-
Translational Cancer Research Jun 2023The effect of cholecystectomy on the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted a large number of population-based studies. However, the results of these...
BACKGROUND
The effect of cholecystectomy on the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted a large number of population-based studies. However, the results of these studies are debatable and inconclusive. Our aim in the present study was to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the causality between cholecystectomy and CRC.
METHODS
Cohort studies published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases up to May 2022 were retrieved. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies, involving 1,469,880 cholecystectomy and 2,356,238 non-cholecystectomy cases, were eligible for the final analysis. Cholecystectomy was not associated with the development of CRC (P=0.109), colon cancer (P=0.112), or rectal cancer (P=0.184). Subgroup analysis of sex, lag period, geographic region, and study quality revealed no significant differences in the relationship between cholecystectomy and CRC. Interestingly, cholecystectomy was significantly associated with right-sided colon cancer (RR =1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.38; P=0.010), especially in the cecum, the ascending colon and/or the hepatic flexure (RR =1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40; P=0.007) but not in the transverse, descending, or sigmoid colon.
CONCLUSIONS
Cholecystectomy has no effect on the risk of CRC overall, but a harmful effect on the risk of right-sided colon cancer proximally.
PubMed: 37434692
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2049 -
Annals of Surgical Treatment and... Jan 2024Compared with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA), intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) is expected to provide some benefits, including a shorter operation time and less...
PURPOSE
Compared with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA), intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) is expected to provide some benefits, including a shorter operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. Nevertheless, the benefits of ICA have mainly been evaluated in nonrandomized studies. Owing to the recent update of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of right hemicolectomy (RHC), the need to measure the actual effect by synthesizing the outcomes of these studies has emerged.
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (from inception to January 30, 2023) for studies that applied ICA and ECA for RHC with MIS. We included 7 RCTs. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, length of incision, and postoperative outcomes such as ileus, anastomosis leakage, length of hospitalization, and postoperative pain were compared between ICA and ECA.
RESULTS
A total of 740 patients were included in the study. Among them, 377 and 373 underwent ICA and ECA, respectively. There were significant differences in age (P = 0.003) and incision type (P < 0.001) between ICA and ECA. ICA was associated with a significantly longer operation time (P = 0.033). Although the postoperative pain associated with ICA was significantly lower than that associated with ECA on postoperative day 2 (POD 2) (P = 0.003), it was not different on POD 3 between the groups. Other perioperative outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
In this meta-analysis, ICA did not significantly improve short-term outcomes compared to ECA; other advantages to overcome ICA's longer operation time are not clear.
PubMed: 38205092
DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.1.1 -
Medicine Feb 2024Situs inversus is a rare congenital anatomical variant that involves a group of anomalies regarding the arrangement of intrathoracic and intraabdominal organs. Being...
BACKGROUND
Situs inversus is a rare congenital anatomical variant that involves a group of anomalies regarding the arrangement of intrathoracic and intraabdominal organs. Being able to find in the abdominal region the liver, gallbladder, inferior vena cava, and head of the pancreas and ascending colon on the left side of the abdomen, while on the right side there is the spleen, the stomach, the body of the pancreas, the ligament of Treitz, descending colon among others. In this same way, the thoracic organs, lungs and heart, are changed in their position in a mirror translocation.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Scopus, and LILACS; the search strategy included a combination of the following terms: "Situs inversus," "Situs inversus totalis," "Cancer," "Neoplasm," "Abdominopelvic regions," and "clinical anatomy."
RESULTS
Within the 41 included studies, 46 patients with situs inversus who had cancer, in addition to being found in this organ and in these regions, we also found as a result that the majority of the studies in the research were in stage II; finally, no one study could assert the direct relationship between the situs inversus totalis and the cancer.
CONCLUSION
If our hallmarks could make us think that more exhaustive follow-up of the stomach and other organs should be carried out in these patients, there could also be other predisposing factors for cancer, which is why more studies are suggested to give future diagnostic and treatment guidelines treatment.
Topics: Humans; Situs Inversus; Abdomen; Spleen; Dextrocardia; Neoplasms
PubMed: 38394506
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037093