-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2024The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is suggested to differ according to different age groups. While its prevalence has been extensively investigated among... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is suggested to differ according to different age groups. While its prevalence has been extensively investigated among middle-aged and old individuals, very few studies have summarized its prevalence among young adults. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of OSA prevalence among healthy adults aged 18-30 years in the general population.
METHODS
A search of Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases for articles reporting the prevalence of OSA among young adults confirmed by objective diagnostic methods was completed by two reviewers. Studies identified and included in the review were summarized qualitatively. Additionally, a meta-analysis of prevalence rates was conducted using a random effects model.
RESULTS
11 articles out of 5898 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The diagnostic thresholds, scoring criteria, and the type of used device varied substantially among all the studies. We found that the pooled prevalence of OSA among young adults was 16% (CI 95%, 8-29%, I = 92%, τ = 1.47).
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of OSA among young adults was found to be ~16%. However, a few factors diverged prevalence between the studies, such as hypopnea definition, AHI threshold, and type of device. Most of the studies included examined healthy volunteers, suggesting that the disease burden may be underestimated. Findings from our review highlight the need to include OSA-related assessment and intervention in the overall health care of young adults. By early detection and offered treatment, further complications related to comorbidities may be omitted.
PubMed: 38592210
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051386 -
Clinical Kidney Journal Jan 2024Several studies have examined the frequency of sleep apnoea (SA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reporting different prevalence rates. Our systematic...
BACKGROUND
Several studies have examined the frequency of sleep apnoea (SA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reporting different prevalence rates. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to define the clinical penetrance of SA in CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients.
METHODS
Ovid-MEDLINE and PubMed databases were explored up to 5 June 2023 to identify studies providing SA prevalence in CKD and ESKD patients assessed by different diagnostic methods, either sleep questionnaires or respiration monitoring equipment [such as polysomnography (PSG), type III portable monitors or other diagnostic tools]. Single-study data were pooled using the random-effects model. The Chi and Cochrane-I tests were used to assess the presence of heterogeneity, which was explored performing sensitivity and/or subgroup analyses.
RESULTS
A cumulative analysis from 32 single-study data revealed a prevalence of SA of 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42%-71%] in the CKD population, whereas a prevalence of 49% (95% CI 47%-52%) was found pooling data from 91 studies in ESKD individuals. The prevalence of SA using instrumental sleep monitoring devices, including classical PSG and type III portable sleep monitors, was 62% (95% CI 52%-72%) and 56% (95% CI 42%-69%) in CKD and ESKD populations, respectively. Sleep questionnaires revealed a prevalence of 33% (95% CI 16%-49%) and 39% (95% CI 30%-49%).
CONCLUSIONS
SA is commonly seen in both non-dialysis CKD and ESKD patients. Sleep-related questionnaires underestimated the presence of SA in this population. This emphasizes the need to use objective diagnostic tools to identify such a syndrome in kidney disease.
PubMed: 38186876
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad179 -
BMC Oral Health Jun 2024To assess the efficacy of positional therapy and oral appliance therapy for the management of positional obstructive sleep apnea. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To assess the efficacy of positional therapy and oral appliance therapy for the management of positional obstructive sleep apnea.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SCOPUS for relevant clinical trials. Quality assessment of the included trials was evaluated according to Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), AHI non-supine, AHI supine, sleep efficiency, percentage of supine sleep, Adherence (≥ 4 h/night, ≥ 5 days/week), Oxygen desaturation Index, Arousal Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (ESS), Mean SpO2, and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire.
RESULTS
The AHI non-supine and the ESS scores were significantly lower in the OAT cohort than in the PT cohort. The PT cohort was associated with a significantly decreased percentage of supine sleep than the OAT cohort (MD= -26.07 [-33.15, -19.00], P = 0.0001). There was no significant variation between PT cohort and OAT cohort regarding total AHI, AHI supine, ODI, sleep efficiency, arousal index, FOSQ, adherence, and mean SpO2.
CONCLUSION
Both Positional Therapy and Oral Appliance Therapy effectively addressed Obstructive Sleep Apnea. However, Oral Appliance Therapy exhibited higher efficiency, leading to increased supine sleep percentage and more significant reductions in the Apnea Hypopnea Index during non-supine positions, as well as lower scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Topics: Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Supine Position; Patient Positioning
PubMed: 38849827
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04277-8 -
Sleep Medicine Apr 2024To study the role of adenotonsillectomy (ADT) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To study the role of adenotonsillectomy (ADT) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS).
METHODS
A systematic review were performed following the PRISMA guideline. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies regarding adenotonsillectomy for OSA in children with MPS. The MINOR Score were applied for quality assessment of the included studies.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion: fifteen were retrospective and four prospective. A total of 1406 subjects were included. The samples size varied from 2 to 336, the male to female ratio is 1.2 and mean age varied from 2.4 to 11 years. Overall, 56.2 % (IC 95%: 53.6-58.8) of the included subjects underwent ADT. MPS I and II are the two most operated types. Three studies, including 50 children, reported improvement in polysomnographic parameters after surgery. Two authors described the duration of follow-up: 8.4 and 9.8 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
More than half of children with MPS underwent ADT for the treatment of OSA, although few evidence demonstrated improvement in term of polysomnographic parameters. The two types of MPS most involved are type I and II. Considering the disease progression and anesthetic risks, multidisciplinary management may help identify the subgroup of children with MPS who benefit from ADT for the treatment of OSA.
