-
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a progressively utilized therapeutic approach for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the complete...
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a progressively utilized therapeutic approach for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the complete determination of their cardiovascular safety remains inconclusive. Hence, the primary objective of this network meta-analysis is to meticulously assess and juxtapose the cardiovascular risks linked to distinct JAK inhibitors employed in RA patients. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were meticulously conducted, encompassing a collection of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on investigating the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Extensive exploration was performed across multiple electronic databases, incorporating studies published until March 2023. To be included in this analysis, the RCTs were required to involve adult participants diagnosed with RA who received treatment with JAK inhibitors. To ensure accuracy, two authors independently undertook the selection of eligible RCTs and meticulously extracted aggregate data. In order to examine the outcomes of MACE and all-cause mortality, a frequentist graph theoretical approach within network meta-analyses was employed, utilizing random-effects models. Third study has been registered on PROSPERO under the reference CRD42022384611. A specific selection encompassing a total of 14 meticulously chosen randomized controlled trials was undertaken, wherein 13,524 patients were assigned randomly to distinct treatment interventions. The analysis revealed no notable disparity in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the interventions and the placebo group. However, in comparison to adalimumab, the employment of JAK inhibitors exhibited an association with higher rates of all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.81]. This observed increase in risk primarily stemmed from the usage of tofacitinib (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.12-3.23). None of the other JAK inhibitors exhibited a statistically significant variance in all-cause mortality when compared to adalimumab. Our study suggests that JAK inhibitors may not increase the risk of MACE in RA patients but may be associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to adalimumab, primarily due to tofacitinib use. Rheumatologists should carefully consider the cardiovascular risks when prescribing JAK inhibitors, particularly tofacitinib, for RA patients. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=384611, CRD42022384611.
PubMed: 37614310
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237234 -
European Journal of Clinical... Mar 2024There is currently no curative treatment for childhood Crohn's disease (CD). This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
There is currently no curative treatment for childhood Crohn's disease (CD). This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric patients with CD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched all relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were induction (≤ 12 weeks) and maintenance (up to 48 weeks) of remission and response. Secondary outcomes were severe adverse events and opportunistic infections to ADA. The Cochrane bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. The methodological quality of the single-arm studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies tool.
RESULTS
Ten clinical trials involving a total of 885 patients were included. Results indicated that 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39-80%) of the subjects treated with ADA achieved induction of remission, and 60% (95% CI 35-86%) of the subjects treated with ADA achieved induction of response, 57% (95% CI 44-70%) achieved maintenance of remission, and 63% (95% CI 26-69%) achieved maintenance of response.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence indicates that ADA is effective in children and adolescents with CD and that adverse events vary but are usually not severe.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42023402199.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Adalimumab; Crohn Disease; Remission Induction
PubMed: 38157000
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03613-1 -
PloS One 2023There are currently no studies comparing histologic remission of FDA-approved biologics for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), except for one head-to-head... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS
There are currently no studies comparing histologic remission of FDA-approved biologics for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), except for one head-to-head VARSITY trial. The current study employs a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, including histologic remission and safety of biologic agents for UC.
METHODS
Using four electronic databases, including Pubmed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, a search was conducted of all literature published until September 2022. Included were studies of randomized controlled trials with adult patients with moderate to severe UC using biologics approved by the FDA. An odd ratio with a 95 percent credible interval and ranking information was calculated for each endpoint.
RESULTS
The results of the network meta-analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences among biological agents. However, the ranking information for each biological agent exhibited the following patterns. Vedolizumab was ranked first for overall efficacy endpoints in the maintenance phase, including histologic remission. Except for histologic remission, Ustekinumab was identified as the top-ranked drug for induction phase efficacy endpoints other than histologic remission. Adalimumab was identified as the top-ranked drug for maintenance phase corticosteroid-free remission. Vedolizumab was identified as the top-ranked drug in the induction phase for Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE). Adalimumab was identified as the top-ranked drug in the induction phase for infection. For TEAE and infection in the maintenance phase and Treatment Emergent Severe Adverse Events (TESAE) in both the induction and maintenance phases, Ustekinumab was determined to be the top-ranked medication.
