-
Canadian Journal of Pain = Revue... 2023Craniofacial pain (CFP) poses a burden on patients and health care systems. It is hypothesized that ketamine, an -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, can... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Craniofacial pain (CFP) poses a burden on patients and health care systems. It is hypothesized that ketamine, an -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, can reverse central sensitization associated with causation and propagation of CFP. This systematic review aims to assess the role of ketamine for CFP.
METHODS
Databases were searched for studies published up to September 26, 2022, investigating the efficacy of ketamine for adults with CFP. Primary outcome was the change in pain intensity at 60 min postintervention. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Registration with PROSPERO was performed (CRD42020178649).
RESULTS
Twenty papers (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 14 observational studies) including 670 patients were identified. Substantial heterogeneity in terms of study design, population, dose, route of administration, treatment duration, and follow-up was noted. Bolus dose ranged from 0.2-0.3 mg/kg (intravenous) to 0.4 mg/kg (intramuscular) to 0.25-0.75 mg/kg (intranasal). Ketamine infusions (0.1-1 mg/kg/h) were given over various durations. Follow-up was short in RCTs (from 60 min to 72 h) but longer in observational studies (up to 18 months). Ketamine by bolus treatment failed to reduce migraine intensity but had an effect by reducing intensity of aura, cluster headache (CH), and trigeminal neuralgia. Prolonged ketamine infusions showed sustainable reduction of migraine intensity and frequency of CH attacks, but the quality of the evidence is low.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence remains conflicting on the efficacy of ketamine for CFP owing to low quality and heterogeneity across studies. Ketamine infusions are suggested to provide sustained improvement, possibly because of prolonged duration and higher dosage of administration. RCTs should focus on the dose-response relationship of prolonged ketamine infusions on CFP.
PubMed: 37383673
DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2023.2210167 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2023This systematic review aimed to compare extended infusion or continuous infusion with bolus infusion for febrile neutropenia (FN). We included clinical trials comparing... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aimed to compare extended infusion or continuous infusion with bolus infusion for febrile neutropenia (FN). We included clinical trials comparing extended or continuous infusion with bolus infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics as empirical treatment for FN and evaluated the clinical failure, all-cause mortality, and adverse event rates. Five articles (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective studies) from 2014 to 2022 were included. Clinical failure was assessed with a risk ratio (RR) (95% coincident interval (CI)) of 0.74 (0.53, 1.05) and odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of 0.14 (0.02, 1.17) in the 2 RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. All-cause mortality was assessed with an RR (95% CI) of 1.25 (0.44, 3.54) and OR (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.44, 2.23) in the RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. Only 1 RCT evaluated adverse events (with an RR (95% CI) of 0.46 (0.13, 1.65)). The quality of evidence was "low" for clinical failure and all-cause mortality in the RCTs. In the retrospective studies, the clinical failure and all-cause mortality evidence qualities were considered "very low" due to the study design. Extended or continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics did not reduce mortality better than bolus infusion but was associated with shorter fever durations and fewer adverse events.
PubMed: 37370343
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061024 -
Frontiers in Microbiology 2024Meropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific...
BACKGROUND
Meropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the entire treatment period. This study aimed to find out the association between continuous infusions of meropenem and mortality rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 14 August 2023. The six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in our analysis. The random-effects model was implemented using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to examine the outcomes.
RESULTS
Our study included a total of 1,529 adult patients from six randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome indicated that continuous infusion of meropenem did not lead to reduction in the mortality rate (odds ratio = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.671-1.061, =0.147). Secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU mortality, clinical cure, or adverse events between continuous infusion and traditional intermittent bolus strategies of meropenem. Notably, we observed significant improvements in bacterial eradication (odds ratio 19 = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.467-3.320, < 0.001) with continuous infusion of meropenem. Our study also suggested that performing continuous infusion may lead to better bacterial eradication effects in resistant pathogens (coefficient: 2.5175, = 0.0138).
CONCLUSION
Continuous infusion of meropenem did not result in the reduction of mortality rates but showed potential in improving bacterial eradication. Furthermore, this strategy may be particularly beneficial for achieving better bacterial eradication, especially in cases involving resistant pathogens.