Topics: Child; Male; Humans; Female; Child, Preschool; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Polysomnography; Adenoidectomy; Tonsillectomy; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Mucopolysaccharidoses
PubMed: 38402648
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.02.030 -
Journal of Investigational Allergology... Jan 2024Olfactory impairment is one of the cardinal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), yet the effect of the currently available therapeutic options... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Olfactory impairment is one of the cardinal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), yet the effect of the currently available therapeutic options on the recovery of the sense of smell is not well defined. The aim of this systematic review was to compile the evidence on the impact of medical, surgical, and biological therapies on the olfactory outcomes in patients with CRSwNP.
METHODS
This review was conducted by two reviewers, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of evidence of all studies included in the qualitative synthesis was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).
RESULTS
Forty-four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (assessing sinonasal surgery [n = 23], biologics [n =15], and conventional medical treatment [n = 6]); most had moderate-to-high methodological quality. Overall, significant improvements in the sense of smell were detected with all analyzed interventions measured by either an objective or a subjective tool (or both). However, most studies used different outcome measurements, hindering comparisons between interventions, and data on clinically relevant changes were missing.
CONCLUSION
Oral corticosteroids, biologics and sinonasal surgery improve olfactory impairment associated with CRSwNP, but the high variability among existing studies does not allow accurate comparisons.
PubMed: 38174981
DOI: 10.18176/jiaci.0987 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Jun 2024Maxillomandibular advancement has been shown to be an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea; however, the literature focuses mainly on sleep-related parameters...
Maxillomandibular advancement has been shown to be an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea; however, the literature focuses mainly on sleep-related parameters such as apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory disturbance index and Epworth sleepiness scale. Other factors that may be important to patients, such as esthetics, patient satisfaction, nasality, swallowing problems and so forth have been reported in the literature but have not been systematically studied. Together with an information specialist, an extensive search in Medline, Embase and Scopus yielded 1592 unique articles. Titles and abstracts were screened by two blinded reviewers. In total, 75 articles were deemed eligible for full-text screening and 38 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. The most common categories of non-sleep related outcomes found were surgical accuracy, facial esthetics, functional outcomes, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and emotional health. All categories were reported using heterogenous methods, such that meta-analysis could not be performed. There was lack of consistent methods to assess these outcomes. This work is the first to systematically review non-sleep related outcomes of maxillomandibular advancement. Despite growing interest in evaluating surgical outcomes through patient subjective experiences, this review points to the need of standardized, validated methods to report these outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Esthetics; Mandibular Advancement; Maxilla; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38503113
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101917 -
Computational and Mathematical Methods... 2023[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/8905736.].
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/8905736.].
PubMed: 37503426
DOI: 10.1155/2023/9826319 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region.
METHODS
This study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O'Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review's eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized.
RESULTS
A total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients' QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC.
CONCLUSION
Compared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Tonsillitis; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 38408988
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04035-w -
Sleep and Biological Rhythms Oct 2023[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s41105-023-00445-5.].
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s41105-023-00445-5.].
PubMed: 38476187
DOI: 10.1007/s41105-023-00475-z -
Thorax Nov 2023Vibrotactile positional therapy (PT) devices are a new treatment modality for positional obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA). This review aimed to determine the effect of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Vibrotactile positional therapy (PT) devices are a new treatment modality for positional obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA). This review aimed to determine the effect of vibrotactile PT on the Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI) and the percentage of time spent in the supine position (%Tsupine) in patients with POSA, compared with baseline. Secondary aims were to investigate the effect on daytime sleepiness, quality of life and sleep quality.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that investigated the effect of vibrotactile PT in POSA patients. Searches were performed via MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Embase up to 29 October 2022.
RESULTS
1119 studies were identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria (10 RCTs, 8 cohort studies). The use of vibrotactile PT significantly reduced the AHI at follow-up compared with baseline (mean difference (95% CI) -9.19 events/hour (-11.68 to -6.70); p<0.00001). The mean %Tsupine was also significantly reduced (mean difference (95% CI) -32.79% (-38.75% to -26.83%); p<0.00001). The percentage changes in the AHI and %Tsupine were 43% and 70%, respectively. Secondary outcomes were daytime sleepiness, quality of life and sleep indices. These showed minimal change, although follow-up was short.
CONCLUSION
Vibrotactile PT devices are effective in treating POSA; reducing both AHI and %Tsupine. The effect on sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and disease-specific quality of life was minimal. However, there were limited data and follow-up was often brief, meaning that further research is needed to determine the effect of vibrotactile PT on patient-centred outcomes.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020188617.
Topics: Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Cohort Studies; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
PubMed: 37344178
DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2021-218402