-
Annals of Hepatology 2023Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease, with 60% of patients being asymptomatic at diagnosis and 30% progressing rapidly into liver fibrosis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease, with 60% of patients being asymptomatic at diagnosis and 30% progressing rapidly into liver fibrosis. Liver biopsy is standard for staging fibrosis, but performance of non-invasive methods such as transient elastography (TE) have not been evaluated. We conducted a meta-analysis of articles up to May 2022 to evaluate the performance of TE compared with liver biopsy in adult patients with PBC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two reviewers performed the search and assessed which articles were included. The quality of each study was evaluated according to QUADAS-2 and NOS. Meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity was conducted with a bivariate random-effects model. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, ID CRD42020199915.
RESULTS
Four studies involving 377 patients were included. Only stages F3 and F4 were computed in the meta-analysis. TE had a pooled sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 92% for stage F3 and a pooled sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 94% for stage F4. The AUROC curves were 0.91 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.88-0.93) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) for stages F3 and F4, respectively. The mean cut-off points of TE for stage F3 were 9.28 kPa (95% CI 4.98-13.57) and for stage F4 were 15.2 kPa (95% CI 7.02-23.37).
CONCLUSIONS
TE performance compared with liver biopsy in adult patients with PBC was excellent for staging liver fibrosis and was able to rule out cirrhosis in clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Biopsy; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Fibrosis; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; ROC Curve
PubMed: 37088420
DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101107 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Oct 2023Noninvasive methods have been developed to detect fibrosis in many liver diseases due to the limits of liver biopsy. However, previous studies have focused primarily on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Noninvasive methods have been developed to detect fibrosis in many liver diseases due to the limits of liver biopsy. However, previous studies have focused primarily on chronic viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The diagnostic value of transient elastography for autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) is worth studying.
AIM
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques with serum biomarkers of fibrosis in AILD.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched. Studies evaluating the efficacy of noninvasive methods in the diagnosis of AILDs [autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)] were included. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the accuracy of these noninvasive methods for staging fibrosis.
RESULTS
A total of 60 articles were included in this study, and the number of patients with AIH, PBC and PSC was 1594, 3126 and 501, respectively. The summary AUROC of transient elastography in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with AIH were 0.84, 0.88 and 0.90, respectively, while those in patients with PBC were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.91, respectively. The AUROC of cirrhosis for patients with PSC was 0.95. However, other noninvasive indices (aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, fibrosis-4 index) had corresponding AUROCs less than 0.80.
CONCLUSION
Transient elastography exerts better diagnostic accuracy in AILD patients, especially in PBC patients. The appropriate cutoff values for staging advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis ranged from 9.6 to 10.7 and 14.4 to 16.9 KPa for PBC patients.
Topics: Humans; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Liver Cirrhosis; Fibrosis; Hepatitis, Autoimmune; ROC Curve; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Liver
PubMed: 37900994
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i39.5503 -
Cancer Medicine Jul 2023Postoperative bile leakage (POBL) is one of the most common complications after liver resection. However, current studies on the risk factors for POBL and their impacts... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Postoperative bile leakage (POBL) is one of the most common complications after liver resection. However, current studies on the risk factors for POBL and their impacts on surgical outcomes need to be more consistent. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to analyze the risk factors for POBL after hepatectomy.
METHODS
We incorporated all eligible studies from Embase, PubMed, and the Web of Science database (until July 2022) into this study. RevMan and STATA software were used to analyze the extracted data.
RESULTS
A total of 39 studies, including 43,824 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. We found that gender, partial hepatectomy, repeat of hepatectomy, extended hepatectomy, abdominal drain, diabetes, Child≥B, solitary tumor, and chemotherapy are the factors of grade B and C POBL. Some recognized risk factors were considered potential risk factors for grade B and C bile leakage because no subgroup analysis was performed, like HCC, cholangiocarcinoma, major resection, posterior sectionectomy, bi-segmentectomy, S4 involved, S8 involved, central hepatectomy, and bile duct resection/reconstruction. Meanwhile, cirrhosis, benign diseases, left hepatectomy, and Segment 1 resection were not significant for grade B and C bile leakage. The influence of lateral sectionectomy, anterior sectionectomy, S1 involved, S3 involved, high-risk procedure, laparoscope, and blood loss>1000 mL on POBL of ISGLS needs further research. Meanwhile, POBL significantly influenced overall survival (OS) after liver resection.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified several risk factors for POBL after hepatectomy, which could prompt the clinician to decrease POBL rates and make more beneficial decisions for patients who underwent the hepatectomy.