CONCLUSIONS
Including histologic remission, for the overall efficacy endpoints in the maintenance phase, VDZ was identified as the first rank drug, but there was no statistically significant difference between biologics. Therefore, the generalization of the results of this study is bounded due to the intrinsic limitations of the study provided.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Colitis, Ulcerative; Adalimumab; Ustekinumab; Network Meta-Analysis; Biological Factors; Biological Products; Biological Therapy
PubMed: 37917756
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293655 -
Cureus Jun 2024Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder affecting the colon, and typically, during the disease course, the condition may exacerbate, relapse, and remit. One... (Review)
Review
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder affecting the colon, and typically, during the disease course, the condition may exacerbate, relapse, and remit. One of the most successful lines for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in subjects with UC is biological therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents, including adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). This meta-analysis is an attempt to obtain complementary information driven by real-world experience (RWE) concerning the efficacy and safety of two of the most popular anti-TNFs in treating UC. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RWE studies comparing ADA and IFX as naïve anti-TNF agents for the treatment of subjects with UC. Studies were obtained by searching Scopus, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and the PubMed Central databases. Patients treated with IFX showed significantly higher induction responses. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison of response in the maintenance treatment period. Higher overall adverse events were related to IFX treatment, with serious adverse events that were nonsignificantly higher in the ADA-treated group. In conclusion, IFX demonstrated significantly higher induction responses compared to ADA in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. IFX was associated with higher overall adverse events, whereas serious adverse events were non-significantly higher in the ADA-treated group. IFX may be favored as a first-line agent for its induction efficacy, and the choice between IFX and ADA should be individualized based on comprehensive clinical evaluation.
PubMed: 38835557
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61547 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology Jan 2024The approval of TNF-a inhibitors (TNFi) was a breakthrough in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although also effective in psoriasis, drug-related adverse... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The approval of TNF-a inhibitors (TNFi) was a breakthrough in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although also effective in psoriasis, drug-related adverse events of onset of psoriasiform skin lesions - paradoxical psoriasis (PP) under TNFi have been reported.
METHODS
We performed an electronic data search in MEDLINE via Pubmed and Cochrane library scientific databases from inception to January 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed the distinct characteristics and frequency of risks for PP appearance in AS patients treated with different TNFi.
RESULTS
PP was found in 0.5-1% of TNFi-treated AS patients and the latency period was 2-11 months. The safest TNFi in terms of PP induction was certolizumab, whereas the one most commonly associated with PP was infliximab.
CONCLUSIONS
PP is an uncommon adverse reaction to TNFi treatment in AS patients and responds well to drug withdrawal. More large data studies need to be conducted though, to shed light on PP nature and management.
Topics: Humans; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Infliximab; Psoriasis; Adalimumab
PubMed: 37812484
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/rq4k3u -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Feb 2024Capacity to work is impacted by psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our objective was to describe the course of work productivity and leisure activity in patients with PsA... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Capacity to work is impacted by psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our objective was to describe the course of work productivity and leisure activity in patients with PsA treated with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified all trials and observational studies published January 1, 2010-October 22, 2021, reporting work productivity using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) in patients with PsA treated with b/tsDMARDs. Outcomes for WPAI domains (absenteeism, presenteeism, total work productivity, and activity impairment) were collected at baseline and time point closest to 24 weeks of treatment. A random effects meta-analysis of single means was conducted to calculate an overall absolute mean change from baseline for each WPAI domain.
RESULTS
Twelve studies (ten randomized controlled and two observational) assessing patients treated with adalimumab, bimekizumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, or upadacitinib were analysed. Among 3741 employed patients, overall mean baseline scores were 11.4%, 38.7%, 42.7%, and 48.9% for absenteeism, presenteeism, total work productivity impairment, and activity impairment, respectively. Estimated absolute mean improvements (95% confidence interval) to week 24 were 2.4 percentage points (%p) (0.6, 4.1), 17.8%p (16.2,19.3), 17.6%p (15.9,19.4), and 19.3%p (17.6, 21.0) respectively, leading to a mean relative improvement of 41% for total work productivity. The change in work outcomes in the b/tsDMARDs appeared similar.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic literature review and meta-analysis confirmed that patients with active PsA have a substantially reduced capacity to work and participate in leisure activities. Substantial improvements across various WPAI domains were noted after 24 weeks of b/tsDMARD treatment, especially in presenteeism, total work productivity, and activity impairment. These findings may be useful for reimbursement purposes and in the context of shared decision-making. This systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized clinical trials and observational studies of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs b/tsDMARDs in patients with PsA found that at treatment introduction, patients presented with a 42.7% mean productivity loss per week as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire. Through a meta-analysis comparing before/after values without adjustment for placebo response, we found that after 24 weeks of treatment with b/tsDMARDs, there was a mean absolute improvement of 17.6 percentage points and a mean relative improvement of 41% in total work productivity, with similar magnitudes of improvement in time spent at work and regular activities outside of work. These results provide clinical-, regulatory- and reimbursement decision-makers with data on the potential societal and socio-economic benefits of b/tsDMARDs in PsA.
