, Compression; Treatment Outcome; Spine; Spinal Fractures; Osteoporotic Fractures; Chronic Pain
PubMed: 37782170
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33779 -
Biomechanics and Modeling in... Aug 2023The outcome of vertebroplasty is hard to predict due to its dependence on complex factors like bone cement and marrow rheologies. Cement leakage could occur if the...
The outcome of vertebroplasty is hard to predict due to its dependence on complex factors like bone cement and marrow rheologies. Cement leakage could occur if the procedure is done incorrectly, potentially causing adverse complications. A reliable simulation could predict the patient-specific outcome preoperatively and avoid the risk of cement leakage. Therefore, the aim of this work was to introduce a computationally feasible and experimentally validated model for simulating vertebroplasty. The developed model is a multiphase continuum-mechanical macro-scale model based on the Theory of Porous Media. The related governing equations were discretized using a combined finite element-finite volume approach by the so-called Box discretization. Three different rheological upscaling methods were used to compare and determine the most suitable approach for this application. For validation, a benchmark experiment was set up and simulated using the model. The influence of bone marrow and parameters like permeability, porosity, etc., was investigated to study the effect of varying conditions on vertebroplasty. The presented model could realistically simulate the injection of bone cement in porous materials when used with the correct rheological upscaling models, of which the semi-analytical averaging of the viscosity gave the best results. The marrow viscosity is identified as the crucial reference to categorize bone cements as 'high- 'or 'low-' viscosity in the context of vertebroplasty. It is confirmed that a cement with higher viscosity than the marrow ensures stable development of the injection and a proper cement interdigitation inside the vertebra.
Topics: Humans; Bone Cements; Porosity; Vertebroplasty; Spine; Computer Simulation
PubMed: 37171687
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01715-4 -
Medicinski Glasnik : Official... Feb 2024Aim Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are minimally invasive procedures used in bone augmentation following vertebral fractures when conservative management has failed....
Aim Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are minimally invasive procedures used in bone augmentation following vertebral fractures when conservative management has failed. Cement injection could leak into surrounding structures leading to post-operative sequelae, which could be symptomatic. This study compared the rate and site of cement extravasation in vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and a combined approach. The indications, aetiology, and factors influencing results and the effect of screws were considered. Methods A retrospective descriptive study of 171 patients was conducted between 2009 and 2021. Only 89 patients had available imaging. The site of cement extravasation was evaluated postoperatively by CT-scan and X-ray. Results There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of cement extravasation between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty procedures (p=0.004). Age and gender had no significant influence on the rate of cement extravasation. Patients who underwent kyphoplasty had the lowest rate of cement extravasation (46.9%) compared to vertebroplasty (85.2%) and the combined approach (69.2%). The most common site of leakage was in perivertebral veins (37.9%). The use of screws did not indicate a greater risk of cement leak (p=0.652). Bone metastases were the aetiology with the highest cement leakage rate (27.5%). Conclusion The use of kyphoplasty alone or in conjunction with vertebroplasty decreases the risk of cement extravasation and subsequent complications compared to vertebroplasty alone. The use of pedicle screws appears to be safe and was not found to increase the risk of cement extravasation.
PubMed: 37950655
DOI: 10.17392/1626-23 -
Spine Jul 2024A retrospective, single-center, observational study.
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective, single-center, observational study.
OBJECTIVE
This study investigated the risk factors associated with the failure of conservative treatment for adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Adjacent vertebral fractures following vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are not uncommon. Presently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the management of adjacent vertebral fractures.
METHODS
We included patients who developed adjacent vertebral fractures within two years post single-level vertebroplasty between January 2013 and December 2020. All patients initially underwent six weeks of conservative treatment, including pain medications, bracing, and physical therapy. Surgical intervention was offered to those with intractable back pain due to AVFs. Baseline demographics, AVF characteristics, and radiological measurements were systematically collected, and sequential univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors.