Topics: Child; Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Postoperative Complications; Bile; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Biliary Tract Diseases
PubMed: 37326370
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6128 -
Systematic Reviews Jan 2024Up to 40% of UDCA-treated patients do not have an adequate clinical response. Farnesoid X receptor agonists, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Optimal drug regimens for improving ALP biochemical levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis refractory to UDCA: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Up to 40% of UDCA-treated patients do not have an adequate clinical response. Farnesoid X receptor agonists, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, and fibroblast growth factor 19 analogs were developed as adjunctive therapy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of these drugs as add-on therapy for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) refractory to UDCA in improving ALP levels.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies until 1 December 2023. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing the efficacy of different combination treatments and UDCA monotherapy in UDCA-refractory PBC patients were included in the analysis. Cumulative probability was used to rank the included treatments.
RESULTS
A total of 23 articles were eligible for our network meta-analysis. In terms of improving ALP levels, In terms of improving ALP biochemical levels, bezafibrate combined with UDCA (MD 104.49, 95% CI 60.41, 161.92), fenofibrate combined with UDCA (MD 87.81, 95% CI (52.34, 129.79), OCA combined with UDCA (MD 65.21, 95% CI 8.99, 121.80), seladelpar combined with UDCA (MD 117.39, 95% CI 19.97, 213.95), elafibranor combined with UDCA (MD 140.73, 95% CI 74.34, 209.98), saroglitazar combined with UDCA (MD 132.09, 95% CI 13.99, 247.04) was more effective than UDCA monotherapy. Elafibranor in combination with UDCA was the most likely (32%) to be the optimal drug regimen.
CONCLUSION
As second-line therapy for UDCA-refractory PBC, PPAR agonists were more effective than any other drugs with other mechanisms in improving ALP biochemical levels, with elafibranor being the best.
Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Ursodeoxycholic Acid; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Propionates; Chalcones
PubMed: 38287391
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02460-0 -
Medicine Nov 2023Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and the M2 subtype are considered serological hallmarks in the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, these... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and the M2 subtype are considered serological hallmarks in the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, these autoantibodies may be undetectable in some patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum AMA and M2 for PBC.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a random-effects model. We also constructed hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the area under the curve values.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis included 28 studies, of which 24 examined the diagnostic accuracy of AMA for PBC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of AMA were 84% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 77-90%) and 98% (96-99%), respectively. Pooled LR+, LR-, and DOR were 42.2 (22.1-80.5), 0.16 (0.11-0.24), and 262 (114-601), respectively. Sixteen studies explored the diagnostic value of the M2 subtype, demonstrating pooled sensitivity and specificity of 89% (81-94%) and 96% (93-98%), respectively. Pooled LR+, LR-, and DOR were 20.3 (8.0-51.1), 0.12 (0.05-0.26), and 169 (41-706), respectively. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves for both of serum AMA and M2 subtype lie closer to the upper left corner of the plot with area under the curve values of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99) respectively.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides evidence affirming the utility of AMA and M2 as sensitive and specific serological hallmarks that can facilitate early screening and diagnosis of PBC.
Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Mitochondria; Autoantibodies; Sensitivity and Specificity; ROC Curve
PubMed: 37960792
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036039 -
Annals of Gastroenterology 2023We performed a meta-analysis to assess the benefit of bridging locoregional treatment (LRT) before liver transplantation for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular...
Bridging locoregional treatment prior to liver transplantation for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
We performed a meta-analysis to assess the benefit of bridging locoregional treatment (LRT) before liver transplantation for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) already within the Milan criteria at diagnosis.
METHODS
We included original studies with HCC cases within the Milan criteria at diagnosis, comparing patients with and without bridging LRT before liver transplantation.
RESULTS
Twenty-six retrospective original studies were included. Out of the 9068 patients within the Milan criteria, 6435 (71%) received bridging LRT and 2633 (29%) did not. The most frequent LRTs were transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation. Most of the patient and tumor characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Maximum tumor diameter on scans was slightly larger in the LRT arm (mean difference: 0.36 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.61; =79%). The LRT group also had multifocal disease slightly more frequently (risk ratio [RR] 1.21, 95%CI 1.04-1.41; =0%) and disease extent outside the Milan criteria (RR 1.3, 95%CI 1.03-1.66; =0%) on pathological examination of explanted livers. There was no difference between the 2 arms in the waiting time for transplant, dropout rates, disease-free survival at 1, 3, 5 years after transplant, or overall survival at 3 and 5 years after transplant. However, cases with LRT had better overall survival at 1 year after transplant (hazard ratio 0.54, 95%CI 0.35-0.86; =0%).
CONCLUSIONS
The precise benefit of bridging LRT for cirrhotic patients with HCC within the Milan criteria at diagnosis is unclear. There may be an advantage regarding short-term overall survival after liver transplantation.
PubMed: 37396004
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0812