PubMed: 38525074
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential dose-response relationship between prophylactic norepinephrine (NE) infusion rates and the risks of hypotension during...
Prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential dose-response relationship between prophylactic norepinephrine (NE) infusion rates and the risks of hypotension during cesarean section following spinal anesthesia. Randomized controlled trials with two or more NE doses for post-spinal hypotension prophylaxis during cesarean section were systematically searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and US Clinical Trials Registry databases until 31 July 2022. The primary outcome was the relative risk of maternal hypotension with different NE regimens (infusion rates or bolus doses). Secondary outcomes included the relative risks of maternal and fetal adverse events with different NE regimens. Ten studies with 1,144 parturients were included for final analysis using restricted cubic splines and random-effects dose-response meta-analysis models. A significant dose-response relationship existed between NE infusion rates and the relative risks of maternal hypotension. Every 0.01 μg/kg/min increment in the NE infusion rate was associated with a 14% decrease in the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. ED and ED of NE infusion rates for post-spinal hypotension prophylaxis were estimated to be 0.046 (95% CI from 0.032 to 0.085) and 0.2 (95% CI from 0.14 to 0.37) μg/kg/min, respectively. However, a higher NE infusion rate was associated with a higher incidence of maternal hypertension. An increased NE infusion rate was associated with a decreased incidence of post-spinal hypotension but an increased incidence of hypertension. Therefore, 0.07 μg/kg/min was recommended as the initial NE infusion rate for clinical practice, as it was associated with the lowest risk of physician intervention for unstable hemodynamics after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349934), identifier (CRD42022349934).
PubMed: 37795034
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1247214 -
Cureus Jan 2024Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells and consequent insulin deficiency, leads to various complications.... (Review)
Review
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells and consequent insulin deficiency, leads to various complications. Management primarily focuses on optimal glycemic control through intensive insulin therapy, either via multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin pumps, which offer flexibility and improved basal insulin delivery. Despite the benefits of insulin pumps, such as reduced hypoglycemia risk and better mealtime insulin management, they pose challenges such as complexity in site changes and potential ketoacidosis due to tubing issues. This systematic review adheres to PRISMA guidelines and compares CSII with MDI in children and adolescents with T1DM, concentrating on outcomes such as glycemic control measured with HbA1c and glucose levels. The review includes studies meeting stringent criteria, encompassing a broad range of methodologies and geographies. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate the differences in glycemic control with CSII compared to MDI. However, significant heterogeneity in results and methodological variations across studies necessitate cautious interpretation. The study underscores the potential of CSII in offering better control for some patients, supporting a more personalized approach to T1DM management. It highlights the need for further research to understand the long-term effects and to refine treatment protocols, considering the variations in healthcare systems, treatment approaches, and patient demographics globally.
PubMed: 38344584
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52054 -
Translational Lung Cancer Research Mar 2024To identify intersegmental planes (ISPs) in video/robot-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomies, indocyanine green (ICG) is commonly used. The aim of this systematic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
To identify intersegmental planes (ISPs) in video/robot-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomies, indocyanine green (ICG) is commonly used. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous ICG in the identification of ISP.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed. Studies evaluating patients who underwent a video/robot-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy using intravenous ICG were included. The primary outcome measure was the frequency and percentage of patients in whom the ISP was adequately visualized. Secondary outcomes encompassed the ICG dose, time to visualization, time to maximum ICG visualization, time to disappearance of ICG effect and adverse reactions to ICG.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included for systematic review, enrolling a total of 1,090 patients. Irrespective of the injected dose, intravenous ICG identified the ISP in 94% of the cases (range, 30-100%). Overall, there was a considerable amount of heterogeneity regarding the injected dose of ICG (range, 5-25 mg or 0.05-0.5 mg/kg). The mean time before first effect of ICG was visible ranged from 10 to 40 seconds. The mean total time of ICG visibility ranged from 90 to 140 seconds after a bolus injection and was 170 seconds after continuous infusion. No adverse reactions were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
After administration of intravenous ICG, visualization of the ISP is successful in up to 94% of cases, even after administration of a low dose (0.05 mg/kg) of ICG. The use of intravenous ICG is safe with no reported adverse effects in the immediate peri-operative period.
PubMed: 38601441
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-23-807