-
Thoracic Cancer Sep 2023The aim of the study was to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of the study was to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Studies that enrolled NSCLC patients treated with two lines of ICIs were included using four databases. The initial line (1L-) and subsequent lines (2L-) of ICIs were defined as 1L-ICI and 2L-ICI, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies involving 2100 patients were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) for 2L-ICIs were 10%, 50%, 3.0 months, and 13.1 months, respectively. The 2L-ICI discontinuation rates caused by toxicities ranged from 0% to 23.5%. Original data were extracted from six studies, covering 89 patients. Patients in whom 1L-ICIs were discontinued following clinical decision (the mPFS of 2L-ICIs was not reach) achieved a more prolonged mPFS of 2L-ICIs than those due to toxicity (5.2 months) and progressive disease (2.1 months) (p < 0.0001). Patients' 1L-PFS for more than 2-years had preferable 2L-ORR (35.0% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.03), 2L-DCR (85.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.007), and 2L-mPFS (12.4 vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.0001) than those less than 1-year. Patients administered the same drugs achieved a significantly prolonged mPFS compared with the remaining patients (5.4 vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.0004), and those who did not accept antitumor treatments during the intervals of two lines of ICIs achieved a prolonged mPFS compared to those patients who did accept treatments (7.6 vs. 1.9 months, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
ICI rechallenge is a useful therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients, especially suitable for those who achieve long-term tumor remission for more than 2-years under 1L-ICIs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Databases, Factual; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 37551891
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15063 -
Complementary Therapies in Medicine Mar 2024Curcumin has antioxidant properties and has been proposed as a potential treatment for NAFLD. The aim of current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Curcumin effects on glycaemic indices, lipid profile, blood pressure, inflammatory markers and anthropometric measurements of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES
Curcumin has antioxidant properties and has been proposed as a potential treatment for NAFLD. The aim of current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate previous findings for the effect of curcumin supplementation on glycaemic indices, lipid profile, blood pressure, inflammatory markers, and anthropometric measurements of NAFLD patients.
METHODS
Relevant studies published up to January 2024 were searched systematically using the following databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS, Science Direct, Ovid and Cochrane. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the papers was assessed the using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model and reported as the WMD and 95% CI. Also, subgroup analyses were done to find probable sources of heterogeneity among studies.
RESULTS
Out of 21010 records initially identified, 21 eligible RCTs were selected for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Overall, 1191 participants of both genders, 600 in the intervention and 591 in the control group with NAFLD were included. There are several limitations in the studies that were included, for instance, the results are weakened substantially by potential bias or failure to account for potential adulteration (with pharmaceuticals) or contamination (with other herbs) of the curcumin supplements that were tested. However, previous studies have reported curcumin to be a safe complementary therapy for several conditions. Our study indicated that curcumin supplementation in doses of 50-3000 mg/day was associated with significant change in FBG [WMD: -2.83; 95% CI: -4.61, -1.06), I = 51.3%], HOMA-IR [WMD: -0.52; 95% CI: -0.84, -0.20), I= 82.8%], TG [WMD: -10.31; 95% CI: -20.00, -0.61), I = 84.5%], TC [WMD: -11.81; 95% CI: -19.65, -3.96), I = 94.6%], LDL [WMD: -8.01; 95% CI: -15.79, -0.24), I = 96.1%], weight [WMD: -0.81; 95% CI: -1.28, -0.35), I= 0.0%] and BMI [WMD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.13), I= 0.0%] in adults with NAFLD. There was no significant change in HbA1C, plasma insulin, QUICKI, HDL, SBP, DBP, CRP, TNF-α and WC after curcumin therapy. Subgroup analysis suggested a significant changes in serum FBG, TG, SBP, WC in RCTs for intervention durations of ≥ 8 weeks, and SBP, TG, LDL, HDL, BMI, WC in RCTs with sample size > 55 participants.