RESULTS
Of the 114 patients with a mean age of 78.6 years, two-thirds (76 patients) tolerated conservative treatment well, while 38 required surgical interventions for adjacent vertebral fractures. Both groups demonstrated similar baseline demographics and radiological parameters regarding AVFs (P>0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the development of AVFs later than six months post-vertebroplasty and their caudal location to the index vertebroplasty were the independent risk factors of unsuccessful conservative treatment, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-11.1, P=0.029) and 2.50 (95% CI: 1.09-5.88, P=0.032), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Adjacent vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty generally have favorable outcomes under conservative treatment. However, the timing and the relative anatomical location of adjacent vertebral fractures are associated with treatment efficacy. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurring later than six months following the initial vertebroplasty or situated in the caudal location to the index vertebroplasty may exhibit reduced responsiveness to conservative treatment. These patients might benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3.
PubMed: 38949261
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Apr 2024Vertebral augmentation, such as vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP), has been utilized for decades to treat OVCFs; however, the precise impact of this procedure on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vertebral augmentation, such as vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP), has been utilized for decades to treat OVCFs; however, the precise impact of this procedure on reducing mortality risk remains a topic of controversy. This study aimed to explore the potential protective effects of vertebral augmentation on mortality in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) using a large-scale meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science databases were employed for literature exploration until May 2023. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized as a summary statistic via random-effect models. Statistical analysis was executed using Review Manager 5.3 software.
RESULTS
After rigorous screening, a total of five studies with substantial sample sizes were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The total number of participants included in the study was an 2,421,178, comprising of 42,934 cases of vertebral augmentation and 1,991,244 instances of non-operative management. The surgical intervention was found to be significantly associated with an 18% reduction in the risk of mortality (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.78, 0.85). Subgroup analysis revealed a remarkable 71% reduction in mortality risk following surgical intervention during short-term follow-up (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.26, 0.32). Furthermore, KP exhibited a superior and more credible decrease in the risk of mortality when compared to VP treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on a comprehensive analysis of large samples, vertebral augmentation has been shown to significantly reduce the mortality risk associated with OVCFs, particularly in the early stages following fractures. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that KP is more reliable and effective than VP in terms of mitigating mortality risk.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Fractures, Compression; Spinal Fractures; Osteoporotic Fractures; Vertebroplasty; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38062266
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08032-5 -
The Journal of the American Academy of... Nov 2023The purpose of this study was to determine the stability of statistical findings among sham surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery using...
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine the stability of statistical findings among sham surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedic surgery using fragility analysis.
METHODS
PubMed systematic review was conducted to include studies reporting dichotomous outcomes pertaining to sham surgery. The final review included eight RCTs involving only partial meniscectomies and vertebroplasties from 2009 to 2020. With a fixed sample size with dichotomous outcome measures (events versus non-events), the Total Fragility Index (TFI), which is composed of the fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI), was calculated by altering the ratio of events to non-events in an iterative fashion until results were reversed from significant to nonsignificant findings (FI) or vice versa (RFI). The TFI, FI, and RFI were divided by their sample sizes to obtain the respective total fragility quotient, fragility quotient (FQ), and reverse fragility quotient. Median fragility indices and quotients were reported for all studies.
RESULTS
The eight RCTs included 50 dichotomous outcomes involving either partial meniscectomies or vertebroplasties, with a median TFI and total fragility quotient of 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 4 to 6] and 0.035 (IQR 0.028 to 0.048), respectively, indicating that a median of five total patients or 3.5 per 100 patients would need to experience a different outcome to reverse significant or insignificant findings for each of the eight trials. Among the 8 statistically significant ( P < 0.05) outcome events (16%), the respective FI and FQ were 2 (IQR 1 to 5) and 0.018 (IQR 0.010 to 0.044). Among the 42 statistically insignificant outcome events (84%), the respective RFI and reverse fragility quotient were 5 (IQR 4 to 6) and 0.04 (IQR 0.034 to 0.048). The median number of patients lost to follow-up was 1.5 (IQR 0.5 to 2).
CONCLUSION
The unstable findings in partial meniscectomy and vertebroplasty sham surgical RCTs undermine their study conclusions and recommendations. We recommend using fragility analysis in future sham surgical RCTs to contextualize statistical findings.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV; Systematic Review.
PubMed: 37678845
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00245