Topics: Humans; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Treatment Outcome; Adalimumab; Antirheumatic Agents; Biological Products
PubMed: 38360699
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03282-0 -
The Saudi Dental Journal Nov 2023This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of tumor necrotic factor alpha inhibitors in suppressing bone resorption in periodontitis, and its potential to... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of tumor necrotic factor alpha inhibitors in suppressing bone resorption in periodontitis, and its potential to cause osteonecrosis. Extensive electronic research was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, which connected various aspects of anti-TNF-a (anti-tumor necrosis factor-a) to periodontitis and osteonecrosis patients.
BACKGROUND
TNF-a inhibitors are broadly indicated in the treatment of autoimmune patients with possible joint resorption and increased inflammatory processes such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, where they reduce bone loss and certain mediators. As rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis share many characteristics, these medications may also be helpful in the treatment of coexisting periodontitis. However, besides medical benefits, anti-TNF-a also exhibits several adverse effects, ranging from dizziness to tuberculosis. Osteonecrosis is considered a recent adverse impact.
METHODS
An extensive electronic systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for English-language papers using the following databases as sources of information: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Library Genesis, Worldwide Science, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), and other related articles. This systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO platform under registration number CRD42022341753.
RESULTS
Twenty articles were identified after the exclusion criteria were applied. These include systematic reviews, case reports, retrospective cohort studies, case report series, -analyses, clinical trials, randomised clinical trials, cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, longitudinal observational studies, and prospective clinical trials. All these were included in the quantitative and qualitative analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-TNF-a drugs show promising results in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis but could be considered a risk factor for osteonecrosis. Hence, patients receiving such medications should be closely monitored by the dentist and physician before, during, and after administration.
PubMed: 38025596
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.006 -
Indian Journal of Dermatology,... Feb 2024Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of... (Review)
Review
Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.
PubMed: 38595016
DOI: 10.25259/IJDVL_665_2023 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2024Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the digestive tract usually characterized by diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and abdominal pain. IBD... (Review)
Review
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the digestive tract usually characterized by diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and abdominal pain. IBD includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis as the main entities. IBD is a debilitating condition that can lead to life-threatening complications, involving possible malignancy and surgery. The available therapies aim to achieve long-term remission and prevent disease progression. Biologics are bioengineered therapeutic drugs that mainly target proteins. Although they have revolutionized the treatment of IBD, their potential therapeutic benefits are limited due to large interindividual variability in clinical response in terms of efficacy and toxicity, resulting in high rates of long-term therapeutic failure. It is therefore important to find biomarkers that provide tailor-made treatment strategies that allow for patient stratification to maximize treatment benefits and minimize adverse events. Pharmacogenetics has the potential to optimize biologics selection in IBD by identifying genetic variants, specifically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are the underlying factors associated with an individual's drug response. This review analyzes the current knowledge of genetic variants associated with biological agent response (infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab) in IBD. An online literature search in various databases was conducted. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 reports from the 1685 results were employed for the review. The most significant SNPs potentially useful as predictive biomarkers of treatment response are linked to immunity, cytokine production, and immunorecognition.
Topics: Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Biological Products; Biomarkers
PubMed: 38612528
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073717 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics May 2024Although little information is available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during pregnancy, multiple mAbs are being used during pregnancy for...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Although little information is available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during pregnancy, multiple mAbs are being used during pregnancy for various indications. The aim of this systematic literature review was to characterize the PK of mAbs throughout pregnancy.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed and Embase on 21 April 2023. Articles were included when information on PK or exposure parameters of mAbs in pregnant women was available.
RESULTS
A total of 42 relevant articles were included, of which eight discussed adalimumab, three certolizumab pegol, five eculizumab, one golimumab, 12 infliximab (IFX), two natalizumab, one canakinumab, one omalizumab, five tocilizumab, eight ustekinumab, and five vedolizumab. One of the 42 studies reported information on clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (VD) of IFX; all other studies only reported on serum concentrations in the pre-pregnancy state, different trimesters, and the postpartum period. For all of the assessed mAbs except IFX, serum concentrations were similar to concentrations in the pre-pregnancy state or modestly decreased. In contrast, IFX trough concentrations generally increased in the second and third trimesters in comparison to the non-pregnant state.
CONCLUSION
Available information suggests that the anatomical and physiological changes throughout pregnancy may have meaningful effects on the PK of mAbs. For most mAbs (not IFX), modestly higher dosing (per mg) maybe needed during pregnancy to sustain a similar serum exposure compared to pre-pregnancy.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 38583128
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-024-01370-7