CONCLUSION
Curcumin supplementation in doses of 50-3000 mg/day over 8-12 weeks was associated with significant reductions in levels of FBG, HOMA-IR, TG, TC, LDL, weight and BMI in patients with NAFLD. Previous studies have reported curcumin as a safe complementary therapy for several diseases. We would suggest that should curcumin supplements be used clinically in specific conditions, it should be used with caution. Also, difference in grades of NAFLD may effect the evaluated outcomes, so it is suggested that future studies be conducted with an analyses on subgroups according to their NAFLD grade. Furthermore, because of the failure to conduct independent biochemical assessment of the turmeric/curcumin product used in most studies as well as potential sources of bias, results should be interpreted with caution.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Blood Pressure; Curcumin; Dietary Supplements; Glycemic Index; Lipids; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38232906
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103025 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Sep 2023Ectopic pregnancy is an important health condition which affects up to 1 in 100 women. Women who present with mild symptoms and low serum human chorionic gonadotrophin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Ectopic pregnancy is an important health condition which affects up to 1 in 100 women. Women who present with mild symptoms and low serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) are often treated with methotrexate (MTX), but expectant management with close monitoring is a feasible alternative. Studies comparing the two treatments have not shown a statistically significant difference in uneventful resolution of ectopic pregnancy, but these studies were too small to define whether certain subgroups could benefit more from either treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We performed a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) of randomized controlled trials comparing systemic MTX and expectant management in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy and low hCG (<2000 IU/L). A one-stage IPD-MA was performed to assess overall treatment effects of MTX and expectant management to generate a pooled intervention effect. Subgroup analyses and exploratory multivariable analyses were undertaken according to baseline serum hCG and progesterone levels. Primary outcome was treatment success, defined as resolution of clinical symptoms and decline in level of serum hCG to <20 IU/L, or a negative urine pregnancy test by the initial intervention strategy, without any additional treatment. Secondary outcomes were need for blood transfusion, surgical intervention, additional MTX side-effects and hCG resolution times.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO: CRD42021214093.
RESULTS
1547 studies reviewed and 821 remained after duplicates removed. Five studies screened for eligibility and three IPD requested. Two randomized controlled trials supplied IPD, leading to 153 participants for analysis. Treatment success rate was 65/82 (79.3%) after MTX and 48/70 (68.6%) after expectant management (IPD risk ratio [RR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.40). Surgical intervention rates were not significantly different: 8/82 (9.8%) vs 13/70 (18.6%) (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.23-1.14). Mean time to success was 19.7 days (95% CI 17.4-22.3) after MTX and 21.2 days (95% CI 17.8-25.2) after expectant management (P = 0.25). MTX specific side-effects were reported in 33 MTX compared to four in the expectant group.
CONCLUSIONS
Our IPD-MA showed no statistically significant difference in treatment efficacy between MTX and expectant management in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy with low hCG. Initial expectant management could be the preferred strategy due to fewer side-effects.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Methotrexate; Watchful Waiting; Pregnancy, Tubal; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37345445
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14617 -
European Journal of Clinical... May 2024Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, though uncertainty exists regarding their immune-related safety. The objective of this study... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, though uncertainty exists regarding their immune-related safety. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative safety profile (odds ratio) of ICIs and estimate the absolute rate of immune-related serious adverse events (irSAEs) in cancer patients undergoing treatment with ICIs.
METHODS
We searched for randomized trials till February 2021, including all ICIs for all cancers. Primary outcome was overall irSAEs, and secondary outcomes were pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, hypophysitis, myocarditis, nephritis, and pancreatitis. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses, estimated absolute rates and ranked treatments according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
RESULTS
We included 96 trials (52,811 participants, median age 62 years). Risk of bias was high in most trials. Most cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (28 trials) and melanoma (15 trials). The worst-ranked ICI was ipilimumab (SUCRA 14%; event rate 848/10,000 patients) while the best-ranked ICI was atezolizumab (SUCRA 82%; event rate 119/10,000 patients).
CONCLUSION
Each ICI showed a unique safety profile, with certain events more frequently observed with specific ICIs, which should be considered when managing cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Network Meta-Analysis; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Bayes Theorem; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38372756
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03647-z -
Medicine Jul 2023EGFR-TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) monotherapy has become the first-line treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prolonging... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparation of EGFR-TKI (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors) combination therapy and osimertinib for untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
EGFR-TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) monotherapy has become the first-line treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prolonging the survival time, improving the progression-free survival of front-line treatment, and delaying the occurrence of drug resistance. At present, combination therapy is being widely used. Evaluate the therapeutic effect of TKI joint and Osimertinib drug therapy for positive patients with gene positive.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Articles that met the inclusion criteria were searched through electronic databases. treatment emergent adverse events were summarized, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Appropriate networks for different outcomes were created to incorporate all the evidence. Bayesian network-based multitreatment was used to compare the efficacy and specific toxicity of all treatment regimens.
RESULTS
Fourteen eligible studies involving 2325 patients were included. Of these, 7 studies compared EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy with EGFR-TKI alone, and 6 studies compared EGFR-TKI plus antiangiogenic therapy with EGFR-TKI alone. One study compared Osimertinib and GP, ER, EB, and GCP were more effective than SOC in PFS analysis; however, there was no significant difference between osimertinib and the other 4 combination regimens. The cumulative probabilities of being the most efficacious treatments were (PFS, OS, treatment emergent adverse events): O (73%, 16%, 0%, 0%), GCP (14%, 64%, 10%, 16%), GP (2%, 17%,8%), and EB (3%, 3%, 8%), ER (5%, NA, 4%);GA(1%, NA, 69%).
CONCLUSION
Osimertinib has the lowest side effects and provides better PFS first-line treatment in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.GCP is the best regimen for OS, but its toxicity limits its application, and it may be the first choice for patients with higher survival requirements.
Topics: Humans; Bayes Theorem; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Network Meta-Analysis; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 37505120
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034483 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2023Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Venetoclax-based therapies have been increasingly used for treating post-transplantation relapse of AML. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for AML/MDS relapse post-transplantation.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, and Clinical. gov for eligible studies from the inception to February 2022. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures. The inverse variance method calculated the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 10 studies involving a total of 243 patients. The pooled complete response and complete response with incomplete blood count recovery rate of Venetoclax combined with HMAs for post-transplantation relapse in AML/MDS was 32% (95% CI, 26-39%, I = 0%), with an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI, 39-56%, I = 37%). The 6-month survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 29-55%, I = 62%) and the 1-year survival rate was 23% (95% CI, 11-38%, I = 78%).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated a moderate benefit of Venetoclax in combination with HMAs for patients with relapsed AML/MDS post-transplantation (including those who have received prior HMAs therapy), and may become one of treatment options in the future. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit from venetoclax combined with HMAs.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Chronic Disease; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 37592239
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11259-6 -
BMC Cancer Jul 2023Adjuvant endocrine treatment is essential for treating luminal subtypes of breast cancer, which constitute 75% of all breast malignancies. However, the detrimental side...
PURPOSE
Adjuvant endocrine treatment is essential for treating luminal subtypes of breast cancer, which constitute 75% of all breast malignancies. However, the detrimental side effects of treatment make it difficult for many patients to complete the guideline-required treatment. Such non-adherence may jeopardize the lifesaving ability of anti-estrogen therapy. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the consequences of non-adherence and non-persistence from available studies meeting strict statistical and clinical criteria.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using several databases, yielding identification of 2,026 studies. After strict selection, 14 studies were eligible for systematic review. The review included studies that examined endocrine treatment non-adherence (patients not taking treatment as prescribed) or non-persistence (patients stopping treatment prematurely), in terms of the effects on event-free survival or overall survival among women with non-metastatic breast cancer.
RESULTS
We identified 10 studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on event-free survival. Of these studies, seven showed significantly poorer survival for the non-adherent or non-persistent patient groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.39 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.53) to 2.44 (95% CI, 1.89 to 3.14). We identified nine studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on overall survival. Of these studies, seven demonstrated significantly reduced overall survival in the groups with non-adherence and non-persistence, with HRs ranging from 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.43) to 2.18 (95% CI, 1.99 to 2.39).
CONCLUSION
The present systematic review demonstrates that non-adherence and non-persistence to endocrine treatment negatively affect event-free and overall survival. Improved follow-up, with focus on adherence and persistence, is vital for improving health outcomes among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Survivors; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Medication Adherence
PubMed: 37403065
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11122-8 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Oct 2023The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Safety and feasibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment combined with radiotherapy in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, there are conflicting data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy, and no consensus guidelines exist to guide practice. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and feasibility of CDK4/6i treatment with radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies in advanced/metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and radiotherapy with the provided safety data on the occurrence of toxicity. The main outcomes were safety (grade 3-5 adverse events), CDK 4/6i dose reduction, and the discontinuation rate due to toxicity.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies comprising 1133 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were included. Among them, 617 pts received CDK4/6i and radiotherapy; the median follow-up was 17.0 months (IQR 9.2 - 18.0), and the median age was 58.8 years (IQR 55.5---62.5). The pooled prevalence of severe hematologic toxicity was 29.4% (95% CI 14.0% - 47.4%; I = 93%; τ = 0.084; p < 0.01 and severe non-hematologic toxicity was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1% - 4.8%; I = 0%; τ = 0.0; p = 0.67). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i dose reduction was 24.0% (95% CI 11.1% - 39.4%; I = 90%; τ = 0.052; p < 0.01) with no difference between CDK4/6i plus RT vs. CDK4/6i (odds ratio of 0.934; 95% CI 0.66 - 1.33; I = 0%; τ = 0.0; p = 0.56). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i discontinuation due to toxicity was 2.3% (95% CI 0.4% - 5.2%; I = 23%; τ = 0.002; p = 0.24).
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study suggest that radiotherapy in addition to CDK4/6i treatment in breast cancer patients is generally safe and well tolerated and remains a viable treatment option.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Consensus; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Epidermal Growth Factor; Feasibility Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 37536378
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109839 -
Systematic Reviews Aug 2023Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction. Treatments such as endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and rectal topical formalin have imposed a significant medical burden on CRP patients. In contrast, oral therapies offer a more accessible and acceptable option for managing CRP. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of oral treatments for CRP to assess their potential as an effective and convenient treatment option for this condition.
METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese VIP in February 2021. We included post-radiotherapy participants with CRP that compared oral medicine alone or in combination with other treatments versus control treatments. The primary outcomes were bleeding, diarrhoea and symptom score. Heterogeneity between studies was checked using Cochrane Q test statistics and I test statistics. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
RESULTS
We included 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 retrospective study with 898 participants. Three placebo-controlled trials evaluated the effects of oral sucralfate on CRP, with meta-analysis showing no significant different with placebo arm. Four trials on TCM demonstrated significant improvement of symptoms, especially for the 3 trials on oral TCM drinks. Retinyl palmitate and high-fibre diet were found to reduce rectal bleeding. The combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol did not significantly change the process of CRP.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study implies that oral TCM drinks, retinyl palmitate and a high-fiber diet showed significant improvement in CRP symptoms, but not with the combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol. Further multicentre, larger-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments and optimize treatment strategies, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients with CRP.
Topics: Humans; Pentoxifylline; Tocopherols; Diarrhea; Proctitis
PubMed: 37608385
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02294-2 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024At present, several important trials have been published show that perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
At present, several important trials have been published show that perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, which further optimizes treatment options. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS
The following databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library (updated 12 October 2023). All randomized trials comparing perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, rate of underwent surgery and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
A total of 2912 patients (1453 receiving perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and 1459 receiving chemotherapy alone) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The result showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, combined therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.68;95% CI: 0.56-0.83), EFS (HR = 0.58;95% CI: 0.51-0.65), pCR (OR = 7.53;95% CI: 4.63-12.26), MPR (OR = 5.03;95% CI: 3.40-7.44), R0 resection (OR = 1.58;95% CI: 1.152.18) and rate of underwent surgery (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.04-1.49). However, combination therapy was associated with higher risk of severe adverse event (OR = 1.46;95% CI: 1.19-1.78; P=0.0002), grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.06-1.49; P=0.010), TRAE that led to interruption (OR = 1.90;95% CI: 1.34-2.68; P=0.0003) and immune-related adverse event (OR = 2.78;95% CI: 2.18-3.55; P<0.00001). Significant benefits were observed across most subgroups of EFS and pCR. However, no statistical differences were observed for EFS of never smoked (HR = 0.73;95% CI: 0.51-1.05) and EGFR-mutation positive (HR = 0.35;95% CI: 0.04-3.03).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in both tumor regression and prolonged survival in resectable NSCLC, but increased the risk of TRAE, so monitoring for adverse events is warranted.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42023476786).
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38646542
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359302